Would you ever date a post-op Transexual.

  • 154 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for DBScott11
DBScott11

409

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#51 DBScott11
Member since 2009 • 409 Posts
sure vaginas a vigina no matter whose it is lol
Avatar image for BumFluff122
BumFluff122

14853

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#52 BumFluff122
Member since 2004 • 14853 Posts
what would someone who was born part man/part woman (Yes there are people who are born as both) be called after the operation?
Avatar image for Nifty_Shark
Nifty_Shark

13137

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 Nifty_Shark
Member since 2007 • 13137 Posts

what would someone who was born part man/part woman (Yes there are people who are born as both) be called after the operation?BumFluff122

Ying Yang?

Avatar image for BumFluff122
BumFluff122

14853

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#54 BumFluff122
Member since 2004 • 14853 Posts

[QUOTE="BumFluff122"]what would someone who was born part man/part woman (Yes there are people who are born as both) be called after the operation?Nifty_Shark

Ying Yang?

post-op ying yang?
Avatar image for 3picuri3
3picuri3

9618

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 3picuri3
Member since 2006 • 9618 Posts

Rather open minded bunch you all are.

If I liked her as a person and we shared a lot in common, why not? My sexual attraction to her would depend on just how masculine her features are, the male physique is rather disgusting to me, so it would depend. But sex is not everything, geez. If my partner got into some serious accident that left her horribly disfigured and unsexually appealing to me, I would still be with her because I LOVE her.

Love is blind.

dhyce
nothing to do with open minds. just the thought of bumping uglies with franken-genitalia is something that i find really off-putting. have you seen the videos that show how it's done? i don't care how perfect it looks that thought will always be there. and sexual attraction is largely pheromone based, so looks aren't everything. even if the features were perfect you'd be chemically rejecting love (as terrible as that sounds) based on genetic differences, unless you swing that way. so yeah, so sum up - love it blind, it's pheromone based largely - so you're own cliche kind of undercuts your larger point. and i'd like to clarify that i would still love my partner if they were disfigured. i just couldn't love someone who is a man with inverted genitalia fashioned to look like women's bits.
Avatar image for Lord_Daemon
Lord_Daemon

24535

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#56 Lord_Daemon
Member since 2005 • 24535 Posts
If they're somebody I'm attracted to, we have a lot of the same interests, and I have a great time with them whenever we spend time together then it wouldn't bother me. Love is love and nobody is perfect so as long as I was in love with them I wouldn't care.
Avatar image for KHfanboy2
KHfanboy2

42258

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 KHfanboy2
Member since 2007 • 42258 Posts
H to the E to the double L NO!
Avatar image for Algor44
Algor44

73

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 Algor44
Member since 2009 • 73 Posts

YES!... Oh wait...

NO! (I wouldn't. Nasty)

Avatar image for marcus4hire
marcus4hire

2684

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 marcus4hire
Member since 2003 • 2684 Posts

*shrugges*

Meh, I'd hit it.

For the novelty factor alone. Talk about a notch in the bedpost.

Avatar image for nocoolnamejim
nocoolnamejim

15136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#60 nocoolnamejim
Member since 2003 • 15136 Posts

Rather open minded bunch you all are.

If I liked her as a person and we shared a lot in common, why not? My sexual attraction to her would depend on just how masculine her features are, the male physique is rather disgusting to me, so it would depend. But sex is not everything, geez. If my partner got into some serious accident that left her horribly disfigured and unsexually appealing to me, I would still be with her because I LOVE her.

Love is blind.

dhyce
I think that I'd agree with this answer. Granted, there would be some "weird" factor to get over for me, but I like to think that I'm not so shallow as to judge the person in question SOLELY by her operation. A person isn't exclusively defined by any one thing. IF I was attracted to her, and IF we shared a lot of common interests and enjoyed spending time together, then yes I'd consider dating her. Of course, this all assumes that I was somehow no longer married.
Avatar image for scoots9
scoots9

3505

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#61 scoots9
Member since 2006 • 3505 Posts
No
Avatar image for MgamerBD
MgamerBD

17550

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 MgamerBD
Member since 2006 • 17550 Posts
hell to the nofreshgman
Avatar image for dracula_16
dracula_16

16564

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#63 dracula_16
Member since 2005 • 16564 Posts

Yes, but only the ones that did the male to female transition. I could never go the other way.

Avatar image for FalcoLX
FalcoLX

4452

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#64 FalcoLX
Member since 2007 • 4452 Posts
No, the whole situation is just screwed up.
Avatar image for dhyce
dhyce

5609

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 dhyce
Member since 2003 • 5609 Posts

nothing to do with open minds. just the thought of bumping uglies with franken-genitalia is something that i find really off-putting. have you seen the videos that show how it's done? i don't care how perfect it looks that thought will always be there. and sexual attraction is largely pheromone based, so looks aren't everything. even if the features were perfect you'd be chemically rejecting love (as terrible as that sounds) based on genetic differences, unless you swing that way. so yeah, so sum up - love it blind, it's pheromone based largely - so you're own cliche kind of undercuts your larger point. and i'd like to clarify that i would still love my partner if they were disfigured. i just couldn't love someone who is a man with inverted genitalia fashioned to look like women's bits. 3picuri3

Again, what on the planet Jupiter does just dating and love have to do with sex? You open up by saying "bumping uglies." That's not what I'm talking about, I'm saying I would most likely date a post-op transexual given that we have a lot in common/truly connect. I said I would only be able to have sex with them if their appearance was attractive/adequately believable.

What is this about pheromones? I would argue a much larger aspect of sexual attraction is simple looks based on what the individuals concept of attractiveness is. A humans ability to be attracted to another is much more complex than that of the average lifeform. For instance, I know I'm homosexual, I have zero attraction to the male anatomy, however, if a transexual looked believable enough, I can't see myself being turned off by the knowledge that they were male and simply had their genitals altered; in fact I might just find their ability to go out and become what they wanted to be somewhat admirable, if anything. I'm certain you're correct on some level, though there's a lot more to it than arbitrary pheromones.. Besides, transexuals go through hormone therapy that likely alters their pheromones, at least somewhat.

I can understand where you're coming from sexually, but I'm talking about love. Sorry for the miscommunication there.

Avatar image for ImmortalWrath12
ImmortalWrath12

1834

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 ImmortalWrath12
Member since 2005 • 1834 Posts

Rather open minded bunch you all are.

If I liked her as a person and we shared a lot in common, why not? My sexual attraction to her would depend on just how masculine her features are, the male physique is rather disgusting to me, so it would depend. But sex is not everything, geez. If my partner got into some serious accident that left her horribly disfigured and unsexually appealing to me, I would still be with her because I LOVE her.

Love is blind.

dhyce

I agree entirely, the worst I'd be worried about if I dated someone like that would be my family.

Avatar image for kulmiye
kulmiye

12094

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 kulmiye
Member since 2004 • 12094 Posts
H to the E to the double L NO!KHfanboy2
Agreed and let us never speak of this subject again.
Avatar image for BumFluff122
BumFluff122

14853

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#68 BumFluff122
Member since 2004 • 14853 Posts

Again, what on the planet Jupiter does just dating and love have to do with sex? You open up by saying "bumping uglies." That's not what I'm talking about, I'm saying I would most likely date a post-op transexual given that we have a lot in common/truly connect. I said I would only be able to have sex with them if their appearance was attractive/adequately believable.

What is this about pheromones? I would argue a much larger aspect of sexual attraction is simple looks based on what the individuals concept of attractiveness is. A humans ability to be attracted to another is much more complex than that of the average lifeform. For instance, I know I'm homosexual, I have zero attraction to the male anatomy, however, if a transexual looked believable enough, I can't see myself being turned off by the knowledge that they were male and simply had their genitals altered; in fact I might just find their ability to go out and become what they wanted to be somewhat admirable, if anything. I'm certain you're correct on some level, though there's a lot more to it than arbitrary pheromones.. Besides, transexuals go through hormone therapy that likely alters their pheromones, at least somewhat.

I can understand where you're coming from sexually, but I'm talking about love. Sorry for the miscommunication there.

dhyce
Well you're a female. You aren't looking for a sexual relation with soemoen who can bear your children. Even if men don't think that's what they are lookign for it is. Have you ever seen those studies concerning what men find attractive in a woman physically? OR what the perfect female body is shaped the way it is? (I'm not too sure what the dimensions are but it's something similar to hips/bust ratio being 1 to 1 with a smaller stomach or something). Most males (Who aren't homophobic) can't see themselves having a child with a post op transexual who was formerly male because it's almost impossible.
Avatar image for SaintLeonidas
SaintLeonidas

26735

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#69 SaintLeonidas
Member since 2006 • 26735 Posts
I dont know. It all depends, Im not againest people have a sex change, but it would depend on the person. Im not going to say I would never do it.
Avatar image for observer77
observer77

1647

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 observer77
Member since 2009 • 1647 Posts
Yes I could I am bi so dating a man that is now a women doesn't bother me or dating a women who is now a man doesn't bother me either niether odes dating before the operation as long as they are good looking and funny and easy to get along with I don't care waht is down stairs.
Avatar image for SatanAntichrist
SatanAntichrist

355

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 SatanAntichrist
Member since 2009 • 355 Posts

no.

that's gross.

Avatar image for Tauruslink
Tauruslink

6586

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 Tauruslink
Member since 2005 • 6586 Posts
Probably not, but I'm not completely closed off to the idea.
Avatar image for observer77
observer77

1647

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 observer77
Member since 2009 • 1647 Posts

Here's the problem with your thread:

The transexual had the operation with the hopes that you would NEVER HAVE KNOWN THE TRUTH IN THE FIRST PLACE.

You don't make the "switch" to stand out, you make it to fit in.

Netherscourge

most transgenders will confess to their partners waht they use to be and most partners don't care because they love their partner for who they are. transgender people who don't tell their partners are just mean or scared but you can't blame them people freak out about it and don't think about how they have broken the persons heart and only think about how embarrssed they could be if someoe found out.

Avatar image for dhyce
dhyce

5609

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 dhyce
Member since 2003 • 5609 Posts

]Well you're a female. You aren't looking for a sexual relation with soemoen who can bear your children. Even if men don't think that's what they are lookign for it is. Have you ever seen those studies concerning what men find attractive in a woman physically? OR what the perfect female body is shaped the way it is? (I'm not too sure what the dimensions are but it's something similar to hips/bust ratio being 1 to 1 with a smaller stomach or something). Most males (Who aren't homophobic) can't see themselves having a child with a post op transexual who was formerly male because it's almost impossible.BumFluff122

Nah, I don't really pay much attention to those studies. I feel they generalize men in a negative way. While the majority feel the way some of those studies dictate, I'm certain it's not all true, given the well-spring of fetishes men literally have that contradict these "studies." The same for women, some of my girlfriends have told me sexual fantasies/quirks of theirs that would send a cold chill down most men. We've all got our own specific sexual identity, it's not as broad as homosexual, heterosexual, bisexual and so forth.

Avatar image for observer77
observer77

1647

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 observer77
Member since 2009 • 1647 Posts

what would someone who was born part man/part woman (Yes there are people who are born as both) be called after the operation?BumFluff122

it depends on waht they are after the operation if they got ride of the male parts then female, or the female parts leaving the male then a man, But in most cases they are born with more dominate female parts and are turned female as children and told later so they themselves can figure out for sure.

Avatar image for observer77
observer77

1647

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 observer77
Member since 2009 • 1647 Posts

[QUOTE="BumFluff122"]]Well you're a female. You aren't looking for a sexual relation with soemoen who can bear your children. Even if men don't think that's what they are lookign for it is. Have you ever seen those studies concerning what men find attractive in a woman physically? OR what the perfect female body is shaped the way it is? (I'm not too sure what the dimensions are but it's something similar to hips/bust ratio being 1 to 1 with a smaller stomach or something). Most males (Who aren't homophobic) can't see themselves having a child with a post op transexual who was formerly male because it's almost impossible.dhyce

Nah, I don't really pay much attention to those studies. I feel they generalize men in a negative way. While the majority feel the way some of those studies dictate, I'm certain it's not all true, given the well-spring of fetishes men literally have that contradict these "studies." The same for women, some of my girlfriends have told me sexual fantasies/quirks of theirs that would send a cold chill down most men. We've all got our own specific sexual identity, it's not as broad as homosexual, heterosexual, bisexual and so forth.

Sorry to but in but I agree.

Avatar image for BumFluff122
BumFluff122

14853

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#77 BumFluff122
Member since 2004 • 14853 Posts

Nah, I don't really pay much attention to those studies. I feel they generalize men in a negative way. While the majority feel the way some of those studies dictate, I'm certain it's not all true, given the well-spring of fetishes men literally have that contradict these "studies." The same for women, some of my girlfriends have told me sexual fantasies/quirks of theirs that would send a cold chill down most men. We've all got our own specific sexual identity, it's not as broad as homosexual, heterosexual, bisexual and so forth.

dhyce
Yes I know all about fetishes. In fact I have a couple (thousand) myself. I was talking more in terms of majority. The majority of straight males in western civlization consider a female more attractive if she has the right body proportions for bearing a helthy child. If you go elsewhere in the world and look at those different cultures their's may differ as to what they find attractive but they will still be mostly preferred for bearing strong, healthy and powerful children.
Avatar image for dhyce
dhyce

5609

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 dhyce
Member since 2003 • 5609 Posts

Yes I know all about fetishes. In fact I have a couple (thousand) myself. I was talking more in terms of majority. The majority of straight males in western civlization consider a female more attractive if she has the right body proportions for bearing a helthy child. If you go elsewhere in the world and look at those different cultures their's may differ as to what they find attractive but they will still be mostly preferred for bearing strong, healthy and powerful children. BumFluff122

Ah, just making sure I know what you mean. In that case, blonde versus brunette, short versus tall aside, most men in the US SEEM to favor a certain figure on women. One that transexuals can rarely carry. I guess I agree with that point.

Still, I'd like to think people are looking for more than an ideal body. That's just the way I choose to look at things, I guess.

Avatar image for MetalGear_Ninty
MetalGear_Ninty

6337

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#79 MetalGear_Ninty
Member since 2008 • 6337 Posts
[QUOTE="dhyce"]

Rather open minded bunch you all are.

If I liked her as a person and we shared a lot in common, why not? My sexual attraction to her would depend on just how masculine her features are, the male physique is rather disgusting to me, so it would depend. But sex is not everything, geez. If my partner got into some serious accident that left her horribly disfigured and unsexually appealing to me, I would still be with her because I LOVE her.

Love is blind.

nocoolnamejim

I think that I'd agree with this answer. Granted, there would be some "weird" factor to get over for me, but I like to think that I'm not so shallow as to judge the person in question SOLELY by her operation. A person isn't exclusively defined by any one thing. IF I was attracted to her, and IF we shared a lot of common interests and enjoyed spending time together, then yes I'd consider dating her. Of course, this all assumes that I was somehow no longer married.

The words 'shallow' and a lack of being 'open minded' has been used.

But in reality, yous two are the ones who seem to be criticisng decisions made by users which would be very personal to them. Irony much. :wink:

Avatar image for Bourbons3
Bourbons3

24238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#80 Bourbons3
Member since 2003 • 24238 Posts
Probably not.
Avatar image for BumFluff122
BumFluff122

14853

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#81 BumFluff122
Member since 2004 • 14853 Posts

[QUOTE="BumFluff122"] Yes I know all about fetishes. In fact I have a couple (thousand) myself. I was talking more in terms of majority. The majority of straight males in western civlization consider a female more attractive if she has the right body proportions for bearing a helthy child. If you go elsewhere in the world and look at those different cultures their's may differ as to what they find attractive but they will still be mostly preferred for bearing strong, healthy and powerful children. dhyce

Ah, just making sure I know what you mean. In that case, blonde versus brunette, short versus tall aside, most men in the US SEEM to favor a certain figure on women. One that transexuals can rarely carry. I guess I agree with that point.

Still, I'd like to think people are looking for more than an ideal body. That's just the way I choose to look at things, I guess.

The perfect body hypothesis is for those first-glance types I believe. Personally I'm the type of person that enjoys being friends with a girl first before becoming romantically involved with them though I do understand completely where various cultures look for certain things in the opposite sex to bear or protect their children. Isn't it commonly known that most straight women look for men who are Strong and Powerful (Either physically or mentally) in public and **** cats at home? This is the perfect description of a perfect father: One who can protect and support his children and wife in publicwhile being a perfect father athome.
Avatar image for dhyce
dhyce

5609

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 dhyce
Member since 2003 • 5609 Posts

The words 'shallow' and a lack of being 'open minded' has been used.

But in reality, yous two are the ones who seem to be criticisng decisions made by users which would be very personal to them. Irony much. :wink:

MetalGear_Ninty

Yes, I'm calling the sexual perspective of most people quite shallow, and I do not see the irony, because it is true. I'm not saying it's a bad thing, I'm just calling it like I see it.

Avatar image for kemar7856
kemar7856

11789

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#83 kemar7856
Member since 2004 • 11789 Posts
NEVER!!!!
Avatar image for lbjkurono23
lbjkurono23

12544

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#84 lbjkurono23
Member since 2007 • 12544 Posts
[QUOTE="clyde46"]

how about now?

Neon-Tiger
I'd hti that. You guys are way too weird and picky. Anything that moves is game to me.

thats my motto man
Avatar image for MKLOL
MKLOL

2080

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#85 MKLOL
Member since 2007 • 2080 Posts
Not in a million years.!
Avatar image for MetalGear_Ninty
MetalGear_Ninty

6337

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#86 MetalGear_Ninty
Member since 2008 • 6337 Posts
[QUOTE="dhyce"][QUOTE="MetalGear_Ninty"]

The words 'shallow' and a lack of being 'open minded' has been used.

But in reality, yous two are the ones who seem to be criticisng decisions made by users which would be very personal to them. Irony much. :wink:

Yes, I'm calling the sexual perspective of most people quite shallow, and I do not see the irony, because it is. I'm not saying it's a bad thing, I'm just calling it like I see it.

I don't know, I just think it is ironic to imply that people are close minded effectively because they don't think like you do, and they wouldn't make the same decisions as you. But hey, that'syour perspective.
Avatar image for Moroes
Moroes

2041

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#87 Moroes
Member since 2008 • 2041 Posts
If I knew that he used to be a man, then probably not.
Avatar image for Mr_Leonis
Mr_Leonis

4615

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#88 Mr_Leonis
Member since 2007 • 4615 Posts
Not to be offensive but i'm strictly heterosexual. The thought of being with someone who is/was the same gender as I will meet rejection very quickly...... Don't make me have to find out the hard way. :?
Avatar image for nocoolnamejim
nocoolnamejim

15136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#89 nocoolnamejim
Member since 2003 • 15136 Posts
[QUOTE="nocoolnamejim"][QUOTE="dhyce"]

Rather open minded bunch you all are.

If I liked her as a person and we shared a lot in common, why not? My sexual attraction to her would depend on just how masculine her features are, the male physique is rather disgusting to me, so it would depend. But sex is not everything, geez. If my partner got into some serious accident that left her horribly disfigured and unsexually appealing to me, I would still be with her because I LOVE her.

Love is blind.

MetalGear_Ninty

I think that I'd agree with this answer. Granted, there would be some "weird" factor to get over for me, but I like to think that I'm not so shallow as to judge the person in question SOLELY by her operation. A person isn't exclusively defined by any one thing. IF I was attracted to her, and IF we shared a lot of common interests and enjoyed spending time together, then yes I'd consider dating her. Of course, this all assumes that I was somehow no longer married.

The words 'shallow' and a lack of being 'open minded' has been used.

But in reality, yous two are the ones who seem to be criticisng decisions made by users which would be very personal to them. Irony much. :wink:

I suppose you could look at it that way. And this is a bit of a subjective area so there is certainly room for opposing viewpoints. But then again, the very definition of shallow is "concerned mainly with superficial matters". Preemptively rejecting someone solely on the basis of a physical operation without considering anything other than that one thing does strike me as the dictionary definition of the word I used. If someone came on here and said "Would you ever date someone who had big ears and a scar on her right cheek?" and a whole bunch of people chimed in "hell no!", "Ooh gross!" and "Absolutely no way" then you'd probably consider that to be somewhat shallow, right? Now, if they were applying other criteria for the rejection beyond just the one thing - such as wanting to have children - then I think the situation would be somewhat different.
Avatar image for deactivated-5fc39ee132cf4
deactivated-5fc39ee132cf4

2465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#90 deactivated-5fc39ee132cf4
Member since 2006 • 2465 Posts
Nay nay nay.
Avatar image for darksword1123
darksword1123

30121

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#91 darksword1123
Member since 2004 • 30121 Posts
No
Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#92 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
Not to be offensive but i'm strictly heterosexual. The thought of being with someone who is/was the same gender as I will meet rejection very quickly...... Don't make me have to find out the hard way. :?Mr_Leonis

But what defines gender? You could define gender physical and/or emotionally. Many transgenders feel that they are "women trapped in men's bodies" or vice-versa. The reason they get operations and hormone therapy is because they don't feel like their mental programming matches the physical.

Now, I personally would tend to agree with you to some extent. It would be a challenge for me to deal with it emotionally in the beginning since I am physically and emotionally heterosexual and do not find anyone of the male gender to be physically appealing in any way (aside from wanting myself to look like particular men). But a man's physical body altered to look like a woman's with the mind of a woman? It would make for some interesting beginnings of a relationship, that's for sure.
Avatar image for dhyce
dhyce

5609

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#93 dhyce
Member since 2003 • 5609 Posts

I don't know, I just think it is ironic to imply that people are close minded effectively because they don't think like you do, and they wouldn't make the same decisions as you. But hey, that'syour perspective.MetalGear_Ninty

There's quite a difference between "I can never see myself being sexually attracted to a transexual, so I doubt I would date one out of concern for how far I can take our relationship" and "HELL TO THE NO LOL!!!!"

The latter is just unopenminded, and it's the majority of this thread. I know opinion varies, obviously, yet I get the impression most of the lovely people here never sincerely thought about it.

As I originally posted, I was talking about love, not sex. This thread is about dating, right? I must have taken a wrong turn in albaquerky. I was trying to propose that, given you're a mature person, you met someone you were convinced was the opposite sex. You two date, for a while and really fall for one another. During a night of wine and secrets they finally admit they're a transexual, what do you do? I mean, if you actually care about this person, thought yourself to be in love. "Hell to the no" just ceases to become relevant.

Hence I'm saying there might be a few closed minds around.

Again, not that I'm implying that's a bad thing. Everyone's mind varies, nobody can help it.

Avatar image for Mr_Leonis
Mr_Leonis

4615

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#94 Mr_Leonis
Member since 2007 • 4615 Posts

[QUOTE="Mr_Leonis"]Not to be offensive but i'm strictly heterosexual. The thought of being with someone who is/was the same gender as I will meet rejection very quickly...... Don't make me have to find out the hard way. :?foxhound_fox

But what defines gender? You could define gender physical and/or emotionally. Many transgenders feel that they are "women trapped in men's bodies" or vice-versa. The reason they get operations and hormone therapy is because they don't feel like their mental programming matches the physical.

Now, I personally would tend to agree with you to some extent. It would be a challenge for me to deal with it emotionally in the beginning since I am physically and emotionally heterosexual and do not find anyone of the male gender to be physically appealing in any way (aside from wanting myself to look like particular men). But a man's physical body altered to look like a woman's with the mind of a woman? It would make for some interesting beginnings of a relationship, that's for sure.

I see your point but the fact that they were born a male kinda....I'm sorry. Sometimes I wish I was born differently aswell.(not gender wise)

Avatar image for MetalGear_Ninty
MetalGear_Ninty

6337

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#95 MetalGear_Ninty
Member since 2008 • 6337 Posts
[QUOTE="MetalGear_Ninty"][QUOTE="nocoolnamejim"] I think that I'd agree with this answer. Granted, there would be some "weird" factor to get over for me, but I like to think that I'm not so shallow as to judge the person in question SOLELY by her operation. A person isn't exclusively defined by any one thing. IF I was attracted to her, and IF we shared a lot of common interests and enjoyed spending time together, then yes I'd consider dating her. Of course, this all assumes that I was somehow no longer married.nocoolnamejim
The words 'shallow' and a lack of being 'open minded' has been used.

But in reality, yous two are the ones who seem to be criticisng decisions made by users which would be very personal to them. Irony much. :wink:

I suppose you could look at it that way. And this is a bit of a subjective area so there is certainly room for opposing viewpoints. But then again, the very definition of shallow is "concerned mainly with superficial matters". Preemptively rejecting someone solely on the basis of a physical operation without considering anything other than that one thing does strike me as the dictionary definition of the word I used. If someone came on here and said "Would you ever date someone who had big ears?" and a whole bunch of people chimed in "hell no!", "Ooh gross!" and "Absolutely no way" then you'd probably consider that to be somewhat shallow, right? Now, if they were applying other criteria for the rejection beyond just the one thing - such as wanting to have children - then I think the situation would be somewhat different.

I recognise that this is perhaps a sensitive issue that has probably not been dealt with as sensitively as it should have been generally in the thread. (and perhaps my previous post was a tad over the top as well)

However, the contrary perspective could be said. The operation can be said just to be superficial -- the person doesn't actually change their x or y chromosomes, and any changes made are largely superficial -- with this in mind it is understandable is some people would flat-out reject dating a transexual because the gender change is not absolute.

Moreover, the situation becomes a lot more complex when considering religious sensibilities, where it may be percieved as a sin to 'lie with another man'.

Avatar image for Paladin_King
Paladin_King

11832

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#96 Paladin_King
Member since 2008 • 11832 Posts
No. Too bad I probably wouldn't know.
Avatar image for MetalGear_Ninty
MetalGear_Ninty

6337

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#97 MetalGear_Ninty
Member since 2008 • 6337 Posts

[QUOTE="MetalGear_Ninty"] I don't know, I just think it is ironic to imply that people are close minded effectively because they don't think like you do, and they wouldn't make the same decisions as you. But hey, that'syour perspective.dhyce

There's quite a difference between "I can never see myself being sexually attracted to a transexual, so I doubt I would date one out of concern for how far I can take our relationship" and "HELL TO THE NO LOL!!!!"

The latter is just unopenminded, and it's the majority of this thread. I know opinion varies, obviously, yet I get the impression most of the lovely people here never sincerely thought about it.

As I originally posted, I was talking about love, not sex. This thread is about dating, right? I must have taken a wrong turn in albaquerky. I was trying to propose that, given you're a mature person, you met someone you were convinced was the opposite sex. You two date, for a while and really fall for one another. During a night of wine and secrets they finally admit they're a transexual, what do you do? I mean, if you actually care about this person, thought yourself to be in love. "Hell to the no" just ceases to become relevant.

Hence I'm saying there might be a few closed minds around.

Again, not that I'm implying that's a bad thing. Everyone's mind varies, nobody can help it.

Rather open minded bunch you all are dhyce
To be fair, you did kinda generalise everybody in the thread.
Avatar image for dhyce
dhyce

5609

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#98 dhyce
Member since 2003 • 5609 Posts

To be fair, you did kinda generalise everybody in the thread. MetalGear_Ninty

Oh wow, totally wasn't aware of hoew I worded that, I'm sorry.

I had my wisdom teeth out yesterday, I'm cranky, sore, and the Percocet is making me a bit loopy. I'm really not a **** I swear, just down in the dumps today.

Avatar image for MetalGear_Ninty
MetalGear_Ninty

6337

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#99 MetalGear_Ninty
Member since 2008 • 6337 Posts

[QUOTE="MetalGear_Ninty"] To be fair, you did kinda generalise everybody in the thread. dhyce

Oh wow, totally wasn't aware of hoew I worded that, I'm sorry.

I had my wisdom teeth out yesterday, I'm cranky, sore, and the Percocet is making me a bit loopy. I'm really not a **** I swear, just down in the dumps today.

No problem, whatsoever. I empathise with you, I can get cranky a lot myself sometimes. :P
Avatar image for nocoolnamejim
nocoolnamejim

15136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#100 nocoolnamejim
Member since 2003 • 15136 Posts
[QUOTE="nocoolnamejim"][QUOTE="MetalGear_Ninty"] The words 'shallow' and a lack of being 'open minded' has been used.

But in reality, yous two are the ones who seem to be criticisng decisions made by users which would be very personal to them. Irony much. :wink:

MetalGear_Ninty

I suppose you could look at it that way. And this is a bit of a subjective area so there is certainly room for opposing viewpoints. But then again, the very definition of shallow is "concerned mainly with superficial matters". Preemptively rejecting someone solely on the basis of a physical operation without considering anything other than that one thing does strike me as the dictionary definition of the word I used. If someone came on here and said "Would you ever date someone who had big ears?" and a whole bunch of people chimed in "hell no!", "Ooh gross!" and "Absolutely no way" then you'd probably consider that to be somewhat shallow, right? Now, if they were applying other criteria for the rejection beyond just the one thing - such as wanting to have children - then I think the situation would be somewhat different.

I recognise that this is perhaps a sensitive issue that has probably not been dealt with as sensitively as it should have been generally in the thread. (and perhaps my previous post was a tad over the top as well)

However, the contrary perspective could be said. The operation can be said just to be superficial -- the person doesn't actually change their x or y chromosomes, and any changes made are largely superficial -- with this in mind it is understandable is some people would flat-out reject dating a transexual because the gender change is not absolute.

Moreover, the situation becomes a lot more complex when considering religious sensibilities, where it may be percieved as a sin to 'lie with another man'.

Now to me this falls into the category of "If they were applying other criteria for the rejection beyond just the one thing".



There are plenty of reasons why someone would not want to date a transexual that are NOT shallow. Religious beliefs are one of them.



What I suspect though is that they hear "Transexual" and are immediately jumping to an image similar to this, saying "Yucky!", and that's as far as their evaluation criteria is being processed. :P