Why is everyone so excited that China is becoming a superpower?

  • 103 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Kage1
Kage1

6806

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 Kage1
Member since 2003 • 6806 Posts

I've seen tons of posts in this forum where people seem so happy and excited that China will eventually become the top superpower. Posters can't wait until they pass the US. So my question is why? Doesn't China have a pretty bad history of human rights violation and oppression of civil rights and freedoms? Is that what people are looking forward to? Hooray for censorship?

sonicare

The US has a bad history of oppression and civil rights also.

Avatar image for Lost-Memory
Lost-Memory

1556

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 Lost-Memory
Member since 2009 • 1556 Posts

I've seen tons of posts in this forum where people seem so happy and excited that China will eventually become the top superpower. Posters can't wait until they pass the US. So my question is why? Doesn't China have a pretty bad history of human rights violation and oppression of civil rights and freedoms? Is that what people are looking forward to? Hooray for censorship?

sonicare
Do you know anything about the differences between oldschool china and modern china ? or, do you have an idea on how todays generation of 20 yo's will be the ones to shape the coming future ? and then our kids after that. China will do fine.
Avatar image for MgamerBD
MgamerBD

17550

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 MgamerBD
Member since 2006 • 17550 Posts
[QUOTE="Kage1"]

[QUOTE="sonicare"]

I've seen tons of posts in this forum where people seem so happy and excited that China will eventually become the top superpower. Posters can't wait until they pass the US. So my question is why? Doesn't China have a pretty bad history of human rights violation and oppression of civil rights and freedoms? Is that what people are looking forward to? Hooray for censorship?

The US has a bad history of oppression and civil rights also.

I'm not defending...but so does every country. At least the U.S. improved. Also do you see how China oppresses people? I'm sure it is gonna be way worse for immigrants.
Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#54 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

[QUOTE="sonicare"]

I've seen tons of posts in this forum where people seem so happy and excited that China will eventually become the top superpower. Posters can't wait until they pass the US. So my question is why? Doesn't China have a pretty bad history of human rights violation and oppression of civil rights and freedoms? Is that what people are looking forward to? Hooray for censorship?

Kage1

The US has a bad history of oppression and civil rights also.

meh, not really. we are getting worse though, baby boomers +tech they dont understand = bad laws

Avatar image for shert
shert

561

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 shert
Member since 2008 • 561 Posts

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"]

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

What the hell is the point of that?!

Wasdie

me posting it, or what china is doing?

what china's doing. It's crazy.

It's almost insane but to them it's all good as long as they keep the GDP up.

Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts
[QUOTE="MetalGear_Ninty"][QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="MetalGear_Ninty"] Oh yeah that pernicious Indoeuropean mentality, y'know, with its freedom of speech, individual liberties and religious freedom. Can't wait until we get rid of that :roll: PS. Also, every society is patriarchal, no matter where you look.

LOL, the indoeuropeans have probably been the most violent culture in the history of the world and have probably destroyed and assimilated more cultures than all other cultures combined. And before the agricultural revolution lots of cultures were mainly matriarchals. Eastern cultures like Japan are not patriarchal like we assume, they may look like patriarchals but they are quite different from the west, a different kind of patriarchalism or even disguised matriarchalisms.

We are talking about now not hundreds of years ago, but I don't see why are you are mentioning violence anyway because every society ever studied has exhibited violence to some extent, the myth of the noble savages who were largely peaceful and harmonious before corrupting western influence is exactly that, a myth. The enemy you so enthusiatically try to identify is not western imperialism but rather human nature. Of course, all humans are unique and different, but history has shown time after time that human societies tend to be violent and patriarchal. You mention Japan, but Japan is largely a patriarchal society, likewise, I've never heard of these preagricultural matriarchal societies you speak of.

You should read a little about history then then you will realize that most of the western world was conquered by the indoeuropeans because of how warmongers they were. All of western main languages are indoeuropean in origin including english, german, spanish, etc only maybe finnish and estonian are not of indoeuropean descent. And yes there has always been skirmishes and conflicts with human societies but it is by no means the norm to go out and conquer the others, I suggest you read Guns, Germs and Steel for a pretty good account on how the modern cultural makeup came to be. There were lots of cultures who mostly kept to themselves and were minding their own business until the indoeuropeans went out of their way to conquer all of the modern world. Of course the indoeuropeans has not been the only violent ones but they have been, by far the most, violently successful ones. And yes there has been matriarchal societies as there are a couple left right now by the way. Human nature is not specially violent, that's what the western mentality has promoted and made popular. There has been lots of examples on how we don't particularly enjoy being violent because it will have basically made our evolution impossible. Even Darwin insisted on the non confrontationist and cooperative nature of humans but he was ignored in favor of the violent side interpretation by politicians and economists who had an interest to promote aggressive overly-competitive capitalism as the only real option for modern society.
Avatar image for MAILER_DAEMON
MAILER_DAEMON

45906

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#57 MAILER_DAEMON
Member since 2003 • 45906 Posts

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"] me posting it, or what china is doing?

shert

what china's doing. It's crazy.

It's almost insane but to them it's all good as long as they keep the GDP up.

Which will eventually cause the bubble to burst once this gets unsustainable. That could even be worse than what happened in the US...
Avatar image for anihimz
anihimz

14242

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#58 anihimz
Member since 2010 • 14242 Posts
Oh, yes. I'm so excited.
Avatar image for MetalGear_Ninty
MetalGear_Ninty

6337

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#59 MetalGear_Ninty
Member since 2008 • 6337 Posts
[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="MetalGear_Ninty"][QUOTE="kuraimen"] LOL, the indoeuropeans have probably been the most violent culture in the history of the world and have probably destroyed and assimilated more cultures than all other cultures combined. And before the agricultural revolution lots of cultures were mainly matriarchals. Eastern cultures like Japan are not patriarchal like we assume, they may look like patriarchals but they are quite different from the west, a different kind of patriarchalism or even disguised matriarchalisms.

We are talking about now not hundreds of years ago, but I don't see why are you are mentioning violence anyway because every society ever studied has exhibited violence to some extent, the myth of the noble savages who were largely peaceful and harmonious before corrupting western influence is exactly that, a myth. The enemy you so enthusiatically try to identify is not western imperialism but rather human nature. Of course, all humans are unique and different, but history has shown time after time that human societies tend to be violent and patriarchal. You mention Japan, but Japan is largely a patriarchal society, likewise, I've never heard of these preagricultural matriarchal societies you speak of.

You should read a little about history then then you will realize that most of the western world was conquered by the indoeuropeans because of how warmongers they were. All of western main languages are indoeuropean in origin including english, german, spanish, etc only maybe finnish and estonian are not of indoeuropean descent. And yes there has always been skirmishes and conflicts with human societies but it is by no means the norm to go out and conquer the others, I suggest you read Guns, Germs and Steel for a pretty good account on how the modern cultural makeup came to be. There were lots of cultures who mostly kept to themselves and were minding their own business until the indoeuropeans went out of their way to conquer all of the modern world. Of course the indoeuropeans has not been the only violent ones but they have been, by far the most, violently successful ones. And yes there has been matriarchal societies as there are a couple left right now by the way. Human nature is not specially violent, that's what the western mentality has promoted and made popular. There has been lots of examples on how we don't particularly enjoy being violent because it will have basically made our evolution impossible. Even Darwin insisted on the non confrontationist and cooperative nature of humans but he was ignored in favor of the violent side interpretation by politicians and economists who had an interest to promote aggressive overly-competitive capitalism as the only real option for modern society.

Of course altruism and cooperation was an importat fact in the evolution of humans, but mostly this circle of morality only extends to people within your own tribe, history has shown that humans are most able to commit heinous violent crimes when they fail to accept the humanity of their victims. It is this denial of the humanity of those outside your 'tribes' that has allowed humans in general, and not just Eurasian to be so violent. Even if you study remote tribal civilisations you hear stories of constant tribal warfare which is often brutal and bloody. Remember, often we are talking about tribes untouched by western influence. Also, I'm still not aware of these matriarchal societies you speak of. Care to give a few examples?
Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts
[QUOTE="MetalGear_Ninty"][QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="MetalGear_Ninty"] We are talking about now not hundreds of years ago, but I don't see why are you are mentioning violence anyway because every society ever studied has exhibited violence to some extent, the myth of the noble savages who were largely peaceful and harmonious before corrupting western influence is exactly that, a myth. The enemy you so enthusiatically try to identify is not western imperialism but rather human nature. Of course, all humans are unique and different, but history has shown time after time that human societies tend to be violent and patriarchal. You mention Japan, but Japan is largely a patriarchal society, likewise, I've never heard of these preagricultural matriarchal societies you speak of.

You should read a little about history then then you will realize that most of the western world was conquered by the indoeuropeans because of how warmongers they were. All of western main languages are indoeuropean in origin including english, german, spanish, etc only maybe finnish and estonian are not of indoeuropean descent. And yes there has always been skirmishes and conflicts with human societies but it is by no means the norm to go out and conquer the others, I suggest you read Guns, Germs and Steel for a pretty good account on how the modern cultural makeup came to be. There were lots of cultures who mostly kept to themselves and were minding their own business until the indoeuropeans went out of their way to conquer all of the modern world. Of course the indoeuropeans has not been the only violent ones but they have been, by far the most, violently successful ones. And yes there has been matriarchal societies as there are a couple left right now by the way. Human nature is not specially violent, that's what the western mentality has promoted and made popular. There has been lots of examples on how we don't particularly enjoy being violent because it will have basically made our evolution impossible. Even Darwin insisted on the non confrontationist and cooperative nature of humans but he was ignored in favor of the violent side interpretation by politicians and economists who had an interest to promote aggressive overly-competitive capitalism as the only real option for modern society.

Of course altruism and cooperation was an importat fact in the evolution of humans, but mostly this circle of morality only extends to people within your own tribe, history has shown that humans are most able to commit heinous violent crimes when they fail to accept the humanity of their victims. It is this denial of the humanity of those outside your 'tribes' that has allowed humans in general, and not just Eurasian to be so violent. Even if you study remote tribal civilisations you hear stories of constant tribal warfare which is often brutal and bloody. Remember, often we are talking about tribes untouched by western influence. Also, I'm still not aware of these matriarchal societies you speak of. Care to give a few examples?

Now we are talking :) Yep, cooperative pressures are mostly within group but that doesn't mean they don't exist with other groups. Yeah there's truth in what you say, that usually the other is dehumanized to justify violence against them. The thing is that I think there are many many examples of cultures that have maintained this kind of cooperation and altruism even between groups. Of course many of those are probably extinct now (see the moriori in New Zealand for example). That violent cultures like the indoeuropeans were predominant and conquered many cultures doesn't mean there were no other non violent cultures before (that's the problem on encasing yourself in written history that represents like less than 1% of humanity's real history), likewise other non-indoeuropean violent cultures can have conquered non violent ones like in the case of the maiori and moriori. Tribal warfare before the agricultural revolution is very different from war. With war you have organized institutions dedicated 100% of the time to war, this is not the case of tribal warfare that's more equivalent to occasional skirmishes between groups of people similar probably to how chimpanzees attack their neighbors for example while searching for resources and such. Once agriculture starts and, with it, the concept of private property, cities, nations, etc then war is made into a much more complex and institutionalize endeavor and becomes much more frequent, specially with cultures like the indoeuropean which numbers increased exponentially very rapidly so they needed more resources and land. It is really not so difficult to find evidence of matriarchalism in humans. Patriarchalism has a direct connection to agricultural societies too since they become warfare/male centric and women become baby factories to supply for human labor in fields. Many non agricultural societies had a strong matriarchal leaning. That's why non agricultural societies were mostly influenced by the Moon in their mythology while agricultural ones have a bigger influence from the Sun (it makes sense to pay attention to the Sun when you are growing crops). Here a link of many http://www.second-congress-matriarchal-studies.com/goettnerabendroth.html I said Japan has a different patriarchalism than the west specially due to how much power women have in society. The image of the geisha is basically a power figure within japanese society and they could influence very powerful landlords in the past. Female power in human societies (and in other species too, read Frans de Waal Chimpanzee Politics to see how females influence males in that species) is many times subtle but very real.
Avatar image for gamerguru100
gamerguru100

12718

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#61 gamerguru100
Member since 2009 • 12718 Posts

Doesn't China have a pretty bad history of human rights violation and oppression of civil rights and freedoms?

sonicare

Yup, so does the United States. O_O

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 LJS9502_basic  Online
Member since 2003 • 180120 Posts
They just can't wait for the U.S to fall. People hate America so much that they don't see the reprocussions of the U.S. losing superpower status. Its sad really...MgamerBD
Pretty much this.....
Avatar image for YoshiYogurt
YoshiYogurt

6008

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 YoshiYogurt
Member since 2010 • 6008 Posts
I am the opposite of excited, don't want them to be a superpower.
Avatar image for gameguy6700
gameguy6700

12197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 gameguy6700
Member since 2004 • 12197 Posts
[QUOTE="sonicare"][QUOTE="kuraimen"]Another thing and this is probably the most important one in my book. Ever since we have written memory the "world culture" has been dominated by the "western" mentality. From Greece, to the Romans, to the Spanish, English empires and now the US, everyone of those cultures evolved from an indoeuropean heritage meaning that we are plagued by indoeuropean mentality, which, among other characteristics, is very patriarchal, dualistic and rational oriented. China will be the first big diversion from this pattern. It is probably not the best one but it is a start. I think eastern cultures has a lot to teach us westerners in matters as to how they conceive the world, religion and human nature. kuraimen
Japan has been a world economic superpower for years.

Yeah but they are not a cultural influence. There's a difference between being economically powerful and being the cultural power of the world. Japan just adapted to the western-type of mentality and succeeded economically.

Which is exactly what China is doing too. In Hong Kong you can't even get a corporate job without being fluent in English. The reason western culture has been spread so much is because of all the Western European empires that (literally) ruled the world during the imperial age. Then America exacerbated the situation even further when Hollywood, fast food, and chain stores came into being. No other country has ever boasted "culture" as one of its main exports. And right now it seems unlikely that China will overtake the US as the world's biggest producer of pop culture. Not only because there's no sign of them really focusing on that, but also because no other country to date has really pumped out high quality movies, music, TV shows, etc. as the US. Not to say that there aren't countries that produce a lot of those things, but their output is completely dwarfed by the US entertainment industry.
Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts

[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="sonicare"] Japan has been a world economic superpower for years.gameguy6700
Yeah but they are not a cultural influence. There's a difference between being economically powerful and being the cultural power of the world. Japan just adapted to the western-type of mentality and succeeded economically.

Which is exactly what China is doing too. In Hong Kong you can't even get a corporate job without being fluent in English. The reason western culture has been spread so much is because of all the Western European empires that (literally) ruled the world during the imperial age. Then America exacerbated the situation even further when Hollywood, fast food, and chain stores came into being. No other country has ever boasted "culture" as one of its main exports. And right now it seems unlikely that China will overtake the US as the world's biggest producer of pop culture. Not only because there's no sign of them really focusing on that, but also because no other country to date has really pumped out high quality movies, music, TV shows, etc. as the US. Not to say that there aren't countries that produce a lot of those things, but their output is completely dwarfed by the US entertainment industry.

Of course we are going through a transition so it is obvious that China sees the need to learn english, it is not like the US is completely irrelevant now. I don't know you but in my country, which is in latinamerica, they opened hundreds of chinese language centers last year. We have a lot of cultural influence from the US and yet we see more and more chinese stuff in the streets everyday, they are even creating a chinese neighborhood in the center of the capital. The government here ignored a call from the US condemn China because of human rights violations and accepted a soccer stadium from the chinese in return (everything in that stadium is written in chinese by the way). I have seen similar stuff happening in several other countries specially Brazil which is more and more growing to become a economical power. Of course a transition as big as this one is not going to happen so fast but it will happen and it already started. Hell my 3 year old niece is learning chinese in kindergarten in a german school (a german government policy for that school here), they even teach that here before english now.

Avatar image for MetalGear_Ninty
MetalGear_Ninty

6337

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#66 MetalGear_Ninty
Member since 2008 • 6337 Posts

[QUOTE="MetalGear_Ninty"][QUOTE="kuraimen"] You should read a little about history then then you will realize that most of the western world was conquered by the indoeuropeans because of how warmongers they were. All of western main languages are indoeuropean in origin including english, german, spanish, etc only maybe finnish and estonian are not of indoeuropean descent. And yes there has always been skirmishes and conflicts with human societies but it is by no means the norm to go out and conquer the others, I suggest you read Guns, Germs and Steel for a pretty good account on how the modern cultural makeup came to be. There were lots of cultures who mostly kept to themselves and were minding their own business until the indoeuropeans went out of their way to conquer all of the modern world. Of course the indoeuropeans has not been the only violent ones but they have been, by far the most, violently successful ones. And yes there has been matriarchal societies as there are a couple left right now by the way. Human nature is not specially violent, that's what the western mentality has promoted and made popular. There has been lots of examples on how we don't particularly enjoy being violent because it will have basically made our evolution impossible. Even Darwin insisted on the non confrontationist and cooperative nature of humans but he was ignored in favor of the violent side interpretation by politicians and economists who had an interest to promote aggressive overly-competitive capitalism as the only real option for modern society.kuraimen
Of course altruism and cooperation was an importat fact in the evolution of humans, but mostly this circle of morality only extends to people within your own tribe, history has shown that humans are most able to commit heinous violent crimes when they fail to accept the humanity of their victims. It is this denial of the humanity of those outside your 'tribes' that has allowed humans in general, and not just Eurasian to be so violent. Even if you study remote tribal civilisations you hear stories of constant tribal warfare which is often brutal and bloody. Remember, often we are talking about tribes untouched by western influence. Also, I'm still not aware of these matriarchal societies you speak of. Care to give a few examples?

Now we are talking :) Yep, cooperative pressures are mostly within group but that doesn't mean they don't exist with other groups. Yeah there's truth in what you say, that usually the other is dehumanized to justify violence against them. The thing is that I think there are many many examples of cultures that have maintained this kind of cooperation and altruism even between groups. Of course many of those are probably extinct now (see the moriori in New Zealand for example). That violent cultures like the indoeuropeans were predominant and conquered many cultures doesn't mean there were no other non violent cultures before (that's the problem on encasing yourself in written history that represents like less than 1% of humanity's real history), likewise other non-indoeuropean violent cultures can have conquered non violent ones like in the case of the maiori and moriori. Tribal warfare before the agricultural revolution is very different from war. With war you have organized institutions dedicated 100% of the time to war, this is not the case of tribal warfare that's more equivalent to occasional skirmishes between groups of people similar probably to how chimpanzees attack their neighbors for example while searching for resources and such. Once agriculture starts and, with it, the concept of private property, cities, nations, etc then war is made into a much more complex and institutionalize endeavor and becomes much more frequent, specially with cultures like the indoeuropean which numbers increased exponentially very rapidly so they needed more resources and land. It is really not so difficult to find evidence of matriarchalism in humans. Patriarchalism has a direct connection to agricultural societies too since they become warfare/male centric and women become baby factories to supply for human labor in fields. Many non agricultural societies had a strong matriarchal leaning. That's why non agricultural societies were mostly influenced by the Moon in their mythology while agricultural ones have a bigger influence from the Sun (it makes sense to pay attention to the Sun when you are growing crops). Here a link of many http://www.second-congress-matriarchal-studies.com/goettnerabendroth.html I said Japan has a different patriarchalism than the west specially due to how much power women have in society. The image of the geisha is basically a power figure within japanese society and they could influence very powerful landlords in the past. Female power in human societies (and in other species too, read Frans de Waal Chimpanzee Politics to see how females influence males in that species) is many times subtle but very real.

I've looked at your link and it appears to me from the opening paragraph that the website has a distinct political leaning which is why I question the validity of any evidence they have presented. In fact, I looked at the wikipedia page for matriarchy and got this quote:

"The view of matriarchy as constituting a stage of cultural development now is generally discredited. Furthermore, the consensus among modern anthropologists and sociologists is that a strictly matriarchal society never existed." 'Matriarchy', Encyclopædia Britannica, 2007.

You can talk about feminine symbology and Godess worship but I'm afraid this does not translate into political or military power for women.

Avatar image for comp_atkins
comp_atkins

38934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#67 comp_atkins
Member since 2005 • 38934 Posts
i'm excited because they'll finally be able to make a sequel to red dawn.
Avatar image for Solid_Snake325
Solid_Snake325

6091

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#68 Solid_Snake325
Member since 2006 • 6091 Posts

Chinese girls are pretty hot.

entropyecho
Pretty much this.
Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts

[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="MetalGear_Ninty"] Of course altruism and cooperation was an importat fact in the evolution of humans, but mostly this circle of morality only extends to people within your own tribe, history has shown that humans are most able to commit heinous violent crimes when they fail to accept the humanity of their victims. It is this denial of the humanity of those outside your 'tribes' that has allowed humans in general, and not just Eurasian to be so violent. Even if you study remote tribal civilisations you hear stories of constant tribal warfare which is often brutal and bloody. Remember, often we are talking about tribes untouched by western influence. Also, I'm still not aware of these matriarchal societies you speak of. Care to give a few examples?MetalGear_Ninty

Now we are talking :) Yep, cooperative pressures are mostly within group but that doesn't mean they don't exist with other groups. Yeah there's truth in what you say, that usually the other is dehumanized to justify violence against them. The thing is that I think there are many many examples of cultures that have maintained this kind of cooperation and altruism even between groups. Of course many of those are probably extinct now (see the moriori in New Zealand for example). That violent cultures like the indoeuropeans were predominant and conquered many cultures doesn't mean there were no other non violent cultures before (that's the problem on encasing yourself in written history that represents like less than 1% of humanity's real history), likewise other non-indoeuropean violent cultures can have conquered non violent ones like in the case of the maiori and moriori. Tribal warfare before the agricultural revolution is very different from war. With war you have organized institutions dedicated 100% of the time to war, this is not the case of tribal warfare that's more equivalent to occasional skirmishes between groups of people similar probably to how chimpanzees attack their neighbors for example while searching for resources and such. Once agriculture starts and, with it, the concept of private property, cities, nations, etc then war is made into a much more complex and institutionalize endeavor and becomes much more frequent, specially with cultures like the indoeuropean which numbers increased exponentially very rapidly so they needed more resources and land. It is really not so difficult to find evidence of matriarchalism in humans. Patriarchalism has a direct connection to agricultural societies too since they become warfare/male centric and women become baby factories to supply for human labor in fields. Many non agricultural societies had a strong matriarchal leaning. That's why non agricultural societies were mostly influenced by the Moon in their mythology while agricultural ones have a bigger influence from the Sun (it makes sense to pay attention to the Sun when you are growing crops). Here a link of many http://www.second-congress-matriarchal-studies.com/goettnerabendroth.html I said Japan has a different patriarchalism than the west specially due to how much power women have in society. The image of the geisha is basically a power figure within japanese society and they could influence very powerful landlords in the past. Female power in human societies (and in other species too, read Frans de Waal Chimpanzee Politics to see how females influence males in that species) is many times subtle but very real.

I've looked at your link and it appears to me from the opening paragraph that the website has a distinct political leaning which is why I question the validity of any evidence they have presented. In fact, I looked at the wikipedia page for matriarchy and got this quote:

"The view of matriarchy as constituting a stage of cultural development now is generally discredited. Furthermore, the consensus among modern anthropologists and sociologists is that a strictly matriarchal society never existed." 'Matriarchy', Encyclopædia Britannica, 2007.

You can talk about feminine symbology and Godess worship but I'm afraid this does not translate into political or military power for women.

Yeah maybe that site I posted was not the best one but still in the wikipedia entry it also says: There are no known societies that are unambiguously matriarchal,[1][2][3][4][5][6] although there are attested matrilinear, matrilocal, and avunculocal societies, especially among indigenous peoples of Asia and Africa,[7] such as those of the Minangkabau, E De (Rhade), Mosuo, Berbers and Tuareg and, in Europe, Basques and Sardinian people.[8][9] Strongly matrilocal societies sometimes are referred to as matrifocal, and there is some debate concerning the terminological delineation between matrifocality and matriarchy. Even in patriarchical systems of male-preference primogeniture, there may occasionally be queens regnant, as in the case of Elizabeth I of England. So it is not a black and white issue and women can excerpt a lot of power even if the society is regarded as highly patriarchal. That's why I put the japan example and examples regarding how subtle female power is in other species close to us like the chimpanzees whose female power is similar to the power that a mother or a grandmother excerpts in a family or a community in many cultures (like the japanese) which is sometimes greater than the power excerpted by the males. Of course women won't have military power since warfare is a male endeavor mainly and politics after the agricultural revolution has been always male centric.
Avatar image for stanleycup98
stanleycup98

6144

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#70 stanleycup98
Member since 2006 • 6144 Posts
In my opinion, if China is able to sustain their economy for a long period of time, their human rights issues will start to improve as people's education and standard of living increases. China has only been an industrial power since about the 1970s. The US started becoming an industrial power in the mid-1800's. After 40 years from the start of the major industrialization of the US, there were tons of human rights violations, the biggest obviously being slavery (at the beginning). After that, you had the civil rights issues for blacks and women, child labor problems, etc. It took decades for these issues to be fixed. I expect China will follow the same path, as their human rights have been improving gradually.
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 LJS9502_basic  Online
Member since 2003 • 180120 Posts
In my opinion, if China is able to sustain their economy for a long period of time, their human rights issues will start to improve as people's education and standard of living increases. China has only been an industrial power since about the 1970s. The US started becoming an industrial power in the mid-1800's. After 40 years from the start of the major industrialization of the US, there were tons of human rights violations, the biggest obviously being slavery (at the beginning). After that, you had the civil rights issues for blacks and women, child labor problems, etc. It took decades for these issues to be fixed. I expect China will follow the same path, as their human rights have been improving gradually. stanleycup98
Just an FYI...slavery existed in most countries back in the day and certainly didn't originate in the states.
Avatar image for stanleycup98
stanleycup98

6144

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#72 stanleycup98
Member since 2006 • 6144 Posts
[QUOTE="stanleycup98"]In my opinion, if China is able to sustain their economy for a long period of time, their human rights issues will start to improve as people's education and standard of living increases. China has only been an industrial power since about the 1970s. The US started becoming an industrial power in the mid-1800's. After 40 years from the start of the major industrialization of the US, there were tons of human rights violations, the biggest obviously being slavery (at the beginning). After that, you had the civil rights issues for blacks and women, child labor problems, etc. It took decades for these issues to be fixed. I expect China will follow the same path, as their human rights have been improving gradually. LJS9502_basic
Just an FYI...slavery existed in most countries back in the day and certainly didn't originate in the states.

I'm aware
Avatar image for Agent-Zero
Agent-Zero

6198

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 Agent-Zero
Member since 2009 • 6198 Posts
I just can't wait for Team America: World Police 2: Team China: World Police
Avatar image for ruhunrocks
ruhunrocks

321

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 ruhunrocks
Member since 2010 • 321 Posts

It's nice to see some change in the world...

Sides

indeed

Avatar image for CHOASXIII
CHOASXIII

14716

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#75 CHOASXIII
Member since 2009 • 14716 Posts

Because the plan is...once China becomes the major superpower then China will look for a cheap way to produce products and look to the U.S. and then we get manufacturing from them. (Idk really...just sounded good)

Avatar image for superfluidity
superfluidity

2163

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 superfluidity
Member since 2010 • 2163 Posts

I would have no problem with China rising in power if they had a democratic government and human rights. Fortunately, their political backwardness should limit them in terms of forming military and economic alliances in the future.

Whatever the case, I'm joining the party through emerging market funds.

Avatar image for branketra
branketra

51726

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 9

#77 branketra
Member since 2006 • 51726 Posts
I know what you mean. However, hopefully, they change some of their major policies in regards to citizenship and laws.
Avatar image for gameguy6700
gameguy6700

12197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 gameguy6700
Member since 2004 • 12197 Posts

[QUOTE="gameguy6700"][QUOTE="kuraimen"] Yeah but they are not a cultural influence. There's a difference between being economically powerful and being the cultural power of the world. Japan just adapted to the western-type of mentality and succeeded economically.kuraimen

Which is exactly what China is doing too. In Hong Kong you can't even get a corporate job without being fluent in English. The reason western culture has been spread so much is because of all the Western European empires that (literally) ruled the world during the imperial age. Then America exacerbated the situation even further when Hollywood, fast food, and chain stores came into being. No other country has ever boasted "culture" as one of its main exports. And right now it seems unlikely that China will overtake the US as the world's biggest producer of pop culture. Not only because there's no sign of them really focusing on that, but also because no other country to date has really pumped out high quality movies, music, TV shows, etc. as the US. Not to say that there aren't countries that produce a lot of those things, but their output is completely dwarfed by the US entertainment industry.

Of course we are going through a transition so it is obvious that China sees the need to learn english, it is not like the US is completely irrelevant now. I don't know you but in my country, which is in latinamerica, they opened hundreds of chinese language centers last year. We have a lot of cultural influence from the US and yet we see more and more chinese stuff in the streets everyday, they are even creating a chinese neighborhood in the center of the capital. The government here ignored a call from the US condemn China because of human rights violations and accepted a soccer stadium from the chinese in return (everything in that stadium is written in chinese by the way). I have seen similar stuff happening in several other countries specially Brazil which is more and more growing to become a economical power. Of course a transition as big as this one is not going to happen so fast but it will happen and it already started. Hell my 3 year old niece is learning chinese in kindergarten in a german school (a german government policy for that school here), they even teach that here before english now.

Well yeah but just becau- wait, did you just say that your country declined to condemn human rights violations in exchange for a soccer stadium?

Avatar image for one_plum
one_plum

6823

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 one_plum
Member since 2009 • 6823 Posts

Everyone? Generalization much?

Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts

[QUOTE="kuraimen"]

[QUOTE="gameguy6700"] Which is exactly what China is doing too. In Hong Kong you can't even get a corporate job without being fluent in English. The reason western culture has been spread so much is because of all the Western European empires that (literally) ruled the world during the imperial age. Then America exacerbated the situation even further when Hollywood, fast food, and chain stores came into being. No other country has ever boasted "culture" as one of its main exports. And right now it seems unlikely that China will overtake the US as the world's biggest producer of pop culture. Not only because there's no sign of them really focusing on that, but also because no other country to date has really pumped out high quality movies, music, TV shows, etc. as the US. Not to say that there aren't countries that produce a lot of those things, but their output is completely dwarfed by the US entertainment industry.gameguy6700

Of course we are going through a transition so it is obvious that China sees the need to learn english, it is not like the US is completely irrelevant now. I don't know you but in my country, which is in latinamerica, they opened hundreds of chinese language centers last year. We have a lot of cultural influence from the US and yet we see more and more chinese stuff in the streets everyday, they are even creating a chinese neighborhood in the center of the capital. The government here ignored a call from the US condemn China because of human rights violations and accepted a soccer stadium from the chinese in return (everything in that stadium is written in chinese by the way). I have seen similar stuff happening in several other countries specially Brazil which is more and more growing to become a economical power. Of course a transition as big as this one is not going to happen so fast but it will happen and it already started. Hell my 3 year old niece is learning chinese in kindergarten in a german school (a german government policy for that school here), they even teach that here before english now.

Well yeah but just becau- wait, did you just say that your country declined to condemn human rights violations in exchange for a soccer stadium?

lol, yep. We also supported the US in the illegal iraqi war in exchange of the US training a special police task force. That's how my country rolls :P

Avatar image for musalala
musalala

3131

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#81 musalala
Member since 2008 • 3131 Posts

I've seen tons of posts in this forum where people seem so happy and excited that China will eventually become the top superpower. Posters can't wait until they pass the US. So my question is why? Doesn't China have a pretty bad history of human rights violation and oppression of civil rights and freedoms? Is that what people are looking forward to? Hooray for censorship?

sonicare

Doesn't China have a pretty bad history of human rights violation and oppression of civil rights and freedoms? The same thing can be said of America. The only differnce is America tends to do its dirt outside of its borders, a lot of brutal dictators around the world have enjoyed American support. The guy in Egypt and even the "evil" Bin ladin

Avatar image for Sagem28
Sagem28

10498

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#82 Sagem28
Member since 2010 • 10498 Posts

It'll spice things up, thats for sure.

Avatar image for EsYuGee
EsYuGee

466

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 EsYuGee
Member since 2007 • 466 Posts

Another thing and this is probably the most important one in my book. Ever since we have written memory the "world culture" has been dominated by the "western" mentality. From Greece, to the Romans, to the Spanish, English empires and now the US, everyone of those cultures evolved from an indoeuropean heritage meaning that we are plagued by indoeuropean mentality, which, among other characteristics, is very patriarchal, dualistic and rational oriented. China will be the first big diversion from this pattern. It is probably not the best one but it is a start. I think eastern cultures has a lot to teach us westerners in matters as to how they conceive the world, religion and human nature. kuraimen

What the heck are you talking about? "World culture" has been dominated by the "western" mentality since recorded history? Where did you get that gem from? I guess a life of learning mainly European/ American history in school has robbed you of the whole picture of world history.

BTW I don't think China will surpass the US in influence or standard of living anytime soon. The people of developed and developing countries are much more attracted to the American system rather than the Chinese one. However, the world is changing. We can't boil everything down into a China vs US argument. How does India fit into the picture? Or South America?

Avatar image for Espada12
Espada12

23247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#84 Espada12
Member since 2008 • 23247 Posts

I've always said, if someone has to police the world or even take it over I rather it be the Americans than the chinese.

Avatar image for tenaka2
tenaka2

17958

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#85 tenaka2
Member since 2004 • 17958 Posts

I'm not a huge fan of the American approach, however China banned Dr. Who. I like Dr. Who.

Avatar image for KH-mixerX
KH-mixerX

5702

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#86 KH-mixerX
Member since 2007 • 5702 Posts

Most of the posters who looking forward to the possibility of China surpassing the US are adolescents living in countries outside the US who have a massive inferiority complex about their nationality. If China becomes a superpower then they'll just complain about China too.gameguy6700

Reading this post was like getting punched in the face by a physical manifestation truth itself.

Avatar image for Desulated
Desulated

30952

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 55

User Lists: 0

#87 Desulated
Member since 2005 • 30952 Posts

I am Asian myself and I'm not excited one bit. Corruption in the government arena in China is by far out of control. Of course, the officials will abuse that power to an even greater extent if they were a first-class world figure.

Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#88 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

I am Asian myself and I'm not excited one bit. Corruption in the government arena in China is by far out of control. Of course, the officials will abuse that power to an even greater extent if they were a first-****world figure.

Desulated

we havethat in the states now, so in that area nothing would change

Avatar image for SUD123456
SUD123456

7055

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#89 SUD123456
Member since 2007 • 7055 Posts

I happen to believe that having 1/6 of the world's population become more educated, increase their standard of living, and make the transition to informed consumers is a good thing.

Indeed, I would suggest that in an interconnected world economy it is inevitable that political and social reform occurs or else superpower status cannot be obtained/retained.

Oppression/tyranny relies upon having a mostly poor, uneducated, and often rural population. Clearly China has a long way to go, but they are certainly much more open than when I was a young man. The difference over those 30+ years is the shift to urban dwellers and the rapidly increasing economic wealth and increased education that comes with that.

Avatar image for Barbariser
Barbariser

6785

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#90 Barbariser
Member since 2009 • 6785 Posts

Would be nice if, as people said, acquiring superpower status turns that nation into a less backward country in terms of human and civil rights. However, I'm Chinese yet I can't speak the language (and learning it is a real pain in the ass) so I sure as hell hope English retains its dominance as an international language for the next 80 years.

Avatar image for tenaka2
tenaka2

17958

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#91 tenaka2
Member since 2004 • 17958 Posts

I've always said, if someone has to police the world or even take it over I rather it be the Americans than the chinese.

Espada12

Damn right!

aasd

Avatar image for deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
deactivated-6127ced9bcba0

31700

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#92 deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
Member since 2006 • 31700 Posts

What's funny is is that every single person rooting for China is in for a rude awakening. Their housing bubble is going to collapse so hard it's really not even funny.

Avatar image for Lonelynight
Lonelynight

30051

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#93 Lonelynight
Member since 2006 • 30051 Posts
I just hope that there are social reforms in China in the near future.
Avatar image for villa4europe
villa4europe

7081

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#94 villa4europe
Member since 2004 • 7081 Posts

the 12th 5 year plan has already highlighted that china is looking to go greener, treat the people better and do away with many of the human rights issues that plague the country, their growth can only be a good thing

as for the housing bubble bursting and ruining them, cant see it personally, learnt too much from japan, the biggest problem for them is the yuan being floated too fast and the issue within the original special economic zones potentially becoming ghost towns when companies go inland for cheaper prices (foxconn have already gone for example)

within5 years india and vietnam will be cheaper than the chinese coast for manufacturing

Avatar image for CoolSkAGuy
CoolSkAGuy

9665

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#95 CoolSkAGuy
Member since 2006 • 9665 Posts
They have good chinese food.
Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#96 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

the 12th 5 year plan has already highlighted that china is looking to go greener, treat the people better and do away with many of the human rights issues that plague the country, their growth can only be a good thing

as for the housing bubble bursting and ruining them, cant see it personally, learnt too much from japan, the biggest problem for them is the yuan being floated too fast and the issue within the original special economic zones potentially becoming ghost towns when companies go inland for cheaper prices (foxconn have already gone for example)

within5 years india and vietnam will be cheaper than the chinese coast for manufacturing

villa4europe

you think people/states learn from the past let alone the past of others?

Avatar image for redstorm119
redstorm119

207

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#97 redstorm119
Member since 2010 • 207 Posts

I'm fine with China and the power and no I'm not Chinese. And they are only reemerging there position. Throughout history they have always been ahead in technology and on the top as far as economy and military. So this is really nothing new. After the Ming Dynastythey started going downhill, but now they are just retaking what they are normally used to being at the top.

Avatar image for Lonelynight
Lonelynight

30051

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#98 Lonelynight
Member since 2006 • 30051 Posts
we havethat in the states now, so in that area nothing would changesurrealnumber5
I doubt that the U.S. is even comparable to China in terms of corruption. A murderer who went on a rampage to kill police officers was actually held as a hero by the people there.(China)
Avatar image for SolidSnake35
SolidSnake35

58971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 3

#99 SolidSnake35
Member since 2005 • 58971 Posts
I don't know how anyone could get excited over economics.
Avatar image for ferrari2001
ferrari2001

17772

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#100 ferrari2001
Member since 2008 • 17772 Posts
If China's citizens were to rise up and demand change, and the many injustices that the Chinese people suffer under the hands of the government were to end than I would support the rise of another super power. But as it is right now, where the average worker gets paid less per week than we pay for the products that they make, citizens are poorly treated, many good things are censored and certain decisions of the Chinese peoples are banned I cannot and will not give my support to China.