This topic is locked from further discussion.
actually it is overclocked...its not clocked the same as the 9800gtxNo, because it uses the new 55nm core.
It's just Nvidia with their messed up naming schemes...
Denex1
Remember the 8800 gts, no not that one, the first one the 640mb... or was it the 320mb? Oh hell the g80. Then there was the 8800 gts, I mean then there was the g92 and the 8800gts 512mb. Well there was a 9800gtx 65nm and now theres a 9800gtx 55nm and a 260gtx which is a 65nm 9800gtx and a 280gtx ( a 65nm 9800gx2).
Was that so hard? Are you retarded or something?
watRemember the 8800 gts, no not that one, the first one the 640mb... or was it the 320mb? Oh hell the g80. Then there was the 8800 gts, I mean then there was the g92 and the 8800gts 512mb. Well there was a 9800gtx 65nm and now theres a 9800gtx 55nm and a 260gtx which is a 65nm 9800gtx and a 280gtx ( a 65nm 9800gx2).
Was that so hard? Are you retarded or something?
pknyo
[QUOTE="pknyo"]watRemember the 8800 gts, no not that one, the first one the 640mb... or was it the 320mb? Oh hell the g80. Then there was the 8800 gts, I mean then there was the g92 and the 8800gts 512mb. Well there was a 9800gtx 65nm and now theres a 9800gtx 55nm and a 260gtx which is a 65nm 9800gtx and a 280gtx ( a 65nm 9800gx2).
Was that so hard? Are you retarded or something?
cole_793
Lol. Not sure what that guy is trying to say.
What I meant was Nvidia loves to try to confuse everyone by rereleasing cards alot. First round benches put the 9800gtx and the 260gtx about equal with the 260 marginally faster, and the 9800gx2 and the 280 even closer. Oh and about the nm sizes I was off. g92 use 65 nm cores for some reason I was thinking 55 nm. See nvidias got me so f*cked in the head right, nvidia cards are the big red ones right?
pknyo
What I meant was Nvidia loves to try to confuse everyone by rereleasing cards alot. Oh and before someone corrects me and feels all smart and s**t the g92 is 65nm not 55nm. my bad. Y`all just cant appreciated my humor for what its worth.
pknyo
i wouldn't consider what you wrote up there humor. It's just bad sarcasm
[QUOTE="cole_793"][QUOTE="pknyo"]watRemember the 8800 gts, no not that one, the first one the 640mb... or was it the 320mb? Oh hell the g80. Then there was the 8800 gts, I mean then there was the g92 and the 8800gts 512mb. Well there was a 9800gtx 65nm and now theres a 9800gtx 55nm and a 260gtx which is a 65nm 9800gtx and a 280gtx ( a 65nm 9800gx2).
Was that so hard? Are you retarded or something?
ISuperGamerI
Lol. Not sure what that guy is trying to say.
is called sarcasm nvidia naming schme is overly complicated and confusing.
[QUOTE="ISuperGamerI"][QUOTE="cole_793"][QUOTE="pknyo"]watRemember the 8800 gts, no not that one, the first one the 640mb... or was it the 320mb? Oh hell the g80. Then there was the 8800 gts, I mean then there was the g92 and the 8800gts 512mb. Well there was a 9800gtx 65nm and now theres a 9800gtx 55nm and a 260gtx which is a 65nm 9800gtx and a 280gtx ( a 65nm 9800gx2).
Was that so hard? Are you retarded or something?
johnny27
Lol. Not sure what that guy is trying to say.
is called sarcasm nvidia naming schme is overly complicated and confusing.
Yes, I know and I found it to be pretty funny. :P
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment