This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="Solid_Snake325"]Anything by Stephen King. In my opinion, "It" was shockingly bad. I couldn't get over how dark and mature the novel was, compared to how squeaky clean the film adaptation was.spazzx625It was a miniseries that aired on TV... Seriously? You felt the need to correct me on that? Ok, my post is rendered irrelevant then....
[QUOTE="spazzx625"][QUOTE="Solid_Snake325"]Anything by Stephen King. In my opinion, "It" was shockingly bad. I couldn't get over how dark and mature the novel was, compared to how squeaky clean the film adaptation was.Solid_Snake325It was a miniseries that aired on TV... Seriously? You felt the need to correct me on that? Ok, my post is rendered irrelevant then....Correcting you and also giving an explanation of why it was "squeaky clean" compared to the book. All things considered I think it's a pretty good adaptation given the limitations.
The 1966 Alice In Wonderland. The animals were just people, Alice is a psychopath, the Cheshire Cat doesn't smile and only whispers in Alice's voice, Lewis Carrol's witty jokes were replaced by terrible dialogue.
The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe just tried to be The Lord of the Rings, basically.
Thumbs up for that. Being forced to sit through what the Wachowski Brothers did to Alan Moore's finest work makes me long for another viewing of Zak Snyder's mediocre Watchmen.V for Vendetta.
JediXMan7
The Count of Monte Cristo with Jim Cavizel had barely anything that resembled the book, but it was a totally bad movie though.
Jurassic Park II - the book was exciting, thrilling, fabulous. The movie was - Gozilla xxxi (the crappy American version, not the good Japanese ones).
The Shining - the end to the movie was just plain stupid. It didn't make sense. Kubrick's version/vision, I guess.
The Shining - the tv version with Weber - even worse than the original AND THE TELEPLAY WAS WRITTEN BY KING! What was he thinking? He makes a child/wife abuser killer the hero? Don't think so! The book was just so much better.
And while we're talking about King - David Soul in Salem's Lot? (That movie is SCREAMING for a GOOD version.)
I, Robot - what a total and complete piece of WillSmith Crap! A great book by Isaac Asimov got turned into a WillSMITH EXTRAVAGANZA!
Despite the fact that the actors and the movies were good, I didn't like ANY of the Harry Potter movies. Guess I have to agree with the other poster. Just didn't fit my vision of the books.
Sahara (written by Clive Cussler)
Planet_Pluto
I forgot what everyone else in the thread posted when I got to this. You are absolutely correct.
One I didn't see anywhere else was Timeline (Crichton). My heavens that was an awful movie...
Northern Lights (which is The Golden Compass in the US),the story is so out of place that I don't even think there will be sequel to it.
Starship Troopers-I don't need to say much.
Chronicles of Narnia:The Lion,The Witch and the Wardrobe-Meh.
Stormbreaker-*Shrudders*
I haven't seen enough to say, but I've never been entirely comfortable with any book to film adaptation where I read the book first.
Actually, I do have one. Has anyone ever read Hatchet, concerning a young boy learning to survive in the wilderness with just a hatchet and his wits? Well, there's a film adaptation of it, named "A Cry in the Wild", and it is Absolutely Dreadful.
[QUOTE="Planet_Pluto"]
Sahara (written by Clive Cussler)
3KindgomsRandy
I forgot what everyone else in the thread posted when I got to this. You are absolutely correct.
One I didn't see anywhere else was Timeline (Crichton). My heavens that was an awful movie...
Worst part is, last I heard, Clive Cussler was so ticked off about how much they mutilated Sahara, that he's never let another book become a movie again. Kinda stinks because if done well, could have made some EPIC movies.Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment