Without any information about the target; probably not.
Maybe if I knew a little about why they were marked for death and what they'd done - and it was a valid reason, I probably would.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="BranKetra"][QUOTE="wemhim"] Peace through fiction. Peace is fiction... wemhimPeace may be fiction, but that doesn't mean that it will always be fiction. As for "Peace through fiction," wills find ways.
I would tend to agree - it would be an exceedingly difficult task to achieve world peace. I'd prefer not to say impossible, but for practical purposes, it might as well be. The chances of getting billions of people to cooperate with each other and shed their animal impulses are about as likely as getting Jack Thompson to claim GTA 3 is the most beneficial entertainment product in the history of society.
[QUOTE="fepepinar"]Maybe your society doesn't let children starve in the streets, mine does.
pianist
I sympathize... but that wouldn't make it right to wreck other peoples' lives for luxury. If you condone that behavior, then you might as well condone letting children starve in the streets, too. That's what would happen to animals who lose their parents, after all.
No, I'm only condoning wrecking one person's life for my own luxury. Anyone else doing it is simply egotistical and wrong.
[QUOTE="BranKetra"][QUOTE="wemhim"] Peace through fiction. Peace is fiction... wemhimPeace may be fiction, but that doesn't mean that it will always be fiction. As for "Peace through fiction," wills find ways.
...Wishful thinking that more or less coincides with Pianist's latest post before this one.
nothing ensures their future...even the ability to cope.....but you'd be foolish to say that wealth does not put anyone who has itin a better position to succeed.....One can't help anyone if they are struggling for their own survival.....in all honeslty decisions are always made on the basis of whom will it hurt in comparison to whom it will help. IF there was a trigger i could pull that would guarantee everyone would live happily ever after I'd be first in line to pull it......but if you can;t help everyone....you help who is closest to you...and from there people can continue to help others.....The money isn't going to secure their future, Omni. You know that. It will run out sooner than later. It is THEIR capacity to cope with your loss that will secure their future. It surprises me that people here would consider risking other peoples' well-being to ensure their own comfort. What if the person that died was MY mother or father? What if it was me?
pianist
[QUOTE="mig_killer2"]what if that life you took was the single parent of 5 children?ahh self righteousness......nothing is more hypicritcal.....and what if he was a drug dealer?......I secured my life....an saved possibley thousands in the process.....hell....that'd make me a hero.....or would it?.... what if it was a person working on a an injection to stop death?how can anyone be this selfish. after 2.9 million years of evolution, people like you still reign supreme over this earth.
*vomits*
Omni-Slash
[QUOTE="pianist"][QUOTE="fepepinar"]Maybe your society doesn't let children starve in the streets, mine does.
fepepinar
I sympathize... but that wouldn't make it right to wreck other peoples' lives for luxury. If you condone that behavior, then you might as well condone letting children starve in the streets, too. That's what would happen to animals who lose their parents, after all.
No, I'm only condoning wrecking one person's life for my own luxury. Anyone else doing it is simply egotistical and wrong.
Then you have no business in complaining about children starving in the streets. Good luck to you. Incidentally, few people are hermits. When you kill someone, you usually aren't just wrecking his or her life.
what if it was a person working on a an injection to stop death?What if that injection were to keep alive the person who pbrought the world to an end?.......what ifs are fun......seriously..do you have any idea how hard it is to argue a point you don't believe in in the least?........
DivergeUnify
[QUOTE="DivergeUnify"]what if it was a person working on a an injection to stop death?What if that injection were to keep alive the person who pbrought the world to an end?.......what ifs are fun......seriously..do you have any idea how hard it is to argue a point you don't believe in in the least?........ It only takes a9mm to take away taht bad life. Btw, I've always wanted to say this to you
Omni-Slash
HOW COME IN EVER SENTENCE YOU HAVE THREE PERIODS!?!?!?!? :P
It only takes a9mm to take away taht bad life. Btw, I've always wanted to say this to youcause thought stoppage is completely overated........... :PHOW COME IN EVER SENTENCE YOU HAVE THREE PERIODS!?!?!?!? :P
DivergeUnify
[QUOTE="pianist"]nothing ensures their future...even the ability to cope.....but you'd be foolish to say that wealth does not put anyone who has itin a better position to succeed.....One can't help anyone if they are struggling for their own survival.....in all honeslty decisions are always made on the basis of whom will it hurt in comparison to whom it will help. IF there was a trigger i could pull that would guarantee everyone would live happily ever after I'd be first in line to pull it......but if you can;t help everyone....you help who is closest to you...and from there people can continue to help others.....The money isn't going to secure their future, Omni. You know that. It will run out sooner than later. It is THEIR capacity to cope with your loss that will secure their future. It surprises me that people here would consider risking other peoples' well-being to ensure their own comfort. What if the person that died was MY mother or father? What if it was me?
Omni-Slash
This is absolutely true. And it is precisely because I know I would be inflicting a world of hurt on other people to enrich myself that I could not do this. I guess in the end, it boils down to this - I can not accept murdering someone to protect against something that MIGHT happen in the future. I'm making the future against which I am protecting a reality for somebody else. If I want to protect my family from my death, I'll pay for life insurance. If doing so requires me to give up some luxuries (including the luxury of free time so that I can work to earn enough to pay for the insurance), that's what I'll do.
Knowing that I would be doing to some other family what I would never want done to mine is why I have an immediate and instinctive reaction to deny my selfish desire to have a lot of easy, free money.
[QUOTE="DivergeUnify"]It only takes a9mm to take away taht bad life. Btw, I've always wanted to say this to youcause thought stoppage is completely overated........... :P its so annoying! every time i read a post of yours i want to goHOW COME IN EVER SENTENCE YOU HAVE THREE PERIODS!?!?!?!? :P
Omni-Slash
Y U DO IT????? :cry:
This is absolutely true. And it is precisely because I know I would be inflicting a world of hurt on other people to enrich myself that I could not do this. I guess in the end, it boils down to this - I can not accept murdering someone to protect against something that MIGHT happen in the future. I'm making the future against which I am protecting a reality for somebody else. If I want to protect my family from my death, I'll pay for life insurance. If doing so requires me to give up some luxuries (including the luxury of free time so that I can work to earn enough to pay for the insurance), that's what I'll do.very true indeed.....the thing is the question is so flawed that there really is an easy way out of it.........a more interesting ethicval delemna would have been if you were given a gun and either had to shoot somone you knew....or somone you didn't....or else they would both be shot........now there'sa good ol' fashion morality question....Knowing that I would be doing to some other family what I would never want done to mine is why I have an immediate and instinctive reaction to deny my selfish desire to have a lot of easy, free money.
pianist
[QUOTE="fepepinar"][QUOTE="pianist"][QUOTE="fepepinar"]Maybe your society doesn't let children starve in the streets, mine does.
pianist
I sympathize... but that wouldn't make it right to wreck other peoples' lives for luxury. If you condone that behavior, then you might as well condone letting children starve in the streets, too. That's what would happen to animals who lose their parents, after all.
No, I'm only condoning wrecking one person's life for my own luxury. Anyone else doing it is simply egotistical and wrong.
Then you have no business in complaining about children starving in the streets. Good luck to you. Incidentally, few people are hermits. When you kill someone, you usually aren't just wrecking his or her life.
I can complain for society having more people like me than there should be.
[QUOTE="pianist"]This is absolutely true. And it is precisely because I know I would be inflicting a world of hurt on other people to enrich myself that I could not do this. I guess in the end, it boils down to this - I can not accept murdering someone to protect against something that MIGHT happen in the future. I'm making the future against which I am protecting a reality for somebody else. If I want to protect my family from my death, I'll pay for life insurance. If doing so requires me to give up some luxuries (including the luxury of free time so that I can work to earn enough to pay for the insurance), that's what I'll do.very true indeed.....the thing is the question is so flawed that there really is an easy way out of it.........a more interesting ethicval delemna would have been if you were given a gun and either had to shoot somone you knew....or somone you didn't....or else they would both be shot........now there'sa good ol' fashion morality question....Knowing that I would be doing to some other family what I would never want done to mine is why I have an immediate and instinctive reaction to deny my selfish desire to have a lot of easy, free money.
Omni-Slash
Indeed. In that situation, I'm sure you would pick the person you knew (assuming it's someone you love). I would, too. Or I'd shoot the guy who was asking me to do it, assuming he was alone.:P
nope.
now i'm not a very religious person, but i do believe in hell and i believe that UNWARRANTED murdered will send you there. There's A LOT i would do for a mill...and i mean A LOT lol, but not the murder of an innocent person.
Indeed. In that situation, I'm sure you would pick the person you knew (assuming it's someone you love). I would, too. Or I'd shoot the guy who was asking me to do it, assuming he was alone.:P pianistcheater!...you can't shoot the requestee!...:lol:....oh well..I gotta go home and to bed.....gotta be back here at work first thing in the morning.....have a good night all......
[QUOTE="fepepinar"]I can complain for society having more people like me than there should be.
pianist
:lol:
Touche. But if you aren't part of the solution, you're part of the problem. /cliche
I like to think that I'm somewhere in the middle of thinking about the solution and not applying it to solve the problem.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment