Why do some people really beilive MJ was a rapist?

[QUOTE="feryl06"]

OJ Simpson wasn't charged NOT GUILTY----but we all know that's not the case. ;P I assume those same people who think he was innocent, also believed Simpson is an upstanding wonderful citizen. :P

BiancaDK

Agreed, We can't assume anything, every case is based on it's own merit.:)

You are actually married to Jandurin, or you are joking? ;)

to realese a bit of the inner child in him and play with the kidblazingkiller63

[QUOTE="blazingkiller63"]to realese a bit of the inner child in him and play with the kidGooeykat

I have no regret.

[QUOTE="DarkGamer007"]

Because he admitted to sleeping (in this case sleep did not mean sex) in the same bed as children, while he was holding hands with a child. /thread.

bsman00

Yeah that is disgusting and wrong, but whether or not any molestation went on is still unknown, but for all we know, both of the alleged victims could have made the accusations for money.

[QUOTE="AFraud"]

"Thinked" isn't even a real word simple jack.

BiancaDK

You are actually married to Jandurin, or you are joking? ;)SolidTy

"Thinked" isn't even a real word simple jack.

[QUOTE="BiancaDK"][QUOTE="AFraud"]

"Thinked" isn't even a real word simple jack.

Yodas_Boy

[QUOTE="Yodas_Boy"][QUOTE="BiancaDK"] So... ? Some people have subpar grammar for various reasons, you know. Is it really that enjoyable to bash other people over the internet, big guy?lol_haha_dead

Anyway they believe that because they feel differently about the evidence than you do. /thread

they like to assume?cousin_eddy

Some people are just really bored and want to make celeberties look like a paedophile, crazies, etc

[QUOTE="SolidTy"]You are actually married to Jandurin, or you are joking? ;)BiancaDK

Oh, gotcha.:P Good ol E-marriage's, hopefully you guys don't end up at e-divorce court. You two make a good e-couple.8)

[QUOTE="bsman00"][QUOTE="DarkGamer007"]

Because he admitted to sleeping (in this case sleep did not mean sex) in the same bed as children, while he was holding hands with a child. /thread.

DarkGamer007

Yeah that is disgusting and wrong, but whether or not any molestation went on is still unknown, but for all we know, both of the alleged victims could have made the accusations for money.

[QUOTE="cousin_eddy"]they like to assume?blazingkiller63

Some people are just really bored and want to make celeberties look like a paedophile, crazies, etc

They really believe he did it, honestly there is a lot of evidence to support both sides. He is dead now, honestly I think we should bury it with him. If he did not do it thank goodness and be glad not everyone turned there back on him, if he really did do it there is nothing we an do now. Anyway let people mourn how they choose.

The truth is none of us know all the facts, so we have to assume that the jurors did their job appropriately, and he was found not guilty. he was tried and found guilty by people who were given all the facts, so who are we to claim they were wrong, when we know close to nothing of the evidence shown and testimony?II_Seraphim_II

[QUOTE="II_Seraphim_II"]The truth is none of us know all the facts, so we have to assume that the jurors did their job appropriately, and he was found not guilty. he was tried and found guilty by people who were given all the facts, so who are we to claim they were wrong, when we know close to nothing of the evidence shown and testimony?LJS9502_basic

Oh, gotcha.:P Good ol E-marriage's, hopefully you guys don't end up at e-divorce court. You two make a good e-couple.8)SolidTy

[QUOTE="SolidTy"]Oh, gotcha.:P Good ol E-marriage's, hopefully you guys don't end up at e-divorce court. You two make a good e-couple.8)BiancaDK

so your british?

can people stop saying he was "Found Innocent" he was found "Not guilty"...there is a difference.

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]

[QUOTE="II_Seraphim_II"]The truth is none of us know all the facts, so we have to assume that the jurors did their job appropriately, and he was found not guilty. he was tried and found guilty by people who were given all the facts, so who are we to claim they were wrong, when we know close to nothing of the evidence shown and testimony?II_Seraphim_II

[QUOTE="SolidTy"]Oh, gotcha.:P Good ol E-marriage's, hopefully you guys don't end up at e-divorce court. You two make a good e-couple.8)BiancaDK

[QUOTE="BiancaDK"][QUOTE="SolidTy"]Oh, gotcha.:P Good ol E-marriage's, hopefully you guys don't end up at e-divorce court. You two make a good e-couple.8)blazingkiller63

so your british?

as a parent of a 2 there is no way anyone could pay my wife and i off if our son came to us saying what these kids said about MJ. only a person who loves money more than their kid. i think MJ's foolish and strange life style did not help his case. but IMHO Michael was setup because his was rich and had far too many kids around him.

Because they are sick and believe the media and their dumb stories, all Michael ever wanted was for the media to back off and now even when the legend is no longer with us, they insist on making up stupid stories.69ANT69

The pain of being acused of something you never did, mustave ruined teh poor guys life or maybe he did do it, still....ruined his life.

I don't know if he was a pedophile, but I'm not going to call him one. I'm not saying he isn't a pedophile, but he was found not guilty, so I'm not going to call him a pedo.

[QUOTE="II_Seraphim_II"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Just to clear something up...juries are not necessarily given all the facts. In general...not talking about any specific case.

LJS9502_basic

There is an awful lot to take into account about the case against him.. alot of people are to lazy to look into it and so go with the media, it's the world we live in. But there is still a minority that whole heartedly believe in the evidence against him based on there own opinions, and frankly they are entitled to there opinions even if some of us don't agree. I personnally do not believe he done anything.

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]

[QUOTE="II_Seraphim_II"] Yes, but they were given more facts than the rest of us, so their opinion is probably more educated than ours (on the matter at hand).II_Seraphim_II

[QUOTE="savebattery"][QUOTE="Darthmatt"]

My question is, wouldnt it have been cheeper to take the original case to court, and be vindicated if found innocent than pay off the kids family? I mean if he had nothing to hid, or was 100% innocent, I would think the legal process would cost less than $10 million. That is, unless he knew he couldnt win that case...

SolidTy

La Toya was not part of the any of the Jackson's lives, and His Sister La Toya RETRACTED her statement publically, she also cllaimed her husband made her say it to get in the news.

INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY, you weren't there, end of story.

Before Michael Jackson died, 75% of the people defending him on here would be either neutral or saying they don't like him...dreDREb13

Before Michael Jackson died, 75% of the people defending him on here would be either neutral or saying they don't like him...dreDREb13

[QUOTE="II_Seraphim_II"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Actually I'd argue that we got more facts since it didn't have to be approved as evidentuary.(sp)

LJS9502_basic

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]

[QUOTE="II_Seraphim_II"] Im pretty sure some of the "facts" we got were BS or irrelevant or the prosecution would have pushed hard to have them admitted into evidence.II_Seraphim_II