Battlefield 2 or battlefield 2142

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for niko44
niko44

2281

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#1 niko44
Member since 2004 • 2281 Posts

Which one should I get?

If your gonna post please post what they have differently and stuff.I tried the 2142 demo and loved it but not sure which is better since i have heard good(and bad) stuff about both.If you don't like them dont post crap like "none they suck anyway lawl get bioshock".

Thank you in advance :)

Avatar image for thanatose
thanatose

2465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#2 thanatose
Member since 2003 • 2465 Posts
Both are equally good. I really liked the hover tanks and the walker in 2141 but I liked the modern feel to BF2. If you are interested in having a lot of servers to choose from then I'd suggest BF2.
Avatar image for teuf_
Teuf_

30805

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Teuf_
Member since 2004 • 30805 Posts
I prefer 2142, personally. Titan mode is excellent, and its a good change of pace from conquest mode. I also like only having 2 factions, and the upgrade system is killer.
Avatar image for DrDoomed
DrDoomed

11386

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 DrDoomed
Member since 2003 • 11386 Posts

niko you have tried both demos?

only trying one especially the secondary version will not help you make up your own mind.

For me i realy like the sci-fi feel of 2142 due to the vehicles but i disliked the dark landscape. but from only trying both demos myself i feel that BF2 is better because it's brighter. But if it came to the crunch i'd just go with the one with the most players online in it's retail version.

Avatar image for dayaccus007
dayaccus007

4349

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 dayaccus007
Member since 2007 • 4349 Posts
I don't like modern combat, so I say Battlefield 2 is better
Avatar image for chessboxer1
chessboxer1

953

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#6 chessboxer1
Member since 2004 • 953 Posts
I prefer modern combat to sci fi combat so BF2 all the way. Depends what you like best. I had a quick go on the BF 2142 demo and the maps seemed a bit bland in comparison to BF2
Avatar image for EntwineX
EntwineX

5858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#7 EntwineX
Member since 2005 • 5858 Posts

niko you have tried both demos?

only trying one especially the secondary version will not help you make up your own mind.

For me i realy like the sci-fi feel of 2142 due to the vehicles but i disliked the dark landscape. but from only trying both demos myself i feel that BF2 is better because it's brighter. But if it came to the crunch i'd just go with the one with the most players online in it's retail version.

DrDoomed
Well, you took the words right out of my keyboard.
Avatar image for Deus_Ex_Fan
Deus_Ex_Fan

625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#8 Deus_Ex_Fan
Member since 2006 • 625 Posts

For me i realy like the sci-fi feel of 2142 due to the vehicles but i disliked the dark landscape.DrDoomed

Play the Camp and Suez maps (each are desert maps, and very bright). Camp is the favorite of all, as it's mostly an infantry map (only 2 Battlewalkers and some jeeps) and one BF2 players would like; Suez (Titan mode) is the best for armor and gunships with that end-of-all-ending Titan battle.

Unlike BF2, BF2142 is very balanced and the devs constantly tweak the weapons to ensure no one weapon is the "best". For example, the Voss is the favorite for close up combat with Assault classes, but it's poor at mid-range; Baur is prefered by anti-snipers (one rifle that will out snipe the snipers at their own game) and the mid-range killer, but it's smaller clip size makes it poor as an in-your-face assault rifle.

In BF2142 you really need to figure out which weapons/vehicles you'll prefer to use and train hard in mastering them, as there's an equal counterpart -- Battlewalkers can be blown up by one Sniper with RDX (he'll be cammoed and just has to run, decloak,and unload 4 RDX packs then BOOM), or even anyone shooting at the vents under it; gunships can be blown from the sky with AAs; SAAWs; Titan cannons; RDX and even motion mines (really cool demolition that Engineers use).

From what I've played 64 player Camp maps last about 25 to 30 minutes a game. Suez about 40 minutes. Suez (conquest mode) with 32 players can last ***2hrs*** per game.

Avatar image for hibikino
hibikino

666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#9 hibikino
Member since 2004 • 666 Posts
Battlefield 2!! A little old but still kickin'
Avatar image for RK-Mara
RK-Mara

11489

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#10 RK-Mara
Member since 2006 • 11489 Posts
There's a new topic about this every day.
Avatar image for oscar530
oscar530

4430

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 oscar530
Member since 2005 • 4430 Posts
2142 ftw I played 2142 first and I thought it was really good so I bought BF2 as well expecting the same thing.....man i was i wrong bf2 was soooo boring for me
Avatar image for mimic-Denmark
mimic-Denmark

4382

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#12 mimic-Denmark
Member since 2006 • 4382 Posts
Put this thread as a damn sticky.
Avatar image for thusaha
thusaha

14495

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 thusaha
Member since 2007 • 14495 Posts
BF2
Avatar image for cardshark86
cardshark86

603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 cardshark86
Member since 2003 • 603 Posts
I say 2142 simply because the Titan mode is such a blast to play. I really don't get much enjoyment out of the conquest mode in these games. You run, you shoot, whatever. The Titan mode seems more like I'm working toward accomplishing a goal. The dynamic is really, really good.
Avatar image for bdever32
bdever32

757

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#15 bdever32
Member since 2005 • 757 Posts
I'd say I like the maps of BF2 better and the gameplay of 2142 better. My biggest problem with BF2 is there never seems to be anyone using maps from the expansions, and there's too many Strike at Karkand only servers.
Avatar image for bob9999999999
bob9999999999

103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#16 bob9999999999
Member since 2005 • 103 Posts
2142, it is balanced, fun, and Titan mode is really cool. Both are excellent games though.
Avatar image for chessboxer1
chessboxer1

953

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#17 chessboxer1
Member since 2004 • 953 Posts

I'd say I like the maps of BF2 better and the gameplay of 2142 better. My biggest problem with BF2 is there never seems to be anyone using maps from the expansions, and there's too many Strike at Karkand only servers.bdever32

So true! I bought both expansion packs and nobody plays them. It's all Wake Island and Karkland!!

Avatar image for Whermacht02
Whermacht02

1069

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#18 Whermacht02
Member since 2006 • 1069 Posts

BF2 hands down. I played a little bit of 2142 and didnt like the feel of it. Besides, the unlock system is plain bad... For instance you have to unlock grenades!!! Grenades were always a standard issue equipment for infantry!!! I understand if a gun is locked for use, but not something as basic as grenades, or the defibrillator. Thats my opinion...

Avatar image for Deus_Ex_Fan
Deus_Ex_Fan

625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#19 Deus_Ex_Fan
Member since 2006 • 625 Posts

Besides, the unlock system is plain bad... For instance you have to unlock grenades!!! Grenades were always a standard issue equipment for infantry!!! I understand if a gun is locked for use, but not something as basic as grenades, or the defibrillator. Thats my opinion...

Whermacht02

Some would argue (especially as attackers on the Titan) that grenades should be a top unlock (for those who don't play BF2142: defenders stake out the console corridors with teams of grenaders, turning it into a meat puppet fest. Not many attackers like grenaders, either in Titan mode or on the Camp map....hehehe). They're not as hated as RDX bunnies (BF2's AWP shooters) and Voss types, but a close third.

And unlocking the grenadesis quite fast, a couple games and you can unlock it. What's tough is unlocking useless stuff to get the top weapon (smoke grenade, for example).