Anyone here still running on a 32 bit OS?

  • 64 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Mystery_Writer
Mystery_Writer

8351

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1 Mystery_Writer
Member since 2004 • 8351 Posts

if so, what's holding you back from upgrading to 64bit OS?

P.S. I'm running vista 64 mainly due to my 8 GB RAM (32bit vista doesn't support it ).

Avatar image for OoSuperMarioO
OoSuperMarioO

6539

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 OoSuperMarioO
Member since 2005 • 6539 Posts
Compatibility.
Avatar image for Mystery_Writer
Mystery_Writer

8351

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#3 Mystery_Writer
Member since 2004 • 8351 Posts

Compatibility.OoSuperMarioO

have you tried installing vista 64 on your pc?

Avatar image for EntwineX
EntwineX

5858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#4 EntwineX
Member since 2005 • 5858 Posts
Still running XP 32bit, there just doesn't seem to be a reason to switch to Vista yet, let alone Vista 64bit. Also people seem to have more issues with drivers and other stiff like that on 64bit than 32bit. I personally tried XP 64bit when it came out, and it was a mess, kinda lost my interest in it after that.
Avatar image for OoSuperMarioO
OoSuperMarioO

6539

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 OoSuperMarioO
Member since 2005 • 6539 Posts

[QUOTE="OoSuperMarioO"]Compatibility.Mystery_Writer

have you tried installing vista 64 on your pc?

Haven't but I stand by what I said due to compatibility for software that I really need at the moment. However by the end of this year I will most defiantly look into making that jump to 64 Bit.
Avatar image for iam2green
iam2green

13991

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 iam2green
Member since 2007 • 13991 Posts
i'm still running xp, i'm not good with computers i don't feel like screwing it up.
Avatar image for Elemayo
Elemayo

879

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Elemayo
Member since 2007 • 879 Posts

Seriously...

What made you want to switch to 64bit...?

There are really no benefits from doing it...

Avatar image for Doom_HellKnight
Doom_HellKnight

12217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#8 Doom_HellKnight
Member since 2005 • 12217 Posts
Still running XP 32bit, and I see no reason to upgrade to Vista yet.
Avatar image for deactivated-57e5de5e137a4
deactivated-57e5de5e137a4

12929

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9 deactivated-57e5de5e137a4
Member since 2004 • 12929 Posts

Compatibility.OoSuperMarioO

Same. No I haven't tried it with my current pc because I don't have the urge to spend hours on an experiment that in the end won't grant me any increased performance on the programs that I use.

Avatar image for Indestructible2
Indestructible2

5935

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Indestructible2
Member since 2007 • 5935 Posts
XP Home 32-bit here.
Avatar image for Mystery_Writer
Mystery_Writer

8351

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#11 Mystery_Writer
Member since 2004 • 8351 Posts

Seriously...

What made you want to switch to 64bit...?

There are really no benefits from doing it...

Elemayo

what about support to 8GB RAM?

Avatar image for ElArab
ElArab

5754

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 ElArab
Member since 2007 • 5754 Posts
I'm running XP 32 bit, haven't noticed a single difference.
Avatar image for hunter2316
hunter2316

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 hunter2316
Member since 2003 • 25 Posts
Im running vista 32 bit. works fine for me.
Avatar image for harrisi17
harrisi17

4010

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#14 harrisi17
Member since 2004 • 4010 Posts
Well I have vista 32 bit, I didn't think I really needed more than 2gb of ram at this moment, so I just got 32 bit to be safe with compatability. When the next OS come, 64 bit will probably be more of a standard (maybe), so I won't be afraid to get it then.
Avatar image for giantraddish
giantraddish

307

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#15 giantraddish
Member since 2002 • 307 Posts

I'm running 32bit XP. Don't see any reason to rush off to a 64bit OS which has occasional game issues.

what about support to 8GB RAM?

Mystery_Writer

I looked at this when I built my last machine a couple months ago. I couldn't find any benchmarks that show performance gain in an existing game going from 2GB to 4GB RAM. Going beyond 4GB at this point seems pointless for gaming. If I was running a database server I'd find a 64bit OS. Right now, I'm playing games.

Avatar image for Ps2stony
Ps2stony

1888

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#16 Ps2stony
Member since 2006 • 1888 Posts
I've got 32 pieces of cake. Wait... What? OH! We're talking about colour quality?! OHHHH! My cake is brown.
But just so this doesn't get modded, I got 32-bit Vista.
Avatar image for Rickylee
Rickylee

1342

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 Rickylee
Member since 2002 • 1342 Posts
32 bit XP pro. However when I do install Vista I'll do 64 bit. But I'm like most of the other posts I'm not ready for Vista yet.
Avatar image for dbowman
dbowman

6836

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#18 dbowman
Member since 2005 • 6836 Posts
Still running 32-bit XP. I don't like Vista, so i don't think i will be upgrading anytime soon.
Avatar image for GodLovesDead
GodLovesDead

9755

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#19 GodLovesDead
Member since 2007 • 9755 Posts
32bit XP. I have 32bit Vista. Operating systems @ 64bit don't get enough attention for me to switch to. I heard it uses different drivers for everything, and to me that's a nightmare.
Avatar image for Herrick
Herrick

4553

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 Herrick
Member since 2004 • 4553 Posts
[QUOTE="Elemayo"]

Seriously...

What made you want to switch to 64bit...?

There are really no benefits from doing it...

Mystery_Writer

what about support to 8GB RAM?

What are the other benefits besides that? That does sound like a big benefit, but don't games have to be developed a certain way in order for them to utilize so much RAM?

Avatar image for Ps2stony
Ps2stony

1888

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#21 Ps2stony
Member since 2006 • 1888 Posts
^Another benefit is that you get to call MS far more than you can with the standard problems with 32-bit.
Avatar image for Simechak
Simechak

1497

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#22 Simechak
Member since 2002 • 1497 Posts

if so, what's holding you back from upgrading to 64bit OS?

P.S. I'm running vista 64 mainly due to my 8 GB RAM (32bit vista doesn't support it ).

Mystery_Writer

Lol, I bet more than 95% of the people on this board still use a 32 bit OS. Asking the question as if they would be in the minority is silly.

Avatar image for juggernaut8419
juggernaut8419

872

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#23 juggernaut8419
Member since 2003 • 872 Posts
I am running x64. Haven't had a single issue with compatiablity outside of my programming projects which just took a little bit of tweaking to get compiled on an x64 environment.
Avatar image for Hewkii
Hewkii

26339

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 Hewkii
Member since 2006 • 26339 Posts
I don't have any real need for 64 bit and I doubt I will really until Microsoft pushes it.
Avatar image for EndersAres
EndersAres

5711

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 EndersAres
Member since 2005 • 5711 Posts
Yeah 32 Vista. Gonna upgrade because of the 2GB barrier and most modern games seem to breach and gonna upgrade to four gigs of ram. Vista alone runs around 600MB+ ram which is outrageous. That's with all the goodies like aero off and such.
Avatar image for Hewkii
Hewkii

26339

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 Hewkii
Member since 2006 • 26339 Posts

Yeah 32 Vista. Gonna upgrade because of the 2GB barrier and most modern games seem to breach and gonna upgrade to four gigs of ram. Vista alone runs around 600MB+ ram which is outrageous. That's with all the goodies like aero off and such.EndersAres

it appears to use more RAM depending on how much you have. for instance, mine is using about 800 MB and I have all of the "goodies" on as well as Firefox and Steam.

Avatar image for PandaBear86
PandaBear86

3389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#27 PandaBear86
Member since 2007 • 3389 Posts

Yeah 32 Vista. Gonna upgrade because of the 2GB barrier and most modern games seem to breach and gonna upgrade to four gigs of ram. Vista alone runs around 600MB+ ram which is outrageous. That's with all the goodies like aero off and such.EndersAres

32 bit Vista has 3gb barrier, not 2gb. Not that many games would be affected by it. However, 64 bit OSes will be the future as time goes on, so feel free to upgrade to 4-8gb if you want your PC to be future proof :)

Avatar image for EndersAres
EndersAres

5711

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 EndersAres
Member since 2005 • 5711 Posts

32 bit Vista has 3gb barrier, not 2gb. Not that many games would be affected by it. However, 64 bit OSes will be the future as time goes on, so feel free to upgrade to 4-8gb if you want your PC to be future proof :)

PandaBear86

No I'm pretty sure programs can't use more than 2gb of ram. All my games like Crysis, Witcher and some other crash after they hit 2gb of ram used. I know Vista can detect 3gb of ram. I wasn't talking about that.

Avatar image for PandaBear86
PandaBear86

3389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#29 PandaBear86
Member since 2007 • 3389 Posts
[QUOTE="PandaBear86"]

32 bit Vista has 3gb barrier, not 2gb. Not that many games would be affected by it. However, 64 bit OSes will be the future as time goes on, so feel free to upgrade to 4-8gb if you want your PC to be future proof :)

EndersAres

No I'm pretty sure programs can't use more than 2gb of ram. All my games like Crysis, Witcher and some other crash after they hit 2gb of ram used. I know Vista can detect 3gb of ram. I wasn't talking about that.

They crash after 2gb of RAM is reached? I was never aware of this issue. If this is the case, when I buy a PC gaming rig in a few months, should I buy a Pc with only 2gb RAM? Or is it safe to get 3gb?

Avatar image for -wildflower-
-wildflower-

2997

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 -wildflower-
Member since 2003 • 2997 Posts
I'm still running 32 bit XP Pro and I see no reason to upgrade to anything else. 2 GB of RAM is just fine.
Avatar image for ProudLarry
ProudLarry

13511

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#31 ProudLarry
Member since 2004 • 13511 Posts
There's noting in Vista that would justify paying $100 for it.
Avatar image for EndersAres
EndersAres

5711

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 EndersAres
Member since 2005 • 5711 Posts

They crash after 2gb of RAM is reached? I was never aware of this issue. If this is the case, when I buy a PC gaming rig in a few months, should I buy a Pc with only 2gb RAM? Or is it safe to get 3gb?

PandaBear86

From what I have read it only happens in 32 bit Vista. Something about calculations or whatever. The Witcher support people told me to wait for SP1 to fix the problem if it even does or upgrade to 64b Vista. I thought it was ridiculous honestly. Most of the games I am playing now don't have the problem. It seems to be with games that have bad coding and optimization.

Avatar image for Qixote
Qixote

10843

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#33 Qixote
Member since 2002 • 10843 Posts

so feel free to upgrade to 4-8gb if you want your PC to be future proof :)

PandaBear86

Lol. There's no such thing as a future proof PC. You must be fairly new to the pc gaming scene.

Avatar image for PandaBear86
PandaBear86

3389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#34 PandaBear86
Member since 2007 • 3389 Posts
[QUOTE="PandaBear86"]

so feel free to upgrade to 4-8gb if you want your PC to be future proof :)

Qixote

Lol. There's no such thing as a future proof PC. You must be fairly new to the pc gaming scene.

I have been playing PC games since 1994. When I say "future proof" I mean that a computer with 8gb of RAM will still be good enough to last you until 2012 without any problem, and 2012 is the future, so yes it is future proof, even if its just in the short term. "future proof" does NOT mean it has to last you 30 years. 5 years is good enough to be considered "future proof".

Avatar image for ProudLarry
ProudLarry

13511

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#35 ProudLarry
Member since 2004 • 13511 Posts
[QUOTE="Qixote"][QUOTE="PandaBear86"]

so feel free to upgrade to 4-8gb if you want your PC to be future proof :)

PandaBear86

Lol. There's no such thing as a future proof PC. You must be fairly new to the pc gaming scene.

I have been playing PC games since 1994. When I say "future proof" I mean that a computer with 8gb of RAM will still be good enough to last you until 2012 without any problem, and 2012 is the future, so yes it is future proof, even if its just in the short term. "future proof" does NOT mean it has to last you 30 years. 5 years is good enough to be considered "future proof".

By the time it gets to 2012, there will probably be a new RAM standard and that 8GBs are going to be comparatively slow. It would be like saying 4 years ago that since I have 4GB of SDRAM PC133 I'm good for games in 2008.
Avatar image for Deihmos
Deihmos

7819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#36 Deihmos
Member since 2007 • 7819 Posts
Untill all applications are coded in 64bit I don't see the point. You are still using 32bit applications that will need to be emulated by the 64bit OS. I don't see the point of 8GB of ram either. 2GB is good enough for me.
Avatar image for Qixote
Qixote

10843

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#37 Qixote
Member since 2002 • 10843 Posts

I have been playing PC games since 1994. When I say "future proof" I mean that a computer with 8gb of RAM will still be good enough to last you until 2012 without any problem, and 2012 is the future, so yes it is future proof, even if its just in the short term. "future proof" does NOT mean it has to last you 30 years. 5 years is good enough to be considered "future proof".

PandaBear86

You still sound naive to me. 8gb of RAM may last you until 2012. But nothing else in your current PC will. At least not for gaming. You're forgetting about how newer games will continue to demand faster processors and video cards. When faster processors are made, it's not long before a newer motherboard is required to use the new processor. So the only thing about your current PC which you still might be using are your 8gb ram, and maybe your case, keyboard and mouse. But then again, ram technology is always changing, so the ram you have now may not work with a new motherboard. Yep, let's just see how far your 8gb ram gets you without upgrading anything else for the next 5 years.

Avatar image for -Master_St3ve-
-Master_St3ve-

1421

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 -Master_St3ve-
Member since 2007 • 1421 Posts
All the cool kids are running a 64bit OS. But the even cooler kids run XP Pro X64. ;)
Avatar image for PandaBear86
PandaBear86

3389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#39 PandaBear86
Member since 2007 • 3389 Posts
[QUOTE="PandaBear86"]

I have been playing PC games since 1994. When I say "future proof" I mean that a computer with 8gb of RAM will still be good enough to last you until 2012 without any problem, and 2012 is the future, so yes it is future proof, even if its just in the short term. "future proof" does NOT mean it has to last you 30 years. 5 years is good enough to be considered "future proof".

Qixote

You still sound naive to me. 8gb of RAM may last you until 2012. But nothing else in your current PC will. At least not for gaming. You're forgetting about how newer games will continue to demand faster processors and video cards. When faster processors are made, it's not long before a newer motherboard is required to use the new processor. So the only thing about your current PC which you still might be using are your 8gb ram, and maybe your case, keyboard and mouse. But then again, ram technology is always changing, so the ram you have now may not work with a new motherboard. Yep, let's just see how far your 8gb ram gets you without upgrading anything else for the next 5 years.

You CAN still play new games on a computer that is a few years old, even without upgrading. Have you forgotten that you can lower resolution and texture details if your computer cannot handle a game on max setings? It appears to me that you will only play a computer game if you are able to max it. I play several games on my crappy laptop with a mere 7300Gs, its just that I have to put up with lowered resolution, framerate and details. Many games are still playable, though.

You don't have to max a game to be able to play it.

Avatar image for OOOOhhhhh
OOOOhhhhh

148

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 OOOOhhhhh
Member since 2003 • 148 Posts
I'm still running XP 32 bit too.
Avatar image for Qixote
Qixote

10843

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#41 Qixote
Member since 2002 • 10843 Posts

You don't have to max a game to be able to play it.

PandaBear86

Willing to play games at low settings greatly contradicts your need for 8gb RAM.

Avatar image for madman683
madman683

483

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 1

#42 madman683
Member since 2005 • 483 Posts
I'm still running XP 32-Bit and I don't have any complains about it...
Avatar image for PandaBear86
PandaBear86

3389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#43 PandaBear86
Member since 2007 • 3389 Posts
[QUOTE="PandaBear86"]

You don't have to max a game to be able to play it.

Qixote

Willing to play games at low settings greatly contradicts your need for 8gb RAM.

If you buy a PC today with 8gb and cannot max games in 2012, I think the GPU will be the biggest bottleneck, not the RAM. Crysis only needs 2gb of RAM, but on the other hand it is extremely hard to get a GPU to max it. If 2gb is enough for a graphics monster like Crysis, I think it will a long time before 8gb becomes a bottleneck for any game.

Remember, I said 8gb of RAM will be futureproof, NOT the entire computer. I never said anything about GPUs being futureproof. I only said 8gb of RAM is future proof.

Avatar image for Qixote
Qixote

10843

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#44 Qixote
Member since 2002 • 10843 Posts

Remember, I said 8gb of RAM will be futureproof, NOT the entire computer. I never said anything about GPUs being futureproof. I only said 8gb of RAM is future proof.

PandaBear86

No, I'm absolutely positive you said PC is futureproof. Let me refresh your memory, you said "so feel free to upgrade to 4-8gb if you want your PC to be future proof"

Avatar image for inyourface_12
inyourface_12

14757

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#45 inyourface_12
Member since 2006 • 14757 Posts
for one thing i wont switching from xp until vistas successor if i can get away with missing very few games and secondly i wouldnt run 64bit because of poor compatability with software and flawed drivers
Avatar image for PandaBear86
PandaBear86

3389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#46 PandaBear86
Member since 2007 • 3389 Posts
[QUOTE="PandaBear86"]

Remember, I said 8gb of RAM will be futureproof, NOT the entire computer. I never said anything about GPUs being futureproof. I only said 8gb of RAM is future proof.

Qixote

No, I'm absolutely positive you said PC is futureproof. Let me refresh your memory, you said "so feel free to upgrade to 4-8gb if you want your PC to be future proof"

In terms of RAM, yes. But I never said anything about the GPU.

And yes, your PC can still play games on a computer that is a few years old, just because you cannot max it does not mean that it is not future proof. It appears that your definition of "future proof" is different than mine.

My definition of "future proof": You buy a high end PC gaming rig today with 8gb RAM, and you can still play games in 2012, but you will not be able to max it. As long as you can still play it, it is still good enough.

Your definition of "future proof": You buy a PC today, and even in the year 2025 you will be able to max every sinle game and still achieve a framerate of 100fps, even without upgrading your PC.

If I am wrong about your definition of "future proof" then please let me know what your definition is.

Avatar image for Baselerd
Baselerd

5104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#47 Baselerd
Member since 2003 • 5104 Posts

Seriously...

What made you want to switch to 64bit...?

There are really no benefits from doing it...

Elemayo

Faster performance, more addressable memory space...

Avatar image for Qixote
Qixote

10843

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#48 Qixote
Member since 2002 • 10843 Posts

If I am wrong about your definition of "future proof" then please let me know what your definition is.

PandaBear86

Frankly I don't know what point you're trying to make anymore, I don't think you even know. All I know is I've shown plainly that you've contradicted yourself twice about how "futureproof" 8gb is. Why don't you just go buy yourself 1 terrabyte of RAM? That will surely keep you futureproof with RAM only. You won't be able to use it all before the rest of your PC goes obsolete, but maybe you can decorate your home with the extra sticks you'll never benefit from.

Avatar image for PandaBear86
PandaBear86

3389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#49 PandaBear86
Member since 2007 • 3389 Posts
[QUOTE="PandaBear86"]

If I am wrong about your definition of "future proof" then please let me know what your definition is.

Qixote

Frankly I don't know what point you're trying to make anymore, I don't think you even know. All I know is I've shown plainly that you've contradicted yourself twice about how "futureproof" 8gb is. Why don't you just go buy yourself 1 terrabyte of RAM? That will surely keep you futureproof with RAM only. You won't be able to use it all before the rest of your PC goes obsolete, but maybe you can decorate your home with the extra sticks you'll never benefit from.

Okay then FINE. There is no such thing as "future proof". You win.

Avatar image for fenriz275
fenriz275

2394

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#50 fenriz275
Member since 2003 • 2394 Posts
The main reason I'm running XP 32 bit is because there's nothing that demands I upgrade. As a gamer Xp is still much better than Vista and there are hardly any games or other software that need or even benefit from 64 bit. It's like putting a V8 engine in a riding lawnmower, sure you can but what's the point?