will humans ever figure out how to travel faster than light?

  • 110 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for dgbiker1
dgbiker1

2139

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#51 dgbiker1
Member since 2003 • 2139 Posts

/sigh* ok there are two ways of traveling From point A to point B, currently humans can only travel from point A to point B by physically trekking the distance from point A to point. The other way is by manipulating the positions of point A to point B. let me dumb it down for you

First way of traveling: ok your sitting at the dinner table and you to go to the refrigerator. From Point A (the seat) you would get up and walk to the refrigerator (point B). this is the normal way we humans travel through out physical plain.

Second way of traveling: Ok your sitting at the dinner table and you want to go to the refrigerator. From point A (the seat) you would manipulate the distance between point A&B, thus making it shorter.

what i'm trying to get at is that it is possible (technically)to travel faster than lightby Warping space&time(as space and time are related).

----think i should wrap this up

Summary: yes it is possible to travel faster than light, but by unconventional travel means: either by "wormholes" "jumps" warpingspace and manipulating the space medium.

howis it possibleby using techonology? i personally dont know how humans can achieve the second type of traveling.Ask a physics professor or wait till the unified theory is verified( string theory?)

Either way it's to early in human tech developement to simply say no it isnt possible.

btw the speed of sound is 600mph not 700mph

middito
One problem, you're still not travelling faster than light following the distorted space-time path...so technically you're still not travelling faster than light, you're just taking a shortcut.
Avatar image for Montaya
Montaya

4269

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 Montaya
Member since 2005 • 4269 Posts
hehh.. i hate these threads, they give me headaches :x
Avatar image for Panzer-schreck
Panzer-schreck

2835

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 Panzer-schreck
Member since 2007 • 2835 Posts
No.
Avatar image for TongHua
TongHua

2929

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 TongHua
Member since 2007 • 2929 Posts

[QUOTE="TongHua"]I don't think you can figure out how to break the laws of physics.verparanoidpers
well, if space is a flat plane as postulated by the theory of general relativity, then woulden't it theoretically be possible to create a wormhole and travel outside this plane?

If space is a flat plane, then would making a wormhole around it not take longer? It's like tunneling underground when you could just walk to your destination.

Avatar image for freshgman
freshgman

12241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#55 freshgman
Member since 2005 • 12241 Posts
not in our lifetime
Avatar image for MrGeezer
MrGeezer

59765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 MrGeezer
Member since 2002 • 59765 Posts

Its wierd. I coulda sworn 300 years ago I was in this forum and someone said "will we every build something that makes us fly?".

Heck yeah its possible.
kevint1818

That's stupiud. You're assuming that just because some things are possible, EVERYTHING is possible.

Furthermore, 300 years ago it was known that flight was possible. After all, people knew about birds and bugs back then. No one doubted that flight was physically possible, they just weren't sure on how to do it. By contrast, all current scientific knoiwledge shows FTL travel to be IMPOSSIBLE (and no, wormholes and warp drives don't count as FTL travel, and even then we're not 100% sure that they're possible).

Now, if you're gonna say that it IS possible, you'd better have some pretty damn convincing evidence to go against everything that we've learned since the early 20th century. I await your evidence.

Avatar image for camreeno360
camreeno360

6850

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#57 camreeno360
Member since 2005 • 6850 Posts
Wait, what's the very fastest speed something can be pulled by gravity? It has to be something in the speed range of light...
Avatar image for -Serpahim-
-Serpahim-

1627

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 -Serpahim-
Member since 2007 • 1627 Posts

Wait, what's the very fastest speed something can be pulled by gravity? It has to be something in the speed range of light...camreeno360

it depends which gravity you are talking about. On earth the terminal velocity is no where near the speed of light. I cant remember it off the top of my head, but trust me, it isnt even 1/10000th of the speed of light. Anyways, to answer the TC, its impossible to travel faster than the speed of light LOCALLY. but it is theoretically possible to travels faster than the speed of light in the grand scheme of things through wormholes.

edit: I cant give u a set number for terminal velocity, but the terminal velocity of an average sized male sky diver is about 200km/h. it all depends on mass, volume, drag, gravitational force and density of the medium (on earth its a mixture of oxygen, nitrogen, hydrogen + many other elements and compounds)

Avatar image for camreeno360
camreeno360

6850

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#59 camreeno360
Member since 2005 • 6850 Posts

[QUOTE="camreeno360"]Wait, what's the very fastest speed something can be pulled by gravity? It has to be something in the speed range of light...-Serpahim-

it depends which gravity you are talking about. On earth the terminal velocity is no where near the speed of light. I cant remember it off the top of my head, but trust me, it isnt even 1/10000th of the speed of light. Anyways, to answer the TC, its impossible to travel faster than the speed of light LOCALLY. but it is theoretically possible to travels faster than the speed of light in the grand scheme of things through wormholes.

I know about the wormhole thing forever, but I woulnd't call it "faster than light". It's more like a warping thing than something with an actual speed.

Anway I was saying, since anything with a larger mass has a larger gravitational force....Say we had a planet with 10 trillion times the mass of earth and some rock was getting sucked into the force. So since things speed up at 10m/s2, would the object eventually get to the speed of light or pass it? If the velocity just kept getting bigger and bigger, I don't understand how that won't work. It's complicated.

Avatar image for munu9
munu9

11109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#60 munu9
Member since 2004 • 11109 Posts
I believe there will be some form of faster than light travel or transport (not for humans) by the year 2200 :)
Avatar image for ufopuller
ufopuller

6054

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 39

User Lists: 0

#61 ufopuller
Member since 2004 • 6054 Posts

Where have you been?
Have you missed the last 10 seasons of Stargate SG-1???

Avatar image for -Serpahim-
-Serpahim-

1627

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 -Serpahim-
Member since 2007 • 1627 Posts
[QUOTE="-Serpahim-"]

[QUOTE="camreeno360"]Wait, what's the very fastest speed something can be pulled by gravity? It has to be something in the speed range of light...camreeno360

it depends which gravity you are talking about. On earth the terminal velocity is no where near the speed of light. I cant remember it off the top of my head, but trust me, it isnt even 1/10000th of the speed of light. Anyways, to answer the TC, its impossible to travel faster than the speed of light LOCALLY. but it is theoretically possible to travels faster than the speed of light in the grand scheme of things through wormholes.

I know about the wormhole thing forever, but I woulnd't call it "faster than light". It's more like a warping thing than something with an actual speed.

Anway I was saying, since anything with a larger mass has a larger gravitational force....Say we had a planet with 10 trillion times the mass of earth and some rock was getting sucked into the force. So since things speed up at 10m/s2, would the object eventually get to the speed of light or pass it? If the velocity just kept getting bigger and bigger, I don't understand how that won't work. It's complicated.

well, at the speed of light, the object would turn into pure energy (light) and light cant pass the speed of light...so no :P

Avatar image for -R3Volation
-R3Volation

657

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 -R3Volation
Member since 2007 • 657 Posts
Anti-matter propulsion method is our best bet right now and I believe that goes 9/10th of the speed of light? Don't quote me on it.
Avatar image for Runningflame570
Runningflame570

10388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#64 Runningflame570
Member since 2005 • 10388 Posts
No, because that violates the laws of physics and unless we happen to have gotten those wrong its not happening.
Avatar image for kitty
kitty

115479

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#65 kitty  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 115479 Posts
probably not in our time
Avatar image for X360PS3AMD05
X360PS3AMD05

36320

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#66 X360PS3AMD05
Member since 2005 • 36320 Posts
Yes, but isn't this disruptive posting if you don't post your opinion?
Avatar image for -Serpahim-
-Serpahim-

1627

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 -Serpahim-
Member since 2007 • 1627 Posts

No, because that violates the laws of physics and unless we happen to have gotten those wrong its not happening.Runningflame570

unless if we find a way to shrink ourselves to the subatomic level (maybe if we download ourselves into pure data, and we have better data streamers, we could stream ourselves to other places at a sub atomic lvl where the laws of physics are "fluid" and faster than light travel is theoretically possible....) or we could go to the center of a black hole where time and space converge and at that point, any movement you make would be faster than light because time would have stopped (or some say, would be non existant o_O')

Avatar image for fourier404
fourier404

515

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 fourier404
Member since 2006 • 515 Posts
[QUOTE="middito"]

/sigh* ok there are two ways of traveling From point A to point B, currently humans can only travel from point A to point B by physically trekking the distance from point A to point. The other way is by manipulating the positions of point A to point B. let me dumb it down for you

First way of traveling: ok your sitting at the dinner table and you to go to the refrigerator. From Point A (the seat) you would get up and walk to the refrigerator (point B). this is the normal way we humans travel through out physical plain.

Second way of traveling: Ok your sitting at the dinner table and you want to go to the refrigerator. From point A (the seat) you would manipulate the distance between point A&B, thus making it shorter.

what i'm trying to get at is that it is possible (technically)to travel faster than lightby Warping space&time(as space and time are related).

----think i should wrap this up

Summary: yes it is possible to travel faster than light, but by unconventional travel means: either by "wormholes" "jumps" warpingspace and manipulating the space medium.

howis it possibleby using techonology? i personally dont know how humans can achieve the second type of traveling.Ask a physics professor or wait till the unified theory is verified( string theory?)

Either way it's to early in human tech developement to simply say no it isnt possible.

btw the speed of sound is 600mph not 700mph

dgbiker1

One problem, you're still not travelling faster than light following the distorted space-time path...so technically you're still not travelling faster than light, you're just taking a shortcut.

Has the same effect.

Kinda like generating more energy vs using it more efficiently.

Avatar image for Gokuja
Gokuja

3767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 Gokuja
Member since 2005 • 3767 Posts

i truly believe it is possible. i dont care what any form of science tells us. i know its wrong, and in 10,000 yrs from now you all.....won't to?? unless they solve the whole death thing to.

just because we haven't measured anything in the universe that travels faster than light, doesn't mean that it doesn't exist. and we as humans have a thing for taking things and manipulating them to make them better. I think down the road this will apply. even if its not scientifically possible, i think we will learn to bend or break the rules.

and also, i dont get the people who talk about wormholes, but say we won't/aren't traveling faster than light...well ok that argument might be won on a technicality. we wouldn't really be "traveling" faster than light. but we would definitely be faster.

Avatar image for omerdv
omerdv

1071

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#70 omerdv
Member since 2005 • 1071 Posts
I just figured out how to do so: WE NEED TO RUN :o
Avatar image for middito
middito

955

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 middito
Member since 2003 • 955 Posts
as i said earlier, i have no idea how to manipulate or bend the sapce/time medium, but there may be as many ways of doing this as there are types of conventional propulsion systems.
Avatar image for thriteenthmonke
thriteenthmonke

49823

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 thriteenthmonke
Member since 2005 • 49823 Posts
Definitely, it's already well known that it's possible to achieve infinite accerelation by driving a truck in reverse.
Avatar image for Zaeryn
Zaeryn

9070

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#73 Zaeryn
Member since 2005 • 9070 Posts
No, I don't think so.
Avatar image for Whicker89
Whicker89

18919

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#74 Whicker89
Member since 2004 • 18919 Posts
I can travel faster than life right now
Avatar image for Buffalo_Soulja
Buffalo_Soulja

13151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 Buffalo_Soulja
Member since 2004 • 13151 Posts
It doesn't matter what BS propulsion system you use. The body can only handle so many G-Forces, and to accelerate to the Speed of Light safely would take lifetimes. If we are going to travel outside out galaxy, we will need less direct methods.
Avatar image for sthadji
sthadji

4682

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#76 sthadji
Member since 2004 • 4682 Posts

Nope. The day we do that, the Earth will be destroyed. Imagine this:

Scientist: 'I finally discovered how to travel faster than...' *explosion*

Avatar image for Oleg_Huzwog
Oleg_Huzwog

21885

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77 Oleg_Huzwog
Member since 2007 • 21885 Posts

Physics says it's impossible. Not improbable; impossible.

Avatar image for bradleybhoy
bradleybhoy

6501

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 bradleybhoy
Member since 2005 • 6501 Posts

Yeah apparently it's impossible to ever reach it.

Avatar image for Gigagamer2
Gigagamer2

2149

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#79 Gigagamer2
Member since 2004 • 2149 Posts

ok lets get some scientific facts into this matter. What is the speed of light, simply the speed at which photons travel in the vacuum of space (approx 3x10^8 m/s). Now photons are one of the elementory particles defined in the standard model of the universe (ie it is one of the building blocks that matter is made out of). The problem is the standard model isnt fully proven and there are missing parts (many of these missing parts are to be investigated soon at CERN's LHC).

Now photons tavel at the speed of light and the reason why nothing else can is because everything has mass (or as i look at it, more mass than photons). So if there is something smaller than photons, technically given the same energy, it would travel faster. Although many people including physicists dont believe this, it has yet to be proven wrong or right.

also, all of you saying we would turn to mush at the speed of light or we couldnt handle the geforce, imagine travelling in a rocket which constantly accelerates at 1m/s^2 (ie one second it is travelling 1m/s, the next 2m/s), we could handle it all the way to the speed of light. The reason why we have yet to reach the speed of light is because it takes a huge amount of energy and the speed at which the exaust travels out of the back isnt at the speed of light.

Avatar image for Oleg_Huzwog
Oleg_Huzwog

21885

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 Oleg_Huzwog
Member since 2007 • 21885 Posts

The reason why we have yet to reach the speed of light is because it takes a huge amount of energy and the speed at which the exaust travels out of the back isnt at the speed of light.Gigagamer2

The speed at which exhaust travels out the back has nothing to do with why we can't reach the speed of light.

Avatar image for futures_past
futures_past

286

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81 futures_past
Member since 2007 • 286 Posts

Physics says it's impossible. Not improbable; impossible.

Oleg_Huzwog

physics say its impossible but its physics as we know it. Dark matter and dark energy are the key. they go against everything we know. In the universe there are things we cant explain and with dark energy i know we can travel faster then light

Avatar image for Gigagamer2
Gigagamer2

2149

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#82 Gigagamer2
Member since 2004 • 2149 Posts

[QUOTE="Gigagamer2"]The reason why we have yet to reach the speed of light is because it takes a huge amount of energy and the speed at which the exaust travels out of the back isnt at the speed of light.Oleg_Huzwog

The speed at which exhaust travels out the back has nothing to do with why we can't reach the speed of light.

think about it, when u push off a wall, do u suddenly travel faster than your arms were pushing you?

Avatar image for deshields538
deshields538

8699

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#83 deshields538
Member since 2005 • 8699 Posts

Where have you been?
Have you missed the last 10 seasons of Stargate SG-1???

ufopuller

Unfortunately there isn't a Stargate at Giza or under Antarctica, I checked. :(

And they have stopped the series ( :cry: ) so we'll never know how to build one ourselves. :(

Atlantis may hold some hope though. *crosses fingers*

However the concept is not to travel faster than light to a destination, but to make the distance between the 2 points shorter which may be possible to do in the future. :D

Avatar image for hongkingkong
hongkingkong

9368

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#84 hongkingkong
Member since 2006 • 9368 Posts
Yes, I can't tell you how i know this, but when the time does come, you'll know what to do....
Avatar image for Oleg_Huzwog
Oleg_Huzwog

21885

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#85 Oleg_Huzwog
Member since 2007 • 21885 Posts

think about it, when u push off a wall, do u suddenly travel faster than your arms were pushing you?

Gigagamer2

I am well aware of Newton's Third Law, but that has nothing to do with the impossibility of accelerating a finite mass to the speed of light. Mass can approach relativistic speeds but can never reach c.

Avatar image for comp_atkins
comp_atkins

38925

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#86 comp_atkins
Member since 2005 • 38925 Posts

not this year.

Avatar image for 194197844077667059316682358889
194197844077667059316682358889

49173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87 194197844077667059316682358889
Member since 2003 • 49173 Posts

[QUOTE="verparanoidpers"]topichollywood6258

yes and we already have, using a particle accelerator to create an immense amount of energy a wormhole within quantum foam could be created and expanded allowing humans to travel anywhere in our universe and others in a matter of seconds

We most certainly have not; quantum entanglement is the only thing that has ever operated at a distance with speeds exceeding c, and that cannot be used to transfer matter or even information.
Avatar image for deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51

57548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#88 deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
Member since 2004 • 57548 Posts
I think it is physically impossible. At least according to the theory of relativity.
Avatar image for DrinkDuff
DrinkDuff

6762

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#89 DrinkDuff
Member since 2004 • 6762 Posts

It's not possible.

and if it was you would arrive at a destination before you departed... and that doesn't even make sense

: - ]

Brainkiller05
It makes sense, it's called time travel. :PNot saying its possible though.
Avatar image for 194197844077667059316682358889
194197844077667059316682358889

49173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#90 194197844077667059316682358889
Member since 2003 • 49173 Posts

ok lets get some scientific facts into this matter. What is the speed of light, simply the speed at which photons travel in the vacuum of space (approx 3x10^8 m/s). Now photons are one of the elementory particles defined in the standard model of the universe (ie it is one of the building blocks that matter is made out of). The problem is the standard model isnt fully proven and there are missing parts (many of these missing parts are to be investigated soon at CERN's LHC).

Now photons tavel at the speed of light and the reason why nothing else can is because everything has mass (or as i look at it, more mass than photons). So if there is something smaller than photons, technically given the same energy, it would travel faster. Although many people including physicists dont believe this, it has yet to be proven wrong or right.

also, all of you saying we would turn to mush at the speed of light or we couldnt handle the geforce, imagine travelling in a rocket which constantly accelerates at 1m/s^2 (ie one second it is travelling 1m/s, the next 2m/s), we could handle it all the way to the speed of light. The reason why we have yet to reach the speed of light is because it takes a huge amount of energy and the speed at which the exaust travels out of the back isnt at the speed of light.

Gigagamer2
Photons are not privileged, since all particles that mediate fields travel at c. Rather, c is something fundamental about the structure of spacetime, hence gravitational fields and strong and weak nuclear force fields all propagate at the same speed. The only theoretical structure below the scale of photons would be strings, but despite over a decade of work on them, no testable predictions have yet come up that can prove or disprove them, and even if they do exist, there is no indication that they are superluminal. Your assumption is based on macroscale mechanical intuition which simply does not apply at the quantum scale.
Avatar image for Oleg_Huzwog
Oleg_Huzwog

21885

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#91 Oleg_Huzwog
Member since 2007 • 21885 Posts

It makes sense, it's called time travel. :PNot saying its possible though.DrinkDuff

Time travel is possible. That is fact, not theory. Of course, it's only possible in the forward direction.

Avatar image for luke1889
luke1889

14617

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#92 luke1889
Member since 2004 • 14617 Posts
Maybe, but not any time soon.
Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#93 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts

I doubt mankind will even be able to reach the speed of light.. A bowling ball thats like 3kg's, would need the energy produced on the planet for an entire week to accelerate it to that speed.. So good luck trying to reach the speed of light.

And good luck trying to protect your craft from a speck of dust which would heavily damage or destroy your space craft when going at those speeds.

Avatar image for deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51

57548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#94 deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
Member since 2004 • 57548 Posts
[QUOTE="Oleg_Huzwog"]

Physics says it's impossible. Not improbable; impossible.

futures_past

physics say its impossible but its physics as we know it. Dark matter and dark energy are the key. they go against everything we know. In the universe there are things we cant explain and with dark energy i know we can travel faster then light

There is dark matter, but there is no such thing as dark energy. It's impossible because the amount of energy you need to travel faster goes up exponentially as you approach the speed of light. It becomes infinite.

Avatar image for deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51

57548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#95 deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
Member since 2004 • 57548 Posts
Correction, it becomes infinite for those things that have mass.
Avatar image for SilvrDog
SilvrDog

200

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#96 SilvrDog
Member since 2007 • 200 Posts
Dark matter is not a definite, it assumed that dark matter exist in space. When looking up this topic a lot of dictionary's used the word postulated which means suggest or assumed.
Avatar image for zepman71
zepman71

4120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#97 zepman71
Member since 2005 • 4120 Posts
But wouldn't humans die if they ever tried to go at the speed of light?
Avatar image for double_decker
double_decker

146090

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#98 double_decker
Member since 2006 • 146090 Posts
I don't know, we'll just have to wait and see :o
Avatar image for futures_past
futures_past

286

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#99 futures_past
Member since 2007 • 286 Posts
[QUOTE="futures_past"][QUOTE="Oleg_Huzwog"]

Physics says it's impossible. Not improbable; impossible.

sonicare

physics say its impossible but its physics as we know it. Dark matter and dark energy are the key. they go against everything we know. In the universe there are things we cant explain and with dark energy i know we can travel faster then light

There is dark matter, but there is no such thing as dark energy. It's impossible because the amount of energy you need to travel faster goes up exponentially as you approach the speed of light. It becomes infinite.

http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/051129_dark_energy.html

here in lies the secret. i have been working on this for 10 years, and i think i have figured out a few things

Avatar image for Morphic
Morphic

4345

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#100 Morphic
Member since 2003 • 4345 Posts
Chances are there are alot easier ways to travel great distances without going faster than light travel.