Assassin's Creed PC Delayed Again

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for crazyfist36
crazyfist36

574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 crazyfist36
Member since 2003 • 574 Posts
March 28th.... DAMN IT!!! why why why?
Avatar image for Geewiner
Geewiner

33

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#2 Geewiner
Member since 2008 • 33 Posts
It's not so bad, I'll buy it with Far Cry 2 I'll probably blow my mind out of fun, at least I hope so.
Avatar image for The_lol_maker
The_lol_maker

220

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 The_lol_maker
Member since 2008 • 220 Posts
I'm pissed aswell, Ubisoft suck ass with optimizing....Assassin's Creed is more demending then Crysis, that's so stupid.....:(
Avatar image for k_ozz
k_ozz

1088

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#4 k_ozz
Member since 2007 • 1088 Posts
OMG not again.. I hpoe it comes out atleast on 28th..
Avatar image for RK-Mara
RK-Mara

11489

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#5 RK-Mara
Member since 2006 • 11489 Posts
Wait, they are actually planning to optimize it?
Avatar image for foggy666
foggy666

1123

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#6 foggy666
Member since 2003 • 1123 Posts

Wait, they are actually planning to optimize it?RK-Mara

i hope so, unless they want it to end up like RS:Vegas...

Avatar image for NosmoKing1984
NosmoKing1984

115

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#7 NosmoKing1984
Member since 2007 • 115 Posts

I've lost all interest in Assassins Creed, I've even canceled my preorder. If they originally announced that it would come to PC but not right away, I'd have been fine. But to say it's coming out for PC at the same time for ages and then delay it, twice, is very bad form. A developer should know, months in advance whether a game would be ready for the announced launch so there's no excuse.

Maybe when I've run out of games to play I'll buy it but for now, I'm not interested.

Have fun

Avatar image for Erandel
Erandel

1164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#8 Erandel
Member since 2004 • 1164 Posts

Well, they don't have the worst record, to be fair

Duke Nukem forever has been coming out for 10 years, and is ony just appearing :P

Avatar image for Adversary16
Adversary16

1705

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#9 Adversary16
Member since 2007 • 1705 Posts
:(
Avatar image for dayaccus007
dayaccus007

4349

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 dayaccus007
Member since 2007 • 4349 Posts
I was scared about the title when I saw it first time. I know about this delay from a week ago but when I first saw the title I believe it was delayed even more.
Avatar image for blackdreamhunk
blackdreamhunk

3880

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 blackdreamhunk
Member since 2007 • 3880 Posts
March 28th.... DAMN IT!!! why why why?crazyfist36
any links need pruff
Avatar image for _Pedro_
_Pedro_

6829

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#12 _Pedro_
Member since 2004 • 6829 Posts
I hope they optimize it.
Avatar image for johnny27
johnny27

4400

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#13 johnny27
Member since 2006 • 4400 Posts
March 28th.... DAMN IT!!! why why why?crazyfist36
omg again this is like the third time hopefully they will optimize it enough so i can max it out.
Avatar image for AngelB1ack
AngelB1ack

7936

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 AngelB1ack
Member since 2005 • 7936 Posts
I'm so over this port..
Avatar image for mrbojangles25
mrbojangles25

60869

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#15 mrbojangles25
Member since 2005 • 60869 Posts

Idunno about this game. I mean it got a good review and all, but if you actually read the review it just seemed like they werent that hot for it. I think it got the high score simply because of the technology and innovation; the gameplay still seems questionable imo.

Still, it might be worth checking out. And the story seems pretty damn cool to boot.

Oh well, time to load up some Thief to hold me over for the next month or two.

Avatar image for OgreB
OgreB

2523

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#16 OgreB
Member since 2004 • 2523 Posts

Whatever...

The game isn't that great..

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#17 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
I guess after all the backlash after the game was revealed to have higher system requirements than Crysis made them decide to spend some time actually optimising the game. Good.
Avatar image for mrbojangles25
mrbojangles25

60869

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#18 mrbojangles25
Member since 2005 • 60869 Posts

I guess after all the backlash after the game was revealed to have higher system requirements than Crysis made them decide to spend some time actually optimising the game. Good.foxhound_fox

hmmmm, didnt think about that. You might be right.

I mean, it is rediculous to have requirements that high, especially since it can run on a 360. 360s arent weak or anything, but they definately arent the equivelent of what the initial PC requirements were.

I just hope Ubisoft learned their lesson with Vegas and Silent Hunter 4.

Avatar image for EskimosAreReal
EskimosAreReal

496

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 EskimosAreReal
Member since 2007 • 496 Posts
I hope they're using this time to optimize it. There's no way it should be more demanding than Crysis...
Avatar image for Swiftstrike5
Swiftstrike5

6950

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#20 Swiftstrike5
Member since 2005 • 6950 Posts
Aw... it was gona come out on my birthday before. It's only 3days... not that bad.
Avatar image for EntwineX
EntwineX

5858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#21 EntwineX
Member since 2005 • 5858 Posts
Not really that interested after hearing all the comments on how repetitive it was, not to mention after seeing the requirements. Hopefully they do actually try to optimize it, Ubi's track record with ports ain't that great tho so I wouldn't get my hopes up.
Avatar image for CubePrime_basic
CubePrime_basic

3230

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 CubePrime_basic
Member since 2003 • 3230 Posts

[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]I guess after all the backlash after the game was revealed to have higher system requirements than Crysis made them decide to spend some time actually optimising the game. Good.mrbojangles25

hmmmm, didnt think about that. You might be right.

I mean, it is rediculous to have requirements that high, especially since it can run on a 360. 360s arent weak or anything, but they definately arent the equivelent of what the initial PC requirements were.

I just hope Ubisoft learned their lesson with Vegas and Silent Hunter 4.

you are mistaken, the requirements are far weaker than the 360's specs. No contest, except for brute memory size, a random 256mb gpu and x2 3800+ is nothing compared to the Xenos and 3 core power pc cpu.

AC aside, I hope to see the day soon where pc games actually require dual core cpus so that physics in the game get more intense and actually affect gameplay directly. It's cool and all to play any game by stripping it down but I think it's time to move on.

Avatar image for drbob
drbob

253

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 drbob
Member since 2002 • 253 Posts

I think some publishers are coming to the conclusion that a simultaneous PC release actually costs them sales overall.

Call of duty 4 sold 350,000 units on PC, 10 times less than consoles sales. At the same time there were literally millions of pirate downloads of the PC version from bit-torrent sites. Were no PC version available only a small fraction of these pirates would need to buy the console version instead for a PC version to become uneconomic.

I think the long delay for the PC version of assassins creed may be ubisoft testing this. Is there a correlation between having a simultaneous PC release and a game selling less well than expected overall? How many extra console sales do they get whilst a PC version isn't available? If these extra console sales outweigh PC sales you can expect to see more and more long delays or outright cancellations for PC versions.

Avatar image for biggest_loser
biggest_loser

24508

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 60

User Lists: 0

#24 biggest_loser
Member since 2007 • 24508 Posts
Who the hell actually has 3GB on their computer? lol. Thats what is recommended ..yeesh.
Avatar image for Avenger1324
Avenger1324

16344

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 Avenger1324
Member since 2007 • 16344 Posts

An 82% Metacritic average for 360 isn't a glowing results considering the amount of hype for the game, and technical requirements aside, a lot of the criticism was for gameplay issues, which aren't something Ubisoft are going to change for the PC release.

Ubisoft shot themselves in the foot on this for PC. 5 months extra waiting for a poorly optimised console port demanding a Crysis-beater PC to run it - no thanks.

Pre-order cancelled