Why do obese people in the US always say they don't eat much?

  • 182 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for cain006
cain006

8625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 38

User Lists: 0

#101 cain006
Member since 2008 • 8625 Posts

Say you had that for lunch, the issue is that the meal you just had, closes in on the 2000 calorie diet, and oddly enough, pretty much all other combos or actual meal combos come close or pass that. In fact, you could potentiall reach right next to 2000 at mdonalds with some menu items. not even counting in cookies or mcflurries for desert.

Eddie-Murphy48

That's not true. The big combos are usually around 1100-1200 calories including the soda.

Avatar image for mrbojangles25
mrbojangles25

60740

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#102 mrbojangles25
Member since 2005 • 60740 Posts

Its tough to explain.  I am very obese (morbidly so, as the doctors call it), but I have also been overweight my whole life.

In my opinion, though, anyone that is significantly overweight needs to be approached as if they have a psychological problem, not a physical one.  Treating the weight is the wrong approach; they need to reframe their view, and make mental lifestyle changes, not just "walk" and "go to the gym".

I was an athlete growing up, went to college, started training for strongman competitions.  Somewhere along the line, something happened, and I got fat.

Avatar image for MrPraline
MrPraline

21351

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#103 MrPraline
Member since 2008 • 21351 Posts
I don't know. It's easy to claim that obese people eat too much and that being thin is a choice but life its a little bit more complicated than that. Not sure what the purpose of viewing the world in black and white is. Undermines its complexity.
Avatar image for Rich3232
Rich3232

2628

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#104 Rich3232
Member since 2012 • 2628 Posts
I don't know. It's easy to claim that obese people eat too much and that being thin is a choice but life its a little bit more complicated than that. Not sure what the purpose of viewing the world in black and white is. Undermines its complexity. MrPraline
Makes it easier for people to point fingers and demonize and dehumanize.
Avatar image for MrPraline
MrPraline

21351

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#105 MrPraline
Member since 2008 • 21351 Posts
[QUOTE="MrPraline"]I don't know. It's easy to claim that obese people eat too much and that being thin is a choice but life its a little bit more complicated than that. Not sure what the purpose of viewing the world in black and white is. Undermines its complexity. Rich3232
Makes it easier for people to point fingers and demonize and dehumanize.

Yeah, true. Wish people would just mind their own f*cking business.
Avatar image for Slashless
Slashless

9534

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 88

User Lists: 0

#106 Slashless
Member since 2011 • 9534 Posts

[QUOTE="Slashless"][QUOTE="Ackad"]http://thisiswhyyourefat.com/jhcho2

>Domino's Mayonnaise pizza wUt

Haha. That caught my attention as well. That one in particular.

Yeah what the hell.

Mayonnaise itself is disgusting and you want it on your PIZZA???

In fact most of that stuff doesn't even look remotely appetizing.

>Dat disgusting excuse for a burrito

>pizza fries, the most overrated food in existance

>dat baco (wtf?)

>the super guser (gushers are terrible)

I will admit though

dat Kit kat cake

cut-mm-cake.jpg

who wants to live to 40 anyway? \0/

Avatar image for Rich3232
Rich3232

2628

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#107 Rich3232
Member since 2012 • 2628 Posts
[QUOTE="Rich3232"][QUOTE="MrPraline"]I don't know. It's easy to claim that obese people eat too much and that being thin is a choice but life its a little bit more complicated than that. Not sure what the purpose of viewing the world in black and white is. Undermines its complexity. MrPraline
Makes it easier for people to point fingers and demonize and dehumanize.

Yeah, true. Wish people would just mind their own f*cking business.

Here is my final point...About drugs, about alcohol, about pornography...What business is it of yours what I do, read, buy, see, or take into my body as long as I do not harm another human being on this planet? And for those who are having a little moral dilemma in your head about how to answer that question, I'll answer it for you. NONE of your **** business. Take that to the bank, cash it, and go **** on a vacation out of my life. - Bill Hicks
Avatar image for MrPraline
MrPraline

21351

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#108 MrPraline
Member since 2008 • 21351 Posts
[QUOTE="Rich3232"][QUOTE="MrPraline"][QUOTE="Rich3232"] Makes it easier for people to point fingers and demonize and dehumanize.

Yeah, true. Wish people would just mind their own f*cking business.

Here is my final point...About drugs, about alcohol, about pornography...What business is it of yours what I do, read, buy, see, or take into my body as long as I do not harm another human being on this planet? And for those who are having a little moral dilemma in your head about how to answer that question, I'll answer it for you. NONE of your **** business. Take that to the bank, cash it, and go **** on a vacation out of my life. - Bill Hicks

Love it.
Avatar image for MakeMeaSammitch
MakeMeaSammitch

4889

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#109 MakeMeaSammitch
Member since 2012 • 4889 Posts

denial.

Avatar image for jhcho2
jhcho2

5103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 2

#110 jhcho2
Member since 2004 • 5103 Posts

Cheap food have empty calories.

US is all about cars and driving around and you dont get excersise.

So the intake is high and the output is low.

 

I live in tokyo where you have to walk and use public transport so you get to burn a great deal of calories, as well as have a culture of drinking tea, not soda and juice.

So naturally it seems people are a lot slimmer here.

 

A lot of friends that went to live abroad come back massive so there has to be a corelation.

Angie7F

There are many other countries in Asia which do not have as good a transport system as Japan, and yet do not have an obesity problem. Japanese food is generally quite healthy, with a lot of things being raw, or just cooked in a very minimal way.

Avatar image for jhcho2
jhcho2

5103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 2

#111 jhcho2
Member since 2004 • 5103 Posts

[QUOTE="MrPraline"][QUOTE="Rich3232"] Makes it easier for people to point fingers and demonize and dehumanize. Rich3232
Yeah, true. Wish people would just mind their own f*cking business.

Here is my final point...About drugs, about alcohol, about pornography...What business is it of yours what I do, read, buy, see, or take into my body as long as I do not harm another human being on this planet? And for those who are having a little moral dilemma in your head about how to answer that question, I'll answer it for you. NONE of your **** business. Take that to the bank, cash it, and go **** on a vacation out of my life. - Bill Hicks

Well, if people get so fat until they block an entire isle in the supermarket, and have difficulty to even move aside to let me pass, why is it not my business? And obese people have a tendency to take up 2 seats in cinemas, planes, trains or buses. It impacts the public. You can't compare it to watching pr0n, whereby you do it in private.

Avatar image for jhcho2
jhcho2

5103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 2

#112 jhcho2
Member since 2004 • 5103 Posts

the only people who think all americans are obese like the OP are people from other countries who are just jealous of us. Don't blame us that we're better then you and mother didn't hug u enough ;)

kickingcarpet

lol, I don't believe i said all Americans are obese, but studies show that one in every three adults is obese in America. That's extremely high, and feels like almost every other person passing by is obese.

Avatar image for leeveeu
leeveeu

3405

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#113 leeveeu
Member since 2003 • 3405 Posts
Afaik 2000 kcal is for a moderately active person. If you take in 2000 kcal and just sit in front of the tv/computer it's too much.
Avatar image for Rich3232
Rich3232

2628

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#114 Rich3232
Member since 2012 • 2628 Posts

[QUOTE="Rich3232"][QUOTE="MrPraline"] Yeah, true. Wish people would just mind their own f*cking business.jhcho2

Here is my final point...About drugs, about alcohol, about pornography...What business is it of yours what I do, read, buy, see, or take into my body as long as I do not harm another human being on this planet? And for those who are having a little moral dilemma in your head about how to answer that question, I'll answer it for you. NONE of your **** business. Take that to the bank, cash it, and go **** on a vacation out of my life. - Bill Hicks

Well, if people get so fat until they block an entire isle in the supermarket, and have difficulty to even move aside to let me pass, why is it not my business? And obese people have a tendency to take up 2 seats in cinemas, planes, trains or buses. It impacts the public. You can't compare it to watching pr0n, whereby you do it in private.

I didn't say they were free from the consequences of their choices. My issue is when the fascists in power use this excuse to pass large, sweeping bans/unnecessary restrictions based on the small minority. Also, demonizing/dehumanizing is never the way to go when solving issues.
Avatar image for This_Is_Not
This_Is_Not

2421

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#115 This_Is_Not
Member since 2003 • 2421 Posts

Poverty, wealth inequality, car culture, and a poor educational system in the U.S. plays a large part in our obesity problem. When you're born into a toxic environment spending billions to control your mind it's going to be harder to overcome it.

Edit: As well as a dysfunctional healthcare system.

Avatar image for Nibroc420
Nibroc420

13571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#116 Nibroc420
Member since 2007 • 13571 Posts


it is not a scientific scale, it holds no sound theory other than the rantings of an 18th C  quack who tried to scale his frame up and down in height, because he thought he had the perfect body. if weak and anemic is healthy, i suggest you pick up a modern text book and find the definition of "healthy" surrealnumber5


18th century? Try 1900's.

BMI provided a simple numeric measure of a person's thickness or thinness, allowing health professionals to discuss overweight and underweight problems more objectively with their patients. However, BMI has become controversial because many people, including physicians, have come to rely on its apparent numerical authority for medical diagnosis, but that was never the BMI's purpose; it is meant to be used as a simple means of classifying sedentary (physically inactive) individuals, or rather, populations, with an average body composition.

Those idiots who tell you BMI makes them overweight or even obese, dispite the fact they run daily and have a body fat of 8%, simply are not using it correctly.

Avatar image for kickingcarpet
kickingcarpet

570

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#117 kickingcarpet
Member since 2011 • 570 Posts

I just don't understand why everybody NOT from the USA thinks 1 in every 2 americans is a fattie blahblahblah you've never been here, and honestly I'm around a lot of people daily and i see very few obese. I'd say obesity is more of a 1-25 thing or more, you can't stand outside a McDonalds and take the statistic....your just an arrogant fool

 

People from England seem to be fatter then us, from the clips and videos i've seen of their news I see alot of "big boned" borderline obese people..

Avatar image for jhcho2
jhcho2

5103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 2

#118 jhcho2
Member since 2004 • 5103 Posts

[QUOTE="jhcho2"]

[QUOTE="Rich3232"] Here is my final point...About drugs, about alcohol, about pornography...What business is it of yours what I do, read, buy, see, or take into my body as long as I do not harm another human being on this planet? And for those who are having a little moral dilemma in your head about how to answer that question, I'll answer it for you. NONE of your **** business. Take that to the bank, cash it, and go **** on a vacation out of my life. - Bill Hickssurrealnumber5

Well, if people get so fat until they block an entire isle in the supermarket, and have difficulty to even move aside to let me pass, why is it not my business? And obese people have a tendency to take up 2 seats in cinemas, planes, trains or buses. It impacts the public. You can't compare it to watching pr0n, whereby you do it in private.

because you dont own that busines, who the hell are you to say they cant block the isles with fat, that is not a decision for you to have at any level. it is not your property or your life that you are deeming that you control. the fatass in your case is already living a shitty life without you shaming him or her and attempting to make their being illegal. "impact the public" kinda like discarding a swath of the population because you disagree with a life style. you might as well be race or sex bashing. you offend my eyes and there for i own the right to force you not to offend my eyes, the same moral call as the racists and sexists.

Most people would not compare discriminating fat people with being sexist or racist. People don't get to choose their sex or race at birth. In the case of being fat...you could simply just be a little more disciplined.

And your argument about not blocking the isle thing is just plain stupid. That's just like saying that a smoker has the right to make everyone else around him/her second hand smokers just because nobody owns the place, and he/she can pretty much do what he wants. And in case you didn't know, isles in supermarkets are something like 7 feet wide. clearly meant to fit more than one person. No human being should eat himself/herself till they take up the full 7 feet width.

And you're finding fault with the BMI now? The BMI ratio may not be fully applicable to body builders, but that's because muscle weighs more than fat. And the last time I checked, having muscle isn't nearly as unhealthy as having the equivalent weight of fat. And more importantly, to gain muscle, you must have been burning off a lot of energy. You gain fat when you're clearly not exercising enough. See the disparity there? The main point of the BMI is to give a ballpark indication of how much you weigh relative to your height. So if you're say...5' 9" tall, and weigh 400 pounds, and you're not a body builder, then something is clearly not right. It's no more complicated than that. However, the trend I notice among Americans is to dismiss the evidence, and then blame it on trauma, psychology, genetics (lol) and whatever they can think of.

Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#119 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

[QUOTE="Rich3232"][QUOTE="MrPraline"] Yeah, true. Wish people would just mind their own f*cking business.jhcho2

Here is my final point...About drugs, about alcohol, about pornography...What business is it of yours what I do, read, buy, see, or take into my body as long as I do not harm another human being on this planet? And for those who are having a little moral dilemma in your head about how to answer that question, I'll answer it for you. NONE of your **** business. Take that to the bank, cash it, and go **** on a vacation out of my life. - Bill Hicks

Well, if people get so fat until they block an entire isle in the supermarket, and have difficulty to even move aside to let me pass, why is it not my business? And obese people have a tendency to take up 2 seats in cinemas, planes, trains or buses. It impacts the public. You can't compare it to watching pr0n, whereby you do it in private.

because you dont own that busines, who the hell are you to say they cant block the isles with fat, that is not a decision for you to have at any level. it is not your property or your life that you are deeming that you control. the fatass in your case is already living a shitty life without you shaming him or her and attempting to make their being illegal. "impact the public" kinda like discarding a swath of the population because you disagree with a life style. you might as well be race or sex bashing. you offend my eyes and there for i own the right to force you not to offend my eyes, the same moral call as the racists and sexists.
Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#120 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

[QUOTE="kickingcarpet"]

the only people who think all americans are obese like the OP are people from other countries who are just jealous of us. Don't blame us that we're better then you and mother didn't hug u enough ;)

jhcho2

lol, I don't believe i said all Americans are obese, but studies show that one in every three adults is obese in America. That's extremely high, and feels like almost every other person passing by is obese.

BMI is not to be used for anything EVER EVER.
Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#121 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"][QUOTE="jhcho2"]

Well, if people get so fat until they block an entire isle in the supermarket, and have difficulty to even move aside to let me pass, why is it not my business? And obese people have a tendency to take up 2 seats in cinemas, planes, trains or buses. It impacts the public. You can't compare it to watching pr0n, whereby you do it in private.

jhcho2

because you dont own that busines, who the hell are you to say they cant block the isles with fat, that is not a decision for you to have at any level. it is not your property or your life that you are deeming that you control. the fatass in your case is already living a shitty life without you shaming him or her and attempting to make their being illegal. "impact the public" kinda like discarding a swath of the population because you disagree with a life style. you might as well be race or sex bashing. you offend my eyes and there for i own the right to force you not to offend my eyes, the same moral call as the racists and sexists.

Most people would not compare discriminating fat people with being sexist or racist. People don't get to choose their sex or race at birth. In the case of being fat...you could simply just be a little more disciplined.

And your argument about not blocking the isle thing is just plain stupid. That's just like saying that a smoker has the right to make everyone else around him/her second hand smokers just because nobody owns the place, and he/she can pretty much do what he wants. And in case you didn't know, isles in supermarkets are something like 7 feet wide. clearly meant to fit more than one person. No human being should eat himself/herself till they take up the full 7 feet width.

And you're finding fault with the BMI now? The BMI ratio may not be fully applicable to body builders, but that's because muscle weighs more than fat. And the last time I checked, having muscle isn't nearly as unhealthy as having the equivalent weight of fat. And more importantly, to gain muscle, you must have been burning off a lot of energy. You gain fat when you're clearly not exercising enough. See the disparity there? The main point of the BMI is to give a ballpark indication of how much you weigh relative to your height. So if you're say...5' 9" tall, and weigh 400 pounds, and you're not a body builder, then something is clearly not right. It's no more complicated than that. However, the trend I notice among Americans is to dismiss the evidence, and then blame it on trauma, psychology, genetics (lol) and whatever they can think of.

i am not for smoking Nazism either... only stupid people try to make exceptions the rules, as of 2008 the average male weight was 189 pounds, and you are talking about people several deviations away from that and then you are using this to base an argument of controlling other peoples lives. this is not a respectable argument, not by any objective measure i am aware of

Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#122 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"]i am not for smoking Nazism either... only stupid people try to make exceptions the rules, as of 2008 the average male weight was 189 pounds, and you are talking about people several deviations away from that and then you are using this to base an argument of controlling other peoples lives. this is not a respectable argument, not be any objective measure i am aware of jhcho2

189 pounds is rather fair for an average male. Obese people easily weigh 300 pounds. I'm not even going to the extreme of 500 or 600 pounds. Those are contenders for being top 100 fattest people in the world. But even for 300 pounds, that's not merely several 'deviations' away from 189 pounds. Again this could turn into a semantical debate about what one deviation means in this context. Since the obesity rate in America is incresing, it is also becoming more and more common, meaning that normal distribution curve would flatten out, and the magnitude of one deviation would be larger. But I don't think that's the point.

Obese people are just really fat people who we can identify as being fat just by a single glance. It doesn't have to be more complicated than that. And we don't even have to talk about those on the borderline of being obese. Many people are clearly way pass the borderline and are downright obese. The labeling and stimatization arises due to these people being way heavier than a normal human being should be. 40 to 50 years ago, this kind of weight and size was unheard of. Only now, is it becoming commonplace. And these obese people are trying to claim that it's somewhat 'normal' to be such. Any kind of pressure is interpreted as an insult or stigma. The cause is blamed on food companies and genetics. It's just the American way. What do we do when we have school shootings? Blame the NRA. Blame video games. Blame Hollywood. Err....why isn't parenthood ever mentioned? The fear of victimizing people the way fat people are being victimized? Probably. Coincidence? Nope.

obese starts at 143 lbs @ 4'10" and goes up to 243 lbs for 6'4, if you think those are obese that is why i am deriding you. But who needs to argue what is when you can cry emotion and feelings.

Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#123 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

BMI, for people who think a 6 foot 4 man is "healthy" if he is 156 pounds..... HEALTHY! go tell that to someone 6'4"



Average American height 5 9 average weight 189 OMG the average American man is over weight(according to BMI) and if this average had a form he would look absolutely ordinary. not like a 600 pound wheelchair bound chocolate siphoning fat machine, but like the standard extra in a movie. but ZOMG the 1800 and all of its great medical quackeries were right, we must have a flood tide of amorphous blobs flooding the streets.

Avatar image for Nibroc420
Nibroc420

13571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#124 Nibroc420
Member since 2007 • 13571 Posts
[QUOTE="jhcho2"]

[QUOTE="kickingcarpet"]

the only people who think all americans are obese like the OP are people from other countries who are just jealous of us. Don't blame us that we're better then you and mother didn't hug u enough ;)

surrealnumber5

lol, I don't believe i said all Americans are obese, but studies show that one in every three adults is obese in America. That's extremely high, and feels like almost every other person passing by is obese.

BMI is not to be used for anything EVER EVER.

It was intended for usage in sedentary people. People who work out 24/7 and are muscle machines are the idiots who simply cannot use it correctly.
Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#125 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts
[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"][QUOTE="jhcho2"]

lol, I don't believe i said all Americans are obese, but studies show that one in every three adults is obese in America. That's extremely high, and feels like almost every other person passing by is obese.

Nibroc420
BMI is not to be used for anything EVER EVER.

It was intended for usage in sedentary people. People who work out 24/7 and are muscle machines are the idiots who simply cannot use it correctly.

it is not a scientific scale, it holds no sound theory other than the rantings of an 18th C quack who tried to scale his frame up and down in height, because he thought he had the perfect body. if weak and anemic is healthy, i suggest you pick up a modern text book and find the definition of "healthy"
Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#126 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"][QUOTE="Nibroc420"] /facepalm Wikipedia has citations, in this case, it goes to a report done(and hosted by) the World Health Organization. I'm going to take a committee of world renowned doctors and nutritionists over a personal trainer with a few "cirts" who cannot follow simple citations to find how credible a source of information is.Nibroc420
what the BMI IS and how it was created and the theory behind it are not up for debate, and yet you are debating it. weight and height are not measures of health, they cant be as those things are not material to ones health. ignoring body composition, nutrition, and other factors like age genetics and history all of whom are measures of health. what about vitals? blood pressure, sugar levels, hell water consumption has more to do with general health than weight and height.

I'm not going to argue with you, you have the internet, you clearly have some grasp of the english language. I will tell you, when people who're exercising regularly start using a BMI chart, they're using a BMI chart wrong. BMI's are used on an individual basis when talking about SEDENTARY PEOPLE, not those gym nuts who are 6'0 and have 250lbs of muscle. They can also be used to talk about the general health/fitness levels of a group of people. IE: A group of kids entering Fat-camp, should have have a higher BMI than when they're leaving that fat-camp. Yes, levels of nutrition in the body in regards to sugar/water/blood pressure are all very important, but how does one obtain that in a 15 minute consultation?

i am telling you using the BMI at all is using it wrong, because its basis is wrong. i take my vitals all the time, its not hard. people who are making fun of fat people for being lazy in their life are using the same argument they assume fat people use with regards to their own health. i dont take sugar levels because i am not diabetic but i do blood pressure often as well as resting heart rate and other measures a few times a week. when you care about your health you really care, it is the difference between being a political activist on the internet and being an active protester. you seem to pretend to care, but only to the extent that it forms to your already set ways, kinda like fat people.

Avatar image for kickingcarpet
kickingcarpet

570

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#127 kickingcarpet
Member since 2011 • 570 Posts

Ever stop to consider that maybe some people are just big boned

Avatar image for GrannyGoat
GrannyGoat

1190

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#128 GrannyGoat
Member since 2010 • 1190 Posts

Fat women love to claim they have thyroid problems, metabolism disorders, hormone issues. No fatties, just no. 

Avatar image for GrannyGoat
GrannyGoat

1190

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#129 GrannyGoat
Member since 2010 • 1190 Posts

The obesity epidemic is not just happening in the US it is happening in most western countries remember. I blame it on the people who shop for these people their families are killing them.seahorse123
I was recently in England and they are just as fat as the USA> 

Avatar image for Nibroc420
Nibroc420

13571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#130 Nibroc420
Member since 2007 • 13571 Posts
I'll never forget watching that reality TV show where a nutritionist goes into a home and works with a family. They were insistent about it being genetic, yet their kitchen was stocked with sugary foods, and they had a huge drawer dedicated to chocolate bars (which they noted was always fully stocked) SMH.
Avatar image for GrannyGoat
GrannyGoat

1190

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#131 GrannyGoat
Member since 2010 • 1190 Posts

I hate how fat women are all "curvy" now and if you don't find fat women attractive you must be gay and "like little boys bodies". Why do fat women love to tell men what they should be attracted to, yet nobody tells women they should be attracted to fat men? 

Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#132 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"]
it is not a scientific scale, it holds no sound theory other than the rantings of an 18th C  quack who tried to scale his frame up and down in height, because he thought he had the perfect body. if weak and anemic is healthy, i suggest you pick up a modern text book and find the definition of "healthy" Nibroc420



18th century? Try 1900's.

BMI provided a simple numeric measure of a person's thickness or thinness, allowing health professionals to discuss overweight and underweight problems more objectively with their patients. However, BMI has become controversial because many people, including physicians, have come to rely on its apparent numerical authority for medical diagnosis, but that was never the BMI's purpose; it is meant to be used as a simple means of classifying sedentary (physically inactive) individuals, or rather, populations, with an average body composition.

Those idiots who tell you BMI makes them overweight or even obese, dispite the fact they run daily and have a body fat of 8%, simply are not using it correctly.

if it is not accurate for individuals how can it possibly be accurate for populations of individuals, it is not like the body mass index was created to measure what a person boy mass is comprised of, just that their is a homogeneous target for heterogeneous populations. the ectomorph minimum should not be held as an ideal by anyone who is not naturally aligned to that body type. if any other variation should choose this ideal as their goal they are at risk of hurting them selves or possible death from unnecessarily organ stress. using and promoting a standard that may well do more harm than good is not a good thing.
Avatar image for Nibroc420
Nibroc420

13571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#133 Nibroc420
Member since 2007 • 13571 Posts
[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"] if it is not accurate for individuals how can it possibly be accurate for populations of individuals, it is not like the body mass index was created to measure what a person boy mass is comprised of, just that their is a homogeneous target for heterogeneous populations.

You failed to understand Wikipedia. Is there an award for that?
Avatar image for Murderstyle75
Murderstyle75

4412

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#134 Murderstyle75
Member since 2011 • 4412 Posts

[QUOTE="kickingcarpet"]

the only people who think all americans are obese like the OP are people from other countries who are just jealous of us. Don't blame us that we're better then you and mother didn't hug u enough ;)

jhcho2

lol, I don't believe i said all Americans are obese, but studies show that one in every three adults is obese in America. That's extremely high, and feels like almost every other person passing by is obese.

But what defines obese? When we think obese, we are picturing the woman with three chins grocery shopping from the electric cart at Walmart. The data these studies go by actually label somebody who looks completely normal with the exception of a few extra pounds around the mid section as being obese. As somebody else mentioned, BMI is bullshit but that is what the studies are based on. Meanwhile there is no way to take things like bone density and muscle mass into account. Now instead of having toned and fit arms and legs, I could have flabby ones and weigh exactly the same or less.
Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#135 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts
[QUOTE="Nibroc420"][QUOTE="surrealnumber5"] if it is not accurate for individuals how can it possibly be accurate for populations of individuals, it is not like the body mass index was created to measure what a person boy mass is comprised of, just that their is a homogeneous target for heterogeneous populations.

You failed to understand Wikipedia. Is there an award for that?

appeal to authority, sadly wiki has none and my first profession was as a personal trainer, i had several cirts including two from the NASM including a FNS and PSE. you failed at getting an actual understanding of the material and measures.
Avatar image for Nibroc420
Nibroc420

13571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#136 Nibroc420
Member since 2007 • 13571 Posts
[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"][QUOTE="Nibroc420"][QUOTE="surrealnumber5"] if it is not accurate for individuals how can it possibly be accurate for populations of individuals, it is not like the body mass index was created to measure what a person boy mass is comprised of, just that their is a homogeneous target for heterogeneous populations.

You failed to understand Wikipedia. Is there an award for that?

appeal to authority, sadly wiki has none and my first profession was as a personal trainer, i had several cirts including two from the NASM including a FNS and PSE. you failed at getting an actual understanding of the material and measures.

/facepalm Wikipedia has citations, in this case, it goes to a report done(and hosted by) the World Health Organization. I'm going to take a committee of world renowned doctors and nutritionists over a personal trainer with a few "cirts" who cannot follow simple citations to find how credible a source of information is.
Avatar image for jhcho2
jhcho2

5103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 2

#137 jhcho2
Member since 2004 • 5103 Posts

[QUOTE="jhcho2"]

[QUOTE="kickingcarpet"]

the only people who think all americans are obese like the OP are people from other countries who are just jealous of us. Don't blame us that we're better then you and mother didn't hug u enough ;)

Murderstyle75

lol, I don't believe i said all Americans are obese, but studies show that one in every three adults is obese in America. That's extremely high, and feels like almost every other person passing by is obese.

But what defines obese? When we think obese, we are picturing the woman with three chins grocery shopping from the electric cart at Walmart. The data these studies go by actually label somebody who looks completely normal with the exception of a few extra pounds around the mid section as being obese. As somebody else mentioned, BMI is bullshit but that is what the studies are based on. Meanwhile there is no way to take things like bone density and muscle mass into account. Now instead of having toned and fit arms and legs, I could have flabby ones and weigh exactly the same or less.

Someone who has a few extra pounds around the mid-section is categorized as 'overweight', not obese. That's why I never used the term 'overweight', as there is a lot of room for a semantical debate. Obese is normally one whole category beyond just being overweight. So...it's not just a few extra pounds like you said. To be obese, you'd have to be something like a hundred pounds heavier than a normal person.

Avatar image for Nibroc420
Nibroc420

13571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#138 Nibroc420
Member since 2007 • 13571 Posts

[QUOTE="Murderstyle75"][QUOTE="jhcho2"]

lol, I don't believe i said all Americans are obese, but studies show that one in every three adults is obese in America. That's extremely high, and feels like almost every other person passing by is obese.

jhcho2

But what defines obese? When we think obese, we are picturing the woman with three chins grocery shopping from the electric cart at Walmart. The data these studies go by actually label somebody who looks completely normal with the exception of a few extra pounds around the mid section as being obese. As somebody else mentioned, BMI is bullshit but that is what the studies are based on. Meanwhile there is no way to take things like bone density and muscle mass into account. Now instead of having toned and fit arms and legs, I could have flabby ones and weigh exactly the same or less.

Someone who has a few extra pounds around the mid-section is categorized as 'overweight', not obese. That's why I never used the term 'overweight', as there is a lot of room for a semantical debate. Obese is normally one whole category beyond just being overweight. So...it's not just a few extra pounds like you said. To be obese, you'd have to be something like a hundred pounds heavier than a normal person.

a hundred pounds of "extra weight" looks a lot more than it sounds.
Avatar image for jhcho2
jhcho2

5103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 2

#139 jhcho2
Member since 2004 • 5103 Posts

[QUOTE="jhcho2"]

[QUOTE="Murderstyle75"] But what defines obese? When we think obese, we are picturing the woman with three chins grocery shopping from the electric cart at Walmart. The data these studies go by actually label somebody who looks completely normal with the exception of a few extra pounds around the mid section as being obese. As somebody else mentioned, BMI is bullshit but that is what the studies are based on. Meanwhile there is no way to take things like bone density and muscle mass into account. Now instead of having toned and fit arms and legs, I could have flabby ones and weigh exactly the same or less.Nibroc420

Someone who has a few extra pounds around the mid-section is categorized as 'overweight', not obese. That's why I never used the term 'overweight', as there is a lot of room for a semantical debate. Obese is normally one whole category beyond just being overweight. So...it's not just a few extra pounds like you said. To be obese, you'd have to be something like a hundred pounds heavier than a normal person.

a hundred pounds of "extra weight" looks a lot more than it sounds.

I know. It's like having the entire weight of a young teen on you.

Avatar image for Nibroc420
Nibroc420

13571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#140 Nibroc420
Member since 2007 • 13571 Posts

[QUOTE="Nibroc420"][QUOTE="jhcho2"]

Someone who has a few extra pounds around the mid-section is categorized as 'overweight', not obese. That's why I never used the term 'overweight', as there is a lot of room for a semantical debate. Obese is normally one whole category beyond just being overweight. So...it's not just a few extra pounds like you said. To be obese, you'd have to be something like a hundred pounds heavier than a normal person.

jhcho2

a hundred pounds of "extra weight" looks a lot more than it sounds.

I know. It's like having the entire weight of a young teen on you.

But a teen has bone/muscle etc. 100lbs of fat takes more space.
Avatar image for jhcho2
jhcho2

5103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 2

#141 jhcho2
Member since 2004 • 5103 Posts

[QUOTE="jhcho2"]

[QUOTE="Nibroc420"] a hundred pounds of "extra weight" looks a lot more than it sounds.Nibroc420

I know. It's like having the entire weight of a young teen on you.

But a teen has bone/muscle etc. 100lbs of fat takes more space.

Tell that to the self-conscious fat people, and the ones who are trying thier best to discredit the BMI system. Not that I think the BMI system is perfect, but it gives a pretty good representation. You can't possibly have a BMI of over 40 and still argue that you're not obese.

Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#142 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts
[QUOTE="Nibroc420"][QUOTE="surrealnumber5"][QUOTE="Nibroc420"] You failed to understand Wikipedia. Is there an award for that?

appeal to authority, sadly wiki has none and my first profession was as a personal trainer, i had several cirts including two from the NASM including a FNS and PSE. you failed at getting an actual understanding of the material and measures.

/facepalm Wikipedia has citations, in this case, it goes to a report done(and hosted by) the World Health Organization. I'm going to take a committee of world renowned doctors and nutritionists over a personal trainer with a few "cirts" who cannot follow simple citations to find how credible a source of information is.

what the BMI IS and how it was created and the theory behind it are not up for debate, and yet you are debating it. weight and height are not measures of health, they cant be as those things are not material to ones health. ignoring body composition, nutrition, and other factors like age genetics and history all of whom are measures of health. what about vitals? blood pressure, sugar levels, hell water consumption has more to do with general health than weight and height.
Avatar image for jhcho2
jhcho2

5103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 2

#143 jhcho2
Member since 2004 • 5103 Posts

i am not for smoking Nazism either... only stupid people try to make exceptions the rules, as of 2008 the average male weight was 189 pounds, and you are talking about people several deviations away from that and then you are using this to base an argument of controlling other peoples lives. this is not a respectable argument, not be any objective measure i am aware of surrealnumber5

189 pounds is rather fair for an average male. Obese people easily weigh 300 pounds. I'm not even going to the extreme of 500 or 600 pounds. Those are contenders for being top 100 fattest people in the world. But even for 300 pounds, that's not merely several 'deviations' away from 189 pounds. Again this could turn into a semantical debate about what one deviation means in this context. Since the obesity rate in America is incresing, it is also becoming more and more common, meaning that normal distribution curve would flatten out, and the magnitude of one deviation would be larger. But I don't think that's the point.

Obese people are just really fat people who we can identify as being fat just by a single glance. It doesn't have to be more complicated than that. And we don't even have to talk about those on the borderline of being obese. Many people are clearly way pass the borderline and are downright obese. The labeling and stimatization arises due to these people being way heavier than a normal human being should be. 40 to 50 years ago, this kind of weight and size was unheard of. Only now, is it becoming commonplace. And these obese people are trying to claim that it's somewhat 'normal' to be such. Any kind of pressure is interpreted as an insult or stigma. The cause is blamed on food companies and genetics. It's just the American way. What do we do when we have school shootings? Blame the NRA. Blame video games. Blame Hollywood. Err....why isn't parenthood ever mentioned? The fear of victimizing people the way fat people are being victimized? Probably. Coincidence? Nope.

Avatar image for jhcho2
jhcho2

5103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 2

#144 jhcho2
Member since 2004 • 5103 Posts

[QUOTE="Nibroc420"][QUOTE="surrealnumber5"] appeal to authority, sadly wiki has none and my first profession was as a personal trainer, i had several cirts including two from the NASM including a FNS and PSE. you failed at getting an actual understanding of the material and measures. surrealnumber5
/facepalm Wikipedia has citations, in this case, it goes to a report done(and hosted by) the World Health Organization. I'm going to take a committee of world renowned doctors and nutritionists over a personal trainer with a few "cirts" who cannot follow simple citations to find how credible a source of information is.

what the BMI IS and how it was created and the theory behind it are not up for debate, and yet you are debating it. weight and height are not measures of health, they cant be as those things are not material to ones health. ignoring body composition, nutrition, and other factors like age genetics and history all of whom are measures of health. what about vitals? blood pressure, sugar levels, hell water consumption has more to do with general health than weight and height.

Being fit and being healthy are two different things. We all know that. If your BMI is within the normal range, it means you're fit, but it doesn't mean you're healthy. Similarly, when your BMI is say...40, clearly you are very unfit. However, if you're that unfit, chances are you're not healthy either. You can't have that much excess fat relative to your height, without having some adverse health complication.

Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#145 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"][QUOTE="Nibroc420"] /facepalm Wikipedia has citations, in this case, it goes to a report done(and hosted by) the World Health Organization. I'm going to take a committee of world renowned doctors and nutritionists over a personal trainer with a few "cirts" who cannot follow simple citations to find how credible a source of information is.jhcho2

what the BMI IS and how it was created and the theory behind it are not up for debate, and yet you are debating it. weight and height are not measures of health, they cant be as those things are not material to ones health. ignoring body composition, nutrition, and other factors like age genetics and history all of whom are measures of health. what about vitals? blood pressure, sugar levels, hell water consumption has more to do with general health than weight and height.

Being fit and being healthy are two different things. We all know that. If your BMI is within the normal range, it means you're fit, but it doesn't mean you're healthy. Similarly, when your BMI is say...40, clearly you are very unfit. However, if you're that unfit, chances are you're not healthy either. You can't have that much excess fat relative to your height, without having some adverse health complication.

BMI does not measure "fit" or "fitness" go read a dictionary and get back to me when you know the words you are using.
Avatar image for Nibroc420
Nibroc420

13571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#146 Nibroc420
Member since 2007 • 13571 Posts
[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"][QUOTE="Nibroc420"][QUOTE="surrealnumber5"] appeal to authority, sadly wiki has none and my first profession was as a personal trainer, i had several cirts including two from the NASM including a FNS and PSE. you failed at getting an actual understanding of the material and measures.

/facepalm Wikipedia has citations, in this case, it goes to a report done(and hosted by) the World Health Organization. I'm going to take a committee of world renowned doctors and nutritionists over a personal trainer with a few "cirts" who cannot follow simple citations to find how credible a source of information is.

what the BMI IS and how it was created and the theory behind it are not up for debate, and yet you are debating it. weight and height are not measures of health, they cant be as those things are not material to ones health. ignoring body composition, nutrition, and other factors like age genetics and history all of whom are measures of health. what about vitals? blood pressure, sugar levels, hell water consumption has more to do with general health than weight and height.

I'm not going to argue with you, you have the internet, you clearly have some grasp of the english language. I will tell you, when people who're exercising regularly start using a BMI chart, they're using a BMI chart wrong. BMI's are used on an individual basis when talking about SEDENTARY PEOPLE, not those gym nuts who are 6'0 and have 250lbs of muscle. They can also be used to talk about the general health/fitness levels of a group of people. IE: A group of kids entering Fat-camp, should have have a higher BMI than when they're leaving that fat-camp. Yes, levels of nutrition in the body in regards to sugar/water/blood pressure are all very important, but how does one obtain that in a 15 minute consultation?
Avatar image for Nibroc420
Nibroc420

13571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#147 Nibroc420
Member since 2007 • 13571 Posts
[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"][QUOTE="Nibroc420"][QUOTE="surrealnumber5"] what the BMI IS and how it was created and the theory behind it are not up for debate, and yet you are debating it. weight and height are not measures of health, they cant be as those things are not material to ones health. ignoring body composition, nutrition, and other factors like age genetics and history all of whom are measures of health. what about vitals? blood pressure, sugar levels, hell water consumption has more to do with general health than weight and height.

I'm not going to argue with you, you have the internet, you clearly have some grasp of the english language. I will tell you, when people who're exercising regularly start using a BMI chart, they're using a BMI chart wrong. BMI's are used on an individual basis when talking about SEDENTARY PEOPLE, not those gym nuts who are 6'0 and have 250lbs of muscle. They can also be used to talk about the general health/fitness levels of a group of people. IE: A group of kids entering Fat-camp, should have have a higher BMI than when they're leaving that fat-camp. Yes, levels of nutrition in the body in regards to sugar/water/blood pressure are all very important, but how does one obtain that in a 15 minute consultation?

i am telling you using the BMI at all is using it wrong, because its basis is wrong.

Which is simply due to your misunderstanding of the proper usage of a BMI.
Avatar image for jhcho2
jhcho2

5103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 2

#148 jhcho2
Member since 2004 • 5103 Posts

[QUOTE="jhcho2"]

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"] what the BMI IS and how it was created and the theory behind it are not up for debate, and yet you are debating it. weight and height are not measures of health, they cant be as those things are not material to ones health. ignoring body composition, nutrition, and other factors like age genetics and history all of whom are measures of health. what about vitals? blood pressure, sugar levels, hell water consumption has more to do with general health than weight and height. surrealnumber5

Being fit and being healthy are two different things. We all know that. If your BMI is within the normal range, it means you're fit, but it doesn't mean you're healthy. Similarly, when your BMI is say...40, clearly you are very unfit. However, if you're that unfit, chances are you're not healthy either. You can't have that much excess fat relative to your height, without having some adverse health complication.

BMI does not measure "fit" or "fitness" go read a dictionary and get back to me when you know the words you are using.

You like ignoring the main context of an argument and instead go for the semantics. Ok, if you say that someone who has the right proportion of height and waistline but without any muscle isn't fit, then fine. He isn't fit. But that's what having a normal BMI means. You have a 'normal build'. You have 'normal proportions'. So now replace the term 'normal proportions' with the 'fit' term in my previous post.

Avatar image for jhcho2
jhcho2

5103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 2

#149 jhcho2
Member since 2004 • 5103 Posts

[QUOTE="jhcho2"]

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"]i am not for smoking Nazism either... only stupid people try to make exceptions the rules, as of 2008 the average male weight was 189 pounds, and you are talking about people several deviations away from that and then you are using this to base an argument of controlling other peoples lives. this is not a respectable argument, not be any objective measure i am aware of surrealnumber5

189 pounds is rather fair for an average male. Obese people easily weigh 300 pounds. I'm not even going to the extreme of 500 or 600 pounds. Those are contenders for being top 100 fattest people in the world. But even for 300 pounds, that's not merely several 'deviations' away from 189 pounds. Again this could turn into a semantical debate about what one deviation means in this context. Since the obesity rate in America is incresing, it is also becoming more and more common, meaning that normal distribution curve would flatten out, and the magnitude of one deviation would be larger. But I don't think that's the point.

Obese people are just really fat people who we can identify as being fat just by a single glance. It doesn't have to be more complicated than that. And we don't even have to talk about those on the borderline of being obese. Many people are clearly way pass the borderline and are downright obese. The labeling and stimatization arises due to these people being way heavier than a normal human being should be. 40 to 50 years ago, this kind of weight and size was unheard of. Only now, is it becoming commonplace. And these obese people are trying to claim that it's somewhat 'normal' to be such. Any kind of pressure is interpreted as an insult or stigma. The cause is blamed on food companies and genetics. It's just the American way. What do we do when we have school shootings? Blame the NRA. Blame video games. Blame Hollywood. Err....why isn't parenthood ever mentioned? The fear of victimizing people the way fat people are being victimized? Probably. Coincidence? Nope.

obese starts at 143 lbs @ 4'10" and goes up to 243 lbs for 6'4, if you think those are obese that is why i am deriding you. But who needs to argue what is when you can cry emotion and feelings.

Once again, you stray from the main point and instead prefer to argue semantics. The example you gave are people who are at the borderline, ie. BMI = 30. I believe I explicitly said that we are not necessarily talking about people who are at borderline because there's too much room for debate on whether they actually fall under the category of overweight or obese. There are clearly so many obese people who have BMIs above 40, and just by one glance, you know they're obese. This entire thread was about such obese people, but somehow your method or debating is about taking a small point relatively out of context from and entire post, srutinize it in isolation, and then use it to discredit the entire post by arguing semantics.

Avatar image for Murderstyle75
Murderstyle75

4412

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#150 Murderstyle75
Member since 2011 • 4412 Posts

[QUOTE="Murderstyle75"][QUOTE="jhcho2"]

lol, I don't believe i said all Americans are obese, but studies show that one in every three adults is obese in America. That's extremely high, and feels like almost every other person passing by is obese.

jhcho2

But what defines obese? When we think obese, we are picturing the woman with three chins grocery shopping from the electric cart at Walmart. The data these studies go by actually label somebody who looks completely normal with the exception of a few extra pounds around the mid section as being obese. As somebody else mentioned, BMI is bullshit but that is what the studies are based on. Meanwhile there is no way to take things like bone density and muscle mass into account. Now instead of having toned and fit arms and legs, I could have flabby ones and weigh exactly the same or less.

Someone who has a few extra pounds around the mid-section is categorized as 'overweight', not obese. That's why I never used the term 'overweight', as there is a lot of room for a semantical debate. Obese is normally one whole category beyond just being overweight. So...it's not just a few extra pounds like you said. To be obese, you'd have to be something like a hundred pounds heavier than a normal person.

That's not true according to the CDC. According to the cdc.gov BMI calculator, I am in fact obese. I am 5ft 7 and weight 195 because I put on about 20 winter pounds. In the summer I weigh between 170 and 175. According to BMI this is still overweight even though there really isn't any fat on me because my job requires me to walk over 20 miles a day on various terrain including up hill.