Everything in this thread is so wrong.
Acting was bad in older movies? Have you heard of Marlon Brando, Chaplin, Keaton, "early" De Niro.
Cinematography bad? Have you seen a good movie from these years?
Bad plot? Oh jeez, I don't even know where to start. 2001, Lawrence of Arabia, M, 8 1/2, La Dolce Vita, Nights of Cabiria, The Seventh Seal and on and on.
This is shameful if this is what the general public thinks. Actually I take that back, its utterly despicable.
Wolfetan
you need to put it in context.
We (or at least, I) never said acting and filmmaking was bad back in the day. I never said old movies are bad.
What I did say, however, is that by today's standards, they do not hold up well. Film is an extremely young art, and a lot of the films before the 1960s were pretty much pioneers of filmmaking. They were fortunate enough to get in early and essentially set the standard. THey are respected not just because they were good (for their time), but because they were lucky enough to be good first.
Not everyone (most everyone, actually) is a film buff. We can't watch a movie from Russia made during the 1950's and put or minds in the correct state to appreciate the subtle rebellion against communism the director is making during Stalin's reign. Its not ignorance, its naivety. So when someone says an old movie is boring or they think the black and white film looks too old-fashioned...guess what? They are right.
Movies of the first 2/3 of the 20th century were made for that type of audience. Baby Boomers, people that survived the Great Depression, people that fought in WWII and Korea, and more. And that was fine. But now its time to appreciate current movies as well, and to not hold them to a dated standard, but to hold them to their own standard.
I refuse to compare every vampire movie to Nosferatu, every Western to The Searchers, every romance to Gone With The Wind, and every comedy to The Three Stooges
Log in to comment