[QUOTE="SolidTy"][QUOTE="savebattery"] I might buy the "they were in it for the money" argument if we weren't talking about three separate cases many years apart. And if Jackson didn't admit to sharing a bed with the children. And if they didn't find books containing photos of children's genitals in his bed room. And if his sister didn't call him a pedophile on national television. And if Jordan Chandler didn't correctly describe a birth mark on Jackson's penis And if Jackson hadn't established a pattern of erratic behavior.savebattery
La Toya was not part of the any of the Jackson's lives, and His Sister La Toya RETRACTED her statement publically, she also cllaimed her husband made her say it to get in the news.
INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY, you weren't there, end of story.
First off, the facts I stated would be enough to convict ANYONE that couldn't afford Jackson's lawyers. Second, my statements WITHOUT La Toya Jackson's support are strong enough in the first place. Third, she only retracted her statements AFTER she ran out of money and wanted to reconcile with her family, who had disowned her.No, because we aren't hearing the defense, just the accusations. Trials aren't ever so one sided. If you knew about La Toya's issues, you shouldn't have brought her up without mentioning the retraction.
Log in to comment