Why is Obama's economic plan not working?

  • 127 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for SoBaus
SoBaus

546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#101 SoBaus
Member since 2011 • 546 Posts

[QUOTE="SoBaus"]

[QUOTE="Nibroc420"] :| obviously that would depend on their location.Nibroc420

So you honestly think 900,000 jobs are sitting out there waiting? have you seen the monthly jobs numbers? only 38,000 private sector jobs were created in may.... These guys are lazy leaches not looking for work afterall, because the jobs are just out there... somewhere... if only these lazy unemployed a-holes would look... amirite?

Pretty much. And they're spending the tax money you pay. Rather than focusing on education, and paying retiree's what is owed, the Government has to put tax dollars into the pockets of people who dont even pay taxes.

unemployment insurance has to be paid by their employer... which essentially comes out of their pocket.

We should head down to the cancer ward at the hospital and yell at all those lazy leaches using their health insurance they paid for! Everyone knows you pay insurance, but never dare claim the benefits... otherwise you are a lazy leach!

Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#102 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"]

[QUOTE="SoBaus"]

so where are the 900,000 jobs for the applicants rejected? We should get this info out to the public ASAP, because they are clearly hungry for work. Where are these jobs just locked and loaded waiting for them? The masses want to know...

SoBaus

mind filling in all of the blanks before i try to know how your question has anything to do with what i was saying about McD's?

900,000 people were rejected when applying to McDonalds in april.... where should they look for work next if they dont want to be "lazy leaches"?

look everywhere, take what you can get, better your self, improve your skills, and get a new better job on your terms.

that is kinda rule of thumb number one for being an adult, if those people did not cut the mustard at McD's then they should not have been hired, and the decision of who is and is not qualified to work at McD's is not a judgement i can make. frankly i dont know a damn thing about fast food, never worked it.

Avatar image for Nibroc420
Nibroc420

13571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#103 Nibroc420
Member since 2007 • 13571 Posts

[QUOTE="Nibroc420"][QUOTE="SoBaus"]

So you honestly think 900,000 jobs are sitting out there waiting? have you seen the monthly jobs numbers? only 38,000 private sector jobs were created in may.... These guys are lazy leaches not looking for work afterall, because the jobs are just out there... somewhere... if only these lazy unemployed a-holes would look... amirite?

SoBaus

Pretty much. And they're spending the tax money you pay. Rather than focusing on education, and paying retiree's what is owed, the Government has to put tax dollars into the pockets of people who dont even pay taxes.

unemployment insurance has to be paid by their employer... which essentially comes out of their pocket.

We should head down to the cancer ward at the hospital and yell at all those lazy leaches using their health insurance they paid for! Everyone knows you pay insurance, but never dare claim the benefits... otherwise you are a lazy leach!

:roll: People only put so much in, yet receive more.
Avatar image for SoBaus
SoBaus

546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#104 SoBaus
Member since 2011 • 546 Posts

[QUOTE="SoBaus"]

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"] mind filling in all of the blanks before i try to know how your question has anything to do with what i was saying about McD's?

surrealnumber5

900,000 people were rejected when applying to McDonalds in april.... where should they look for work next if they dont want to be "lazy leaches"?

look everywhere, take what you can get, better your self, improve your skills, and get a new better job on your terms.

that is kinda rule of thumb number one for being an adult, if those people did not cut the mustard at McD's then they should not have been hired, and the decision of who is and is not qualified to work at McD's is not a judgement i can make. frankly i dont know a damn thing about fast food, never worked it.

You realize, there are more people looking for work than there are jobs... so if everyone got a PHD in physics from MIT, most of them would still be unemployed? Again, this is how the unemployment rate works.

Avatar image for SoBaus
SoBaus

546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#105 SoBaus
Member since 2011 • 546 Posts

[QUOTE="SoBaus"]

[QUOTE="Nibroc420"] Pretty much. And they're spending the tax money you pay. Rather than focusing on education, and paying retiree's what is owed, the Government has to put tax dollars into the pockets of people who dont even pay taxes.Nibroc420

unemployment insurance has to be paid by their employer... which essentially comes out of their pocket.

We should head down to the cancer ward at the hospital and yell at all those lazy leaches using their health insurance they paid for! Everyone knows you pay insurance, but never dare claim the benefits... otherwise you are a lazy leach!

:roll: People only put so much in, yet receive more.

Do you understand the principles of insurance? i have paid thousands upon thousands of dollars in car insurance... but have never been in an accident, and have never recieved 1 dime...

If you have ever been in a car accident, or anyone else here... you are essentially stealing my hard earned money.... you leaches.

Avatar image for Nibroc420
Nibroc420

13571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#106 Nibroc420
Member since 2007 • 13571 Posts

[QUOTE="Nibroc420"][QUOTE="SoBaus"]

unemployment insurance has to be paid by their employer... which essentially comes out of their pocket.

We should head down to the cancer ward at the hospital and yell at all those lazy leaches using their health insurance they paid for! Everyone knows you pay insurance, but never dare claim the benefits... otherwise you are a lazy leach!

SoBaus

:roll: People only put so much in, yet receive more.

Do you understand the principles of insurance? i have paid thousands upon thousands of dollars in car insurance... but have never been in an accident, and have never recieved 1 dime...

If you have ever been in a car accident, or anyone else here... you are essentially stealing my hard earned money.... you leaches.

Yeah... Alright. So these people who dont work, and dont pay taxes, deserve tax dollars more than the schools who educate the future work force? Sounds like America loves digging itself into holes.
Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#107 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"]

[QUOTE="SoBaus"]

900,000 people were rejected when applying to McDonalds in april.... where should they look for work next if they dont want to be "lazy leaches"?

SoBaus

look everywhere, take what you can get, better your self, improve your skills, and get a new better job on your terms.

that is kinda rule of thumb number one for being an adult, if those people did not cut the mustard at McD's then they should not have been hired, and the decision of who is and is not qualified to work at McD's is not a judgement i can make. frankly i dont know a damn thing about fast food, never worked it.

You realize, there are more people looking for work than there are jobs... so if everyone got a PHD in physics from MIT, most of them would still be unemployed? Again, this is how the unemployment rate works.

if that is how unemployment rate works then the unemployment rate can only ever increase, going by your example.

ITT: you recognized unemployment insurance as part of ones pay, just wanted to give props for that, most dont include hidden costs of employment (employers perspective) to wages. now mind you i think such a thing should not be manditory, but that is a whole other topic.

Avatar image for SoBaus
SoBaus

546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#108 SoBaus
Member since 2011 • 546 Posts

[QUOTE="SoBaus"]

[QUOTE="Nibroc420"] :roll: People only put so much in, yet receive more.Nibroc420

Do you understand the principles of insurance? i have paid thousands upon thousands of dollars in car insurance... but have never been in an accident, and have never recieved 1 dime...

If you have ever been in a car accident, or anyone else here... you are essentially stealing my hard earned money.... you leaches.

Yeah... Alright. So these people who dont work, and dont pay taxes, deserve tax dollars more than the schools who educate the future work force? Sounds like America loves digging itself into holes.

but have you ever been in a car accident? why do i have to pay money because you cant drive responsibly?

speaking of education, if you cant figure out how to operate a damn vehicle without getting into an accident, why do i have to pay to fix your car? Hows that fair? 2 pedals and a wheel... i can see why you dont have faith in education since you couldnt get those basics down. Im kidding obviously, but anytime insurance is involved... inequality of benefits is natural.

and the unemployed only get insurance if they were laid off through no fault of their own... alot of that money may go to keeping kids in school from not starving to death when a parent loses a job.

Avatar image for Nibroc420
Nibroc420

13571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#109 Nibroc420
Member since 2007 • 13571 Posts

[QUOTE="Nibroc420"][QUOTE="SoBaus"]

Do you understand the principles of insurance? i have paid thousands upon thousands of dollars in car insurance... but have never been in an accident, and have never recieved 1 dime...

If you have ever been in a car accident, or anyone else here... you are essentially stealing my hard earned money.... you leaches.

SoBaus

Yeah... Alright. So these people who dont work, and dont pay taxes, deserve tax dollars more than the schools who educate the future work force? Sounds like America loves digging itself into holes.

but have you ever been in a car accident? why do i have to pay money because you cant drive responsibly?

speaking of education, if you cant figure out how to operate a damn vehicle without getting into an accident, why do i have to pay to fix your car? Hows that fair? 2 pedals and a wheel... i can see why you dont have faith in education since you couldnt get those basics down.

and the unemployed only get insurance if they were laid off through no fault of their own... alot of that money may go to keeping kids in school from not starving to death when a parent loses a job.

Clearly if a parent is unable to care for their child, they shouldn't have said child. Likewise, if someone's too lazy to get a job, or get educated so they can get a job. Clearly they have no intention of getting a job. Why should we pay lazy people who have no intention of working?
Avatar image for SoBaus
SoBaus

546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#110 SoBaus
Member since 2011 • 546 Posts

[QUOTE="SoBaus"]

[QUOTE="Nibroc420"] Yeah... Alright. So these people who dont work, and dont pay taxes, deserve tax dollars more than the schools who educate the future work force? Sounds like America loves digging itself into holes.Nibroc420

but have you ever been in a car accident? why do i have to pay money because you cant drive responsibly?

speaking of education, if you cant figure out how to operate a damn vehicle without getting into an accident, why do i have to pay to fix your car? Hows that fair? 2 pedals and a wheel... i can see why you dont have faith in education since you couldnt get those basics down.

and the unemployed only get insurance if they were laid off through no fault of their own... alot of that money may go to keeping kids in school from not starving to death when a parent loses a job.

Clearly if a parent is unable to care for their child, they shouldn't have said child. Likewise, if someone's too lazy to get a job, or get educated so they can get a job. Clearly they have no intention of getting a job. Why should we pay lazy people who have no intention of working?

I see someone still avoiding the topic of if i paid to fix their car.... btw you are welcome for the repairs, but a thank you would be nice.;)

but you probably just took my money and just spent it on video games or a flatscreen or something.... but im not mad im paying for your luxury.... its how insurance works.

Avatar image for Nibroc420
Nibroc420

13571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#111 Nibroc420
Member since 2007 • 13571 Posts

[QUOTE="Nibroc420"][QUOTE="SoBaus"]

but have you ever been in a car accident? why do i have to pay money because you cant drive responsibly?

speaking of education, if you cant figure out how to operate a damn vehicle without getting into an accident, why do i have to pay to fix your car? Hows that fair? 2 pedals and a wheel... i can see why you dont have faith in education since you couldnt get those basics down.

and the unemployed only get insurance if they were laid off through no fault of their own... alot of that money may go to keeping kids in school from not starving to death when a parent loses a job.

SoBaus

Clearly if a parent is unable to care for their child, they shouldn't have said child. Likewise, if someone's too lazy to get a job, or get educated so they can get a job. Clearly they have no intention of getting a job. Why should we pay lazy people who have no intention of working?

I see someone still avoiding the topic of if i paid to fix their car.... btw you are welcome for the repairs, but a thank you would be nice.;)

What repairs? Are you making more assumptions? I've never been in a Car accident. Unlike some uneducated people, i know how to drive.
Avatar image for SoBaus
SoBaus

546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#112 SoBaus
Member since 2011 • 546 Posts

[QUOTE="SoBaus"]

[QUOTE="Nibroc420"] Clearly if a parent is unable to care for their child, they shouldn't have said child. Likewise, if someone's too lazy to get a job, or get educated so they can get a job. Clearly they have no intention of getting a job. Why should we pay lazy people who have no intention of working?Nibroc420

I see someone still avoiding the topic of if i paid to fix their car.... btw you are welcome for the repairs, but a thank you would be nice.;)

What repairs? Are you making more assumptions? I've never been in a Car accident. Unlike some uneducated people, i know how to drive.

ok ok, i believe you. But your welcome for me paying for your playstation ;)

Avatar image for Nibroc420
Nibroc420

13571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#113 Nibroc420
Member since 2007 • 13571 Posts

[QUOTE="Nibroc420"][QUOTE="SoBaus"]

I see someone still avoiding the topic of if i paid to fix their car.... btw you are welcome for the repairs, but a thank you would be nice.;)

SoBaus

What repairs? Are you making more assumptions? I've never been in a Car accident. Unlike some uneducated people, i know how to drive.

ok ok, i believe you. But your welcome for me paying for your playstation ;)

:| What play station? What are you talking about?
Avatar image for SoBaus
SoBaus

546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#114 SoBaus
Member since 2011 • 546 Posts

[QUOTE="SoBaus"]

[QUOTE="Nibroc420"] What repairs? Are you making more assumptions? I've never been in a Car accident. Unlike some uneducated people, i know how to drive.Nibroc420

ok ok, i believe you. But your welcome for me paying for your playstation ;)

:| What play station? What are you talking about?

i know you took that check from your fender bender and cashed it and bought lots of sweet stuff, sweet stuff that i paid for... im on to you!

Avatar image for Nibroc420
Nibroc420

13571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#115 Nibroc420
Member since 2007 • 13571 Posts

[QUOTE="Nibroc420"][QUOTE="SoBaus"]

ok ok, i believe you. But your welcome for me paying for your playstation ;)

SoBaus

:| What play station? What are you talking about?

i know you took that check from your fender bender and cashed it and bought lots of sweet stuff, sweet stuff that i paid for... im on to you!

Sorry bro, I've never received a check from any accident. Not that it would be you paying for it :| Regardless, you're going off topic.
Avatar image for genfactor
genfactor

1472

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#116 genfactor
Member since 2004 • 1472 Posts

[QUOTE="genfactor"]

[QUOTE="BMD004"]Any proof that his economic plan prevented a depression and stopped the unemployment rate from reaching 13 percent? Or did you just make that up?BMD004

While it may contradict the talk radio and fox news hacks, this is the general consensus of credible economists.

No, it isn't. A large sum of economists completely disagree with you, and in no way is what you say the general consensus. How can you even prove that the employment rate would be at 13% had it not been for Obama? Where did you even get that number from?

http://www.epi.org/economic_snapshots/entry/without_federal_intervention_unemployment_would_be_near_16/

http://content.usatoday.com/communities/onpolitics/post/2010/02/cbo-unemployment-would-have-topped-11-without-stimulus/1

http://www.bizjournals.com/denver/stories/2010/08/30/daily63.html

http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works/2010/05/26/stimulus_still_working

http://abcnews.go.com/Business/economic-stimulus-minus-grade/story?id=9867659

Where are you getting your numbers from? Are they more credible than the CBO?

Avatar image for Mafiree
Mafiree

3704

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#117 Mafiree
Member since 2008 • 3704 Posts

[QUOTE="BMD004"][QUOTE="genfactor"]

While it may contradict the talk radio and fox news hacks, this is the general consensus of credible economists.

genfactor

No, it isn't. A large sum of economists completely disagree with you, and in no way is what you say the general consensus. How can you even prove that the employment rate would be at 13% had it not been for Obama? Where did you even get that number from?

http://www.epi.org/economic_snapshots/entry/without_federal_intervention_unemployment_would_be_near_16/

http://content.usatoday.com/communities/onpolitics/post/2010/02/cbo-unemployment-would-have-topped-11-without-stimulus/1

http://www.bizjournals.com/denver/stories/2010/08/30/daily63.html

http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works/2010/05/26/stimulus_still_working

http://abcnews.go.com/Business/economic-stimulus-minus-grade/story?id=9867659

Where are you getting your numbers from? Are they more credible than the CBO?

First one is not a credible source....... I see them talking about 11% unemployment which is reasonable (far from the 13% that was brought up), but $800 billion was spent to achieve that 1% drop......
Avatar image for bbkkristian
bbkkristian

14971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 1

#118 bbkkristian
Member since 2008 • 14971 Posts
Because it was meant to cripple our economy not help it. National Debt is still on the rise faster than its ever been.
Avatar image for BMD004
BMD004

5883

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#119 BMD004
Member since 2010 • 5883 Posts

[QUOTE="BMD004"][QUOTE="genfactor"]

While it may contradict the talk radio and fox news hacks, this is the general consensus of credible economists.

genfactor

No, it isn't. A large sum of economists completely disagree with you, and in no way is what you say the general consensus. How can you even prove that the employment rate would be at 13% had it not been for Obama? Where did you even get that number from?

http://www.epi.org/economic_snapshots/entry/without_federal_intervention_unemployment_would_be_near_16/

http://content.usatoday.com/communities/onpolitics/post/2010/02/cbo-unemployment-would-have-topped-11-without-stimulus/1

http://www.bizjournals.com/denver/stories/2010/08/30/daily63.html

http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works/2010/05/26/stimulus_still_working

http://abcnews.go.com/Business/economic-stimulus-minus-grade/story?id=9867659

Where are you getting your numbers from? Are they more credible than the CBO?

The CBO said 11%... not 13%. And the unemployment rate has already been between 10% and 11% not too long ago, so how much did the stimulus really help?

PLUS, sending people to work just for the sake of sending them to work just to say they have a job is NOT a good thing. It is an inefficient allocation of labor. It may make your numbers look better, but in reality it is worse in the long-run. It just delays a recovery.

Avatar image for HoolaHoopMan
HoolaHoopMan

14724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#120 HoolaHoopMan
Member since 2009 • 14724 Posts

[QUOTE="SoBaus"]

[QUOTE="QuistisTrepe_"]

Why would anyone do that? With the extensions in unemployment, we're all but encouraging people NOT to work.

surrealnumber5

Encouraging them to work AT WHAT JOBS? do you understand the basic definition of what an unemployment rate is? In April, McDonalds rejected 93% of applicants, MCDONALDS! thats a fast food place, the bottom of the barrel for jobs... accepting only the top 7% of applicants. What the hell do you want these people to do? Die on the street? thats pretty american of you.

At least unemployment benefits are a HUGE value to stimulating the economy, unlike trickle down.

McD's pays over min wage, they may have a stigma about them due to media bashing the hell out of them whenever some inbred primate pours coffee on him or her self, but they are not the bottom of the barrel for jobs.

McDonalds isn't at or NEAR the bottom barrel for jobs? Are you kidding me? Obviously there are going to be crappier jobs out there but McDonalds is still scraping the bottom.

Avatar image for branketra
branketra

51726

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 9

#121 branketra
Member since 2006 • 51726 Posts
Well, the Pell Grant's definitely working.
Avatar image for tocool340
tocool340

21695

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#123 tocool340
Member since 2004 • 21695 Posts
The way I see it, Obama has done his part. The big name corporations making great profits and high gas prices because of spooked analyst are keeping the economy from really "healing" at this point. Companies are getting comfortable with using less workers and are mostly hiring workers with experience instead of hiring many entry level workers to train. By doing that, quite a bit of new graduates are forced to work dead end jobs, which isn't really helping anyone......
Avatar image for BMD004
BMD004

5883

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#124 BMD004
Member since 2010 • 5883 Posts
The way I see it, Obama has done his part. The big name corporations making great profits and high gas prices because of spooked analyst are keeping the economy from really "healing" at this point. Companies are getting comfortable with using less workers and are mostly hiring workers with experience instead of hiring many entry level workers to train. By doing that, quite a bit of new graduates are forced to work dead end jobs, which isn't really helping anyone......tocool340
So what are you advocating? That companies just start hiring more people than they actually need just so that they can act like a charity and give people jobs?
Avatar image for jaqulle999
jaqulle999

2897

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#125 jaqulle999
Member since 2009 • 2897 Posts

This is something that will take a long time to fix but in a sense its slowly improving

Avatar image for mattbbpl
mattbbpl

23353

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#126 mattbbpl
Member since 2006 • 23353 Posts

[QUOTE="theone86"]

[QUOTE="scorch-62"]See also: private sector job growth.BMD004

This. I'm not entirely convinced that many corporations simply aren't hiring because Obama's pushing for a return to the Clinton tax rates, and they know that if the economy stays bad it increases their chances of getting a President who will do what Ryan is proposing and slash their taxes even further instead. Beyond that, during the recession businesses learned to operate with less overhead, i.e. fewer employees. Now that they see they can be profitable with fewer employees they're not going to go back to previous hiring quotas unless there's some incentive for them to do so. I'm actually beginning to think that 8%+ unemployment is going to become the new norm.

That doesn't make sense. Businesses expand because there is more demand. With the lack of demand, there isn't a need for more employees. A business can only be so efficient with current labor... and once demand exceeds that, then they have to hire more people.

P.S... I don't think direct labor is included in overhead costs.

I'm in agreement, but why do Republicans always deviate from this stance when arguing for supply side tax cuts to further stimulate job growth. It doesn't make sense.

Avatar image for andrewjuly
andrewjuly

199

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#127 andrewjuly
Member since 2011 • 199 Posts
To develop a low-key national stability would also have to demonstrate our strong side!