Why dont we take over the whole world

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for _Celldweller_
_Celldweller_

940

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 _Celldweller_
Member since 2007 • 940 Posts
I dont get it why stop at Iraq and play games, why dont we put the british empire to the test, U.S. forgein policy for the last 50 years has been all a joke, Why not create an empire? I mean its not like we're raping and sending them to camps
Avatar image for Sir_Marwin
Sir_Marwin

9734

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Sir_Marwin
Member since 2006 • 9734 Posts
one wrong move and the penguins would mobilize >_>

and it wouldn't work
Avatar image for CrimzonTide
CrimzonTide

12187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#3 CrimzonTide
Member since 2007 • 12187 Posts
Yes, that makes perfect sense. We're American, so everyone will just bow down and surrender for us.
Avatar image for Tezcatlipoca666
Tezcatlipoca666

7241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Tezcatlipoca666
Member since 2006 • 7241 Posts

Umm.. ya good luck taking over the world :lol:

Avatar image for sandroDX
sandroDX

3661

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#5 sandroDX
Member since 2007 • 3661 Posts
fool! we would not stand a chance against the forces of squirrels and penguins! and ants outnumber us ALOT to 1!! it would be a massacre! madness!!
Avatar image for X360PS3AMD05
X360PS3AMD05

36320

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#6 X360PS3AMD05
Member since 2005 • 36320 Posts
:lol: It's already an empire, wake up bud.
Avatar image for FlaminDeath
FlaminDeath

4181

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 FlaminDeath
Member since 2004 • 4181 Posts
*pulls out passport and goes to Switzerland*
Avatar image for deactivated-5901ac91d8e33
deactivated-5901ac91d8e33

17092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 deactivated-5901ac91d8e33
Member since 2004 • 17092 Posts
It's not as if you can...
Avatar image for DarkKar
DarkKar

6025

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9 DarkKar
Member since 2005 • 6025 Posts

one wrong move and the penguins would mobilize >_>

and it wouldn't workSir_Marwin

I'd put Danny DeVito on it.

Avatar image for CommanderShiro
CommanderShiro

21746

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 CommanderShiro
Member since 2005 • 21746 Posts
Yes because we all remembered what happened to the Roman and British Empire. :|
Avatar image for Booticon
Booticon

35745

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#11 Booticon
Member since 2004 • 35745 Posts

Great plan! :D

...Oh wait...

Bad plan! :(

Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#12 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts
Good luck with that.. The United States is having trouble holding down ONE sparsely populated nation.. I would not want to see what happens with the United States trying to occupy a country 2 or 3 itmes larger then that.. And its not possibl due to MAD (Mutually assured destruction).. Quite a few countries have nuclear weapons including Israel, India, China, Russia, ISrael, pakistan, etc etc.. Russia alone would make such things not possible.
Avatar image for FFinfinite
FFinfinite

435

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 FFinfinite
Member since 2007 • 435 Posts

Well.... we could try to. But then the space time continuem would go haywire and everything will be chaotic. CHEESE!!!!!!!!!!!

Avatar image for ferron321
ferron321

3078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#14 ferron321
Member since 2004 • 3078 Posts
That would just...not work. If America declared war on the whole world, people like Russia would launch nukes at you etc.
Avatar image for thirstychainsaw
thirstychainsaw

3761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 thirstychainsaw
Member since 2007 • 3761 Posts

America = 300 million people
Rest of the world = 6 billion people

:|

Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#16 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts

That would just...not work. If America declared war on the whole world, people like Russia would launch nukes at you etc.ferron321

Not to mention one nuclear device detonated on our soil would not make it worth it.. You saw the reaction 9/11 caused by two buildings falling and the deaths of 3000 innocents.. Could you imagine what it would be then if an entire major city of millions vaporized and a nother few million getting radiation poisioning or being blinded by the flash would do?

Avatar image for whatsit2ya
whatsit2ya

1215

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 whatsit2ya
Member since 2006 • 1215 Posts

Yes because we all remembered what happened to the Roman and British Empire. :|CommanderShiro

hell and the rest.

Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#18 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts

[QUOTE="CommanderShiro"]Yes because we all remembered what happened to the Roman and British Empire. :|whatsit2ya

hell and the rest.

This isn't a good comparison though.. Armies did not take months to years to reach their destination.. Information did not take weeks to months to reach a person, its damn near instanteous.. And they did not have weapons that could reach any where on the planet in under 30 minutes.. Not saying the US would succeed just saying its a absurd comparison.

Avatar image for omerdv
omerdv

1071

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#19 omerdv
Member since 2005 • 1071 Posts
You sound like Hitler :lol:
Avatar image for edd678
edd678

3660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 edd678
Member since 2006 • 3660 Posts
I hope your joking. America would most definitely loose is they did. Think of the opposition, Britain, Germany, Russia, China, Korea etc It would just give the countrys that hate America the perfect oppurtunity to blow it up.
Avatar image for CommanderShiro
CommanderShiro

21746

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 CommanderShiro
Member since 2005 • 21746 Posts
[QUOTE="whatsit2ya"]

[QUOTE="CommanderShiro"]Yes because we all remembered what happened to the Roman and British Empire. :|sSubZerOo

hell and the rest.

This isn't a good comparison though.. Armies did not take months to years to reach their destination.. Information did not take weeks to months to reach a person, its damn near instanteous.. And they did not have weapons that could reach any where on the planet in under 30 minutes.. Not saying the US would succeed just saying its a absurd comparison.

Its not as absurd as you make it out to be. Both those empires died out for the same reason. The more lands you have to govern the more expensive it becomes. Having militaries control territory cost a tremendous amount of resources. The empire decays from the inside by it.
Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#22 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts
[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"][QUOTE="whatsit2ya"]

[QUOTE="CommanderShiro"]Yes because we all remembered what happened to the Roman and British Empire. :|CommanderShiro

hell and the rest.

This isn't a good comparison though.. Armies did not take months to years to reach their destination.. Information did not take weeks to months to reach a person, its damn near instanteous.. And they did not have weapons that could reach any where on the planet in under 30 minutes.. Not saying the US would succeed just saying its a absurd comparison.

Its not as absurd as you make it out to be. Both those empires died out for the same reason. The more lands you have to govern the more expensive it becomes. Having militaries control territory cost a tremendous amount of resources. The empire decays from the inside by it.

Yes but your missing a prime example.. The romans could not respond to a invader in less then a week.. This is why you can not compare them.. Its a completely different ball game.. Forces would think twice if several roman legions could respond ANY where in the empire in less then a few days, instead of weeks, months, etc etc.

Avatar image for deactivated-5901ac91d8e33
deactivated-5901ac91d8e33

17092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 deactivated-5901ac91d8e33
Member since 2004 • 17092 Posts
[QUOTE="CommanderShiro"][QUOTE="sSubZerOo"][QUOTE="whatsit2ya"]

[QUOTE="CommanderShiro"]Yes because we all remembered what happened to the Roman and British Empire. :|sSubZerOo

hell and the rest.

This isn't a good comparison though.. Armies did not take months to years to reach their destination.. Information did not take weeks to months to reach a person, its damn near instanteous.. And they did not have weapons that could reach any where on the planet in under 30 minutes.. Not saying the US would succeed just saying its a absurd comparison.

Its not as absurd as you make it out to be. Both those empires died out for the same reason. The more lands you have to govern the more expensive it becomes. Having militaries control territory cost a tremendous amount of resources. The empire decays from the inside by it.

Yes but your missing a prime example.. The romans could not respond to a invader in less then a week.. This is why you can not compare them.. Its a completely different ball game.. Forces would think twice if several roman legions could respond ANY where in the empire in less then a few days, instead of weeks, months, etc etc.

Yeah, because the enemies of Rome were not anywere near as advanced as the Legionnaires. This, however, isn't not the case when we're talking about America.

Avatar image for cooldude855
cooldude855

209

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 cooldude855
Member since 2007 • 209 Posts
LOOOOOOLLL ROFL !!! LMAO !! WTFBBQQ!!! ROTFLMAO !!
Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#25 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts
[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"][QUOTE="CommanderShiro"][QUOTE="sSubZerOo"][QUOTE="whatsit2ya"]

[QUOTE="CommanderShiro"]Yes because we all remembered what happened to the Roman and British Empire. :|jointed

hell and the rest.

This isn't a good comparison though.. Armies did not take months to years to reach their destination.. Information did not take weeks to months to reach a person, its damn near instanteous.. And they did not have weapons that could reach any where on the planet in under 30 minutes.. Not saying the US would succeed just saying its a absurd comparison.

Its not as absurd as you make it out to be. Both those empires died out for the same reason. The more lands you have to govern the more expensive it becomes. Having militaries control territory cost a tremendous amount of resources. The empire decays from the inside by it.

Yes but your missing a prime example.. The romans could not respond to a invader in less then a week.. This is why you can not compare them.. Its a completely different ball game.. Forces would think twice if several roman legions could respond ANY where in the empire in less then a few days, instead of weeks, months, etc etc.

Yeah, because the enemies of Rome were not anywere near as advanced as the Legionnaires. This, however, isn't not the case when we're talking about America.

Thats not true.. Tons of forces were more superior alot of times they just had the numbers.. My point is you can not make a fair comparison between this hypothetical sitituation and the examples of Roman empire. Yeah I agree its absurd to think of this.. Firstly due to MAD as well as other things.. But they are completely differen tnow.

Avatar image for whatsit2ya
whatsit2ya

1215

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 whatsit2ya
Member since 2006 • 1215 Posts
[QUOTE="whatsit2ya"]

[QUOTE="CommanderShiro"]Yes because we all remembered what happened to the Roman and British Empire. :|sSubZerOo

hell and the rest.

This isn't a good comparison though.. Armies did not take months to years to reach their destination.. Information did not take weeks to months to reach a person, its damn near instanteous.. And they did not have weapons that could reach any where on the planet in under 30 minutes.. Not saying the US would succeed just saying its a absurd comparison.

but they still had the best tech of the time, now the Americans have equal tech to other countries (China, Russia, UK) and if they start taking over the world then one of the countries that has been building nukes all these years (or all of them) will nuke America and get it over with.

Avatar image for matrix_hiei
matrix_hiei

4793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#27 matrix_hiei
Member since 2004 • 4793 Posts
becuase manifest destiny is stupid.
Avatar image for -Serpahim-
-Serpahim-

1627

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 -Serpahim-
Member since 2007 • 1627 Posts

I dont get it why stop at Iraq and play games, why dont we put the british empire to the test, U.S. forgein policy for the last 50 years has been all a joke, Why not create an empire? I mean its not like we're raping and sending them to camps_Celldweller_

funny u should say that...

Avatar image for _Charlie_
_Charlie_

181

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#29 _Charlie_
Member since 2006 • 181 Posts

Yawn at the sad life you must lead....

Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#30 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts
[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"][QUOTE="whatsit2ya"]

[QUOTE="CommanderShiro"]Yes because we all remembered what happened to the Roman and British Empire. :|whatsit2ya

hell and the rest.

This isn't a good comparison though.. Armies did not take months to years to reach their destination.. Information did not take weeks to months to reach a person, its damn near instanteous.. And they did not have weapons that could reach any where on the planet in under 30 minutes.. Not saying the US would succeed just saying its a absurd comparison.

but they still had the best tech of the time, now the Americans have equal tech to other countries (China, Russia, UK) and if they start taking over the world then one of the countries that has been building nukes all these years (or all of them) will nuke America and get it over with.

................. Wait what? I am argueing that the comparison of the Roman empire to the US is a absurd comparison.. I have already said the Us would never win nor would they ever commi them selves ot it.. What I was saying is that the Roman empire and British empire are not good comparisons and examples in history.

Avatar image for GamerPro1984
GamerPro1984

818

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 GamerPro1984
Member since 2006 • 818 Posts

We could take over the entire oceans , the US Navy alone would dominate the globes entire waters... No one with any knowledge of that could argue this.

As for taking over land NO country has that power.... US, Russia, China couldnt take over the world by land thats not possible.

Avatar image for Truth_Seekr
Truth_Seekr

4214

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 Truth_Seekr
Member since 2007 • 4214 Posts

Isn't the take over already in progress?

Avatar image for deactivated-5901ac91d8e33
deactivated-5901ac91d8e33

17092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 deactivated-5901ac91d8e33
Member since 2004 • 17092 Posts

Isn't the take over already in progress?

Truth_Seekr

How exactly?

Avatar image for dylan9999
dylan9999

379

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#34 dylan9999
Member since 2006 • 379 Posts

When microsoft buys switserland and then the rest of teh world and enslaves everyone so they can work n eloborate mining facilities i fing called it!

but any ways USA would lose hands down. and since i wil be taking over the world soon you better call jobs in ministry now. minister of pointy objects and minister of videogaming has already been taken.

Avatar image for Bourbons3
Bourbons3

24238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#35 Bourbons3
Member since 2003 • 24238 Posts
No one country or person can control all of the world. Its not possible.
Avatar image for Truth_Seekr
Truth_Seekr

4214

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 Truth_Seekr
Member since 2007 • 4214 Posts
[QUOTE="Truth_Seekr"]

Isn't the take over already in progress?

jointed

How exactly?

The coming economic collapse of the global economy and not to mention continuing to create events such as 9-11 and the world wars,thanks to international banking dynasties.

Avatar image for GettingTired
GettingTired

5994

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 GettingTired
Member since 2006 • 5994 Posts
Because everyone in history who has tried that has failed.
Avatar image for Truth_Seekr
Truth_Seekr

4214

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 Truth_Seekr
Member since 2007 • 4214 Posts

Because everyone in history who has tried that has failed.GettingTired

Not necessarily. The people that own the US, EU etc are thesame people whos ultimate goal of global government and whatever falls under that will surely be realized if we continue to live at their expense.

Avatar image for MattUD1
MattUD1

20715

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 MattUD1
Member since 2004 • 20715 Posts
Don't worry. It'll happen. Maybe not in our lifetime, or the next, but eventually the Earth shall be called the United States of Earth.