Would you rather have been born 100 years....

I'd be very interested to go this far into the future.

Celldrax

Watch out for the brain slugs!!

[QUOTE="Solid_Snake325"]I just wanna be alive to witness World War 3.gamerguru100

Life would just be harder and more boring without video games or internet.

A_Mobile_Doll

I'd rather be born in late 40s so I could of enjoyed all the amazing free love and change the 60s brought. Just no fear of drafted to 'Nam, I guess.

If that's not an option, it'd be cool to have be borned 100 years ahead to see what's on the go.

IMO, I would've taken being born in the year of 2100, because I'd like to see how the future would be like. I would seriously not like to be born in the early 1900s or before, because life was harder than now back then. Life is still hard though, or maybe, the world would be like futurama hundreds of years later.

On the other hand, I'd keep it the same to enjoy the coolness like what we have now. :)

I'd prefer to keep it how it is now. I know whats happened in the past and don't know what the future is like its too uncertain.

Keep it the same. I have no idea what life will be like in 100 years. The human race could be enslaved by aliens for all we know.

I'll keep it as it is now. If I change it, I would never have never met the my true love.

Both options sound incredibly scary.

100 years earlier. In the country side.

before your birthday or after?

For example, if you were born on January 1, 1990, and you could change it, would you rather have been born January 1, 1890 or January 1, 2090? Or you could just keep it the same and live life as it is now.

I was born on December 6, 1992 and I would easily pick to be born on December 6, 2092. 1892 would be boring. Plus, I would probably end up living through the Great Depression. Screw all that.

gamerguru100

after

I'd like to see what the future looks like 100 years from now, don't know if I'd like to live there permanently.

After, since I know there'd be Internet.