Why is the human race so corrupt?

  • 84 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for mattisgod01
mattisgod01

3476

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#51 mattisgod01
Member since 2005 • 3476 Posts

[QUOTE="mattisgod01"]

Maybe because we where made by microsoft. But honestly its becuase of Darwin's theory of evolution, where everything is based on survival of the fittest. We have traits that are required for our species to survive.

EMOEVOLUTION

Unfortunately survival of the fittest is often misused to represent something else entirely. What you mean to say is Natural Selection which is much more honest to what Darwin was actually saying.

What i meant was our base instincts, which we have had for tens of thousands of years would still be with us regardless of how civilized we become. And yea, Natural selection was the term i meant.

Avatar image for nintendo-4life
nintendo-4life

18281

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 nintendo-4life
Member since 2004 • 18281 Posts
we are still evolving. That's the reason why you still find mistakes.
Avatar image for EMOEVOLUTION
EMOEVOLUTION

8998

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 EMOEVOLUTION
Member since 2008 • 8998 Posts

[QUOTE="EMOEVOLUTION"][QUOTE="mattisgod01"]

Maybe because we where made by microsoft. But honestly its becuase of Darwin's theory of evolution, where everything is based on survival of the fittest. We have traits that are required for our species to survive.

mattisgod01

Unfortunately survival of the fittest is often misused to represent something else entirely. What you mean to say is Natural Selection which is much more honest to what Darwin was actually saying.

What i meant was our base instincts, which we have had for tens of thousands of years would still be with us regardless of how civilized we become. And yea, Natural selection was the term i meant.

Anyways.. no organism functions on an individual level. They all function on a collective level. I understand this is a hard concept for many people to grasp because individualism is over valued in industrialized societies but the truth is it takes many organisms to survive.. not one singular. Sure, natural selection plays a part.. but the evolution of culture is just as important to our success... and you may be able to tie that down to the genetic level. But I'm not completely sure it's always directly connected.

Avatar image for 0Tyler0
0Tyler0

2602

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 0Tyler0
Member since 2008 • 2602 Posts
We're animals. A lot of animals are messed up.
Avatar image for mrbojangles25
mrbojangles25

60853

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#55 mrbojangles25
Member since 2005 • 60853 Posts

I imagine it is to counter all the beautiful things we do. I'd guess for every 100,000 small acts of kindness, one large and horrible thing occurs.

Humanity is very balanced, for better or worse.

Avatar image for Head_of_games
Head_of_games

10859

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 Head_of_games
Member since 2007 • 10859 Posts
Tell me about it! I say we go out and kill all the jerks. :P
Avatar image for BumFluff122
BumFluff122

14853

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#57 BumFluff122
Member since 2004 • 14853 Posts

[QUOTE="mattisgod01"]

Maybe because we where made by microsoft. But honestly its becuase of Darwin's theory of evolution, where everything is based on survival of the fittest. We have traits that are required for our species to survive.

Xx_Hopeless_xX

Darwin's theory of evolution says that over millions of years simple life forms (one celled creatures) slowly evolved into complex life forms (fish), and that one kind of animal evolved into another kind (ape to man).The creation model, on the other hand, says that all life forms were created in six, 24 hour days. If the creation model is wrong and man actually did evolve in small graduations over a long period of time, we should find ample fossil evidence of links in intermediate stages of transition. For decades, evolutionists have searched for fossils of these links to prove the creation model wrong. Although millions of fossils have been unearthed, even evolutionists acknowledge that the links have not been found.

It is a well guarded fact that many evolutionists rejected Darwin's theory of evolution over 20 years ago. Stephen Jay Gould, a professor at Harvard University and one of the foremost authorities on evolution in the world said, "The extreme rarity of transitional forms (missing links) in the fossil record persists as the trade secret of paleontologists,...we view our data as so bad that we never see the very process we profess to study". Natural History, Vol. 86. Gould is still an evolutionist, he just rejects much of Darwin's theory.

Just what i found on Darwins theory of evolution...

See. The problem with what you are stating is that technocally there are no such things as transitional species. Ever species that ever existed is a full complete species on it's own that evolved from an Earlier fully complete species. Evidence of this process is in the much known Ring Species such as Larus Gulls or Ensatina Salamanders to name a few. Ring species began as one particular species type. They came to an obstacle and one group went one way and the other group went the other way. Beneficial mutatiosn began occuring in each of the seperate groups until they meet at the other side. Each of these different species can reproduce with every sub-species in between the two species but they can't reproduce with eachother because they are too different. Tell me, where exactly would you label the transitional species in this instance? Remember there are real world examples of this. Either you label them all as transitional species or you label none of them as transitional species because they are each their own independant sub-species type. I mean you aren't going to find something like, say, a crocoduck. Which is what it seems you are claiming.

Darwin also lived over 100 years ago. Much has been found since then and much has been discovered that fully supports the evolutionary process. I mean we even know how and why it occurs. We've seen it in action. Yet for some reason people refuse to look at the data and believe in their own creationist propoganda.

Avatar image for Xx_Hopeless_xX
Xx_Hopeless_xX

16562

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 Xx_Hopeless_xX
Member since 2009 • 16562 Posts

[QUOTE="Xx_Hopeless_xX"]

[QUOTE="mattisgod01"]

Maybe because we where made by microsoft. But honestly its becuase of Darwin's theory of evolution, where everything is based on survival of the fittest. We have traits that are required for our species to survive.

BumFluff122

Darwin's theory of evolution says that over millions of years simple life forms (one celled creatures) slowly evolved into complex life forms (fish), and that one kind of animal evolved into another kind (ape to man).The creation model, on the other hand, says that all life forms were created in six, 24 hour days. If the creation model is wrong and man actually did evolve in small graduations over a long period of time, we should find ample fossil evidence of links in intermediate stages of transition. For decades, evolutionists have searched for fossils of these links to prove the creation model wrong. Although millions of fossils have been unearthed, even evolutionists acknowledge that the links have not been found.

It is a well guarded fact that many evolutionists rejected Darwin's theory of evolution over 20 years ago. Stephen Jay Gould, a professor at Harvard University and one of the foremost authorities on evolution in the world said, "The extreme rarity of transitional forms (missing links) in the fossil record persists as the trade secret of paleontologists,...we view our data as so bad that we never see the very process we profess to study". Natural History, Vol. 86. Gould is still an evolutionist, he just rejects much of Darwin's theory.

Just what i found on Darwins theory of evolution...

See. The problem with what you are stating is that technocally there are no such things as transitional species. Ever species that ever existed is a full complete species on it's own that evolved from an Earlier fully complete species. Evidence of this process is in the much known Ring Species such as Larus Gulls or Ensatina Salamanders to name a few. Ring species began as one particular species type. They came to an obstacle and one group went one way and the other group went the other way. Beneficial mutatiosn began occuring in each of the seperate groups until they meet at the other side. Each of these different species can reproduce with every sub-species in between the two species but they can't reproduce with eachother because they are too different. Tell me, where exactly would you label the transitional species in this instance? Remember there are real world examples of this. Either you label them all as transitional species or you label none of them as transitional species because they are each their own independant sub-species type. I mean you aren't going to find something like, say, a crocoduck. Which is what it seems you are claiming.

Darwin also lived over 100 years ago. Much has been found since then and much has been discovered that fully supports the evolutionary process. I mean we even know how and why it occurs. We've seen it in action. Yet for some reason people refuse to look at the data and believe in their own creationist propoganda.

I never said i was stating anything..actually...i merely said "this is what i found on darwin's theory"..

The presence of individual species actually proves they were not developed by an evolutionary process. If evolution were true, all plants, animals and insects would be in a continual state of change. No two creatures would be identical, because they would not be separate species. All life forms would be a continual blend of characteristics without a clear definition among the species. Everything would be changing, and every animal, insect and plant would be different. The cheetah above proves evolution does not exist. All species are locked solidly within their DNA code.

Evolution: A Theory in Crisisby Michael Denton.

Michael Denton says,

"Despite the tremendous increase in geological activity in every corner of the globe and despite the discovery of many strange and hitherto unknown forms, the infinitude of connecting links has still not been discovered and the fossil record is about as discontinuous as it was when Darwin was writing the Origin."


Avatar image for SpaceMoose
SpaceMoose

10789

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#59 SpaceMoose
Member since 2004 • 10789 Posts
Stupidity goes hand in hand with shortsightedness and a general lack of inhibition, two traits which contribute to having more children.
Avatar image for Snipes_2
Snipes_2

17126

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#60 Snipes_2
Member since 2009 • 17126 Posts

Darwinism has been proven false countless times, just today my Biology teacher said it was False. Throughout Science you can see his theory does not hold true, such as the nature of cells and DNA.

Avatar image for SpaceMoose
SpaceMoose

10789

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#61 SpaceMoose
Member since 2004 • 10789 Posts

Darwinism has been proven false countless times, just today my Biology teacher said it was False. Throughout Science you can see his theory does not hold true, such as the nature of cells and DNA.

Snipes_2
Well, if your biology teacher said it, then that is all the proof I need.
Avatar image for alphamale1989
alphamale1989

3134

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 alphamale1989
Member since 2008 • 3134 Posts
Human nature in general is really flawed. We're intelligent enough to work out all these great ideals but we lack the ablility to live up to them. I'm sure you can think of many ways where the obvious, logical thing to to is *this* but instead you keep on doing *that*.
Avatar image for T_P_O
T_P_O

5388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#63 T_P_O
Member since 2008 • 5388 Posts

Darwinism has been proven false countless times, just today my Biology teacher said it was False. Throughout Science you can see his theory does not hold true, such as the nature of cells and DNA.

Snipes_2

Your biology teacher should not be a science teacher.

Avatar image for Xx_Hopeless_xX
Xx_Hopeless_xX

16562

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 Xx_Hopeless_xX
Member since 2009 • 16562 Posts

[QUOTE="Snipes_2"]

Darwinism has been proven false countless times, just today my Biology teacher said it was False. Throughout Science you can see his theory does not hold true, such as the nature of cells and DNA.

T_P_O

Your biology teacher should not be a science teacher.

Support you statement..?

Avatar image for BumFluff122
BumFluff122

14853

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#65 BumFluff122
Member since 2004 • 14853 Posts

I never said i was stating anything..actually...i merely said "this is what i found on darwin's theory"..

The presence of individual species actually proves they were not developed by an evolutionary process. If evolution were true, all plants, animals and insects would be in a continual state of change. No two creatures would be identical, because they would not be separate species. All life forms would be a continual blend of characteristics without a clear definition among the species. Everything would be changing, and every animal, insect and plant would be different. The cheetah above proves evolution does not exist. All species are locked solidly within their DNA code.

Evolution: A Theory in Crisisby Michael Denton.

Michael Denton says,

"Despite the tremendous increase in geological activity in every corner of the globe and despite the discovery of many strange and hitherto unknown forms, the infinitude of connecting links has still not been discovered and the fossil record is about as discontinuous as it was when Darwin was writing the Origin."

Xx_Hopeless_xX

The presence of individual species does not prove anything. I gave an example of speciation in progress above. Ring Species. Here is an image of where different subspecies of Larus Gulls live.

The Lesser Blackbacked Gull and Herrign Gull can interbreed with any other type of gull in that picture but they can't interbreed with one another because they are too different. This is speciation in action. There is, however, no transitional species as each sub-species is unique. All plants, animals and insects ARE in a continuous state of change. Humans ARE in a continuous state of change. There are currently 11 different genetic codes in the overall human genome that are currently in the process of changing. One of these genetic markers are what creates the difference between Lactose intollerance and lactose tollerance. Other primates and animals can only drink milk when they are babies. However humans have a genetic marker that allows people with this marker to drink milk throughout their lives. The people who are lactose intollerant have the old primate genetic marker while those who are not have the new mutated genetic marker. If every animal was locked solidly in their genetic code retroviruses such as HIV would not exist nor would cancer.

Avatar image for Snipes_2
Snipes_2

17126

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#66 Snipes_2
Member since 2009 • 17126 Posts

Ok, Here you go.

http://www.discovery.org/a/10661

Avatar image for Snipes_2
Snipes_2

17126

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#67 Snipes_2
Member since 2009 • 17126 Posts

If Darwins Theory was true then why are there so many different species? Why do we have so many different cells? Why do we have mutated Cells? WHere did RNA come from? Why do people all look different? Why doesn't everyone have the same exact DNA? Why are there different blood types?

Answer all of these in context please, with reference sources.

Avatar image for T_P_O
T_P_O

5388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#68 T_P_O
Member since 2008 • 5388 Posts

[QUOTE="T_P_O"]

[QUOTE="Snipes_2"]

Darwinism has been proven false countless times, just today my Biology teacher said it was False. Throughout Science you can see his theory does not hold true, such as the nature of cells and DNA.

Xx_Hopeless_xX

Your biology teacher should not be a science teacher.

Support you statement..?

Well, evolution is kinda the cornerstone of modern biology and medicine, not teaching it is woeful.
Avatar image for BumFluff122
BumFluff122

14853

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#69 BumFluff122
Member since 2004 • 14853 Posts

Ok, Here you go.

http://www.discovery.org/a/10661

Snipes_2

Ahh the gloriousness of the Discovery Institute. A group of people who knowingly tell lies after lies after lies as evidenced by their spokesman Casey Luskin. Here's a video you can even watch about him. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JFdhDetQ4wM

Avatar image for Snipes_2
Snipes_2

17126

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#70 Snipes_2
Member since 2009 • 17126 Posts

[QUOTE="Xx_Hopeless_xX"]

[QUOTE="T_P_O"] Your biology teacher should not be a science teacher.

T_P_O

Support you statement..?

Well, evolution is kinda the cornerstone of modern biology and medicine, not teaching it is woeful.

"The meaning ofDarwinismhas changed over time, and varies depending on who is using the term.[4]In theUnited States,Darwinismis often used bycreationistsas apejorativeterm"

"However,Darwinismis also used neutrally within the scientific community to distinguish modern evolutionary theories from those first proposed by Darwin, as well as by historians to differentiate it from other evolutionary theories from around the same period. For example,Darwinismmay be used to refer to Darwin's proposed mechanism of natural selection, in comparison to more recent mechanisms such asgenetic driftandgene flow. It may also refer specifically to the role of Charles Darwin as opposed to others in thehistory of evolutionary thought— particularly contrasting Darwin's results with those of earlier theories such asLamarckismor later ones such as themodern synthesis."

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darwinism

They're supposedly putting Lamarck back in the Biology books sometime in the future.

Avatar image for Snipes_2
Snipes_2

17126

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#71 Snipes_2
Member since 2009 • 17126 Posts

[QUOTE="Snipes_2"]

Ok, Here you go.

http://www.discovery.org/a/10661

BumFluff122

Ahh the gloriousness of the Discovery Institute. A group of people who knowingly tell lies after lies after lies as evidenced by their spokesman Casey Luskin. Here's a video you can even watch about him. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JFdhDetQ4wM

I guess you can't refute it?

Avatar image for Xx_Hopeless_xX
Xx_Hopeless_xX

16562

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 Xx_Hopeless_xX
Member since 2009 • 16562 Posts

BumFluff122

The presence of individual species does not prove anything. I gave an example of speciation in progress above. Ring Species. Here is an image of where different subspecies of Larus Gulls live.

The Lesser Blackbacked Gull and Herrign Gull can interbreed with any other type of gull in that picture but they can't interbreed with one another because they are too different. This is speciation in action. There is, however, no transitional species as each sub-species is unique. All plants, animals and insects ARE in a continuous state of change. Humans ARE in a continuous state of change. There are currently 11 different genetic codes in the overall human genome that are currently in the process of changing. One of these genetic markers are what creates the difference between Lactose intollerance and lactose tollerance. Other primates and animals can only drink milk when they are babies. However humans have a genetic marker that allows people with this marker to drink milk throughout their lives. The people who are lactose intollerant have the old primate genetic marker while those who are not have the new mutated genetic marker. If every animal was locked solidly in their genetic code retroviruses such as HIV would not exist nor would cancer.

Being able to drink milk at an adult age is a mutation...so that really can't be considered a constant "change"..proteins and such may not be produced..which causes the mutation...sounds like being able to drink milk is more of a mistake then a change..

DNA Error Checking Proves Evolution is Wrong..becauseany attempt by the DNA to change is stopped and reversed...

If people were constantly evolving then why haven't the people in Alaska and other severely cold regions started to grow fur?

Each species is locked into its chromosome count that cannot change. If an animal developed an extra chromosome or lost a chromosome because of some deformity, it could not successfully mate.

speciation is cause by reproductive isolation.

I don't see the point in debating this..neither one of us are going to change our viewpoints...so why waste time...

Avatar image for Xx_Hopeless_xX
Xx_Hopeless_xX

16562

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 Xx_Hopeless_xX
Member since 2009 • 16562 Posts

[QUOTE="Xx_Hopeless_xX"]

[QUOTE="T_P_O"] Your biology teacher should not be a science teacher.

T_P_O

Support you statement..?

Well, evolution is kinda the cornerstone of modern biology and medicine, not teaching it is woeful.

o..k then..

Avatar image for BumFluff122
BumFluff122

14853

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#75 BumFluff122
Member since 2004 • 14853 Posts

If Darwins Theory was true then why are there so many different species? Why do we have so many different cells? Why do we have mutated Cells? WHere did RNA come from? Why do people all look different? Why doesn't everyone have the same exact DNA? Why are there different blood types?

Answer all of these in context please, with reference sources.

Snipes_2

1. Evolution concerns the mutation of DNA within a gene. There are 4 different possible base in the human, and almost every other animal that exists, DNA. Adenine, Cytosine, Guanine and Thymine. Each of these base corresponds to another complimentary base that forms a pair. Therefore there are 4 possibilities. When the genetic code is copied often mistakes can occur. This is what causes such things as cancer. The majority of the time, however, the mutation is neutral in that it won't have any effect on the cell function. Sometimes however a mutation occurs where that mutated sequence will be carrie donto the offspring. Sickle Cell Anemia is one example of this as are instances of eye color, hair color, etc.. throughout the world. Sometimes however a mutation occurs that is beneficial to the organism such as the Italian Wall Lizards. Italian Wall Lizards, Darwin's finches and moths, etc... Each of these creatures fit into their own little ecological niche. And as that ecological niche changes those creatures mutate, through the beneficial mutations described, and adapt to their ecological niche. Over time that creature will adapt so much it will look and be vastly different than the creature it originiated from because it's ecological niche has changed so much and the creature has adapted to it slowly.

2. I don't even know what you are trying to ask here. We have so many cells because it makes us what we are. I is our genome so long compared to genomes of other animals, or, how does a DNA sequence copy itself, or mutate, in a way where more base/pairs are within the genome. This is because, as explained above, when the DNA polymerase copies the genetic code to form a new cell often times mistakes can occur. This is how genetic mutation happens. Those mistakes can be anything from a simple base/pair change to the change of an entire sequence of base/pairs to even the doubling of base/pairs within the code.

3. I explained this above.

4. RNA is long thought to have been similar to the original organic material. All RNA is, and DNA, is a combination of simple sugars and other minerals.

5. People look different because their DNA differs. This is because you got half of your genes from your mom and half from yoru dad. This is basic grade 5 science.

6. We don't have the same exact DNA. IF we did we would all be clones. However, if you mean why are we all human, a human can't give birth to a goat. You rmother and father both pass thewir genetic code onto you. That genetic code, when combined, can't form a flying spaghetti monster or a three toed sloth.

7. Origin of blood types: here are a few but I'm not going to go out of my way and post about them.

http://www.ehow.com/about_5547607_origin-blood-type-b.html - Origin of Blood type B

http://www.ehow.com/about_5547585_origin-blood-type.html - Origin of Blood Type A

There are over 20 different blood types known worldwide.

If you would like to get the sources of all unsourced material jjust click on the link at the bottom of my post 'Evidence for Evolution' or whatever it says.

Avatar image for Xx_Hopeless_xX
Xx_Hopeless_xX

16562

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 Xx_Hopeless_xX
Member since 2009 • 16562 Posts

[QUOTE="Snipes_2"]

If Darwins Theory was true then why are there so many different species? Why do we have so many different cells? Why do we have mutated Cells? WHere did RNA come from? Why do people all look different? Why doesn't everyone have the same exact DNA? Why are there different blood types?

Answer all of these in context please, with reference sources.

BumFluff122

1. Evolution concerns the mutation of DNA within a gene. There are 4 different possible base in the human, and almost every other animal that exists, DNA. Adenine, Cytosine, Guanine and Thymine. Each of these base corresponds to another complimentary base that forms a pair. Therefore there are 4 possibilities. When the genetic code is copied often mistakes can occur. This is what causes such things as cancer. The majority of the time, however, the mutation is neutral in that it won't have any effect on the cell function. Sometimes however a mutation occurs where that mutated sequence will be carrie donto the offspring. Sickle Cell Anemia is one example of this as are instances of eye color, hair color, etc.. throughout the world. Sometimes however a mutation occurs that is beneficial to the organism such as the Italian Wall Lizards. Italian Wall Lizards, Darwin's finches and moths, etc... Each of these creatures fit into their own little ecological niche. And as that ecological niche changes those creatures mutate, through the beneficial mutations described, and adapt to their ecological niche. Over time that creature will adapt so much it will look and be vastly different than the creature it originiated from because it's ecological niche has changed so much and the creature has adapted to it slowly.

2. I don't even know what you are trying to ask here. We have so many cells because it makes us what we are. I is our genome so long compared to genomes of other animals, or, how does a DNA sequence copy itself, or mutate, in a way where more base/pairs are within the genome. This is because, as explained above, when the DNA polymerase copies the genetic code to form a new cell often times mistakes can occur. This is how genetic mutation happens. Those mistakes can be anything from a simple base/pair change to the change of an entire sequence of base/pairs to even the doubling of base/pairs within the code.

3. I explained this above.

4. RNA is long thought to have been similar to the original organic material. All RNA is, and DNA, is a combination of simple sugars and other minerals.

5. People look different because their DNA differs. This is because you got half of your genes from your mom and half from yoru dad. This is basic grade 5 science.

6. We don't have the same exact DNA. IF we did we would all be clones. However, if you mean why are we all human, a human can't give birth to a goat. You rmother and father both pass thewir genetic code onto you. That genetic code, when combined, can't form a flying spaghetti monster or a three toed sloth.

7. Origin of blood types: here are a few but I'm not going to go out of my way and post about them.

http://www.ehow.com/about_5547607_origin-blood-type-b.html - Origin of Blood type B

http://www.ehow.com/about_5547585_origin-blood-type.html - Origin of Blood Type A

There are over 20 different blood types known worldwide.

If you would like to get the sources of all unsourced material jjust click on the link at the bottom of my post 'Evidence for Evolution' or whatever it says.

This could go on and on...it all comes down to...all the evidence found to either support or reject Darwin's Theory is subject to ones perception of the data...

Avatar image for BumFluff122
BumFluff122

14853

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#77 BumFluff122
Member since 2004 • 14853 Posts

I guess you can't refute it?

Snipes_2

I refuse to read a novel that was posted on a forum that involves a person's lies. And yet he knowingly lies about certain things. If I posted the entirety of Darwins 1200 page book and asked you to refute it while taking into account the various arguments he made would you sit there, read the 1200 pages and then attempt to refute it? This is a forum. If you have an argument to make post it. Don't like to long novels that involve a days worth of reading.

Avatar image for Snipes_2
Snipes_2

17126

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#78 Snipes_2
Member since 2009 • 17126 Posts

[QUOTE="Snipes_2"]

If Darwins Theory was true then why are there so many different species? Why do we have so many different cells? Why do we have mutated Cells? WHere did RNA come from? Why do people all look different? Why doesn't everyone have the same exact DNA? Why are there different blood types?

Answer all of these in context please, with reference sources.

BumFluff122

1. Evolution concerns the mutation of DNA within a gene. There are 4 different possible base in the human, and almost every other animal that exists, DNA. Adenine, Cytosine, Guanine and Thymine. Each of these base corresponds to another complimentary base that forms a pair. Therefore there are 4 possibilities. When the genetic code is copied often mistakes can occur. This is what causes such things as cancer. The majority of the time, however, the mutation is neutral in that it won't have any effect on the cell function. Sometimes however a mutation occurs where that mutated sequence will be carrie donto the offspring. Sickle Cell Anemia is one example of this as are instances of eye color, hair color, etc.. throughout the world. Sometimes however a mutation occurs that is beneficial to the organism such as the Italian Wall Lizards. Italian Wall Lizards, Darwin's finches and moths, etc... Each of these creatures fit into their own little ecological niche. And as that ecological niche changes those creatures mutate, through the beneficial mutations described, and adapt to their ecological niche. Over time that creature will adapt so much it will look and be vastly different than the creature it originiated from because it's ecological niche has changed so much and the creature has adapted to it slowly.

2. I don't even know what you are trying to ask here. We have so many cells because it makes us what we are. I is our genome so long compared to genomes of other animals, or, how does a DNA sequence copy itself, or mutate, in a way where more base/pairs are within the genome. This is because, as explained above, when the DNA polymerase copies the genetic code to form a new cell often times mistakes can occur. This is how genetic mutation happens. Those mistakes can be anything from a simple base/pair change to the change of an entire sequence of base/pairs to even the doubling of base/pairs within the code.

3. I explained this above.

4. RNA is long thought to have been similar to the original organic material. All RNA is, and DNA, is a combination of simple sugars and other minerals.

5. People look different because their DNA differs. This is because you got half of your genes from your mom and half from yoru dad. This is basic grade 5 science.

6. We don't have the same exact DNA. IF we did we would all be clones. However, if you mean why are we all human, a human can't give birth to a goat. You rmother and father both pass thewir genetic code onto you. That genetic code, when combined, can't form a flying spaghetti monster or a three toed sloth.

7. Origin of blood types: here are a few but I'm not going to go out of my way and post about them.

http://www.ehow.com/about_5547607_origin-blood-type-b.html - Origin of Blood type B

http://www.ehow.com/about_5547585_origin-blood-type.html - Origin of Blood Type A

There are over 20 different blood types known worldwide.

If you would like to get the sources of all unsourced material jjust click on the link at the bottom of my post 'Evidence for Evolution' or whatever it says.

None of these are in Context. By "In Context" I meant pertaining to your belief in Darwinism. Darwin's Theory of Evolution is the widely held notion that all life is related and has descended from a common ancestor: the birds and the bananas, the fishes and the flowers -- all related.

Avatar image for BumFluff122
BumFluff122

14853

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#79 BumFluff122
Member since 2004 • 14853 Posts

Being able to drink milk at an adult age is a mutation...so that really can't be considered a constant "change"..proteins and such may not be produced..which causes the mutation...sounds like being able to drink milk is more of a mistake then a change..

DNA Error Checking Proves Evolution is Wrong..becauseany attempt by the DNA to change is stopped and reversed...

If people were constantly evolving then why haven't the people in Alaska and other severely cold regions started to grow fur?

Each species is locked into its chromosome count that cannot change. If an animal developed an extra chromosome or lost a chromosome because of some deformity, it could not successfully mate.

speciation is cause by reproductive isolation.

I don't see the point in debating this..neither one of us are going to change our viewpoints...so why waste time...

Xx_Hopeless_xX

Being able to drink milk is a mutation within the genetic code that occurred because humans are continuously evolving. You are just dancing around the fact that the ability to drink milk is in fact a mutation that has lead to another possibility within the species. If DNA eror checking, as you call it, worked 100% of the time we would not have cancer. Cancer would not exist and it would not be the leading cause of death in the world. People in colder regions, such as Eskimos, are usually a lot hairier than their equatorial counterparts. Regardless, it takes a whole lot of time for a species to change or become another species unless that mutation is already present in a group and those without the mutation suffer soem sort of catastrophe. An example: Bears with long hair consist of 2% of a population while bears with short fur consist of 98%. A catastrophe occurs blocking out much of the Sunlight and cools the planet. 97% of the population die because they can not survive in that weather. They freeze to death. The rest survive but now the percentage of long fur to shirt fur is 50% to 50%. The mutatiosn was already present and is an example of how a species can change abruptly. However the actual mutation takes a very long time.

You also may want to watch this video. Speciation is caused by reproductive isolation. Yes. And if enough of those instances occur the species will become much different to what it once was. A real life example of creatures with different chromosone counts that have the abillity to mate is the Donkey and the Horse.

Avatar image for Xx_Hopeless_xX
Xx_Hopeless_xX

16562

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 Xx_Hopeless_xX
Member since 2009 • 16562 Posts

. A real life example of creatures with different chromosone counts that have the abillity to mate is the Donkey and the Horse.

BumFluff122

Did you ignore that last line...?

Avatar image for BumFluff122
BumFluff122

14853

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#81 BumFluff122
Member since 2004 • 14853 Posts

This could go on and on...it all comes down to...all the evidence found to either support or reject Darwin's Theory is subject to ones perception of the data...

Xx_Hopeless_xX

No. Evoloution occurs. You just aren't looking at the data. The data can only be interpretted one way. Evolution has been seen. It is either 'it did happen' or 'let's pretend it didn't happen'.

Avatar image for BumFluff122
BumFluff122

14853

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#82 BumFluff122
Member since 2004 • 14853 Posts

None of these are in Context. By "In Context" I meant pertaining to your belief in Darwinism. Darwin's Theory of Evolution is the widely held notion that all life is related and has descended from a common ancestor: the birds and the bananas, the fishes and the flowers -- all related.

Snipes_2

I answered each of your questions and answered them in the context of what we know occurs and how it occurs. If you refuse to take my explanations and attribute them and attribute them to the past that's not my problem. All the explanation you need was in the post you quoted.

Avatar image for jubino
jubino

6265

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#83 jubino
Member since 2005 • 6265 Posts

Every living thing in this world is corrupt in some form or another, it's just that we're advanced enough to have a sense of right and wrong. Animals kill their own kind all the time.

Avatar image for BumFluff122
BumFluff122

14853

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#84 BumFluff122
Member since 2004 • 14853 Posts

[QUOTE="BumFluff122"]

. A real life example of creatures with different chromosone counts that have the abillity to mate is the Donkey and the Horse.

Xx_Hopeless_xX

Did you ignore that last line...?

And which last line would this be?