Who actually thinks Barack Hussein Obama is going to...

  • 113 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Engrish_Major
Engrish_Major

17373

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#101 Engrish_Major
Member since 2007 • 17373 Posts
Because that worked with the bailouts in September. Right?Dalo12345
Christ, how many times do I have to say that the stimulus and the bailouts ARE NOT even close to the same thing?
Avatar image for Dalo12345
Dalo12345

800

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#102 Dalo12345
Member since 2007 • 800 Posts
[QUOTE="Dalo12345"]Obama is saying the exact same thing. He is Bush 2.0 and no Obamaniac wants to admit it.

Engrish_Major

Nope, it's far from the exact same thing. Stimulus =/= bailout. Obama is finally focusing on things that Bush&Co. ignored for so long.

More debt will not solve a problem of debt, regardless of where it is going.

Also, how is it so much different exactly?

Avatar image for Engrish_Major
Engrish_Major

17373

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#103 Engrish_Major
Member since 2007 • 17373 Posts
More debt will not solve a problem of debt, regardless of where it is going. Dalo12345
One is more effective than the other, in theory. One gives massive amounts of money to corporations to continue to do what caused them to fail in the first place. The other injects money into areas of society that have been ignored by the previous administration, such as science and infrastructure. A healthy science industry, and good infrastructure and transportation options CAN in fact create more cash flow in the private sector. Again, they are not equal, like you are saying.
Avatar image for LosDaddie
LosDaddie

10318

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 57

User Lists: 0

#104 LosDaddie
Member since 2006 • 10318 Posts
[QUOTE="Engrish_Major"][QUOTE="Dalo12345"]Obama is saying the exact same thing. He is Bush 2.0 and no Obamaniac wants to admit it.

Dalo12345

Nope, it's far from the exact same thing. Stimulus =/= bailout. Obama is finally focusing on things that Bush&Co. ignored for so long.

More debt will not solve a problem of debt, regardless of where it is going.

Also, how is it so much different exactly?

The bailouts are loans that will be paid back. :)

Avatar image for Dalo12345
Dalo12345

800

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#105 Dalo12345
Member since 2007 • 800 Posts
[QUOTE="Dalo12345"][QUOTE="Engrish_Major"] Nope, it's far from the exact same thing. Stimulus =/= bailout. Obama is finally focusing on things that Bush&Co. ignored for so long.LosDaddie

More debt will not solve a problem of debt, regardless of where it is going.

Also, how is it so much different exactly?

The bailouts are loans that will be paid back. :)

By who?

Avatar image for Engrish_Major
Engrish_Major

17373

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#106 Engrish_Major
Member since 2007 • 17373 Posts
The bailouts are loans that will be paid back. :)LosDaddie
Assuming that the companies completely turn around, and are able to afford it... so I'm guessing that they will not, in fact, be paid back.
Avatar image for LosDaddie
LosDaddie

10318

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 57

User Lists: 0

#107 LosDaddie
Member since 2006 • 10318 Posts
[QUOTE="LosDaddie"][QUOTE="Dalo12345"]

More debt will not solve a problem of debt, regardless of where it is going.

Also, how is it so much different exactly?

Dalo12345

The bailouts are loans that will be paid back. :)

By who?

By the companies taking the bailout/loan.

That should've been clear.

Avatar image for LosDaddie
LosDaddie

10318

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 57

User Lists: 0

#108 LosDaddie
Member since 2006 • 10318 Posts

[QUOTE="LosDaddie"]The bailouts are loans that will be paid back. :)Engrish_Major
Assuming that the companies completely turn around, and are able to afford it... so I'm guessing that they will not, in fact, be paid back.

It's a gamble, for sure.

That's the problem with economics; There just isn't a way to perform experiments on economic theories. Only science I know of with that problem.

Avatar image for Dalo12345
Dalo12345

800

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#109 Dalo12345
Member since 2007 • 800 Posts
[QUOTE="Dalo12345"][QUOTE="LosDaddie"]

The bailouts are loans that will be paid back. :)

LosDaddie

By who?

By the companies taking the bailout/loan.

That should've been clear.

By giving these companies tax dollars, it is a stamp of approval for their failed business policies. Let something better rise from the ashes.

Avatar image for quiglythegreat
quiglythegreat

16886

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#110 quiglythegreat
Member since 2006 • 16886 Posts
ITT: lessons in economics to people who have very strong opinions on how Obama is handling the economy.
Avatar image for LosDaddie
LosDaddie

10318

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 57

User Lists: 0

#111 LosDaddie
Member since 2006 • 10318 Posts
[QUOTE="LosDaddie"][QUOTE="Dalo12345"]

By who?

Dalo12345

By the companies taking the bailout/loan.

That should've been clear.

By giving these companies tax dollars, it is a stamp of approval for their failed business policies. Let something better rise from the ashes.

I notice you have moved on from the "Bailout vs Stimulus" debate :)

But to answer your post, I'd say that (in theory) these loans/bailouts could turn out to be a very wise business venture for the govt if these companies payback them with interest.

And no, this is not the govt applauding failed business decision. But rather recognizing the dire need for liquidity in the credit markets.

Avatar image for munu9
munu9

11109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#112 munu9
Member since 2004 • 11109 Posts
Why do people feel the need to put his entire name? Not that there is anything wrong with the Hussien part but you don't refer to Bush as George Walker Bush do you? So why do it with Obama. I think that most of the people who do it do try to find something about about Hussien being in his name.
Avatar image for duxup
duxup

43443

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#113 duxup
Member since 2002 • 43443 Posts
Locked at TC's request.