• 58 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Riki101
Riki101

2339

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#51 Riki101
Member since 2004 • 2339 Posts

[QUOTE="Riki101"]@itsme185

Feb 1, 2008 4:13 pm PT

Feb 1, 2008 8:20 pm PT

thats 28 minutes?itsme185



Your pathetic, you PMed me just to come and have a look at this?

" go back to my topic, i just debunked your OMG 28 MINUTES?!!"
Haha, some one has no friends, get a life.

And as forvista been faster, are you saying that every single benchmark and every single persons opinion in the world about how vista is slower for gaming then xp is a lie?
lolz?

YOU ARE A JOKE! move out of your parents basment lolz.


im pathetic? didnt you come back just to make fun of me on the internet? irony.... no life... im not even gunna start.

im not saying vista is faster then XP in everything, im saying in my experience, WHICH IM SHARING, it was for me,

i think you need to stop paying internet cafes to go on system wars.. buy your own PC
Avatar image for Lilgunney612
Lilgunney612

1878

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#52 Lilgunney612
Member since 2005 • 1878 Posts
why do people always make bull **** assumptions on these forums.... look at his sig.. he has his own rig...
Avatar image for Riki101
Riki101

2339

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#53 Riki101
Member since 2004 • 2339 Posts
why do people always make bull **** assumptions on these forums.... look at his sig.. he has his own rig...Lilgunney612

i know that, but look at him, he telling everyone im making BS up because it took me 28 minutes to do everything?
yeah right, more like a couple of hours,

then he comes in trying to "make fun of me" :laugh:

he knows he was completely wrong and hes not admiting it cause he feels foolish
Avatar image for itsme185
itsme185

785

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#54 itsme185
Member since 2005 • 785 Posts

[QUOTE="Lilgunney612"]why do people always make bull **** assumptions on these forums.... look at his sig.. he has his own rig...Riki101

i know that, but look at him, he telling everyone im making BS up because it took me 28 minutes to do everything?
yeah right, more like a couple of hours,

then he comes in trying to "make fun of me" :laugh:

he knows he was completely wrong and hes not admiting it cause he feels foolish



Feb 2, 2008 3:52 pm GMT +12

deadfirezero wrote:
"Been a while since I looked but last I checked, all of the updates for
Windows XP does not *automatically* include the latest update to the
DX9 drivers. You have to go get that manually. I've mentioned this
in another thread quite a while ago: The sole act of updating my DX9
drivers from the August '07 to November '07 release got me an extra ~450
in 3DMark06 (from approximately 9320 to 9770). But that of course doesn't
translate to some amazingly higher FPS in games. As always its different for
different games, but nothing went down. And since some games can be more
sensitive to overclocking than others, it's not exactly shocking to run
across a situation like this. The only thing to do is run a range of
tests under both OSes and come up with a proper table of comparisons."


well on XP
defualt clocks 74
overclocked 84

vista will come soon
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Feb 2, 2008 4:20 pm GMT +12

Conclusion!!

XP
default clocks 74
overclocked 84.


and now
VISTA
default 85
overclocked 104

well thats my experience, im off to play some games.... on vista
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

lolz, so you just did the test in vista, then, 28 minutes later you just happen to do the xp test...

Im not the only one, every one else thinks your making im BS to :)

Avatar image for wallpaper42
wallpaper42

4127

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 wallpaper42
Member since 2005 • 4127 Posts

I thought Vista would be great but I don't really like it because it's not compatible with any of my stuff. I can't use my digital camera, my video camcorder, half of the stuff I download, and I constantly get problems with software.

But once they come out with some service packs it should be fixed right?

Avatar image for Riki101
Riki101

2339

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#56 Riki101
Member since 2004 • 2339 Posts
well on XP
defualt clocks 74
overclocked 84

vista will come soon


... dude i was posting to refresh my topic, and remind myself and others what i got.. sorry to confuse you,

also why would i BS? i have both Os and i can choose which one i will use.... so why would i lie?

EDIT * Vista will come soon*
when i was typing that i was reinstalling cs:s on vista, that is why i said VISTA "resualts" will come soon

look if you dont want to believe me then thats fine by me, but telling me im bsing, which im not thats different
Avatar image for Riki101
Riki101

2339

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#57 Riki101
Member since 2004 • 2339 Posts
Feb 1, 2008 4:13 pm PT okay guys, so i fully updated my XP, left EVERYTHING in stock clocks and got.....74

now im gunna take the time reinstall vista and all that and im betting i will be getting.....90 in stock maybe 85 just hold on let me FULLY confirm this news soon


2-3hours later....

Feb 1, 2008 7:48 pm PT okay STATUS REPORT, as im typing this im reinstalling CS:S
i will be running the same settings on the SAME hardware with the SAME Clocks
This time on Windows vista Ultimate,

stay tuned as i will post resualts of my frame rate

also by same clocks i mean default, i got 74FPS on Xp, waitin on vista soon!


28 minutes later...

Feb 1, 2008 8:20 pm PT Conclusion!!

XP
default clocks 74
overclocked 84.


and now
VISTA
default 85
overclocked 104

well thats my experience, im off to play some games.... on vista




AS YOU CAN SEE IT DIDNT ALL TAKE 28 MINUTES IT TOOK ALOT LONGERRiki101


refreshing for itsme,
Avatar image for Nolan16
Nolan16

4022

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#59 Nolan16
Member since 2006 • 4022 Posts
okay then you must have a overclocked vista becuase regular xp is better acrose the boards between me and my buddy and i have a card lower then him. so please tell me how did you overclock your vista is it the Windows Vista Overkill OC edition. where can i get this gaming machine OS please tell me.
Avatar image for itsme185
itsme185

785

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#60 itsme185
Member since 2005 • 785 Posts
okay then you must have a overclocked vista becuase regular xp is better acrose the boards between me and my buddy and i have a card lower then him. so please tell me how did you overclock your vista is it the Windows Vista Overkill OC edition. where can i get this gaming machine OS please tell me.Nolan16


link or it didnt happen.
Avatar image for Riki101
Riki101

2339

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#61 Riki101
Member since 2004 • 2339 Posts
okay then you must have a overclocked vista becuase regular xp is better acrose the boards between me and my buddy and i have a card lower then him. so please tell me how did you overclock your vista is it the Windows Vista Overkill OC edition. where can i get this gaming machine OS please tell me.Nolan16


did you include Cs:s? i mean its not like im saying every game works best on vista, im just saying the Cs:s stress test worked best on vista, i also did not see any improvments in TF2