Would you kill someone for $1000000 and never be caught?

  • 122 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Galzakian
Galzakian

5160

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#101 Galzakian
Member since 2004 • 5160 Posts

Without any information about the target; probably not.

Maybe if I knew a little about why they were marked for death and what they'd done - and it was a valid reason, I probably would.

Avatar image for pianist
pianist

18900

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#103 pianist
Member since 2003 • 18900 Posts

[QUOTE="BranKetra"][QUOTE="wemhim"] Peace through fiction. Peace is fiction... wemhim
Peace may be fiction, but that doesn't mean that it will always be fiction. As for "Peace through fiction," wills find ways.

Maybe, I somehow doubt it. To bring peace, we'd probably have to genetically engineer certain emotions out.

I would tend to agree - it would be an exceedingly difficult task to achieve world peace. I'd prefer not to say impossible, but for practical purposes, it might as well be. The chances of getting billions of people to cooperate with each other and shed their animal impulses are about as likely as getting Jack Thompson to claim GTA 3 is the most beneficial entertainment product in the history of society.

Avatar image for fepepinar
fepepinar

856

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#104 fepepinar
Member since 2007 • 856 Posts
[QUOTE="fepepinar"]

Maybe your society doesn't let children starve in the streets, mine does.

pianist

I sympathize... but that wouldn't make it right to wreck other peoples' lives for luxury. If you condone that behavior, then you might as well condone letting children starve in the streets, too. That's what would happen to animals who lose their parents, after all.

No, I'm only condoning wrecking one person's life for my own luxury. Anyone else doing it is simply egotistical and wrong.

Avatar image for branketra
branketra

51726

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 9

#105 branketra
Member since 2006 • 51726 Posts

[QUOTE="BranKetra"][QUOTE="wemhim"] Peace through fiction. Peace is fiction... wemhim
Peace may be fiction, but that doesn't mean that it will always be fiction. As for "Peace through fiction," wills find ways.

Maybe, I somehow doubt it. To bring peace, we'd probably have to genetically engineer certain emotions out.

Or be the martyr that defeats the evils without killing, as to be an example or something.

...Wishful thinking that more or less coincides with Pianist's latest post before this one.

Avatar image for Omni-Slash
Omni-Slash

54450

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#106 Omni-Slash
Member since 2003 • 54450 Posts

The money isn't going to secure their future, Omni. You know that. It will run out sooner than later. It is THEIR capacity to cope with your loss that will secure their future. It surprises me that people here would consider risking other peoples' well-being to ensure their own comfort. What if the person that died was MY mother or father? What if it was me?

pianist
nothing ensures their future...even the ability to cope.....but you'd be foolish to say that wealth does not put anyone who has itin a better position to succeed.....One can't help anyone if they are struggling for their own survival.....in all honeslty decisions are always made on the basis of whom will it hurt in comparison to whom it will help. IF there was a trigger i could pull that would guarantee everyone would live happily ever after I'd be first in line to pull it......but if you can;t help everyone....you help who is closest to you...and from there people can continue to help others.....
Avatar image for DivergeUnify
DivergeUnify

15150

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#107 DivergeUnify
Member since 2007 • 15150 Posts
[QUOTE="mig_killer2"]what if that life you took was the single parent of 5 children?

how can anyone be this selfish. after 2.9 million years of evolution, people like you still reign supreme over this earth.

*vomits*

Omni-Slash
ahh self righteousness......nothing is more hypicritcal.....and what if he was a drug dealer?......I secured my life....an saved possibley thousands in the process.....hell....that'd make me a hero.....or would it?....

what if it was a person working on a an injection to stop death?
Avatar image for pianist
pianist

18900

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#108 pianist
Member since 2003 • 18900 Posts
[QUOTE="pianist"][QUOTE="fepepinar"]

Maybe your society doesn't let children starve in the streets, mine does.

fepepinar

I sympathize... but that wouldn't make it right to wreck other peoples' lives for luxury. If you condone that behavior, then you might as well condone letting children starve in the streets, too. That's what would happen to animals who lose their parents, after all.

No, I'm only condoning wrecking one person's life for my own luxury. Anyone else doing it is simply egotistical and wrong.

Then you have no business in complaining about children starving in the streets. Good luck to you. Incidentally, few people are hermits. When you kill someone, you usually aren't just wrecking his or her life.

Avatar image for Omni-Slash
Omni-Slash

54450

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#109 Omni-Slash
Member since 2003 • 54450 Posts
what if it was a person working on a an injection to stop death?
DivergeUnify
What if that injection were to keep alive the person who pbrought the world to an end?.......what ifs are fun......seriously..do you have any idea how hard it is to argue a point you don't believe in in the least?........
Avatar image for DivergeUnify
DivergeUnify

15150

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#110 DivergeUnify
Member since 2007 • 15150 Posts

[QUOTE="DivergeUnify"]what if it was a person working on a an injection to stop death?
Omni-Slash
What if that injection were to keep alive the person who pbrought the world to an end?.......what ifs are fun......seriously..do you have any idea how hard it is to argue a point you don't believe in in the least?........

It only takes a9mm to take away taht bad life. Btw, I've always wanted to say this to you

HOW COME IN EVER SENTENCE YOU HAVE THREE PERIODS!?!?!?!? :P

Avatar image for Omni-Slash
Omni-Slash

54450

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#111 Omni-Slash
Member since 2003 • 54450 Posts
It only takes a9mm to take away taht bad life. Btw, I've always wanted to say this to you

HOW COME IN EVER SENTENCE YOU HAVE THREE PERIODS!?!?!?!? :P

DivergeUnify
cause thought stoppage is completely overated........... :P
Avatar image for smokeydabear076
smokeydabear076

22109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#112 smokeydabear076
Member since 2004 • 22109 Posts
No.
Avatar image for pianist
pianist

18900

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#113 pianist
Member since 2003 • 18900 Posts
[QUOTE="pianist"]

The money isn't going to secure their future, Omni. You know that. It will run out sooner than later. It is THEIR capacity to cope with your loss that will secure their future. It surprises me that people here would consider risking other peoples' well-being to ensure their own comfort. What if the person that died was MY mother or father? What if it was me?

Omni-Slash

nothing ensures their future...even the ability to cope.....but you'd be foolish to say that wealth does not put anyone who has itin a better position to succeed.....One can't help anyone if they are struggling for their own survival.....in all honeslty decisions are always made on the basis of whom will it hurt in comparison to whom it will help. IF there was a trigger i could pull that would guarantee everyone would live happily ever after I'd be first in line to pull it......but if you can;t help everyone....you help who is closest to you...and from there people can continue to help others.....

This is absolutely true. And it is precisely because I know I would be inflicting a world of hurt on other people to enrich myself that I could not do this. I guess in the end, it boils down to this - I can not accept murdering someone to protect against something that MIGHT happen in the future. I'm making the future against which I am protecting a reality for somebody else. If I want to protect my family from my death, I'll pay for life insurance. If doing so requires me to give up some luxuries (including the luxury of free time so that I can work to earn enough to pay for the insurance), that's what I'll do.

Knowing that I would be doing to some other family what I would never want done to mine is why I have an immediate and instinctive reaction to deny my selfish desire to have a lot of easy, free money.

Avatar image for xXtheabombXx
xXtheabombXx

775

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#114 xXtheabombXx
Member since 2004 • 775 Posts
Reading through these responses I've confirmed my thoughts that all morals are relative.
Avatar image for DivergeUnify
DivergeUnify

15150

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#115 DivergeUnify
Member since 2007 • 15150 Posts
[QUOTE="DivergeUnify"]It only takes a9mm to take away taht bad life. Btw, I've always wanted to say this to you

HOW COME IN EVER SENTENCE YOU HAVE THREE PERIODS!?!?!?!? :P

Omni-Slash

cause thought stoppage is completely overated........... :P

its so annoying! every time i read a post of yours i want to go

Y U DO IT????? :cry:

Avatar image for Omni-Slash
Omni-Slash

54450

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#116 Omni-Slash
Member since 2003 • 54450 Posts
This is absolutely true. And it is precisely because I know I would be inflicting a world of hurt on other people to enrich myself that I could not do this. I guess in the end, it boils down to this - I can not accept murdering someone to protect against something that MIGHT happen in the future. I'm making the future against which I am protecting a reality for somebody else. If I want to protect my family from my death, I'll pay for life insurance. If doing so requires me to give up some luxuries (including the luxury of free time so that I can work to earn enough to pay for the insurance), that's what I'll do.

Knowing that I would be doing to some other family what I would never want done to mine is why I have an immediate and instinctive reaction to deny my selfish desire to have a lot of easy, free money.

pianist
very true indeed.....the thing is the question is so flawed that there really is an easy way out of it.........a more interesting ethicval delemna would have been if you were given a gun and either had to shoot somone you knew....or somone you didn't....or else they would both be shot........now there'sa good ol' fashion morality question....
Avatar image for fepepinar
fepepinar

856

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#117 fepepinar
Member since 2007 • 856 Posts
[QUOTE="fepepinar"][QUOTE="pianist"][QUOTE="fepepinar"]

Maybe your society doesn't let children starve in the streets, mine does.

pianist

I sympathize... but that wouldn't make it right to wreck other peoples' lives for luxury. If you condone that behavior, then you might as well condone letting children starve in the streets, too. That's what would happen to animals who lose their parents, after all.

No, I'm only condoning wrecking one person's life for my own luxury. Anyone else doing it is simply egotistical and wrong.

Then you have no business in complaining about children starving in the streets. Good luck to you. Incidentally, few people are hermits. When you kill someone, you usually aren't just wrecking his or her life.

I can complain for society having more people like me than there should be.

Avatar image for pianist
pianist

18900

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#118 pianist
Member since 2003 • 18900 Posts
[QUOTE="pianist"]This is absolutely true. And it is precisely because I know I would be inflicting a world of hurt on other people to enrich myself that I could not do this. I guess in the end, it boils down to this - I can not accept murdering someone to protect against something that MIGHT happen in the future. I'm making the future against which I am protecting a reality for somebody else. If I want to protect my family from my death, I'll pay for life insurance. If doing so requires me to give up some luxuries (including the luxury of free time so that I can work to earn enough to pay for the insurance), that's what I'll do.

Knowing that I would be doing to some other family what I would never want done to mine is why I have an immediate and instinctive reaction to deny my selfish desire to have a lot of easy, free money.

Omni-Slash

very true indeed.....the thing is the question is so flawed that there really is an easy way out of it.........a more interesting ethicval delemna would have been if you were given a gun and either had to shoot somone you knew....or somone you didn't....or else they would both be shot........now there'sa good ol' fashion morality question....

Indeed. In that situation, I'm sure you would pick the person you knew (assuming it's someone you love). I would, too. Or I'd shoot the guy who was asking me to do it, assuming he was alone.:P

Avatar image for DrewTheSchu
DrewTheSchu

518

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 83

User Lists: 0

#119 DrewTheSchu
Member since 2003 • 518 Posts

nope.

now i'm not a very religious person, but i do believe in hell and i believe that UNWARRANTED murdered will send you there. There's A LOT i would do for a mill...and i mean A LOT lol, but not the murder of an innocent person.

Avatar image for pianist
pianist

18900

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#120 pianist
Member since 2003 • 18900 Posts

I can complain for society having more people like me than there should be.

fepepinar

:lol:

Touche. But if you aren't part of the solution, you're part of the problem. /cliche

Avatar image for Omni-Slash
Omni-Slash

54450

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#121 Omni-Slash
Member since 2003 • 54450 Posts
Indeed. In that situation, I'm sure you would pick the person you knew (assuming it's someone you love). I would, too. Or I'd shoot the guy who was asking me to do it, assuming he was alone.:P pianist
cheater!...you can't shoot the requestee!...:lol:....oh well..I gotta go home and to bed.....gotta be back here at work first thing in the morning.....have a good night all......
Avatar image for SympathyForLdyV
SympathyForLdyV

767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#122 SympathyForLdyV
Member since 2007 • 767 Posts
Unfortunatly no. I wouldn't want someone I care for taken away from me so I can't do that to someone else. On top of that you never know what that person (the one you have to kill) could do with their life....for all I know he/she could have a cure for cancer.
Avatar image for ice_radon
ice_radon

70464

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#123 ice_radon
Member since 2002 • 70464 Posts
Yes.
Avatar image for fepepinar
fepepinar

856

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#124 fepepinar
Member since 2007 • 856 Posts
[QUOTE="fepepinar"]

I can complain for society having more people like me than there should be.

pianist

:lol:

Touche. But if you aren't part of the solution, you're part of the problem. /cliche

I like to think that I'm somewhere in the middle of thinking about the solution and not applying it to solve the problem.

Avatar image for NaiKoN9293
NaiKoN9293

4102

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#125 NaiKoN9293
Member since 2004 • 4102 Posts
I would have given it serious thought had it been as little as $10 000