Will You Give Mouth to Mouth to Another Man?

  • 96 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#51  Edited By lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

@PSP107 said:

@lostrib said:

@PSP107 said:

@Master_Live said:

@PSP107 said:

@toast_burner said:

Are you 8 years old?

How does that make me 8?

Seems childish to deny life saving mouth to mouth breathers to someone because they might be of your same sex.

You just said you will let them die. And I'm pretty sure the majority will at least hesitate.

Pretty sure he wasn't being serious, but rather pointing out the ridiculousness of your question. If people hesitate, I doubt it is because the person may be of the same gender, but rather that it is a rather huge responsibility to take a strangers life in your hands--and should only be done if you are properly trained. And the thread is pointless since recent CPR changes now only use chest compressions, no mouth to mouth.

1st of all sometimes there is truth into someone using sarcasm. The middle part of your statement is off, I mean you act like people are trained for something like this? Not to mention recent CPR changes. I'm quite sure I'm not alone in knowing their were new CPR methods.

And the best of example of my point is from that Seinfeld episode where Jerry and Newman struggled to give the pool guy mouth to mouth. sure it was comedy, but you cant deny there some truth to that on how most guys will react in a random situation like that.

If you're going to give CPR, then you should be trained, and considering the certification expires every couple of years then you should be up to date on recent changes. CPR is not something to be taken lightly, you are literally compressing someone's rib cage and it is more than likely you will break a rib or two.

Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#52 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

@thegerg said:
@Allicrombie said:

I think I read that nowadays, they just use chest compressions, no more CPR.

Not exactly. In many cases it was found that people were not performing CPR because they were apprehensive about breathing into another person's mouth. Now many people are being trained to use just chest compressions because it's better that they do just compressions instead of nothing.

Rescue breaths are still useful in saving lives.

see above, just chest compressions works just as well as the previous CPR methods

Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#54  Edited By lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

@thegerg said:

@lostrib said:

@thegerg said:
@Allicrombie said:

I think I read that nowadays, they just use chest compressions, no more CPR.

Not exactly. In many cases it was found that people were not performing CPR because they were apprehensive about breathing into another person's mouth. Now many people are being trained to use just chest compressions because it's better that they do just compressions instead of nothing.

Rescue breaths are still useful in saving lives.

see above, just chest compressions works just as well as the previous CPR methods

OK. That has no bearing on my post.

In terms of CPR, rescue breaths aren't used because the time it takes to do them does not provide any benefit over simple chest compressions

Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#56  Edited By lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

@thegerg said:

@lostrib said:

@thegerg said:

@lostrib said:

@thegerg said:
@Allicrombie said:

I think I read that nowadays, they just use chest compressions, no more CPR.

Not exactly. In many cases it was found that people were not performing CPR because they were apprehensive about breathing into another person's mouth. Now many people are being trained to use just chest compressions because it's better that they do just compressions instead of nothing.

Rescue breaths are still useful in saving lives.

see above, just chest compressions works just as well as the previous CPR methods

OK. That has no bearing on my post.

In terms of CPR, rescue breaths aren't used because the time it takes to do them does not provide any benefit over simple chest compressions

OK. That has no bearing on my post.

You stated that rescue breaths are still useful in saving lives, in the context of CPR that just isn't true

Avatar image for plageus900
plageus900

3065

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#58 plageus900
Member since 2013 • 3065 Posts

@PSP107 said:

@plageus900 said:

@PSP107 said:

@toast_burner said:

Are you 8 years old?

How does that make me 8?

Saving a man's life has nothing to do with homosexuality, doofus.

I never said it did retard.

I just ask what will you do if put into that situation.

'But anyway, with all the media coverage of that gay college player hoping to be drafted in the NFL, this topic came up.'

Hurrrrrrr

Avatar image for gba1989
gba1989

189

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 75

User Lists: 1

#59 gba1989
Member since 2009 • 189 Posts

@OT it baffles me to no ends on how you can give a mouth to a mouth and then to another man. How does one remove a mouth from a face in the first place?

Avatar image for Treflis
Treflis

13757

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 Treflis
Member since 2004 • 13757 Posts

No, I would rather have a man die as a result of my sexual insecurity. [/sarcasm]

Of course I'd do it if someone's life depended on it.

Avatar image for bobaban
bobaban

10560

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 bobaban
Member since 2005 • 10560 Posts

I'm trained but no I would not. I wouldn't give it to an ugly/fat/old girl either though.

Avatar image for PSP107
PSP107

18983

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 PSP107
Member since 2007 • 18983 Posts

@plageus900 said:

@PSP107 said:

@plageus900 said:

@PSP107 said:

@toast_burner said:

Are you 8 years old?

How does that make me 8?

Saving a man's life has nothing to do with homosexuality, doofus.

I never said it did retard.

I just ask what will you do if put into that situation.

'But anyway, with all the media coverage of that gay college player hoping to be drafted in the NFL, this topic came up.'

Hurrrrrrr

I only said the topic came up from that.

Avatar image for cynical_buzzard
Cynical_Buzzard

226

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#63 Cynical_Buzzard
Member since 2013 • 226 Posts

I would perform CPR on a man or a woman, I am CPR trained.

Avatar image for Makhaidos
Makhaidos

2162

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64  Edited By Makhaidos
Member since 2013 • 2162 Posts

No, because mouth-to-mouth is an outdated CPR technique that does more harm than good.

I'd kiss a guy, though. And suck him off.

Avatar image for no-scope-AK47
no-scope-AK47

3755

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#66 no-scope-AK47
Member since 2012 • 3755 Posts

Honestly I could care less what sex the person is the answer is most likely no. Why herpes and aids/hiv are at epidemic levels. As for MS I would be hesitant to draft him because I would have to make sure he is in a "safe" workplace ie PC one. The locker room is one of the least PC places on the planet.

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#67  Edited By foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts

Only as an absolute last resort.

AED's and CPR compressions are far more effective (according to statistics of revival).

And if I didn't know the person, I doubt I'd do respirations for fear of contracting a communicable disease (with no access to a proper protection device).

Avatar image for ShepardCommandr
ShepardCommandr

4939

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#68  Edited By ShepardCommandr
Member since 2013 • 4939 Posts

I would just walk away.

male or female i don't care about anyone

Avatar image for Makhaidos
Makhaidos

2162

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69  Edited By Makhaidos
Member since 2013 • 2162 Posts

@thegerg said:

@Makhaidos: Would you perform mouth-to-mouth separate from CPR? Rescue breaths are still very capable of saving lives.

No, because I don't know how to use rescue breath outside of CPR and would probably just get somebody killed.

Avatar image for EatShanna
EatShanna

875

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 EatShanna
Member since 2008 • 875 Posts

Yes, but never ass to mouth.

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#73  Edited By foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts

@thegerg said:

@foxhound_fox: "AED's and CPR compressions are far more effective (according to statistics of revival)"

That depends on what the person's body needs and why you're treating them.

That depends on whether one is a doctor or not and can make such an assessment.

Modern first-aid/CPR trains only to do compressions and/or use an AED (which is the only thing that has a high percentage of resuscitation). They show how to do respirations but encourage against them unless one has proper protection (mouth covers with one-way valves).

It's far more important to keep blood flowing to the brain than to bring oxygen into the blood (and if you respirate too much, from inexperience or over-eagerness, you can distend the stomach and do even more damage).

Avatar image for Riverwolf007
Riverwolf007

26023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 Riverwolf007
Member since 2005 • 26023 Posts

no.

because that's not how you do it anymore.

you just do accelerated chest compression and that is enough to get air into the person.

Avatar image for RadecSupreme
RadecSupreme

4824

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#76 RadecSupreme
Member since 2009 • 4824 Posts

I don't know CPR so I can't perform it on anyone.

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#77 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts

@thegerg said:

OK. That has no bearing on whether or not "AED's and CPR compressions are far more effective" depends on a number of factors.

A number of factors that only a doctor or nurse can determine. Which is why they don't train regular people to be doctors and nurses in CPR/FA training.

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#79 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts

@thegerg said:

I am neither a doctor or a nurse, but I can determine if someone has a heartbeat and is not breathing. It's not nearly as complicated as you seem to think.

When was the last time you took a first-aid course?

People usually aren't breathing because there heart is either in a state of arrhythmia or has stopped entirely. Keeping the brain alive is far more important than getting them to start breathing again. AED's are central to people surviving cardiac arrest (when emergency services can respond within 10 minutes). It has been shown that more than 50% more people survive when an AED is used in addition to regular CPR than CPR by itself.

Putting air into a person's lungs (and if you blow too hard or too much, their stomach) isn't going to get their heart beating again or circulate blood through their body. It's why the CPR system has been drastically changed over the past several years to diminish the use of respirations, in favour of compressions. Not only because of communicable diseases and possibly not having protection for the first-aider, but because air/oxygen aren't going to help save someone's life.

I was re-certified FA/CPR last year. When were you last certified?

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#81 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts

@thegerg said:

@foxhound_fox: "When was the last time you took a first-aid course?"

I recertified my CLS qualification in September.

"AED's are central to people surviving cardiac arrest"

Yes, and? Do you have a point behind stating the ridiculously obvious?

"Putting air into a person's lungs (and if you blow too hard or too much, their stomach) isn't going to get their heart beating again or circulate blood through their body."

No one is suggesting that it will.

"air/oxygen aren't going to help save someone's life."

This is simply incorrect. Without adequate oxygen to a person's brain they will die. Maybe you need to brush up on your training.

My point was that as a first-aider, and not an EMS personnel or doctor/nurse, doing basic CPR and using an AED are all that are required, and in the few minutes it would take EMS to respond to an emergency call, if proper protection is not available, then respirations are not going to increase a person's chance for survival. The blood moving to the brain is the most important.

You are taking what I'm saying out of context and responding to that instead of my central point: Which is that respirations are not mandatory to a person surviving a cardiac arrest incident.

Avatar image for deactivated-5acfa3a8bc51d
deactivated-5acfa3a8bc51d

7914

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#83 deactivated-5acfa3a8bc51d
Member since 2005 • 7914 Posts

I am not trained in CPR but if it was life or death scenario with no paramedics present I would attempt it to save a life. I don't care what common ethics says or if I could be sued. Of course I would let professional paramedics deal with it if available

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#84  Edited By foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts

@thegerg said:

@foxhound_fox: "doing basic CPR and using an AED are all that are required

In many cases such things are not required, and rescue breathing would be much more appropriate.

"in the few minutes it would take EMS to respond to an emergency call, if proper protection is not available, then respirations are not going to increase a person's chance for survival."

Sometimes more advanced medical support/evacuation is not just around the corner, and rescue breathing (by keeping oxygen in the patient's lungs) greatly increases their chances of survival.

"The blood moving to the brain is the most important."

Keeping that blood oxygenated can save lives.

"respirations are not mandatory to a person surviving a cardiac arrest incident."

OK. That has no bearing on whether or not "AED's and CPR compressions are far more effective" depends on a number of factors.

The point is that life saving immediate care is not as simplistic and black-and-white as you seem to think.

Following your line of thought is making my brain hurt. You are an exceedingly dull person to communicate with and I'm not sure why I bother responding to you anymore. You merely keep going down a near-circular mode of discussion that sees the constant reiteration of points, especially those largely unrelated to the original line of discussion.

This topic was about if someone was comfortable with giving someone of the same sex mouth-to-mouth resuscitation.

Somehow, you turned it into a discussion about the effectiveness of AED's and blood-oxygen levels.

Congrats.

Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#86  Edited By lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

@thegerg said:

@foxhound_fox: "doing basic CPR and using an AED are all that are required

In many cases such things are not required, and rescue breathing would be much more appropriate.

Actually the chest compression portions of CPR are more important than the rescue breathing

Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#88 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

@thegerg said:

@lostrib said:

@thegerg said:

@foxhound_fox: "doing basic CPR and using an AED are all that are required

In many cases such things are not required, and rescue breathing would be much more appropriate.

Actually the chest compression portions of CPR are more important than the rescue breathing

I agree. That doesn't mean that CPR is all that may be required, or that rescue breaths may not be more appropriate in some cases.

well CPR is specifically for treating someone in cardiac arrest, so I'm not sure what other situations you would be using it in. And an AED is only for shocking someone whose art is out of rhythm

Avatar image for sukraj
sukraj

27859

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#90 sukraj
Member since 2008 • 27859 Posts

I don't know.

Avatar image for horgen
horgen

127735

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#91 horgen  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 127735 Posts

Yes, no question about it.

@zanelli said:
@Allicrombie said:

I think I read that nowadays, they just use chest compressions, no more CPR.

The last first aid course I was on they said that now you don't have to do it, for legal reasons, but you are more likely to save someone's life if you do.

You can get sued if you do it given that the person does not recover a 100%?

@Allicrombie said:

I think I read that nowadays, they just use chest compressions, no more CPR.

The body, and brain in particular, still needs air. I don't remember the exact numbers, but the brain might go 3 minutes without oxygen before taking damage, while other parts of the body can go 30 minutes or so.

Avatar image for yixingtpot
yixingtpot

1484

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#92 yixingtpot
Member since 2005 • 1484 Posts

I'd only attempt it on people I loved and knew personally, I wouldn't risk AIDS from some random goof be it a man or woman... Yes you can get AIDS from saliva, I'm not blowing into some possible AIDS pit.

Avatar image for destinhpark
destinhpark

4831

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#93 destinhpark
Member since 2006 • 4831 Posts

This is one of the most absurd questions on OT as of late.

Avatar image for Makhaidos
Makhaidos

2162

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#95  Edited By Makhaidos
Member since 2013 • 2162 Posts

@horgen123 said:

Yes, no question about it.

@zanelli said:
@Allicrombie said:

I think I read that nowadays, they just use chest compressions, no more CPR.

The last first aid course I was on they said that now you don't have to do it, for legal reasons, but you are more likely to save someone's life if you do.

You can get sued if you do it given that the person does not recover a 100%?

Depends on whether or not your state has a good samaritan law. It's illegal to sue someone who was only trying to save your life, even if they hurt you in the process (for example, breaking someone's ribs while applying CPR).

Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#96 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

@horgen123 said:

@Allicrombie said:

I think I read that nowadays, they just use chest compressions, no more CPR.

The body, and brain in particular, still needs air. I don't remember the exact numbers, but the brain might go 3 minutes without oxygen before taking damage, while other parts of the body can go 30 minutes or so.

The breathing isn't necessary, the chest compressions are needed for circulating the blood