I know I am. Where is the dark and gritty feel that Diablo 2 had?
This makes me hate WoW even more. I can't stand those stupid kiddy graphics.
If you've seen screenshots / gameplay vids then you know what I'm talking about.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
How about we wait for the game to official release before we trash talk on its graphics? Kinda premature for this arguement.
Like WoW, it has a low polygon count so that people with lower end systems can run it. Ergo it is obviously "kiddy". ;)More than 3 colors = Kiddy?
I don't see a clear wow resemblance.
_Tobli_
What's next? Starcraft 2 uses the same graphics as Warcraft 3? Look at the game, there's nothing kiddy about it.
Drazule
SC2's graphics are awesome. Yeah, ok boss, it looks like Torchlight.
A lot of you guys are in denial. Hopefully Blizzard makes me eat my words.
Even if they look more colourful, they still look very nice. To be honest, the dark and gritty colours of Diablo 2 are boring now and I am sure that Diablo 3 will have stretches of both vibrance and darkness.the_ChEeSe_mAn2This. Also, why are we still having these threads pop up? This matter has essentially been discussed like 400+ times on these forums. Hit the search button.
[QUOTE="jedikevin2"]
How about we wait for the game to official release before we trash talk on its graphics? Kinda premature for this arguement.
DasVolks
Plus I am confused how it looks kiddy. Bright colors? Must be it because i forgot that all games need that beautiful gray, brown, dark brown, darker brown, and black color to look awesome. Now if you are talking about that awful Monk video that used in-game graphics (and got WAY TOO CLOSE) and looked as awful as every in-game video from WoW... then yeah I agree with that part, but not the graphics overall.
EDIT: Sorry just noticed your awesome poll. So no matter what the graphics are kiddy? Because that poll is super ridged. I voted No, but I voted No as in I don't they are a Kiddy, not that I was a dissapointed in some kind of kiddieness.
I know I am. Where is the dark and gritty feel that Diablo 2 had?
This makes me hate WoW even more. I can't stand those stupid kiddy graphics.
If you've seen screenshots / gameplay vids then you know what I'm talking about.
DasVolks
wow, you are the only one with a Yes vote :shock:
No, because how many locations have we seen in the game? We have yet to see Hell and I am sure we have yet to see a lot of different places. Those places could look dark, gloomy, and horrific, but we don't know that because we haven't seen them..........Plus I am confused how it looks kiddy. Bright colors? Must be it because i forgot that all games need that beautiful gray, brown, dark brown, darker brown, and black color to look awesome. Now if you are talking about that awful Monk video that used in-game graphics (and got WAY TOO CLOSE) and looked as awful as every in-game video from WoW... then yeah I agree with that part, but not the graphics overall.
EDIT: Sorry just noticed your awesome poll. So no matter what the graphics are kiddy? Because that poll is super ridged. I voted No, but I voted No as in I don't they are a Kiddy, not that I was a dissapointed in some kind of kiddieness.
jedikevin2
By no, I just meant 'no not disappointed with the graphics in general'. And when I talk about the graphics I'm not talking about the colors as much as the models, if you watch gameplay vids they all have the WoW model type look as opposed to a Titan Quest realistic model type.
[QUOTE="DasVolks"]
I know I am. Where is the dark and gritty feel that Diablo 2 had?
This makes me hate WoW even more. I can't stand those stupid kiddy graphics.
If you've seen screenshots / gameplay vids then you know what I'm talking about.
AFBrat77
wow, you are the only one with a Yes vote :shock:
Only one on these forums, I know a handful of others that agree with me.
Yes. Most people will say no because 1 - they actually like WoW's art style (a lot of people do but I personally hate it and people give me weird looks when I say this) 2 - Blizzard zeolots will defend Blizzard no matter what. They will only mention flaws in a Blizzard game when they're arguing which Blizzard game is better IE Diablo 2 vs Diablo 1.Nerkcon
Finally, someone with some sense!
WoW's art style is great for....WoW. Not Diablo.
Yes. Most people will say no because 1 - they actually like WoW's art style (a lot of people do but I personally hate it and people give me weird looks when I say this) 2 - Blizzard zeolots will defend Blizzard no matter what. They will only mention flaws in a Blizzard game when they're arguing which Blizzard game is better IE Diablo 2 vs Diablo 1.Nerkcon
Beat me to it. I just ignore the delusional fanboys and Blizzard defenders and make my own judgments based on what I've seen. And up to this point, Diablo 3 is nothing impressive neither graphically nor gameplay-wise.
I know a handful of others that agree with me.Isn't a handful like 5 people. Can you even hold 1 person in a hand? I am not sure, but I know that the graphics look fine and it seems that you may have something against artistic graphics. Usually when someone refers to something as "kitty" they too are not that old.DasVolks
I am simply amazed that people still complain about this... And yet they seem to forget how bright and cheerful Diablo 2 was on the first two acts. the third act wasn't even gritty... it was just night time, thus it was dark... The only difference with the graphics from diablo 2 to Diablo 3 is polygons and a painterly quality. You give Diablo 2 a 3D make over, and you are likely to get a game that looks similar to Diablo 3 (maybe ignoring the painterly quality of textures)
Beat me to it. I just ignore the delusional fanboys and Blizzard defenders and make my own judgments based on what I've seen. And up to this point, Diablo 3 is nothing impressive neither graphically nor gameplay-wise.
THA-TODD-BEAST
Pretty much...
The graphics aren't kiddy, and the results of this poll are a clear indication that people on this forum believe D3's graphics work just fine.
AFBrat77
Yeah, okay.:roll::roll:
I am simply amazed that people still complain about this... And yet they seem to forget how bright and cheerful Diablo 2 was on the first two acts. the third act wasn't even gritty... it was just night time, thus it was dark... The only difference with the graphics from diablo 2 to Diablo 3 is polygons and a painterly quality. You give Diablo 2 a 3D make over, and you are likely to get a game that looks similar to Diablo 3 (maybe ignoring the painterly quality of textures)
gamer620
No, you would get a game with graphics such as those from Titan Quest.
EDIT: RAAAAAAAAAAAGE, Gamespot has some of the worst html code for any forum I have ever been on. Jesus Christ make the friggin code the same between quick quote and normal quote, and quoting code is buggy at best.
They don't look that "kiddy" at all, there's blood, gore, and bodies everywhere, and the colors are nice. Also, we have only seen a glimpse of this game, so there's plenty of area to look more gritty. I wanna see what Hell is gonna look like!
Team Fortress 2 has 'gore', but get this, the art style is cartoony/kiddy. (p.s. I love TF2) Just because the game has gore doesn't mean the graphics/art style aren't kiddy.They don't look that "kiddy" at all, there's blood, gore, and bodies everywhere, and the colors are nice. Also, we have only seen a glimpse of this game, so there's plenty of area to look more gritty. I wanna see what Hell is gonna look like!
pvtdonut54
[QUOTE="pvtdonut54"]Team Fortress 2 has 'gore', but get this, the art style is cartoony/kiddy. (p.s. I love TF2) Just because the game has gore doesn't mean the graphics/art style aren't kiddy. Cartoony is different than "kiddy". You think gore is for kids? The game looks fine, and its not even near released yet.They don't look that "kiddy" at all, there's blood, gore, and bodies everywhere, and the colors are nice. Also, we have only seen a glimpse of this game, so there's plenty of area to look more gritty. I wanna see what Hell is gonna look like!
DasVolks
I agree. It looks like a natural progression from Diablo II to Diablo III to me. Just like the jump from Diablo to Diablo II. It fits.
Cartoony is different than "kiddy". You think gore is for kids? The game looks fine, and its not even near released yet.pvtdonut54
Gore was fine for me as a kid. So sure. I guess it depends on the maturity/IQ of the kid, but that's for another thread.
DasVolks, calling the graphics cartoony makes more sense and sounds a lot less insulting. There are kiddy shows that aren't cartoons and cartoons that aren't kiddy, for example...Nerkcon
Sorry boss, kiddy and cartoony have virtually the same meaning to me. Southpark isn't a kid cartoon, but the art is kiddy/cartoony. But I see what you're saying.
[QUOTE="Animorganimate"]
I hate WoW (and everything Warcraft related for that matter). I'm not even a Starcraft fan...at all. And a Blizzard sympathizer I am not, in the least! But Diablo is a game I love, and Diablo III looks AWESOME (graphics-wise, and everything else-wise even)!
Quit whining! Your opinion means nothing. Just look at the results of your poll. If anything, it means your opinion is WRONG! That's possible you know. Not everyone is right, and in this case, you're WRONG.
By the way, I also loved Titan Quest. But if Diablo III looked like Titan Quest, I would be P!$$ED!!! Titan Quest's graphics matched the mythology aspect of the lore. Diablo needs to look unique and different...which it does! It has more color, more polygons (OMG! It's 3D!!!)...and that means WoW?! What are you...13 years old?!?!?!?!?
Just chill kid!
DasVolks
Lol, you're a tool.
Art stlye has too many similarities to WoW. Even Stevie Wonder can see that.
By Titan Quest graphics I meant more realistic as opposed to WoW'y.
BWAHAHAHA!!! Okay. Since you're in the minority, and no one agrees with you...I'll let you call me a tool, since it makes you feel better (even though you're wrong). I'm all about helping out the little people.
Strong logical failure.
DasVolks
Okay...like I said, whatever makes you feel better.
I can't wait for Diablo III! I really hope you don't buy it...even though you hate it's style so much that you decided to devote this portion of your life to it.
Whatever works for you.
[QUOTE="DasVolks"]
Strong logical failure.
Animorganimate
Okay...like I said, whatever makes you feel better.
I can't wait for Diablo III! I really hope you don't buy it...even though you hate it's style so much that you decided to devote this portion of your life to it.
Whatever works for you.
u mad I'm right and your logic fails?
I will buy D3, the graphics aren't going to stop me from playing it.
graphically speaking its quite upsetting. i hate the move there making clearly the visual art team had to rip a few pages from LOST VIKINGS when they decided to break open the mold on this baby. such a pity..
needless to say i will still get it but THE SECOND a visually altering mod arrives im investing fully into it.
Joke post? I can't tell. D3 looks fine, I can understand how somebody would dislike the art style (You can never please everyone; this is a fact) but to not play D3 due to it not looking the way you expect it to look is downright for a lack of better words 'Kiddy" buck up. Also there will NEVER be a visual altering mod for D3, maybe some hues and colors played with but the general atmosphere of the game will always remain the same.graphically speaking its quite upsetting. i hate the move there making clearly the visual art team had to rip a few pages from LOST VIKINGS when they decided to break open the mold on this baby. such a pity..
needless to say i will still get it but THE SECOND a visually altering mod arrives im investing fully into it.
aura_enchanted
I prefer cartoony style of WOW to those that fail at realism. Games that try for the realistic fantasy look just look ridiculous most of the time. For example, EQ2's original character models tried realistic failed, and made alternates that succeeded and looked cartoonish.
I prefer cartoony style of WOW to those that fail at realism. Games that try for the realistic fantasy look just look ridiculous most of the time. For example, EQ2's original character models tried realistic failed, and made alternates that succeeded and looked cartoonish.
Skarwolf
Lolwut? EQ2 original character models looked great. The asian character models looked stupid as hell, well most of them at least.
I prefer cartoony style of WOW to those that fail at realism. Games that try for the realistic fantasy look just look ridiculous most of the time. For example, EQ2's original character models tried realistic failed, and made alternates that succeeded and looked cartoonish.
Skarwolf
I preferred Guild Wars graphics to WoW's by a loooooongshot.
But honestly, i don't have a problem with D3's graphics at all so far.
[QUOTE="Skarwolf"]
I prefer cartoony style of WOW to those that fail at realism. Games that try for the realistic fantasy look just look ridiculous most of the time. For example, EQ2's original character models tried realistic failed, and made alternates that succeeded and looked cartoonish.
DasVolks
Lolwut? EQ2 original character models looked great. The asian character models looked stupid as hell, well most of them at least.
Original EQ2 character models were HORRIBAD.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment