who would win in a bar fight, a champion boxer or a champion mma fighter?

  • 148 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Iconic_D
Iconic_D

849

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#101 Iconic_D
Member since 2008 • 849 Posts
[QUOTE="Sajedene"][QUOTE="Iconic_D"][QUOTE="Sajedene"] I like them and respect them both. I've been to a few training sessions for each and they are all amazing athletes. But to put them in a bar fight and expect them to play by their sports rules is kinda funny.

Yeah but what people are discussing right now is not really about a bar fight, were mainly trying to talk about who's strategies would be better and what their trained in doing.

And it will vary per individual. You're good at what you train at. You're good at what you train against. I'm trying to think of a good analogy for this... would sniper vs assault rifle work?

Well you can't base this kind of argument with possibilities because that's chance, you need to base an argument like this off of facts and technical aspects.
Avatar image for Iconic_D
Iconic_D

849

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#102 Iconic_D
Member since 2008 • 849 Posts

[QUOTE="Iconic_D"][QUOTE="Sajedene"] Yeah but what people are discussing right now is not really about a bar fight, were mainly trying to talk about who's strategies would be better and what their trained in doing.worthyofnote
But to keep on topic, we are discussing fighters specifically trained in a certain style or combination of styles of combat, and put in a specific scenario. No other rules apply. That's what we're trying to discuss.

also, i think people are taking the bar fight too literal. What i meant was just a no rules last man standing fight, so stop putting in bottles or chairs or whatever haha.scratch-o-hey

Avatar image for worthyofnote
worthyofnote

21896

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#103 worthyofnote
Member since 2007 • 21896 Posts
[QUOTE="finesse-gamer"]

[QUOTE="Sajedene"] I like them and respect them both. I've been to a few training sessions for each and they are all amazing athletes. But to put them in a bar fight and expect them to play by their sports rules is kinda funny.Sajedene

who would expect that?

they wouln't JUST use bottles and chairs though either. they'd use the training from each respective sport to win, and since both can fight dirty using bottles and chairs, but only one (the MMA fighter) has trained vigorously to work on his ground game as well as kicks and other moves not allowed in boxing, MMA fighters in general have the edge in everything except for boxing.

if anyone has seen many street fights, you guys would know that they almost always end up on the ground eventually. especially when you are drunk.

who's going to have the edge there?

You and Denny bring up the idea that its an all out brawl and will eventually hit the floor because that is what you all see in bar fights... yes true. But how many of those bar fights involved a boxer and an mma fighter. So if we're talking about the two respective players in a fight and you both are assuming that it will hit the ground... why cant we also assume that perhaps the boxer is so trained that he (bare fisted) knocks the mma fighter out in one fight? I mean the fight does START with both fighters on their feet.

And boxers are trained killers when it comes to face to face, toe to toe punch throwing confrontations.
Avatar image for finesse-gamer
finesse-gamer

946

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#104 finesse-gamer
Member since 2009 • 946 Posts

[QUOTE="finesse-gamer"]

[QUOTE="Sajedene"] I like them and respect them both. I've been to a few training sessions for each and they are all amazing athletes. But to put them in a bar fight and expect them to play by their sports rules is kinda funny.Sajedene

who would expect that?

they wouln't JUST use bottles and chairs though either. they'd use the training from each respective sport to win, and since both can fight dirty using bottles and chairs, but only one (the MMA fighter) has trained vigorously to work on his ground game as well as kicks and other moves not allowed in boxing, MMA fighters in general have the edge in everything except for boxing.

if anyone has seen many street fights, you guys would know that they almost always end up on the ground eventually. especially when you are drunk.

who's going to have the edge there?

You and Denny bring up the idea that its an all out brawl and will eventually hit the floor because that is what you all see in bar fights... yes true. But how many of those bar fights involved a boxer and an mma fighter. So if we're talking about the two respective players in a fight and you both are assuming that it will hit the ground... why cant we also assume that perhaps the boxer is so trained that he (bare fisted) knocks the mma fighter out in one fight? I mean the fight does START with both fighters on their feet.

how do you know the MMA fighter wouldn't kick his legs out from under him before the boxer comes within arms length?

Avatar image for Sajedene
Sajedene

13718

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#105 Sajedene
Member since 2004 • 13718 Posts
[QUOTE="Iconic_D"][QUOTE="Sajedene"][QUOTE="Iconic_D"] Yeah but what people are discussing right now is not really about a bar fight, were mainly trying to talk about who's strategies would be better and what their trained in doing.

And it will vary per individual. You're good at what you train at. You're good at what you train against. I'm trying to think of a good analogy for this... would sniper vs assault rifle work?

Well you can't base this kind of argument with possibilities because that's chance, you need to base an argument like this off of facts and technical aspects.

And even then its still all pomp and circumstance. You have the greatest boxer in the world (the sniper) and the greatest mma fighter in the world ( the rifle) in a no rules street fight... the winner will be whoever gets that headshot first. It could be a one hit kill from either gun or take multiple clips -- who knows. Its the best of the best of the best you know.
Avatar image for Lord_Daemon
Lord_Daemon

24535

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#106 Lord_Daemon
Member since 2005 • 24535 Posts

Well generally speaking if they were both on the same level I would think the MMA guy would usually come out of a bar fight the winner most of the time. I really don't see a boxer giving much game in that scenario.

But as for what you are going to choose to get into I would say boxing unless you are thinking of getting into the MMA scene or just want a good sense of the fundamentals of self defense and want to get the basics down. Training for boxing is really one of the best excercise regimens that you can undergo and having a solid grasp of the fundamentals of striking is a very good thing. I could actually say the same thing for wrestling but there's just not nearly as many good wrestling schools around.

Avatar image for pygmahia5
pygmahia5

7428

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#107 pygmahia5
Member since 2007 • 7428 Posts
[QUOTE="pygmahia5"][QUOTE="worthyofnote"]It depends on personal preference. How about trying out both and seeing what fits in your interests the most then pursue that route. See what works for you. No matter how much people argue back and forth on a forum about a hypothetical situation, it isn't going to make the decision for you yourself. worthyofnote
are you replying to ME or scratch?

Scratch. I was just quoting you because I can agree with you as well.

o ok nice. but yea its all about personal preference.
Avatar image for finesse-gamer
finesse-gamer

946

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#108 finesse-gamer
Member since 2009 • 946 Posts

[QUOTE="Sajedene"][QUOTE="Iconic_D"] Yeah but what people are discussing right now is not really about a bar fight, were mainly trying to talk about who's strategies would be better and what their trained in doing.Iconic_D
And it will vary per individual. You're good at what you train at. You're good at what you train against. I'm trying to think of a good analogy for this... would sniper vs assault rifle work?

Well you can't base this kind of argument with possibilities because that's chance, you need to base an argument like this off of facts and technical aspects.

exactly.

it's like he/she wants to go through the entire fight move by move as if he/she knows what's gonna happen.

Avatar image for KcurtorMas
KcurtorMas

1484

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#109 KcurtorMas
Member since 2009 • 1484 Posts

i'll take Mike Tyson in his prime in a bar fight over any MMA fighterandyboiii

Agreed. Well, Iron Mike in his prime.

~~Oh, right. Yeah, what you said

Avatar image for Sajedene
Sajedene

13718

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#110 Sajedene
Member since 2004 • 13718 Posts

[QUOTE="Sajedene"][QUOTE="finesse-gamer"]

who would expect that?

they wouln't JUST use bottles and chairs though either. they'd use the training from each respective sport to win, and since both can fight dirty using bottles and chairs, but only one (the MMA fighter) has trained vigorously to work on his ground game as well as kicks and other moves not allowed in boxing, MMA fighters in general have the edge in everything except for boxing.

if anyone has seen many street fights, you guys would know that they almost always end up on the ground eventually. especially when you are drunk.

who's going to have the edge there?

finesse-gamer

You and Denny bring up the idea that its an all out brawl and will eventually hit the floor because that is what you all see in bar fights... yes true. But how many of those bar fights involved a boxer and an mma fighter. So if we're talking about the two respective players in a fight and you both are assuming that it will hit the ground... why cant we also assume that perhaps the boxer is so trained that he (bare fisted) knocks the mma fighter out in one fight? I mean the fight does START with both fighters on their feet.

how do you know the MMA fighter wouldn't kick his legs out from under him before the boxer comes within arms length?

I dont know and neither do you... then it just becomes us role-playing a fight and then it becomes silly. That is why I keep saying and will keep saying it will vary with the individual given the opportunity and circumstance. Regardless of training.
Avatar image for Iconic_D
Iconic_D

849

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#111 Iconic_D
Member since 2008 • 849 Posts
[QUOTE="Sajedene"][QUOTE="Iconic_D"][QUOTE="Sajedene"] And it will vary per individual. You're good at what you train at. You're good at what you train against. I'm trying to think of a good analogy for this... would sniper vs assault rifle work?

Well you can't base this kind of argument with possibilities because that's chance, you need to base an argument like this off of facts and technical aspects.

And even then its still all pomp and circumstance. You have the greatest boxer in the world (the sniper) and the greatest mma fighter in the world ( the rifle) in a no rules street fight... the winner will be whoever gets that headshot first. It could be a one hit kill from either gun or take multiple clips -- who knows. Its the best of the best of the best you know.

but thats still basing an argument of chance and possibility, you have to take into account the things each are trained for doing
Avatar image for D3nnyCrane
D3nnyCrane

12058

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#112 D3nnyCrane
Member since 2007 • 12058 Posts
[QUOTE="Sajedene"] You and Denny bring up the idea that its an all out brawl and will eventually hit the floor because that is what you all see in bar fights... yes true. But how many of those bar fights involved a boxer and an mma fighter. So if we're talking about the two respective players in a fight and you both are assuming that it will hit the ground... why cant we also assume that perhaps the boxer is so trained that he (bare fisted) knocks the mma fighter out in one fight? I mean the fight does START with both fighters on their feet.

I've not seen a fight between Tyson and Mir down at the Fox and Hound, but having worked as a bouncer with a guy who has worked with the NZSAS as hand to hand instructor, it's safe to say I've seen skilled men fight. And you're right, a boxer has the potential to knock a man out with one punch. But you've probably seen the hits an MMA guy can wear also. So, I'm gonna totally cop out and say - it's an impromptu fight. Between pros. Any fight can hinge on one move. I lean to MMA guys on the strength of the width of ways they can turn you inside out. But my old man was a Police boxing champ, so I know that a boxer's quick hands can leave you wondering where you parked your car - 3 weeks later.
Avatar image for Jfisch93
Jfisch93

3557

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#113 Jfisch93
Member since 2008 • 3557 Posts

MMA-MIXED Martial Arts. They are trained in all kinds of different styles, boxing, kick boxing, muy thai, wrestling,karate, the list is very long. That's why the MMA fighter would win. They have a bigger arsenal.

Avatar image for kergon07
kergon07

70

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#114 kergon07
Member since 2008 • 70 Posts
boxers are real fighters. they would win
Avatar image for worthyofnote
worthyofnote

21896

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#115 worthyofnote
Member since 2007 • 21896 Posts
[QUOTE="Iconic_D"][QUOTE="Sajedene"][QUOTE="Iconic_D"] Yeah but what people are discussing right now is not really about a bar fight, were mainly trying to talk about who's strategies would be better and what their trained in doing.

And it will vary per individual. You're good at what you train at. You're good at what you train against. I'm trying to think of a good analogy for this... would sniper vs assault rifle work?

Well you can't base this kind of argument with possibilities because that's chance, you need to base an argument like this off of facts and technical aspects.

Within the confines of this scenario that has been presented to us to argue over, technicalities and facts are going to solve the argument. The fighters aren't in a ring and following rules. Sure, they're used to following rules and traditions. They know how to fight when it comes to the respective arts. But technique and skill alone don't always win a fight. There's always a chance that the other guy is stronger than you. Faster than you. Smarter than you. Dirtier than you. That he can see something that you don't. It goes both ways. Not one specific style always finds itself with the upper hand.
Avatar image for Sajedene
Sajedene

13718

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#116 Sajedene
Member since 2004 • 13718 Posts

[QUOTE="Iconic_D"][QUOTE="Sajedene"] And it will vary per individual. You're good at what you train at. You're good at what you train against. I'm trying to think of a good analogy for this... would sniper vs assault rifle work? finesse-gamer

Well you can't base this kind of argument with possibilities because that's chance, you need to base an argument like this off of facts and technical aspects.

exactly.

it's like he/she wants to go through the entire fight move by move as if he/she knows what's gonna happen.

No. I believe that is you doing that. Everytime I bring up a movement circumstance - it is because you have put the scenario to the benefit of just one fighter (IE throwing the high kick or them ending up on the ground). I was the one who keeps on insisting that it will depend. So please do not put that on me. It is you who wants to go through the whole movements to make your chosen fighter win.
Avatar image for Iconic_D
Iconic_D

849

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#117 Iconic_D
Member since 2008 • 849 Posts
[QUOTE="worthyofnote"][QUOTE="Iconic_D"][QUOTE="Sajedene"] And it will vary per individual. You're good at what you train at. You're good at what you train against. I'm trying to think of a good analogy for this... would sniper vs assault rifle work?

Well you can't base this kind of argument with possibilities because that's chance, you need to base an argument like this off of facts and technical aspects.

Within the confines of this scenario that has been presented to us to argue over, technicalities and facts are going to solve the argument. The fighters aren't in a ring and following rules. Sure, they're used to following rules and traditions. They know how to fight when it comes to the respective arts. But technique and skill alone don't always win a fight. There's always a chance that the other guy is stronger than you. Faster than you. Smarter than you. Dirtier than you. That he can see something that you don't. It goes both ways. Not one specific style always finds itself with the upper hand.

You don;t understand what I am trying to get at, i'm basing the argument on if an mma fighter and a boxer were to fight with the techniques they use in their sport who would superior?
Avatar image for worthyofnote
worthyofnote

21896

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#118 worthyofnote
Member since 2007 • 21896 Posts
[QUOTE="Sajedene"] I dont know and neither do you... then it just becomes us role-playing a fight and then it becomes silly. That is why I keep saying and will keep saying it will vary with the individual given the opportunity and circumstance. Regardless of training.

That's all we seem to keep doing, is going back and forth. The matter at hand is, the TC made this thread in order to get a sense of what kind of combat training he should pursue. And we've hardly managed to answer his second question. We've just been able to argue back and forth over these pages who is the better fighter.
Avatar image for KcurtorMas
KcurtorMas

1484

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#119 KcurtorMas
Member since 2009 • 1484 Posts

MMA-MIXED Martial Arts. They are trained in all kinds of different styles, boxing, kick boxing, muy thai, wrestling,karate, the list is very long. That's why the MMA fighter would win. They have a bigger arsenal.

Jfisch93

Being mediocre at many things isnt necessarily better thanbeing a master at one particular thing.

Avatar image for Sajedene
Sajedene

13718

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#120 Sajedene
Member since 2004 • 13718 Posts
[QUOTE="Iconic_D"][QUOTE="Sajedene"][QUOTE="Iconic_D"] Well you can't base this kind of argument with possibilities because that's chance, you need to base an argument like this off of facts and technical aspects.

And even then its still all pomp and circumstance. You have the greatest boxer in the world (the sniper) and the greatest mma fighter in the world ( the rifle) in a no rules street fight... the winner will be whoever gets that headshot first. It could be a one hit kill from either gun or take multiple clips -- who knows. Its the best of the best of the best you know.

but thats still basing an argument of chance and possibility, you have to take into account the things each are trained for doing

Which again brings us into role playing. Do we take wind conditions into consideration? Time of day? Fatigue? Age? Really we could go on and on and on. If we go by training alone... then we say we have the best of one side vs the best of the other. How does one determine it then?
Avatar image for Iconic_D
Iconic_D

849

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#121 Iconic_D
Member since 2008 • 849 Posts

[QUOTE="Jfisch93"]

MMA-MIXED Martial Arts. They are trained in all kinds of different styles, boxing, kick boxing, muy thai, wrestling,karate, the list is very long. That's why the MMA fighter would win. They have a bigger arsenal.

KcurtorMas

Being mediocre at many things isnt necessarily better thanbeing a master at one particular thing.

Thats kind of a silly statement, just because theirs more to go over doesn't make the fighters mediocre
Avatar image for pygmahia5
pygmahia5

7428

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#122 pygmahia5
Member since 2007 • 7428 Posts
[QUOTE="finesse-gamer"]

[QUOTE="Iconic_D"] Well you can't base this kind of argument with possibilities because that's chance, you need to base an argument like this off of facts and technical aspects.Sajedene

exactly.

it's like he/she wants to go through the entire fight move by move as if he/she knows what's gonna happen.

No. I believe that is you doing that. Everytime I bring up a movement circumstance - it is because you have put the scenario to the benefit of just one fighter (IE throwing the high kick or them ending up on the ground). I was the one who keeps on insisting that it will depend. So please do not put that on me. It is you who wants to go through the whole movements to make your chosen fighter win.

dont worry saje, u were right and they're ignorant.
Avatar image for Sajedene
Sajedene

13718

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#123 Sajedene
Member since 2004 • 13718 Posts
[QUOTE="worthyofnote"][QUOTE="Sajedene"] I dont know and neither do you... then it just becomes us role-playing a fight and then it becomes silly. That is why I keep saying and will keep saying it will vary with the individual given the opportunity and circumstance. Regardless of training.

That's all we seem to keep doing, is going back and forth. The matter at hand is, the TC made this thread in order to get a sense of what kind of combat training he should pursue. And we've hardly managed to answer his second question. We've just been able to argue back and forth over these pages who is the better fighter.

His second question was easy to answer though. He just needs to try them all out and see which one works for him the best. Now back to the fun question...
Avatar image for Iconic_D
Iconic_D

849

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#124 Iconic_D
Member since 2008 • 849 Posts

[QUOTE="Sajedene"][QUOTE="finesse-gamer"]

exactly.

it's like he/she wants to go through the entire fight move by move as if he/she knows what's gonna happen.pygmahia5

No. I believe that is you doing that. Everytime I bring up a movement circumstance - it is because you have put the scenario to the benefit of just one fighter (IE throwing the high kick or them ending up on the ground). I was the one who keeps on insisting that it will depend. So please do not put that on me. It is you who wants to go through the whole movements to make your chosen fighter win.

dont worry saje, u were right and they're ignorant.

How am I ignorant? i've been trying to prove an argument with facts this whole time.

Avatar image for Sajedene
Sajedene

13718

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#125 Sajedene
Member since 2004 • 13718 Posts

[QUOTE="Sajedene"][QUOTE="finesse-gamer"]

exactly.

it's like he/she wants to go through the entire fight move by move as if he/she knows what's gonna happen.

pygmahia5

No. I believe that is you doing that. Everytime I bring up a movement circumstance - it is because you have put the scenario to the benefit of just one fighter (IE throwing the high kick or them ending up on the ground). I was the one who keeps on insisting that it will depend. So please do not put that on me. It is you who wants to go through the whole movements to make your chosen fighter win.

dont worry saje, u were right and they're ignorant.

Lol I wouldn't say that. I just don't see how anyone can pick one fighter over the other. Regardless of how great an individual fighter is - they can be the greatest that there ever was in their sport -- for them to face the greatest fighter there ever was on another sport will not give us an outcome. Its like betting on the Patriots to win the superbowl in 2008 :P

Avatar image for D3nnyCrane
D3nnyCrane

12058

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#126 D3nnyCrane
Member since 2007 • 12058 Posts
I still live in fear and awe of Cro Cop...
Avatar image for worthyofnote
worthyofnote

21896

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#127 worthyofnote
Member since 2007 • 21896 Posts
You don;t understand what I am trying to get at, i'm basing the argument on if an mma fighter and a boxer were to fight with the techniques they use in their sport who would superior?Iconic_D
If it were a sanctioned bout to where a boxer and mixed martial artist were to fight in a ring, using only their respective techniques and skill, I would think the MMA fighter would have an upper hand in terms of being well rounded. However, it goes back some of the previous statements I have made. Every dog has his day. Some fighters are smarter than others, some are faster, some are stronger, etc etc. We'd just have to watch and see who would come out on top. Role-playing the scenarios doesn't matter when you really want to find the straightforward factual answer. Two fighters of different backgrounds would have to be pitted together and allowed to duke it out. Which is why PRIDE, UFC, and other associations exist. For our enjoyment while two men beat the living hell out of eachother. That's why boxers box and do their own thing and mixed martial artists do theirs. The topic in which we were arguing over is the scenario in who would win in a barfight? And we've been arguing the strengths and weaknesses of these fighters in this hypothetical situation. It can't simply be decided over a blunt statement. But rather, over an actual altercation left to chance. Surely, each fighter would rely upon his training, but then again they aren't held back by rules either. So therefore, it's left to chance.
Avatar image for Sajedene
Sajedene

13718

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#128 Sajedene
Member since 2004 • 13718 Posts
I still live in fear and awe of Cro Cop...D3nnyCrane
I was so dissapointed with the eye-poke fight... his comeback fight and he didnt get to throw a kick. :(
Avatar image for Iconic_D
Iconic_D

849

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#129 Iconic_D
Member since 2008 • 849 Posts
[QUOTE="Iconic_D"]You don;t understand what I am trying to get at, i'm basing the argument on if an mma fighter and a boxer were to fight with the techniques they use in their sport who would superior?worthyofnote
If it were a sanctioned bout to where a boxer and mixed martial artist were to fight in a ring, using only their respective techniques and skill, I would think the MMA fighter would have an upper hand in terms of being well rounded. However, it goes back some of the previous statements I have made. Every dog has his day. Some fighters are smarter than others, some are faster, some are stronger, etc etc. We'd just have to watch and see who would come out on top. Role-playing the scenarios doesn't matter when you really want to find the straightforward factual answer. Two fighters of different backgrounds would have to be pitted together and allowed to duke it out. Which is why PRIDE, UFC, and other associations exist. For our enjoyment while two men beat the living hell out of eachother. That's why boxers box and do their own thing and mixed martial artists do theirs. The topic in which we were arguing over is the scenario in who would win in a barfight? And we've been arguing the strengths and weaknesses of these fighters in this hypothetical situation. It can't simply be decided over a blunt statement. But rather, over an actual altercation left to chance. Surely, each fighter would rely upon his training, but then again they aren't held back by rules either. So therefore, it's left to chance.

See this is a good statement I totally agree with you and of course how you implied it would just be silly to role play something where theres so many outcomes.
Avatar image for worthyofnote
worthyofnote

21896

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#130 worthyofnote
Member since 2007 • 21896 Posts
[QUOTE="Sajedene"][QUOTE="worthyofnote"][QUOTE="Sajedene"] I dont know and neither do you... then it just becomes us role-playing a fight and then it becomes silly. That is why I keep saying and will keep saying it will vary with the individual given the opportunity and circumstance. Regardless of training.

That's all we seem to keep doing, is going back and forth. The matter at hand is, the TC made this thread in order to get a sense of what kind of combat training he should pursue. And we've hardly managed to answer his second question. We've just been able to argue back and forth over these pages who is the better fighter.

His second question was easy to answer though. He just needs to try them all out and see which one works for him the best. Now back to the fun question...

Yeah, it was pretty easy to give an answer for the second question. I'm sure he/she was looking for a bit more input, but obviously arguing over the first point of the original post is much more fun, and the TC can deduce from these arguments more so than just a simple answer. :)
Avatar image for D3nnyCrane
D3nnyCrane

12058

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#131 D3nnyCrane
Member since 2007 • 12058 Posts
[QUOTE="D3nnyCrane"]I still live in fear and awe of Cro Cop...Sajedene
I was so dissapointed with the eye-poke fight... his comeback fight and he didnt get to throw a kick. :(

We don't actually see that much UFC here in little old backwater NZ, so all I REALLY know is from when he was in Pride. But that man could launch rockets with his left foot...
Avatar image for Sajedene
Sajedene

13718

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#132 Sajedene
Member since 2004 • 13718 Posts
[QUOTE="worthyofnote"][QUOTE="Iconic_D"]You don;t understand what I am trying to get at, i'm basing the argument on if an mma fighter and a boxer were to fight with the techniques they use in their sport who would superior?Iconic_D
If it were a sanctioned bout to where a boxer and mixed martial artist were to fight in a ring, using only their respective techniques and skill, I would think the MMA fighter would have an upper hand in terms of being well rounded. However, it goes back some of the previous statements I have made. Every dog has his day. Some fighters are smarter than others, some are faster, some are stronger, etc etc. We'd just have to watch and see who would come out on top. Role-playing the scenarios doesn't matter when you really want to find the straightforward factual answer. Two fighters of different backgrounds would have to be pitted together and allowed to duke it out. Which is why PRIDE, UFC, and other associations exist. For our enjoyment while two men beat the living hell out of eachother. That's why boxers box and do their own thing and mixed martial artists do theirs. The topic in which we were arguing over is the scenario in who would win in a barfight? And we've been arguing the strengths and weaknesses of these fighters in this hypothetical situation. It can't simply be decided over a blunt statement. But rather, over an actual altercation left to chance. Surely, each fighter would rely upon his training, but then again they aren't held back by rules either. So therefore, it's left to chance.

See this is a good statement I totally agree with you and of course how you implied it would just be silly to role play something where theres so many outcomes.

I've been saying that all this time :cry:
Avatar image for Sajedene
Sajedene

13718

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#133 Sajedene
Member since 2004 • 13718 Posts
[QUOTE="Sajedene"][QUOTE="D3nnyCrane"]I still live in fear and awe of Cro Cop...D3nnyCrane
I was so dissapointed with the eye-poke fight... his comeback fight and he didnt get to throw a kick. :(

We don't actually see that much UFC here in little old backwater NZ, so all I REALLY know is from when he was in Pride. But that man could launch rockets with his left foot...

That he can... his high kicks are inspiring. Sometimes I think he can kick higher than me now :o
Avatar image for worthyofnote
worthyofnote

21896

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#134 worthyofnote
Member since 2007 • 21896 Posts

How am I ignorant? i've been trying to prove an argument with facts this whole time.

Iconic_D

I wouldn't go as far as saying that you're ignorant. Just that maybe you've focused more on arguing based on facts and have ignored the scenarios and possibilities that are left to chance in the proposed situation. Not all arguments can be won on facts alone. Arguments are won by who can better prove or sell a point. Just because you have all the facts doesn't mean that you can argue them correctly. You need facts, I need more than facts. I need the freedom to judge the situation dispassionately. That's the definition of liberty. I don't have to prove whose a better fighter based on facts, I just have to prove that you're wrong. and when you're wrong, I'm right. That's the beauty of an argument. Argue correctly and you're never wrong.

Avatar image for worthyofnote
worthyofnote

21896

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#135 worthyofnote
Member since 2007 • 21896 Posts
[QUOTE="Sajedene"][QUOTE="Iconic_D"][QUOTE="worthyofnote"] If it were a sanctioned bout to where a boxer and mixed martial artist were to fight in a ring, using only their respective techniques and skill, I would think the MMA fighter would have an upper hand in terms of being well rounded. However, it goes back some of the previous statements I have made. Every dog has his day. Some fighters are smarter than others, some are faster, some are stronger, etc etc. We'd just have to watch and see who would come out on top. Role-playing the scenarios doesn't matter when you really want to find the straightforward factual answer. Two fighters of different backgrounds would have to be pitted together and allowed to duke it out. Which is why PRIDE, UFC, and other associations exist. For our enjoyment while two men beat the living hell out of eachother. That's why boxers box and do their own thing and mixed martial artists do theirs. The topic in which we were arguing over is the scenario in who would win in a barfight? And we've been arguing the strengths and weaknesses of these fighters in this hypothetical situation. It can't simply be decided over a blunt statement. But rather, over an actual altercation left to chance. Surely, each fighter would rely upon his training, but then again they aren't held back by rules either. So therefore, it's left to chance.

See this is a good statement I totally agree with you and of course how you implied it would just be silly to role play something where theres so many outcomes.

I've been saying that all this time :cry:

That she has. That you have Saj. I've focused it all into one post instead of it being mentioned here and there. I still give you your credit.
Avatar image for D3nnyCrane
D3nnyCrane

12058

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#136 D3nnyCrane
Member since 2007 • 12058 Posts
[QUOTE="Sajedene"][QUOTE="D3nnyCrane"][QUOTE="Sajedene"] I was so dissapointed with the eye-poke fight... his comeback fight and he didnt get to throw a kick. :(

We don't actually see that much UFC here in little old backwater NZ, so all I REALLY know is from when he was in Pride. But that man could launch rockets with his left foot...

That he can... his high kicks are inspiring. Sometimes I think he can kick higher than me now :o

Don't feel too bad - he IS a world class kickboxer after all... :D
Avatar image for Sajedene
Sajedene

13718

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#137 Sajedene
Member since 2004 • 13718 Posts
[QUOTE="Sajedene"][QUOTE="Iconic_D"]See this is a good statement I totally agree with you and of course how you implied it would just be silly to role play something where theres so many outcomes.worthyofnote
I've been saying that all this time :cry:

That she has. That you have Saj. I've focused it all into one post instead of it being mentioned here and there. I still give you your credit.

And you yours good sir... and you yours. :)
Avatar image for worthyofnote
worthyofnote

21896

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#138 worthyofnote
Member since 2007 • 21896 Posts
[QUOTE="Sajedene"][QUOTE="worthyofnote"][QUOTE="Sajedene"] I've been saying that all this time :cry:

That she has. That you have Saj. I've focused it all into one post instead of it being mentioned here and there. I still give you your credit.

And you yours good sir... and you yours. :)

Thank you. *bows* This is a bit off topic, but I finally picked up The Mailroom, interesting read so far.
Avatar image for Sajedene
Sajedene

13718

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#139 Sajedene
Member since 2004 • 13718 Posts
[QUOTE="Sajedene"][QUOTE="worthyofnote"]That she has. That you have Saj. I've focused it all into one post instead of it being mentioned here and there. I still give you your credit.worthyofnote
And you yours good sir... and you yours. :)

Thank you. *bows* This is a bit off topic, but I finally picked up The Mailroom, interesting read so far.

Oh awesome! Feel free to pm me or catch me on aim to talk about it. I can tell you what still and doesnt happen anymore. It's great to see what the people who run/ran Hollywood had to go through yeah?
Avatar image for worthyofnote
worthyofnote

21896

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#140 worthyofnote
Member since 2007 • 21896 Posts
[QUOTE="Sajedene"][QUOTE="worthyofnote"][QUOTE="Sajedene"] And you yours good sir... and you yours. :)

Thank you. *bows* This is a bit off topic, but I finally picked up The Mailroom, interesting read so far.

Oh awesome! Feel free to pm me or catch me on aim to talk about it. I can tell you what still and doesnt happen anymore. It's great to see what the people who run/ran Hollywood had to go through yeah?

Yeah, will do. Yes, it is nice to know that even the most successful and richest industry giants have had to shovel their fair share of crap.
Avatar image for CleanPlayer
CleanPlayer

9822

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#141 CleanPlayer
Member since 2008 • 9822 Posts
It really depends who gets ahold of what in the bar fight
Avatar image for scratch-o-hey
scratch-o-hey

144

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#142 scratch-o-hey
Member since 2009 • 144 Posts
[QUOTE="Sajedene"][QUOTE="worthyofnote"][QUOTE="Sajedene"] I dont know and neither do you... then it just becomes us role-playing a fight and then it becomes silly. That is why I keep saying and will keep saying it will vary with the individual given the opportunity and circumstance. Regardless of training.

That's all we seem to keep doing, is going back and forth. The matter at hand is, the TC made this thread in order to get a sense of what kind of combat training he should pursue. And we've hardly managed to answer his second question. We've just been able to argue back and forth over these pages who is the better fighter.

thanks man. Anyway i will eventually try out both, but right now i'm more inclined to boxing.
Avatar image for Steameffekt
Steameffekt

4950

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#143 Steameffekt
Member since 2008 • 4950 Posts

Champion MMA Fighter no doubt.

Avatar image for avatar_genius
avatar_genius

8056

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#144 avatar_genius
Member since 2009 • 8056 Posts

I think a ninja could take out both.

Avatar image for worthyofnote
worthyofnote

21896

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#145 worthyofnote
Member since 2007 • 21896 Posts
[QUOTE="scratch-o-hey"] thanks man. Anyway i will eventually try out both, but right now i'm more inclined to boxing.

Sure, no problem.
Avatar image for FreezeBlast95
FreezeBlast95

1287

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#146 FreezeBlast95
Member since 2008 • 1287 Posts

Look at UFC when it first started and see what happens when you don't give them rules. Screw MMA put a muay thai guy in there >.>

Avatar image for worthyofnote
worthyofnote

21896

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#147 worthyofnote
Member since 2007 • 21896 Posts

Look at UFC when it first started and see what happens when you don't give them rules. Screw MMA put a muay thai guy in there >.>

FreezeBlast95
Are we talking traditional Muay Thai for self defense, or comepetitive Muay Thai which is used in sanctioned bouts? There is a difference. And some mixed martial artists train in Muay Thai. Muay Thai as a form of combat trains the fighter to be proficient in striking with eight points of interest instead of four or five as is the case with most traditional martial arts. I don't see why any mma fighter wouldn't want a solid background in Muay Thai.
Avatar image for mdamin76
mdamin76

74

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#148 mdamin76
Member since 2009 • 74 Posts

It could be MMA. In terms of skills, MMA advanced than Boxing.