[QUOTE="I"]
By and large, people in the Army are not in that great of shape. Combat Arms soldiers tend to be in a little better shape, and infantry in a little better shape still. However, you don't start finding exclusively athletic people until you get into elite units.
rawsavon
hmmm...don't know quite how I feel about that
I don't much care for it either. I think the military basic payscale should be tripled. Then the Army can be much more selective about recruits, and demand a much higher standard from people in the service. :)
On a more realistic note, yeah...the military's fitness is overrated. Think about it: Your job in the Army is to drive trucks, and load and unload them with stuff. How good of shape do you have to be in to do that? If you're a simple infantryman (grunt), you have to be in better shape, mostly involving moving long distances with heavy weight.
In elite units, you start running into a problem of time management. If you want to be the best shape humanely possible, you have to work out five or six hours a day. That's not feasible when you have 50 other skillsets you have to work on (weapons, tactics, equipment, foreign languages, how fast you can say the Ranger Creed). Deployments seriously screw up your fitness routine. You go from being able to run and lift every day, and having fine control of your diet, to being able to do none of these things.
The best soldiers are in great shape, but they're not comparable to professional atheletes like some people seem to think they are.
Log in to comment