Am I the only person in the universe that liked Command and Conquer 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for beau_x
beau_x

180

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#1 beau_x
Member since 2009 • 180 Posts

I thought it was a nice change of pace for the series. Played very much like Warhammer 40k IMO, which is also one of my favorite games. Squad based combat is an interesting dynamic that I enjoy, and I think they unit caps makes the game more challenging.

Don't get me wrong, I like building massive armies and decimating my opponents as much as the next guy, but how many times can you rehash that formula? IMO, it was starting to get boring.

Avatar image for deactivated-64ba3ebd35404
deactivated-64ba3ebd35404

7590

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#2 deactivated-64ba3ebd35404
Member since 2004 • 7590 Posts
Yes, you are. C&C4 was nothing but a spam-fest in single player/1v1s. The 2v2s and above were decent, but not great. It felt like it tried to do what DoW2 tried to do, but somehow actually managed to pull it off even worse than Relic did.
Avatar image for shakmaster13
shakmaster13

7138

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#3 shakmaster13
Member since 2007 • 7138 Posts
I liked the beta more than the SC2 beta.
Avatar image for deekanter
deekanter

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#4 deekanter
Member since 2010 • 25 Posts

The C&C formula was fine as it was.They shouldn't have screwed it up like they did in C&C 4.I still think the older games like Generals and Red Alert are a crap load of fun,and I think EA should have stuck with the same kind of gameplay.

Avatar image for AiurProtoss
AiurProtoss

1080

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 AiurProtoss
Member since 2010 • 1080 Posts
yes
Avatar image for the_ChEeSe_mAn2
the_ChEeSe_mAn2

8463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#6 the_ChEeSe_mAn2
Member since 2003 • 8463 Posts
I think it was a wrong idea for them to make the last game in the Tiberian storyline a totally different game in terms of gameplay aspects. The beta also left a poor impression on me with a lack of a tutorial, stable net-code and enjoyable gameplay. Starcraft 2 beta, on the other hand, left me eager and excited for the retail thing to come out.
Avatar image for FleeceJohnson
FleeceJohnson

344

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 FleeceJohnson
Member since 2010 • 344 Posts

C&C has gone steadily downhill ever since EA acquired Westwood. Red Alert 3 was bad, and C&C 4 was a complete turd.

Avatar image for BDK-Soft
BDK-Soft

795

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 BDK-Soft
Member since 2009 • 795 Posts
1 in a million my friend.
Avatar image for Oom_Gert
Oom_Gert

161

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: -5

#9 Oom_Gert
Member since 2004 • 161 Posts

I think it was a wrong idea for them to make the last game in the Tiberian storyline a totally different game in terms of gameplay aspects. The beta also left a poor impression on me with a lack of a tutorial, stable net-code and enjoyable gameplay. Starcraft 2 beta, on the other hand, left me eager and excited for the retail thing to come out.the_ChEeSe_mAn2

I agree, as a game on its own it's probably an OK game (I say probably as I didn't play it long enough to try and find out) but it's not C&C. We waited 15 years to hear the end of the Tiberium story and then they go and change the whole idea behind C&C. Shame on you EA. I bought each C&C tile twice (some even 3 times) and I couldn't be bothered to play C&C4 past the 4th mission.

Dawn of War 2 did the same, sure it's a good game but it's now what Dawn of War 1 was. I applaud companies trying new things, it's what keeps this industry growing but don't false advertise it as something else. Call it Command & Conquer Tactics or Warhammer Tactical Assault or whatever but don't give it the name of a previous series and change almost every detail about it. Sure I'm venting but with good reason.

StarCraft 2 is much closer to the Original StarCraft game and it shines with tributes and reminders of SC1.

Avatar image for Oom_Gert
Oom_Gert

161

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: -5

#10 Oom_Gert
Member since 2004 • 161 Posts

C&C has gone steadily downhill ever since EA acquired Westwood. Red Alert 3 was bad, and C&C 4 was a complete turd.

FleeceJohnson

Red Alert 3 was closer to Red Alert 2 then what C&C4 was to the other previous C&C Tib series but it has been dying slowly over the years. And can EA please finally let the SAGE engine (or RNA for the newer titles) die, I've never truly been a fan of it and sure it has some powerful features but it never really felt right to me.

Avatar image for MrJoltz
MrJoltz

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#11 MrJoltz
Member since 2010 • 25 Posts
sadly, yes
Avatar image for Daytona_178
Daytona_178

14962

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#12 Daytona_178
Member since 2005 • 14962 Posts

Red Alert 2 and Generals were the only fun ones in my opinion.

Avatar image for kdawg88
kdawg88

2923

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#13 kdawg88
Member since 2009 • 2923 Posts
What is this Command and Conquer '4' you speak of?