Am i good for 1680x1050 high detail on crysis?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for pinkyfull
pinkyfull

206

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#1 pinkyfull
Member since 2006 • 206 Posts

Hi everyone. first off i know i don't need RAM or a cpu but would like to know if i have to turn down the settings to get playable frame rates on high detail. i just got this new pc and picked up crysis for a bargain (about US$30 (NZ$50)). anyway on to the pc

CPU: Intel quad core Q9300 @ 2.5 (may overclock but don't really think i'll have to)

RAM:4GB ddr800

Graphics: XFX 9800gtx (not 100% sure which version it is but willpost when i know for sure)

also would like to know if it's worth buying a new mobo for SLI if i were to upgrade it later for future games (most probably another 9800gtx)

Thanks opinions would be appreciated.

Avatar image for Daytona_178
Daytona_178

14962

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#2 Daytona_178
Member since 2005 • 14962 Posts

Hi everyone. first off i know i don't need RAM or a cpu but would like to know if i have to turn down the settings to get playable frame rates on high detail. i just got this new pc and picked up crysis for a bargain (about US$30 (NZ$50)). anyway on to the pc

CPU: Intel quad core Q9300 @ 2.5 (may overclock but don't really think i'll have to)

RAM:4GB ddr800

Graphics: XFX 9800gtx (not 100% sure which version it is but willpost when i know for sure)

also would like to know if it's worth buying a new mobo for SLI if i were to upgrade it later for future games (most probably another 9800gtx)

Thanks opinions would be appreciated.

pinkyfull

Just so you know the 9800GTX is hardly any better than a 8800GTS 512mb. The only thing that can play Crysis on high @ 1680x1050 is a 9800GX2,,,but that will only be about 30FPS average!

Avatar image for pinkyfull
pinkyfull

206

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#3 pinkyfull
Member since 2006 • 206 Posts
ok i'm not asking if i should replace it with an outdated graphics card just asking if it will play it at high detail (NOT very high) at 1980 with playable frame rates or if i will have to turn it down to say 1440x968 or watever the next smallest widescreen is (can't remember exactly which)
Avatar image for Daytona_178
Daytona_178

14962

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#4 Daytona_178
Member since 2005 • 14962 Posts

ok i'm not asking if i should replace it with an outdated graphics card just asking if it will play it at high detail (NOT very high) at 1980 with playable frame rates or if i will have to turn it down to say 1440x968 or watever the next smallest widescreen is (can't remember exactly which)pinkyfull

Lets take this one step at a time then shall we.

I said: The 9800GX2 is the Only card that can play Crysis at HIGH settings @ 1680x1050

So if thats the case it means the 9800GTX CANT play it at that resolution on high settings.

You will be able to play it on high at 1440x900 though at high settings with a 9800GTX.

Also the point i was trying to make is that its a dumb decision to buy a 9800GTX over a 8800GTS 512mb!

Avatar image for adamosmaki
adamosmaki

10718

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#5 adamosmaki
Member since 2007 • 10718 Posts

He said high not very high and yes that card is more than enough to play crysis at that resolution at HIGH not very high( you will also be able to play it with mix high and very high settings at that resolution at about 30fps). And dont use any antialising because no matter the card you have even if you have sli using antialisng in crysis is a big hit in performance (maybe you can use 2x antialisng at lower res.) and besides antialising at that high resolutions doesnt make much of a differnce in quality. Bythe way i play crysis with 8800gt at 1680x1050 at mostly high settings with a couple of settings to medium

Avatar image for Daytona_178
Daytona_178

14962

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#6 Daytona_178
Member since 2005 • 14962 Posts

He said high not very high and yes that card is more than enough to play crysis at that resolution at HIGH not very high( you will also be able to play it with mix high and very high settings at that resolution at about 30fps). And dont use any antialising because no matter the card you have even if you have sli using antialisng in crysis is a big hit in performance (maybe you can use 2x antialisng at lower res.) and besides antialising at that high resolutions doesnt make much of a differnce in quality. Bythe way i play crysis with 8800gt at 1680x1050 at mostly high settings with a couple of settings to medium

adamosmaki

Well you must have a very good 8800GT my friend! I have one and i get slow down at 1440x900...i think i smell something.

Avatar image for adamosmaki
adamosmaki

10718

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#7 adamosmaki
Member since 2007 • 10718 Posts

Here are some benchmarks.

http://www.legionhardware.com/document.php?id=703&p=2

at 1440x900 can run crysis at 36fps all high and that is under dx10 under dx9 expect almost 40

at 1680x1050 you get 27(i have a couple settings on medium and i get about 30)

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/geforce-8800-gt,1714-13.html

35fps at 1680x1050 under dx9Either your trying to play crysis at very high either there is something wrong with your vga or drivers

Avatar image for Einhanderkiller
Einhanderkiller

13259

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#8 Einhanderkiller
Member since 2003 • 13259 Posts
In XP, I get 30 to 45 FPS in Crysis on the High pre-set with my 8800 GTS 512.
Avatar image for achilles614
achilles614

5310

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 achilles614
Member since 2005 • 5310 Posts
[QUOTE="adamosmaki"]

He said high not very high and yes that card is more than enough to play crysis at that resolution at HIGH not very high( you will also be able to play it with mix high and very high settings at that resolution at about 30fps). And dont use any antialising because no matter the card you have even if you have sli using antialisng in crysis is a big hit in performance (maybe you can use 2x antialisng at lower res.) and besides antialising at that high resolutions doesnt make much of a differnce in quality. Bythe way i play crysis with 8800gt at 1680x1050 at mostly high settings with a couple of settings to medium

daytona_178

Well you must have a very good 8800GT my friend! I have one and i get slow down at 1440x900...i think i smell something.

umm 1440x900 is a lower res than 1280x1024, which the 9600gt can do the latter at all high. Maybe you have a dud 8800
Avatar image for swehunt
swehunt

3637

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#10 swehunt
Member since 2008 • 3637 Posts

Also the point i was trying to make is that its a dumb decision to buy a 9800GTX over a 8800GTS 512mb!

daytona_178

I belive Crysis is one game the 9800GTX is a bit faster in but I agree on the conclution.

Avatar image for kodex1717
kodex1717

5925

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 kodex1717
Member since 2005 • 5925 Posts

Here are some benchmarks.

http://www.legionhardware.com/document.php?id=703&p=2

at 1440x900 can run crysis at 36fps all high and that is under dx10 under dx9 expect almost 40

at 1680x1050 you get 27(i have a couple settings on medium and i get about 30)

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/geforce-8800-gt,1714-13.html

35fps at 1680x1050 under dx9Either your trying to play crysis at very high either there is something wrong with your vga or drivers

adamosmaki

Those benchmarks were run with the Crysis benchmark, which gives significantly better FPS than the actual game. You won't be seeing FPS like that when you're playing, especially not inmultiplayer.

Avatar image for adamosmaki
adamosmaki

10718

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#12 adamosmaki
Member since 2007 • 10718 Posts
[QUOTE="adamosmaki"]

Here are some benchmarks.

http://www.legionhardware.com/document.php?id=703&p=2

at 1440x900 can run crysis at 36fps all high and that is under dx10 under dx9 expect almost 40

at 1680x1050 you get 27(i have a couple settings on medium and i get about 30)

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/geforce-8800-gt,1714-13.html

35fps at 1680x1050 under dx9Either your trying to play crysis at very high either there is something wrong with your vga or drivers

kodex1717

Those benchmarks were run with the Crysis benchmark, which gives significantly better FPS than the actual game. You won't be seeing FPS like that when you're playing, especially not inmultiplayer.

No you will see the same FPS. Try using FRAPS(s program that show and record the fps within a game while actually playing the game) i get about 39 at 1280x1024 with 8800gt. And in multiplayer actually the fps should be a bit better since every game in multiplayer mode use a bit lower graphics quality than the singlplayer game in order no to have any lag in fps during gameplay

Avatar image for kodex1717
kodex1717

5925

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 kodex1717
Member since 2005 • 5925 Posts

No you will see the same FPS. Try using FRAPS(s program that show and record the fps within a game while actually playing the game) i get about 39 at 1280x1024 with 8800gt. And in multiplayer actually the fps should be a bit better since every game in multiplayer mode use a bit lower graphics quality than the singlplayer game in order no to have any lag in fps during gameplayadamosmaki

I'm not sure how that's possible. The benchmark (I assume we're talking about Benchmark_GPU.bat) has no AI processing, so that removes load from your CPU. It also has nothing happening, so actual gameplay can only run worse. I suppose I can't speak for others, but my experience with multiplayer is that it runs far worse than singleplayer. I can run the campaign on some High settings, but the multiplayer has me put things on Medium.

Avatar image for adamosmaki
adamosmaki

10718

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#14 adamosmaki
Member since 2007 • 10718 Posts
The A.I. dont use that much of cpu power probably something around 5-10% so yeah you can expect benchmark beign a bit about 5% faster
Avatar image for pinkyfull
pinkyfull

206

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#15 pinkyfull
Member since 2006 • 206 Posts

Ok right now i'm not really concerned about a cpu i think 10 ghz total is more than enough to proccess the AI what i was trying to say is that what will my graphics be like from my practice 30 is more than playable and 40 is very smooth and if i were to get a new graphics (which will prolly happen at some point in the future) is it a good plan to chuck another 9800gtx in there or ditch it all together for a 9800gx2

EDIT: i DO NOT want an 8000 series card just so you know i'll prolly upgrade in a bout 6 months and by then the 8000's will have hit the dustbin IMO.

Avatar image for bachilders
bachilders

1430

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#16 bachilders
Member since 2005 • 1430 Posts

I can play Crysis at around 45 frames on high settings at 1680x1050 with

amd athlon 64 5600+ (2.8 ghz)

4 gb ddr800

8800gts 512mb

so yes, you should be able to do it quite easily, just dont turn on aa

Avatar image for kodex1717
kodex1717

5925

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 kodex1717
Member since 2005 • 5925 Posts

Ok right now i'm not really concerned about a cpu i think 10 ghz total is more than enough to proccess the AI what i was trying to say is that what will my graphics be like from my practice 30 is more than playable and 40 is very smooth and if i were to get a new graphics (which will prolly happen at some point in the future) is it a good plan to chuck another 9800gtx in there or ditch it all together for a 9800gx2

pinkyfull

I wouldn't do either; the HD 4870, HD 4870 X2 or one of new the Nvidia cards would be a better investment. That said, you shouldn't upgrade for just one game. Save your money till your rig actually has trouble across the board.

Also, you don't have a 10 GHz processor, you have four cores running at 2.5 GHz.

Avatar image for achilles614
achilles614

5310

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 achilles614
Member since 2005 • 5310 Posts

I wouldn't do either; the HD 4870, HD 4870 X2 or one of new the Nvidia cards would be a better investment. That said, you shouldn't upgrade for just one game. Save your money till your rig actually has trouble across the board.

Also, you don't have a 10 GHz processor, you have four cores running at 2.5 GHz.

kodex1717

ahem not to be a douche, but it irks me when people call pc components "investments" because they're anything but that.

Just one of my pet peevs :P