[QUOTE="kozzy1234"]
I wasnt impressed with AC1 or AC2 to be honest, just got very boring after the first 2-3 hours.
Nice flashy graphics and thats about all the game has imo... repetative, boring, horrible story, no interesting characters... decent controls, but I just didnt have much fun playing this game in all honesty.
Mazoch
I really disagree. I thought it was immensely refreshing to see a game use real historical characters as a backdrop. It added far detail, color and character to the game world compared to most other similar games. Basically I thought the setting, characters and story surpassed most other recent games. I played AC2 on the X360 rather than the PC, but I have to agree that AC2 was one of the best games of '09. I took what was good about AC1 and pretty consistently succeeded in getting rid of most of the flaws and repetitive elements.The setting and everything was there for a great game and story but they just didnt do anythign with it.
Nothing in the story or characters made it enjoyable to me.
its like they jsut went for good controls and nice graphics and didnt care about any story or characters.
Probably the most overrated series of this gen for me personally.
Bought hte first two AC games hoping they would improve on the story, characters and fun factor but they didnt, I wont be buying another AC again.
nice setting, godo graphics and controsl, but they made the game sooo repetative, it has no fun factor for me after a few hours, just repetative nonsense to me.
I know the series is popular and casul friendly but it jsut was not fun or engaging to me at all after an hour. Wish I never bought the game, waste of money for me personally.
If they made it FUN like the HItman series I would be stoked. Some great ideas in this series but thats abotu it for me.
Log in to comment