Would the US gvt allow an American Muslim to conduct dialogue w. terrorists?

  • 60 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for rimnet00
rimnet00

11003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#51 rimnet00
Member since 2003 • 11003 Posts
[QUOTE="dicpunch"][QUOTE="cliff122316"][QUOTE="rimnet00"][QUOTE="dicpunch"]

[QUOTE="rimnet00"]UrbanSpartan, clearly I have already stated that my life is not the issue here. I have also stated that I disagree with your perspective on the human psyche. This is a proposal that we have not yet attempted. If it is something that will result in both sides putting down their guns, and come to a resolution, I am all for it. cliff122316

I'm sure you understand the nature of the enemy, why do you think they would want peace? .

Ah, long time no see. I don't want to deviate this topic from it's original purpose. Opening up discussion to question whether the insurgents want peace would drive this discussion in a totally different direction. The fact of the matter is, such a discussion has been seen on these boards for quite some time, and I still stand by my stance that both sides ultimately want peace. Whether you agree or not is another matter. Now, I am sure that such a plan I am suggesting would however answer that question; if it were to be put in affect.

while i realize your will to do good, i must disagree that these people want peace. they want revenge for things we have done in the past, and the worst of them are surely beyond reasoning. you cannot reason with someone whose motives are religiously based because religion requires blind faith and therefore no proof. how could you hope to convince someone their path is wrong when they believe it without any proof and despite any other evidence. they have no reason to listen to you in their mind. even if you meant well you could not convince these people to take peace as an option

I don't think they are doing this out of revenge.

why else do they hate us

I think I may not have been clear. However, the point is to understand them. Only when both sides understand one another can the conflict clearly head towards resolution. While we can all make assumptions on what their motives are, we will never really know unless we ask.
Avatar image for dicpunch
dicpunch

5208

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 dicpunch
Member since 2003 • 5208 Posts
[QUOTE="dicpunch"][QUOTE="rimnet00"][QUOTE="dicpunch"]

[QUOTE="rimnet00"]UrbanSpartan, clearly I have already stated that my life is not the issue here. I have also stated that I disagree with your perspective on the human psyche. This is a proposal that we have not yet attempted. If it is something that will result in both sides putting down their guns, and come to a resolution, I am all for it. rimnet00

I'm sure you understand the nature of the enemy, why do you think they would want peace? .

Ah, long time no see. I don't want to deviate this topic from it's original purpose. Opening up discussion to question whether the insurgents want peace would drive this discussion in a totally different direction. The fact of the matter is, such a discussion has been seen on these boards for quite some time, and I still stand by my stance that both sides ultimately want peace. Whether you agree or not is another matter. Now, I am sure that such a plan I am suggesting would however answer that question; if it were to be put in affect.

Are we talking about peace in Iraq, with the insurgency, or peace with those who we are fighting with in the War on Terror? Just for clarification....

We are talking about every area of Muslim vs The West conflict. Ranging from current talks with Iran to the war in Iraq. If we were to focus specifically on Iraq however, the insurgency would be the first place to start with since that is where I think that particular conflict roots itself.

There isn't a conflict between Islam and the West,  this is a conflict between radical Islam and freedom.  Their idea of peace is so far from what we understand there isn't even a table to sit down.  This could end peacefully if the millions and millions of moderate, and even conservative, Muslims fought to get their idenitiy back. 

Avatar image for cliff122316
cliff122316

2333

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#53 cliff122316
Member since 2005 • 2333 Posts
[QUOTE="cliff122316"][QUOTE="dicpunch"][QUOTE="cliff122316"][QUOTE="rimnet00"][QUOTE="dicpunch"]

[QUOTE="rimnet00"]UrbanSpartan, clearly I have already stated that my life is not the issue here. I have also stated that I disagree with your perspective on the human psyche. This is a proposal that we have not yet attempted. If it is something that will result in both sides putting down their guns, and come to a resolution, I am all for it. rimnet00

I'm sure you understand the nature of the enemy, why do you think they would want peace? .

Ah, long time no see. I don't want to deviate this topic from it's original purpose. Opening up discussion to question whether the insurgents want peace would drive this discussion in a totally different direction. The fact of the matter is, such a discussion has been seen on these boards for quite some time, and I still stand by my stance that both sides ultimately want peace. Whether you agree or not is another matter. Now, I am sure that such a plan I am suggesting would however answer that question; if it were to be put in affect.

while i realize your will to do good, i must disagree that these people want peace. they want revenge for things we have done in the past, and the worst of them are surely beyond reasoning. you cannot reason with someone whose motives are religiously based because religion requires blind faith and therefore no proof. how could you hope to convince someone their path is wrong when they believe it without any proof and despite any other evidence. they have no reason to listen to you in their mind. even if you meant well you could not convince these people to take peace as an option

I don't think they are doing this out of revenge.

why else do they hate us

I think I may not have been clear. However, the point is to understand them. Only when both sides understand one another can the conflict clearly head towards resolution. While we can all make assumptions on what their motives are, we will never really know unless we ask.

hmm i see and agree. i suppose i do agree with your plan and it actually seems like it has a chance to change some people's opinions. good luck getting an audience with these groups though, since i find it hard to believe the US has an line of contact with them, if we did we would understand each other better than we do
Avatar image for dicpunch
dicpunch

5208

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 dicpunch
Member since 2003 • 5208 Posts
[QUOTE="dicpunch"][QUOTE="cliff122316"][QUOTE="rimnet00"][QUOTE="dicpunch"]

[QUOTE="rimnet00"]UrbanSpartan, clearly I have already stated that my life is not the issue here. I have also stated that I disagree with your perspective on the human psyche. This is a proposal that we have not yet attempted. If it is something that will result in both sides putting down their guns, and come to a resolution, I am all for it. cliff122316

I'm sure you understand the nature of the enemy, why do you think they would want peace? .

Ah, long time no see. I don't want to deviate this topic from it's original purpose. Opening up discussion to question whether the insurgents want peace would drive this discussion in a totally different direction. The fact of the matter is, such a discussion has been seen on these boards for quite some time, and I still stand by my stance that both sides ultimately want peace. Whether you agree or not is another matter. Now, I am sure that such a plan I am suggesting would however answer that question; if it were to be put in affect.

while i realize your will to do good, i must disagree that these people want peace. they want revenge for things we have done in the past, and the worst of them are surely beyond reasoning. you cannot reason with someone whose motives are religiously based because religion requires blind faith and therefore no proof. how could you hope to convince someone their path is wrong when they believe it without any proof and despite any other evidence. they have no reason to listen to you in their mind. even if you meant well you could not convince these people to take peace as an option

I don't think they are doing this out of revenge.

why else do they hate us

It isn't something we've done it's that they want to impose Shariah Law on us.

Avatar image for rimnet00
rimnet00

11003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#55 rimnet00
Member since 2003 • 11003 Posts
[QUOTE="cliff122316"] hmm i see and agree. i suppose i do agree with your plan and it actually seems like it has a chance to change some people's opinions. good luck getting an audience with these groups though, since i find it hard to believe the US has an line of contact with them, if we did we would understand each other better than we do

Which I guess is why I would suggesting walking right into known enemy lines.

There isn't a conflict between Islam and the West, this is a conflict between radical Islam and freedom. Their idea of peace is so far from what we understand there isn't even a table to sit down. This could end peacefully if the millions and millions of moderate, and even conservative, Muslims fought to get their idenitiy back. dicpunch
Which is exactly what I am trying to do.
Avatar image for dicpunch
dicpunch

5208

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 dicpunch
Member since 2003 • 5208 Posts

[QUOTE="cliff122316"] hmm i see and agree. i suppose i do agree with your plan and it actually seems like it has a chance to change some people's opinions. good luck getting an audience with these groups though, since i find it hard to believe the US has an line of contact with them, if we did we would understand each other better than we dorimnet00
Which I guess is why I would suggesting walking right into known enemy lines.

There isn't a conflict between Islam and the West, this is a conflict between radical Islam and freedom. Their idea of peace is so far from what we understand there isn't even a table to sit down. This could end peacefully if the millions and millions of moderate, and even conservative, Muslims fought to get their idenitiy back. dicpunch
Which is exactly what I am trying to do.

You are just as much of an enemy and maybe even more so than I am to these people.  Part of the issue is that we view peace as a postive and they would view it as a failure.  The bottom line is that they view peace with us in two ways:  our dying or our subjugation.  Not a good start to healing process.     

Avatar image for rimnet00
rimnet00

11003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#57 rimnet00
Member since 2003 • 11003 Posts

[QUOTE="rimnet00"][QUOTE="cliff122316"] hmm i see and agree. i suppose i do agree with your plan and it actually seems like it has a chance to change some people's opinions. good luck getting an audience with these groups though, since i find it hard to believe the US has an line of contact with them, if we did we would understand each other better than we dodicpunch

Which I guess is why I would suggesting walking right into known enemy lines.

There isn't a conflict between Islam and the West, this is a conflict between radical Islam and freedom. Their idea of peace is so far from what we understand there isn't even a table to sit down. This could end peacefully if the millions and millions of moderate, and even conservative, Muslims fought to get their idenitiy back. dicpunch
Which is exactly what I am trying to do.

You are just as much of an enemy and maybe even more so than I am to these people. Part of the issue is that we view peace as a postive and they would view it as a failure. The bottom line is that they view peace with us in two ways: our dying or our subjugation. Not a good start to healing process.

You might be right. However, I want to know for sure. This seems like it is the only way to go about doing so. Worst case scenario: they pwn me before I even knew what happened. Best case scenario: there is progress towards a resolution.
Avatar image for helium_flash
helium_flash

9244

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#58 helium_flash
Member since 2007 • 9244 Posts
Do you support the War on Terror and Iraq?
Avatar image for dicpunch
dicpunch

5208

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 dicpunch
Member since 2003 • 5208 Posts
[QUOTE="dicpunch"]

[QUOTE="rimnet00"][QUOTE="cliff122316"] hmm i see and agree. i suppose i do agree with your plan and it actually seems like it has a chance to change some people's opinions. good luck getting an audience with these groups though, since i find it hard to believe the US has an line of contact with them, if we did we would understand each other better than we dorimnet00

Which I guess is why I would suggesting walking right into known enemy lines.

There isn't a conflict between Islam and the West, this is a conflict between radical Islam and freedom. Their idea of peace is so far from what we understand there isn't even a table to sit down. This could end peacefully if the millions and millions of moderate, and even conservative, Muslims fought to get their idenitiy back. dicpunch
Which is exactly what I am trying to do.

You are just as much of an enemy and maybe even more so than I am to these people. Part of the issue is that we view peace as a postive and they would view it as a failure. The bottom line is that they view peace with us in two ways: our dying or our subjugation. Not a good start to healing process.

You might be right. However, I want to know for sure. This seems like it is the only way to go about doing so.

They have already answered the question.

Portion of a letter to the American people from OBL 2002...

What are we calling you to, and what do we want from you?

(1) The first thing that we are calling you to is Islam.

a) The religion of the Unification of God; of freedom from associating partners with Him, and rejection of this; of complete love of Him, the Exalted; of complete submission to His Laws; and of the discarding of all the opinions, orders, theories and religions which contradict with the religion He sent down to His Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him). Islam is the religion of all the prophets, and makes no distinction between them –  peace be upon them all.

It is to this religion that we call you; the seal of all the previous religions. It is the religion of Unification of God, sincerity, the best of  manners, righteousness, mercy, honour, purity, and piety.  It is the religion of showing kindness to others, establishing justice between them, granting   them their rights, and defending the oppressed and the persecuted. It is the religion of enjoining the good and forbidding the evil with the hand, tongue and heart. It is the religion of Jihad in the way of Allah so that Allah’s   Word and religion reign Supreme. And it is the religion of unity and agreement on the obedience to Allah, and total equality between all people,  without regarding their colour, sex, or language.

b) It is the religion whose book – the Quran – will remained preserved and unchanged, after the other Divine books and messages have been changed. The Quran is the miracle until the Day of Judgment. Allah has challenged anyone to bring a book like the Quran or even ten verses like it.

(2) The second thing we call you to, is to stop your oppression, lies, immorality and debauchery that has spread among you.
        
a) We call you to be a people of manners, principles, honour, and purity; to reject the immoral acts of fornication, homosexuality, intoxicants, gambling's, and trading with interest.

We call you to all of this that you may be freed from that which you have become caught up in; that you may be freed from the deceptive lies that you  are a great nation, that your leaders spread amongst you to conceal from you the despicable state to which you have reached.   

b) It is saddening to tell you that you are the worst civilization witnessed by the history of mankind
:


You are the nation who, rather than ruling by the Shariah of Allah in its Constitution and Laws, choose to invent your own laws as you will and desire. You separate religion from your policies, contradicting the pure nature which affirms Absolute Authority to the Lord and your Creator.  You flee from the  embarrassing question posed to you: How is it possible for Allah the Almighty to create His creation, grant them power over all the creatures and land, grant them all the amenities of life, and then deny them that which they are most in need of: knowledge of the laws which govern their lives?

Avatar image for Jack_Summersby
Jack_Summersby

1444

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 Jack_Summersby
Member since 2005 • 1444 Posts
If we negotiate with terrorists, it only promotes more terrorism. Just review how the N. Korea situation has played out over the last fifteen years. Every time we negotiate with PyongYang, they take what we give them, pretend to do their part, wait a few months or years, and threaten the world again to renegotiate for more supplies and favors. Why? Because it's so darn effective - the N. Korean dictatorship would not be in power if it were not for food handouts and other supplies it obtained by threating the world (i.e. terrorizing the world) and then swearing not to follow through on its threats if we appease them with food and oil.