XXXXXX

109 results
1
2
3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

1878

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#101 Lilgunney612

Member since 2005 • 1878 Posts

[QUOTE="Lilgunney612"]ask and you shall receive http://www23.tomshardware.com/cpu_2007.htmlThinker_145

What are you trying to prove.The E6750 beats the HIGHEST end phenom in every game except supreme commander.And even in supreme commander only the phenom 9700 beats it and the E6750 is ahead of the rest.It's quite sad that most phenoms got beat by the E6750 in sup com considering that this game is one of the few which is actually optimized for quad cores.I guess you got yourself massively owned here.:lol:

proof plox? i showed you mine now you show me yours. that was also just an example, wasnt really thinking about games at the time... most games don't support quad core.

17 years ago

2546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#102 Thinker_145

Member since 2007 • 2546 Posts

[QUOTE="Thinker_145"][QUOTE="Lilgunney612"]ask and you shall receive http://www23.tomshardware.com/cpu_2007.htmlLilgunney612

What are you trying to prove.The E6750 beats the HIGHEST end phenom in every game except supreme commander.And even in supreme commander only the phenom 9700 beats it and the E6750 is ahead of the rest.It's quite sad that most phenoms got beat by the E6750 in sup com considering that this game is one of the few which is actually optimized for quad cores.I guess you got yourself massively owned here.:lol:

proof plox? i showed you mine now you show me yours. that was also just an example, wasnt really thinking about games at the time... most games don't support quad core.

Games are the only thing what matter sorry.And the performance of the lowest phenom is so bad it's not even funny.

But wait,UT 2004 and supreme commander are BOTH optimized for quad cores as you can see that the Q6600 beats the E6750.Well i am sorry but that is just SAD to be honest.

17 years ago

1878

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#103 Lilgunney612

Member since 2005 • 1878 Posts

also, for another example which would apply to games, the 6000+ beats the e6300 and they are both the same price.

17 years ago

1878

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#104 Lilgunney612

Member since 2005 • 1878 Posts

[QUOTE="Lilgunney612"][QUOTE="Thinker_145"][QUOTE="Lilgunney612"]ask and you shall receive http://www23.tomshardware.com/cpu_2007.htmlThinker_145

What are you trying to prove.The E6750 beats the HIGHEST end phenom in every game except supreme commander.And even in supreme commander only the phenom 9700 beats it and the E6750 is ahead of the rest.It's quite sad that most phenoms got beat by the E6750 in sup com considering that this game is one of the few which is actually optimized for quad cores.I guess you got yourself massively owned here.:lol:

proof plox? i showed you mine now you show me yours. that was also just an example, wasnt really thinking about games at the time... most games don't support quad core.

Games are the only thing what matter sorry.And the performance of the lowest phenom is so bad it's not even funny.

But wait,UT 2004 and supreme commander are BOTH optimized for quad cores as you can see that the Q6600 beats the E6750.Well i am sorry but that is just SAD to be honest.

start making sense and stink on topic please, were talking about amd price/performance vs. intel price/performance we have already established that intel beats amd in raw power.

17 years ago

2546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#105 Thinker_145

Member since 2007 • 2546 Posts

Whatever we were talking about the high end market and Intel owns it without question.Whoever buys a phenom for gaming is just dellusional.

17 years ago

2546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#106 Thinker_145

Member since 2007 • 2546 Posts

[QUOTE="Thinker_145"]
[QUOTE="Lilgunney612"][QUOTE="Thinker_145"][QUOTE="Lilgunney612"]ask and you shall receive http://www23.tomshardware.com/cpu_2007.htmlLilgunney612

What are you trying to prove.The E6750 beats the HIGHEST end phenom in every game except supreme commander.And even in supreme commander only the phenom 9700 beats it and the E6750 is ahead of the rest.It's quite sad that most phenoms got beat by the E6750 in sup com considering that this game is one of the few which is actually optimized for quad cores.I guess you got yourself massively owned here.:lol:

proof plox? i showed you mine now you show me yours. that was also just an example, wasnt really thinking about games at the time... most games don't support quad core.

Games are the only thing what matter sorry.And the performance of the lowest phenom is so bad it's not even funny.

But wait,UT 2004 and supreme commander are BOTH optimized for quad cores as you can see that the Q6600 beats the E6750.Well i am sorry but that is just SAD to be honest.

start making sense and stink on topic please, were talking about amd price/performance vs. intel price/performance we have already established that intel beats amd in raw power.

What?You are the one who said that the lowest end phenom beats the E6750 and costs the same and you got owned pretty badly and now you are talking as if you never said something.:roll:

17 years ago

1878

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#107 Lilgunney612

Member since 2005 • 1878 Posts

Whatever we were talking about the high end market and Intel owns it without question.Whoever buys a phenom for gaming is just dellusional.Thinker_145

of corse intel high end market is dominant, but their cpu's are also incredibly expensive which is the whole point the the argument.

17 years ago

1878

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#108 Lilgunney612

Member since 2005 • 1878 Posts

[QUOTE="Lilgunney612"][QUOTE="Thinker_145"]
[QUOTE="Lilgunney612"][QUOTE="Thinker_145"][QUOTE="Lilgunney612"]ask and you shall receive http://www23.tomshardware.com/cpu_2007.htmlThinker_145

What are you trying to prove.The E6750 beats the HIGHEST end phenom in every game except supreme commander.And even in supreme commander only the phenom 9700 beats it and the E6750 is ahead of the rest.It's quite sad that most phenoms got beat by the E6750 in sup com considering that this game is one of the few which is actually optimized for quad cores.I guess you got yourself massively owned here.:lol:

proof plox? i showed you mine now you show me yours. that was also just an example, wasnt really thinking about games at the time... most games don't support quad core.

Games are the only thing what matter sorry.And the performance of the lowest phenom is so bad it's not even funny.

But wait,UT 2004 and supreme commander are BOTH optimized for quad cores as you can see that the Q6600 beats the E6750.Well i am sorry but that is just SAD to be honest.

start making sense and stink on topic please, were talking about amd price/performance vs. intel price/performance we have already established that intel beats amd in raw power.

What?You are the one who said that the lowest end phenom beats the E6750 and costs the same and you got owned pretty badly and now you are talking as if you never said something.:roll:

because i wasnt talking about purely gaming, now i am.

17 years ago

3008

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#109 telefanatic

Member since 2007 • 3008 Posts

Whatever we were talking about the high end market and Intel owns it without question.Whoever buys a phenom for gaming is just dellusional.Thinker_145

Now your telling me if i get a 9900 since i already got a nice mobo which is a M2N32-SLI Deluxe wifi ed im dellusional ?

17 years ago

Indestructible2

5935

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#110 Indestructible2

Member since 2007 • 5935 Posts

[QUOTE="Thinker_145"]Whatever we were talking about the high end market and Intel owns it without question.Whoever buys a phenom for gaming is just dellusional.telefanatic

Now your telling me if i get a 9900 since i already got a nice mobo which is a M2N32-SLI Deluxe wifi ed im dellusional ?

I would assume so...

17 years ago

2546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#111 Thinker_145

Member since 2007 • 2546 Posts

[QUOTE="Thinker_145"]Whatever we were talking about the high end market and Intel owns it without question.Whoever buys a phenom for gaming is just dellusional.telefanatic

Now your telling me if i get a 9900 since i already got a nice mobo which is a M2N32-SLI Deluxe wifi ed im dellusional ?

No you are not.Sorry i should say it this way that if you are building a new rig then you should not get a phenom.Ofcourse if you already have an AMD mobo then the performance increase is not worth it.

17 years ago

566

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#112 snakehips57

Member since 2006 • 566 Posts

[QUOTE="Thinker_145"][QUOTE="snakehips57"]
[QUOTE="bike749"]here my question why would you buy amd over intel when intel is kicking amd ass.Lilgunney612

Haven't you just read the previous 90 posts? There are plenty of reasons, budget, personal preference etc.

How can anybody have a "personal preference" for a CPU.Do you like it's shape or the packaging.Or maybe you think that AMD like you or something.

maybe he prefers his wallet not being raped by intel? :P

:D

17 years ago

109 results
1
2
3

Jump to Top

Please Log In to post.

Use your keyboard!

ESC

Log in to comment