This topic is locked from further discussion.
You don't attack countries with nukes. Especially when a family of psychopaths is in complete control. wstfld
Im not saying to nuke obviously thats bad, but if you were to kill him silently send a USA navy seal in, Noone would know, what are the chances he would be like its time for WW3?
1) Sending a sniper undetected into North Korea and managing to get close enough to Kim Jong Il to kill him is almost impossible. 2) If an invisible sniper killed Kim Jong Il, almost everyone would blame the USA.yeah ur right war isnt the answer but if you snipe him and send someone in, Noones gonna point fingers and say its USA!
cyborg9
[QUOTE="cyborg9"]1) Sending a sniper undetected into North Korea and managing to get close enough to Kim Jong Il to kill him is almost impossible. 2) If an invisible sniper killed Kim Jong Il, almost everyone would blame the USA.yeah ur right war isnt the answer but if you snipe him and send someone in, Noones gonna point fingers and say its USA!
Danm_999
Or South Korea.
Which would be an even worse outcome.
[QUOTE="spawnassasin"]Well... you claim to be. :swhat do we look like the world police to you
Jaguar_Shade
well maybe if other countries could fight there own worlds then maybe we wouldnt have to look over evryone
but no as soon as **** hits the fan its all a wee wee america plz save us from zeh germans
or i saw ole chap care to spare a few plays to help fight a war you didnt want any part in
[spoiler] i am in no way serious about this post [/spoiler]
We aren't the world police. Also the cost in money and life would not be worth it at all...
Wasdie
This, although we'll do it if you pay for it. :P
Edit: And accept all liabilities.
wordsspawnassasinIt's probably worth noting most countries since WW2 which have asked for help from the US, have not received it. And many which had internal struggles have seen intervention by the U.S The claim was you were the world police, but the reality is, it was called the Cold War, and America had its finger in all the pies, sometimes two fingers in the one pie. You also mention WW2... um... maybe you've forgotten all the US men, women, children and servicemen who died during the attack on pearl harbor??
[QUOTE="wstfld"]You don't attack countries with nukes. Especially when a family of psychopaths is in complete control. cyborg9
Im not saying to nuke obviously thats bad, but if you were to kill him silently send a USA navy seal in, Noone would know, what are the chances he would be like its time for WW3?
Nuking = bad. But state-sponsored assassination and terrorism is good? I find that very disturbing logic.
[QUOTE="spawnassasin"]wordsJaguar_ShadeIt's probably worth noting most countries since WW2 which have asked for help from the US, have not received it. And many which had internal struggles have seen intervention by the U.S The claim was you were the world police, but the reality is, it was called the Cold War, and America had its finger in all the pies, sometimes two fingers in the one pie. You also mention WW2... um... maybe you've forgotten all the US men, women, children and servicemen who died during the attack on pearl harbor??
did you miss the part were i said i wasnt serious
[QUOTE="wstfld"]You don't attack countries with nukes. Especially when a family of psychopaths is in complete control. cyborg9
Im not saying to nuke obviously thats bad, but if you were to kill him silently send a USA navy seal in, Noone would know, what are the chances he would be like its time for WW3?
the navy seal could get caught maybe?It's probably worth noting most countries since WW2 which have asked for help from the US, have not received it. And many which had internal struggles have seen intervention by the U.S The claim was you were the world police, but the reality is, it was called the Cold War, and America had its finger in all the pies, sometimes two fingers in the one pie. You also mention WW2... um... maybe you've forgotten all the US men, women, children and servicemen who died during the attack on pearl harbor??[QUOTE="Jaguar_Shade"][QUOTE="spawnassasin"]wordsspawnassasin
did you miss the part were i said i wasnt serious
Yes :3[QUOTE="spawnassasin"][QUOTE="Jaguar_Shade"] It's probably worth noting most countries since WW2 which have asked for help from the US, have not received it. And many which had internal struggles have seen intervention by the U.S The claim was you were the world police, but the reality is, it was called the Cold War, and America had its finger in all the pies, sometimes two fingers in the one pie. You also mention WW2... um... maybe you've forgotten all the US men, women, children and servicemen who died during the attack on pearl harbor??Jaguar_Shade
did you miss the part were i said i wasnt serious
Yes :3its ok
*pats head*
:P
america would lose they would run away after a few 1000 die and they dont have the money for a big war .
america would lose they would run away after a few 1000 die and they dont have the money for a big war .
Is this a joke post? I hope so[QUOTE="lamprey263"]the two wars we're in are bankrupting us, we don't need a third to make things worsetheone86
No, evil Obama, socialist, Nazi, communist, freedom-hating policies are bankrupting us.
well, mandatory education seems to be a futile waste of tax dollars on someWe aren't the world police. Also the cost in money and life would not be worth it at all...
Wasdie
I though we were the world police, we have certianly acted like it.
We don't have the money for the war, china has payed for the last two stupid wars, i doubt they will be game for taking our debts putting our army on their borders.
[QUOTE="James161324"]
[QUOTE="Wasdie"]
We aren't the world police. Also the cost in money and life would not be worth it at all...
cyborg9
I though we were the world police, we have certianly acted like it.
seems like it to me.... what war hasent USA been in?.......
If i'm correct we have been in the middle of every major miltary action/ war in the past 60 so years.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment