This topic is locked from further discussion.
I have the 941BW...awesome LCD. From everything I've read, the 320MB is absolutely fine for a monitor of that size and resolution. Alex1029you've read right. i play games on that monitor...im feeding it oblivion supcom and a whole bunch of other games on max and tis still hungry
I have the 941BW...awesome LCD. From everything I've read, the 320MB is absolutely fine for a monitor of that size and resolution. Alex1029Yes i do have the Samsung 941BW monitor and its an awesome LCD. Thanks for the reply guys and it looks like i will be getting the 320mb version of the 8800 GTS!!!!!
it will max all games on that res for at least 1.5 years, never buy a 640 if ur gonna game @ that res.
plus i would recommend samsung 906BW monitor because it rocks, 2ms respond time. or u can get the samsung 940BW.r3351925
 I have that same monitor. It's ****ing amazing for it's size and price:D
it will max all games on that res for at least 1.5 years, never buy a 640 if ur gonna game @ that res.
plus i would recommend samsung 906BW monitor because it rocks, 2ms respond time. or u can get the samsung 940BW.r3351925
Â
So, is it bad that I bought a 640MB for a cheaper price than the 3xxMB version? I play games at a resolution of 1280x1024 or 1152x864???Â
[QUOTE="r3351925"]it will max all games on that res for at least 1.5 years, never buy a 640 if ur gonna game @ that res.
plus i would recommend samsung 906BW monitor because it rocks, 2ms respond time. or u can get the samsung 940BW.ATLReppa770
So, is it bad that I bought a 640MB for a cheaper price than the 3xxMB version? I play games at a resolution of 1280x1024 or 1152x864???
of course not, if we see the trend continue, we'll see increasing ram usage in future titles such as crysis, so that extra ram helps. the fact that you got that card for less than the 320 mb version is already a reason to say its not bad.[QUOTE="ATLReppa770"][QUOTE="r3351925"]it will max all games on that res for at least 1.5 years, never buy a 640 if ur gonna game @ that res.
plus i would recommend samsung 906BW monitor because it rocks, 2ms respond time. or u can get the samsung 940BW.jfelisario
So, is it bad that I bought a 640MB for a cheaper price than the 3xxMB version? I play games at a resolution of 1280x1024 or 1152x864???
of course not, if we see the trend continue, we'll see increasing ram usage in future titles such as crysis, so that extra ram helps. the fact that you got that card for less than the 320 mb version is already a reason to say its not bad. Good =D, thanks for the assurance.[QUOTE="neodragon"]I've heard the EVGA 320mb actually outperforms the 640 in some cases, so I wouldn't worry at all.
As for 1440x900, you should be more than fine.
Remember to hit up widescreen gaming for all your widescreen gaming needs. (lol that sounded like an ad)ATLReppa770
edit: oh I didn't see you were getting a 640, don't worry it is the best card out there
my 7900gs with a c2d e6400 proves to be sufficient at that resolution. i have a hyundai n91. you should be more than fine with an 880gts 320mb.SanianI too have a 7900GS, I'm running the games that I can at 1440x900 and I can play all of my games on max settings. an 8800GTS should work rather well.
how many stupid people are there on these forums...
the 320 IS crap sure it can play at that resolution but it can also do 1080p the problem is that ur games will NOT be able to do high textures very soon and your going to wish you had atleast 640
Â
remember graw people and other games that NEEDED 512 to run max textures well its the same here 320 is lacking big time and not worth the money unless your a casual.Â
how many stupid people are there on these forums...
the 320 IS crap sure it can play at that resolution but it can also do 1080p the problem is that ur games will NOT be able to do high textures very soon and your going to wish you had atleast 640
remember graw people and other games that NEEDED 512 to run max textures well its the same here 320 is lacking big time and not worth the money unless your a casual.
white45e
I bet you feel stupid almost a year later and the 320mb can still run games at max at that resolution (except for Crysis, but no videocard can) Now the 9800's are coming not to mention the new GT and GTS cards replaced the card you reccommended lol.
[QUOTE="white45e"]how many stupid people are there on these forums...
the 320 IS crap sure it can play at that resolution but it can also do 1080p the problem is that ur games will NOT be able to do high textures very soon and your going to wish you had atleast 640
remember graw people and other games that NEEDED 512 to run max textures well its the same here 320 is lacking big time and not worth the money unless your a casual.
m0ney78
I bet you feel stupid almost a year later and the 320mb can still run games at max at that resolution (except for Crysis, but no videocard can) Now the 9800's are coming not to mention the new GT and GTS cards replaced the card you reccommended lol.
What??.He is right but just exxagerated quite alot and definitely seem to hate the card but still he is right to an extent.You cannot play crysis with high textures OR shaders with the 320MB card.Dont believe me then just see gamespot's crysis performance.I can play crysis with very high textures without a hitch.I also play it with 2xAA and i bet 320Mb would die doing that.I can play COD4 with 16xAA at 12x10.Can the 320MB do it?Look at this the 320MB cannot do high textures in gears of war.It cannot do AA either while i can in 12x10.And guess what even my card stuggles with AA in gears above this resolution.
And look at world in conflict in DX10 at 12x10 with 4xAA.The 640GTS is almost twice faster.
And so what if new cards came to replace it.Can we get those cards for free in exchange for an old GTS.:|
And LOL at the comment of maxing games for 1.5 years.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment