This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="Iconic_D"][QUOTE="Sajedene"] Yeah but what people are discussing right now is not really about a bar fight, were mainly trying to talk about who's strategies would be better and what their trained in doing.worthyofnoteBut to keep on topic, we are discussing fighters specifically trained in a certain style or combination of styles of combat, and put in a specific scenario. No other rules apply. That's what we're trying to discuss.
also, i think people are taking the bar fight too literal. What i meant was just a no rules last man standing fight, so stop putting in bottles or chairs or whatever haha.scratch-o-hey
[QUOTE="finesse-gamer"][QUOTE="Sajedene"] I like them and respect them both. I've been to a few training sessions for each and they are all amazing athletes. But to put them in a bar fight and expect them to play by their sports rules is kinda funny.Sajedene
who would expect that?
they wouln't JUST use bottles and chairs though either. they'd use the training from each respective sport to win, and since both can fight dirty using bottles and chairs, but only one (the MMA fighter) has trained vigorously to work on his ground game as well as kicks and other moves not allowed in boxing, MMA fighters in general have the edge in everything except for boxing.
if anyone has seen many street fights, you guys would know that they almost always end up on the ground eventually. especially when you are drunk.
who's going to have the edge there?
You and Denny bring up the idea that its an all out brawl and will eventually hit the floor because that is what you all see in bar fights... yes true. But how many of those bar fights involved a boxer and an mma fighter. So if we're talking about the two respective players in a fight and you both are assuming that it will hit the ground... why cant we also assume that perhaps the boxer is so trained that he (bare fisted) knocks the mma fighter out in one fight? I mean the fight does START with both fighters on their feet.And boxers are trained killers when it comes to face to face, toe to toe punch throwing confrontations.[QUOTE="finesse-gamer"][QUOTE="Sajedene"] I like them and respect them both. I've been to a few training sessions for each and they are all amazing athletes. But to put them in a bar fight and expect them to play by their sports rules is kinda funny.Sajedene
who would expect that?
they wouln't JUST use bottles and chairs though either. they'd use the training from each respective sport to win, and since both can fight dirty using bottles and chairs, but only one (the MMA fighter) has trained vigorously to work on his ground game as well as kicks and other moves not allowed in boxing, MMA fighters in general have the edge in everything except for boxing.
if anyone has seen many street fights, you guys would know that they almost always end up on the ground eventually. especially when you are drunk.
who's going to have the edge there?
You and Denny bring up the idea that its an all out brawl and will eventually hit the floor because that is what you all see in bar fights... yes true. But how many of those bar fights involved a boxer and an mma fighter. So if we're talking about the two respective players in a fight and you both are assuming that it will hit the ground... why cant we also assume that perhaps the boxer is so trained that he (bare fisted) knocks the mma fighter out in one fight? I mean the fight does START with both fighters on their feet.how do you know the MMA fighter wouldn't kick his legs out from under him before the boxer comes within arms length?
Well generally speaking if they were both on the same level I would think the MMA guy would usually come out of a bar fight the winner most of the time. I really don't see a boxer giving much game in that scenario.
But as for what you are going to choose to get into I would say boxing unless you are thinking of getting into the MMA scene or just want a good sense of the fundamentals of self defense and want to get the basics down. Training for boxing is really one of the best excercise regimens that you can undergo and having a solid grasp of the fundamentals of striking is a very good thing. I could actually say the same thing for wrestling but there's just not nearly as many good wrestling schools around.
[QUOTE="pygmahia5"][QUOTE="worthyofnote"]It depends on personal preference. How about trying out both and seeing what fits in your interests the most then pursue that route. See what works for you. No matter how much people argue back and forth on a forum about a hypothetical situation, it isn't going to make the decision for you yourself. worthyofnoteare you replying to ME or scratch?Scratch. I was just quoting you because I can agree with you as well. o ok nice. but yea its all about personal preference.
[QUOTE="Sajedene"][QUOTE="Iconic_D"] Yeah but what people are discussing right now is not really about a bar fight, were mainly trying to talk about who's strategies would be better and what their trained in doing.Iconic_DAnd it will vary per individual. You're good at what you train at. You're good at what you train against. I'm trying to think of a good analogy for this... would sniper vs assault rifle work? Well you can't base this kind of argument with possibilities because that's chance, you need to base an argument like this off of facts and technical aspects.
exactly.
it's like he/she wants to go through the entire fight move by move as if he/she knows what's gonna happen.
i'll take Mike Tyson in his prime in a bar fight over any MMA fighterandyboiii
Agreed. Well, Iron Mike in his prime.
~~Oh, right. Yeah, what you said
You and Denny bring up the idea that its an all out brawl and will eventually hit the floor because that is what you all see in bar fights... yes true. But how many of those bar fights involved a boxer and an mma fighter. So if we're talking about the two respective players in a fight and you both are assuming that it will hit the ground... why cant we also assume that perhaps the boxer is so trained that he (bare fisted) knocks the mma fighter out in one fight? I mean the fight does START with both fighters on their feet.[QUOTE="Sajedene"][QUOTE="finesse-gamer"]
who would expect that?
they wouln't JUST use bottles and chairs though either. they'd use the training from each respective sport to win, and since both can fight dirty using bottles and chairs, but only one (the MMA fighter) has trained vigorously to work on his ground game as well as kicks and other moves not allowed in boxing, MMA fighters in general have the edge in everything except for boxing.
if anyone has seen many street fights, you guys would know that they almost always end up on the ground eventually. especially when you are drunk.
who's going to have the edge there?
finesse-gamer
how do you know the MMA fighter wouldn't kick his legs out from under him before the boxer comes within arms length?
I dont know and neither do you... then it just becomes us role-playing a fight and then it becomes silly. That is why I keep saying and will keep saying it will vary with the individual given the opportunity and circumstance. Regardless of training.Well you can't base this kind of argument with possibilities because that's chance, you need to base an argument like this off of facts and technical aspects.[QUOTE="Iconic_D"][QUOTE="Sajedene"] And it will vary per individual. You're good at what you train at. You're good at what you train against. I'm trying to think of a good analogy for this... would sniper vs assault rifle work? finesse-gamer
exactly.
it's like he/she wants to go through the entire fight move by move as if he/she knows what's gonna happen.
No. I believe that is you doing that. Everytime I bring up a movement circumstance - it is because you have put the scenario to the benefit of just one fighter (IE throwing the high kick or them ending up on the ground). I was the one who keeps on insisting that it will depend. So please do not put that on me. It is you who wants to go through the whole movements to make your chosen fighter win.MMA-MIXED Martial Arts. They are trained in all kinds of different styles, boxing, kick boxing, muy thai, wrestling,karate, the list is very long. That's why the MMA fighter would win. They have a bigger arsenal.
Jfisch93
Being mediocre at many things isnt necessarily better thanbeing a master at one particular thing.
[QUOTE="Jfisch93"]
MMA-MIXED Martial Arts. They are trained in all kinds of different styles, boxing, kick boxing, muy thai, wrestling,karate, the list is very long. That's why the MMA fighter would win. They have a bigger arsenal.
KcurtorMas
Being mediocre at many things isnt necessarily better thanbeing a master at one particular thing.
Thats kind of a silly statement, just because theirs more to go over doesn't make the fighters mediocre[QUOTE="finesse-gamer"][QUOTE="Iconic_D"] Well you can't base this kind of argument with possibilities because that's chance, you need to base an argument like this off of facts and technical aspects.Sajedene
exactly.
it's like he/she wants to go through the entire fight move by move as if he/she knows what's gonna happen.
No. I believe that is you doing that. Everytime I bring up a movement circumstance - it is because you have put the scenario to the benefit of just one fighter (IE throwing the high kick or them ending up on the ground). I was the one who keeps on insisting that it will depend. So please do not put that on me. It is you who wants to go through the whole movements to make your chosen fighter win. dont worry saje, u were right and they're ignorant.[QUOTE="Sajedene"][QUOTE="finesse-gamer"]No. I believe that is you doing that. Everytime I bring up a movement circumstance - it is because you have put the scenario to the benefit of just one fighter (IE throwing the high kick or them ending up on the ground). I was the one who keeps on insisting that it will depend. So please do not put that on me. It is you who wants to go through the whole movements to make your chosen fighter win. dont worry saje, u were right and they're ignorant. How am I ignorant? i've been trying to prove an argument with facts this whole time.exactly.
it's like he/she wants to go through the entire fight move by move as if he/she knows what's gonna happen.pygmahia5
[QUOTE="Sajedene"][QUOTE="finesse-gamer"]No. I believe that is you doing that. Everytime I bring up a movement circumstance - it is because you have put the scenario to the benefit of just one fighter (IE throwing the high kick or them ending up on the ground). I was the one who keeps on insisting that it will depend. So please do not put that on me. It is you who wants to go through the whole movements to make your chosen fighter win. dont worry saje, u were right and they're ignorant. Lol I wouldn't say that. I just don't see how anyone can pick one fighter over the other. Regardless of how great an individual fighter is - they can be the greatest that there ever was in their sport -- for them to face the greatest fighter there ever was on another sport will not give us an outcome. Its like betting on the Patriots to win the superbowl in 2008 :Pexactly.
it's like he/she wants to go through the entire fight move by move as if he/she knows what's gonna happen.
pygmahia5
You don;t understand what I am trying to get at, i'm basing the argument on if an mma fighter and a boxer were to fight with the techniques they use in their sport who would superior?Iconic_DIf it were a sanctioned bout to where a boxer and mixed martial artist were to fight in a ring, using only their respective techniques and skill, I would think the MMA fighter would have an upper hand in terms of being well rounded. However, it goes back some of the previous statements I have made. Every dog has his day. Some fighters are smarter than others, some are faster, some are stronger, etc etc. We'd just have to watch and see who would come out on top. Role-playing the scenarios doesn't matter when you really want to find the straightforward factual answer. Two fighters of different backgrounds would have to be pitted together and allowed to duke it out. Which is why PRIDE, UFC, and other associations exist. For our enjoyment while two men beat the living hell out of eachother. That's why boxers box and do their own thing and mixed martial artists do theirs. The topic in which we were arguing over is the scenario in who would win in a barfight? And we've been arguing the strengths and weaknesses of these fighters in this hypothetical situation. It can't simply be decided over a blunt statement. But rather, over an actual altercation left to chance. Surely, each fighter would rely upon his training, but then again they aren't held back by rules either. So therefore, it's left to chance.
[QUOTE="Iconic_D"]You don;t understand what I am trying to get at, i'm basing the argument on if an mma fighter and a boxer were to fight with the techniques they use in their sport who would superior?worthyofnoteIf it were a sanctioned bout to where a boxer and mixed martial artist were to fight in a ring, using only their respective techniques and skill, I would think the MMA fighter would have an upper hand in terms of being well rounded. However, it goes back some of the previous statements I have made. Every dog has his day. Some fighters are smarter than others, some are faster, some are stronger, etc etc. We'd just have to watch and see who would come out on top. Role-playing the scenarios doesn't matter when you really want to find the straightforward factual answer. Two fighters of different backgrounds would have to be pitted together and allowed to duke it out. Which is why PRIDE, UFC, and other associations exist. For our enjoyment while two men beat the living hell out of eachother. That's why boxers box and do their own thing and mixed martial artists do theirs. The topic in which we were arguing over is the scenario in who would win in a barfight? And we've been arguing the strengths and weaknesses of these fighters in this hypothetical situation. It can't simply be decided over a blunt statement. But rather, over an actual altercation left to chance. Surely, each fighter would rely upon his training, but then again they aren't held back by rules either. So therefore, it's left to chance.See this is a good statement I totally agree with you and of course how you implied it would just be silly to role play something where theres so many outcomes.
[QUOTE="D3nnyCrane"]I still live in fear and awe of Cro Cop...SajedeneI was so dissapointed with the eye-poke fight... his comeback fight and he didnt get to throw a kick. :( We don't actually see that much UFC here in little old backwater NZ, so all I REALLY know is from when he was in Pride. But that man could launch rockets with his left foot...
[QUOTE="worthyofnote"][QUOTE="Iconic_D"]You don;t understand what I am trying to get at, i'm basing the argument on if an mma fighter and a boxer were to fight with the techniques they use in their sport who would superior?Iconic_DIf it were a sanctioned bout to where a boxer and mixed martial artist were to fight in a ring, using only their respective techniques and skill, I would think the MMA fighter would have an upper hand in terms of being well rounded. However, it goes back some of the previous statements I have made. Every dog has his day. Some fighters are smarter than others, some are faster, some are stronger, etc etc. We'd just have to watch and see who would come out on top. Role-playing the scenarios doesn't matter when you really want to find the straightforward factual answer. Two fighters of different backgrounds would have to be pitted together and allowed to duke it out. Which is why PRIDE, UFC, and other associations exist. For our enjoyment while two men beat the living hell out of eachother. That's why boxers box and do their own thing and mixed martial artists do theirs. The topic in which we were arguing over is the scenario in who would win in a barfight? And we've been arguing the strengths and weaknesses of these fighters in this hypothetical situation. It can't simply be decided over a blunt statement. But rather, over an actual altercation left to chance. Surely, each fighter would rely upon his training, but then again they aren't held back by rules either. So therefore, it's left to chance.See this is a good statement I totally agree with you and of course how you implied it would just be silly to role play something where theres so many outcomes. I've been saying that all this time :cry:
[QUOTE="Sajedene"][QUOTE="D3nnyCrane"]I still live in fear and awe of Cro Cop...D3nnyCraneI was so dissapointed with the eye-poke fight... his comeback fight and he didnt get to throw a kick. :( We don't actually see that much UFC here in little old backwater NZ, so all I REALLY know is from when he was in Pride. But that man could launch rockets with his left foot... That he can... his high kicks are inspiring. Sometimes I think he can kick higher than me now :o
How am I ignorant? i've been trying to prove an argument with facts this whole time.I wouldn't go as far as saying that you're ignorant. Just that maybe you've focused more on arguing based on facts and have ignored the scenarios and possibilities that are left to chance in the proposed situation. Not all arguments can be won on facts alone. Arguments are won by who can better prove or sell a point. Just because you have all the facts doesn't mean that you can argue them correctly. You need facts, I need more than facts. I need the freedom to judge the situation dispassionately. That's the definition of liberty. I don't have to prove whose a better fighter based on facts, I just have to prove that you're wrong. and when you're wrong, I'm right. That's the beauty of an argument. Argue correctly and you're never wrong.Iconic_D
[QUOTE="Sajedene"][QUOTE="Iconic_D"]See this is a good statement I totally agree with you and of course how you implied it would just be silly to role play something where theres so many outcomes.worthyofnoteI've been saying that all this time :cry: That she has. That you have Saj. I've focused it all into one post instead of it being mentioned here and there. I still give you your credit. And you yours good sir... and you yours. :)
[QUOTE="Sajedene"][QUOTE="worthyofnote"]That she has. That you have Saj. I've focused it all into one post instead of it being mentioned here and there. I still give you your credit.worthyofnoteAnd you yours good sir... and you yours. :) Thank you. *bows* This is a bit off topic, but I finally picked up The Mailroom, interesting read so far. Oh awesome! Feel free to pm me or catch me on aim to talk about it. I can tell you what still and doesnt happen anymore. It's great to see what the people who run/ran Hollywood had to go through yeah?
Look at UFC when it first started and see what happens when you don't give them rules. Screw MMA put a muay thai guy in there >.>
Are we talking traditional Muay Thai for self defense, or comepetitive Muay Thai which is used in sanctioned bouts? There is a difference. And some mixed martial artists train in Muay Thai. Muay Thai as a form of combat trains the fighter to be proficient in striking with eight points of interest instead of four or five as is the case with most traditional martial arts. I don't see why any mma fighter wouldn't want a solid background in Muay Thai.Look at UFC when it first started and see what happens when you don't give them rules. Screw MMA put a muay thai guy in there >.>
FreezeBlast95
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment