who was more evil Adolf or stalin

lets please no base this on death toll alone we all know stalin killed over 8 times more people then Adolf

so who do you think was more dissturbed and was more terrible to live under

if you are wondering why i call him adolf it is because his last name is cencored on this site for some reason

i'd say pole pot

atleast Stalin saved his country from invasion.

i'd say pole pot

atleast Stalin saved his country from invasion.

sonofsmeagle

Stalin let Zhukov do most of the work thus creating succes

Adolf suffered from arrogance and self obsession Stalin Suffered from extreame anxiety both led them to kill millions

I'll say Hitler because he literally tried to exterminate a race of people, while Stalin was kind of into the whole inspiring fear to maintain power business, which I don't find quite as evil. Both guys are some of the worst examples of humanity, though, no matter how you look at it.Cube_of_MooN

Adolf killed on an idustrial level stalin killed slowly through famine

by the way why didn't you get cencored when you wrote the name Hitler

the lybian leader Gadafi. but out of those 2 I'd say hitlermayceV

neither was evil. They wanted to rule and that is what it takes most of the time weezyfb

the extermination of the jews was not nessesary for Hitler to hold power he already had absolute power he just wanted to create his perfect society it was not acctualy nessesary

nor was stalins for the same reason he went abit to far when it comes to confirming your streanth

Gaahl from Gorgoroth is more evil than both of them

[QUOTE="Cube_of_MooN"]I'll say Hitler because he literally tried to exterminate a race of people, while Stalin was kind of into the whole inspiring fear to maintain power business, which I don't find quite as evil. Both guys are some of the worst examples of humanity, though, no matter how you look at it.glassfish8

Adolf killed on an idustrial level stalin killed slowly through famine

by the way why didn't you get cencored when you wrote the name Hitler

[QUOTE="sonofsmeagle"]

i'd say pole pot

atleast Stalin saved his country from invasion.

glassfish8

Stalin let Zhukov do most of the work thus creating succes

Adolf suffered from arrogance and self obsession Stalin Suffered from extreame anxiety both led them to kill millions

[QUOTE="weezyfb"]neither was evil. They wanted to rule and that is what it takes most of the time glassfish8

the extermination of the jews was not nessesary for Hitler to hold power he already had absolute power he just wanted to create his perfect society it was not acctualy nessesary

nor was stalins for the same reason he went abit to far when it comes to confirming your streanth

[QUOTE="glassfish8"]

[QUOTE="Cube_of_MooN"]I'll say Hitler because he literally tried to exterminate a race of people, while Stalin was kind of into the whole inspiring fear to maintain power business, which I don't find quite as evil. Both guys are some of the worst examples of humanity, though, no matter how you look at it.Cube_of_MooN

Adolf killed on an idustrial level stalin killed slowly through famine

by the way why didn't you get cencored when you wrote the name Hitler

it was cencored when i tried to put in the title lol

[QUOTE="Cube_of_MooN"][QUOTE="glassfish8"]

Adolf killed on an idustrial level stalin killed slowly through famine

by the way why didn't you get cencored when you wrote the name Hitler

glassfish8

it was cencored when i tried to put in the title lol

[QUOTE="glassfish8"]

[QUOTE="weezyfb"]neither was evil. They wanted to rule and that is what it takes most of the time weezyfb

the extermination of the jews was not nessesary for Hitler to hold power he already had absolute power he just wanted to create his perfect society it was not acctualy nessesary

nor was stalins for the same reason he went abit to far when it comes to confirming your streanth

yes many people died during campains over history however they were not killed on an industrial level like hitler jews were used to help hitler gain power through negative cohesion. However the extermination was not nessesary for him to take power

stalin,simply because he killed most of his record from his own ppl.

I don't know about evilness, but Stalin had a better K/D ratio than Hitlah.Crimsader

Adolf Hitler obviously.

Not only was he a mass murderer, he was also a rage-quitter.

Neither of them will be getting a christmas card from me.

Gaahl from Gorgoroth is more evil than both of them

DmadFearmonger

Neither are "evil", and even if they were, you couldn't quantify it.

george W. Bush

My first response would be Hitler but it's hard to say.

Gaahl from Gorgoroth is more evil than both of them

DmadFearmonger

:lol:

Hitler is more evil. Stalin may of killed more people, but he was also in power longer. Also I think Stalin's intentions were political, and not on the basis of genocide. Not really to say stalin was justified it just doesn't seem as evil as hitlers campaign against the jews. Also if I remember correctly Russia had it's own ethnic campaigns.

Are you kidding me? Aside from the Jews (who obviously had a bad time under Hitler Germany would have been a superpower and a great place to live, had Hitler not lost the war. Stalin turned Russia into the crap hole that it still is to this day.

I wouldn't know exactly the intentions of either man, so it's difficult to compare them. But I'd definitely prefer to live in Nazi Germany than in Soviet Russia.

Are you kidding me? Aside from the Jews (who obviously had a bad time under Hitler Germany would have been a superpower and a great place to live, had Hitler not lost the war. Stalin turned Russia into the crap hole that it still is to this day.

F1_2004

Stalin actually modernized Russia on a massive scale. It was much more backwards when he assumed power. Russia was still under a midieval feudal system with serfs well into the 20th century.

Hitler is more evil. Stalin may of killed more people, but he was also in power longer. Also I think Stalin's intentions were political, and not on the basis of genocide. Not really to say stalin was justified it just doesn't seem as evil as hitlers campaign against the jews. Also if I remember correctly Russia had it's own ethnic campaigns.

jrhawk42

I don't think so what so ever.. Both could be considered pyschopaths I suppose, but people don't realize how many people through out history would love to do such things if they had the power to.. I find it absurd to use the term "evil" or "good" ever in judging the behavior of the person..

Read about Holomodor before you say stalin isn't evil

Hitler is more evil. Stalin may of killed more people, but he was also in power longer. Also I think Stalin's intentions were political, and not on the basis of genocide. Not really to say stalin was justified it just doesn't seem as evil as hitlers campaign against the jews. Also if I remember correctly Russia had it's own ethnic campaigns.

jrhawk42

Also, I find it outrageous that some of you are saying that Hitler "only tried to kill a race of people." An ENTIRE RACE of people, folks. Actually, it was more than that... he also killed disabled people, homosexuals, Polish and Hungarian civilians, and other people with different religious and political views.

The ONLY group of people he saw fit to live were the Aryans.

*edit* Don't get me wrong, they are BOTH evil... but I don't see how some of you are just throwing Hitlers crimes aside.