blizzard "as long as people play it we gonna keep updading"

  • 75 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for HFkami
HFkami

855

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#51 HFkami
Member since 2009 • 855 Posts

[QUOTE="KeithFerns"]

[QUOTE="Linkbest23"]

VALVE NEVER EVER UPDATED TF2 FOR THE 360

they were like oh yeah updates for that

LIERS

kieranb2000

If you are going to play like that blizzard never updated Starcraft 64

Because the N64 didn't have the facilities available to update games. The Xbox 360 does. Not a fair comparison ;p

n64dd

Avatar image for Raxzor
Raxzor

5399

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#52 Raxzor
Member since 2003 • 5399 Posts
Why do people still bang on about 'where's Warcraft 4?' are you stupid? Blizz will never make it as long a WoW is making money.
Avatar image for DanielDust
DanielDust

15402

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 DanielDust
Member since 2007 • 15402 Posts
Why do people still bang on about 'where's Warcraft 4?' are you stupid? Blizz will never make it as long a WoW is making money.Raxzor
They will, making a new RTS has nothing to do with the MMORPG WoW. Why would they make Starcraft and Diablo 3 as long as WoW still makes money? just because they're from the same universe doesn't mean that they won't make a new game for the RTS series, the foundation for WoW.
Avatar image for HFkami
HFkami

855

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#54 HFkami
Member since 2009 • 855 Posts

Why do people still bang on about 'where's Warcraft 4?' are you stupid? Blizz will never make it as long a WoW is making money.Raxzor

wth youre talking about wc4 was never the topic. And its allready confirmed that the starcraft2 team is going to do a wc4 after sc2. Its pretty clear that warcraft and starcraft are 2 different games. Why shouldnt they keep doing 2 different rts franchises to suck even more money from rts gamer if blizzard is such a money hungry company?

Avatar image for deactivated-64ba3ebd35404
deactivated-64ba3ebd35404

7590

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#55 deactivated-64ba3ebd35404
Member since 2004 • 7590 Posts

[QUOTE="kieranb2000"][QUOTE="KeithFerns"]

If you are going to play like that blizzard never updated Starcraft 64

HFkami

Because the N64 didn't have the facilities available to update games. The Xbox 360 does. Not a fair comparison ;p

n64dd

Which Starcraft 64 didn't come out for.
Avatar image for SeeUontheFlip
SeeUontheFlip

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 SeeUontheFlip
Member since 2010 • 25 Posts

VALVE NEVER EVER UPDATED TF2 FOR THE 360

they were like oh yeah updates for that

LIERS

Linkbest23
WRONG! Incorrect. Buzzzz. False. Want to blame someone? Blame Microsoft for charging for the very DLC that Valve offers free to the PC users.
Avatar image for Raxzor
Raxzor

5399

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#57 Raxzor
Member since 2003 • 5399 Posts

[QUOTE="Raxzor"]Why do people still bang on about 'where's Warcraft 4?' are you stupid? Blizz will never make it as long a WoW is making money.HFkami

wth youre talking about wc4 was never the topic. And its allready confirmed that the starcraft2 team is going to do a wc4 after sc2. Its pretty clear that warcraft and starcraft are 2 different games. Why shouldnt they keep doing 2 different rts franchises to suck even more money from rts gamer if blizzard is such a money hungry company?

Go back and read for begining and WC4 is mentioned and show me a source that Blizz have confirmed WC4! They won't make a WC4 as long as there is WoW. It would be a major lore screw up for both games.

Avatar image for HFkami
HFkami

855

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#58 HFkami
Member since 2009 • 855 Posts

[QUOTE="HFkami"]

[QUOTE="Raxzor"]Why do people still bang on about 'where's Warcraft 4?' are you stupid? Blizz will never make it as long a WoW is making money.Raxzor

wth youre talking about wc4 was never the topic. And its allready confirmed that the starcraft2 team is going to do a wc4 after sc2. Its pretty clear that warcraft and starcraft are 2 different games. Why shouldnt they keep doing 2 different rts franchises to suck even more money from rts gamer if blizzard is such a money hungry company?

Go back and read for begining and WC4 is mentioned and show me a source that Blizz have confirmed WC4! They won't make a WC4 as long as there is WoW. It would be a major lore screw up for both games.

lolmao keep arguing without backing up your posts

Avatar image for Raxzor
Raxzor

5399

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#59 Raxzor
Member since 2003 • 5399 Posts

[QUOTE="Raxzor"]

[QUOTE="HFkami"]

wth youre talking about wc4 was never the topic. And its allready confirmed that the starcraft2 team is going to do a wc4 after sc2. Its pretty clear that warcraft and starcraft are 2 different games. Why shouldnt they keep doing 2 different rts franchises to suck even more money from rts gamer if blizzard is such a money hungry company?

HFkami

Go back and read for begining and WC4 is mentioned and show me a source that Blizz have confirmed WC4! They won't make a WC4 as long as there is WoW. It would be a major lore screw up for both games.

lolmao keep arguing without backing up your posts

Read the article that you actually provide and you will see, he says nothing is set in stone. Plus 2 more SC2 expansion. Basically they are saying what people like you want to hear. That basically tells me, no WC4! That confirms nothing!

Avatar image for DanielDust
DanielDust

15402

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 DanielDust
Member since 2007 • 15402 Posts

[QUOTE="HFkami"]

[QUOTE="Raxzor"]

Go back and read for begining and WC4 is mentioned and show me a source that Blizz have confirmed WC4! They won't make a WC4 as long as there is WoW. It would be a major lore screw up for both games.

Raxzor

lolmao keep arguing without backing up your posts

Read the article that you actually provide and you will see, he says nothing is set in stone. Plus 2 more SC2 expansion. Basically they are saying what people like you want to hear. That basically tells me, no WC4! That confirms nothing!

One problem in your logic, Warcraft 4 has nothing to do with WoW, because WoW players DON'T/WON'T play the RTS Warcraft. There will be a Warcraft 4, not soon, because of SC 2 and D3, but there will be one, and that will have nothing to do with WoW.
Avatar image for MJPK
MJPK

3360

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#61 MJPK
Member since 2006 • 3360 Posts

[QUOTE="Raxzor"]

[QUOTE="HFkami"]

lolmao keep arguing without backing up your posts

DanielDust

Read the article that you actually provide and you will see, he says nothing is set in stone. Plus 2 more SC2 expansion. Basically they are saying what people like you want to hear. That basically tells me, no WC4! That confirms nothing!

One problem in your logic, Warcraft 4 has nothing to do with WoW, because WoW players DON'T/WON'T play the RTS Warcraft. There will be a Warcraft 4, not soon, because of SC 2 and D3, but there will be one, and that will have nothing to do with WoW.

What? I know a good few WoW players who would buy Warcraft 4 in a second plus there would be a major lore screw up if they made a Warcraft 4 now with WoW still going.

Warcraft 4 has everything to do with World of WARCRAFT, they are both based on the same lore.

Avatar image for Nagru
Nagru

1956

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#62 Nagru
Member since 2006 • 1956 Posts

"...as long as people play it we gonna keep updating." - Blizzard

If only they would have fixed SC1's compatibility issues, or maybe even added support for higher resolutions if possible. They have been consistently updating it though, and they did release the official no-cd thing, so I suppose I should cut them some slack...

Oh well, I have SC2 to replace it anyways :D

Avatar image for DanielDust
DanielDust

15402

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 DanielDust
Member since 2007 • 15402 Posts

[QUOTE="DanielDust"][QUOTE="Raxzor"] Read the article that you actually provide and you will see, he says nothing is set in stone. Plus 2 more SC2 expansion. Basically they are saying what people like you want to hear. That basically tells me, no WC4! That confirms nothing!

MJPK

One problem in your logic, Warcraft 4 has nothing to do with WoW, because WoW players DON'T/WON'T play the RTS Warcraft. There will be a Warcraft 4, not soon, because of SC 2 and D3, but there will be one, and that will have nothing to do with WoW.

What? I know a good few WoW players who would buy Warcraft 4 in a second plus there would be a major lore screw up if they made a Warcraft 4 now with WoW still going.

Warcraft 4 has everything to do with World of WARCRAFT, they are both based on the same lore.

They're different genres obviously >_> and yes some will play but most of the players don't even care about RTSs, do you actually think that out of those 12 million + accounts even half of their owners care about an RTS? (it isn't going to happen just because you, me and some of our friends care about RTS, the core community couldn't care less) they have nothing in common...again...I'm not talking about the lore. They are aimed at totally different kind players.

There isn't going to be any screw up beacause WoW was made from what every warcraft till 3 did, they only added a few new things, they'll probably continue from 3 rather than make it releated to WoW.

Avatar image for MJPK
MJPK

3360

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#64 MJPK
Member since 2006 • 3360 Posts

[QUOTE="MJPK"]

[QUOTE="DanielDust"] One problem in your logic, Warcraft 4 has nothing to do with WoW, because WoW players DON'T/WON'T play the RTS Warcraft. There will be a Warcraft 4, not soon, because of SC 2 and D3, but there will be one, and that will have nothing to do with WoW.DanielDust

What? I know a good few WoW players who would buy Warcraft 4 in a second plus there would be a major lore screw up if they made a Warcraft 4 now with WoW still going.

Warcraft 4 has everything to do with World of WARCRAFT, they are both based on the same lore.

They're different genres obviously >_> and yes some will play but most of the players don't even care about RTSs, do you actually think that out of those 12 million + accounts even half of their owners care about an RTS? (it isn't going to happen just because you, me and some of our friends care about RTS, the core community couldn't care less) they have nothing in common...again...I'm not talking about the lore. They are aimed at totally different kind players.

There isn't going to be any screw up beacause WoW was made from what every warcraft till 3 did, they only added a few new things, they'll probably continue from 3 rather than make it releated to WoW.

Continue from 3? the major part of warcraft 3 was Arthas becoming the Lich King and he was killed in WoW.Same with Illidan, also a major character in W3 and is now dead.So what will they continue with?

Avatar image for DanielDust
DanielDust

15402

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 DanielDust
Member since 2007 • 15402 Posts
You answered your own question....I said they're probably going to continue where Warcraft 3 ended and you said how will they continue if they killed Arthas in WoW...I doubt they will develop something entirely new that can be used for a future WoW expansion, they won't expand it forever, Cataclysm might be the last expansion.
Avatar image for Raxzor
Raxzor

5399

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#66 Raxzor
Member since 2003 • 5399 Posts

Blizzard will still make expansions for WoW as long as they sell. And it's not like they have had a major sales slump in WoW. I can see WoW going for at least another 10 years.

They won't make WC4 while WoW is still marketable because WoW has to be balanced. You couldn't make WC4 set in the WoW era because it would cause major lore problems. Just say WC4 came out after cataclysum and Thrall dies in WC4 can you imagine the uproar it would cause with WoW players not seeing that event in game?

What else would you base the games events on? Arthas is dead, so is Illidan. They couldnt mess with current factions e.g. make the Forsaken splinter off, because would effect balance. As for a straight battle between Alliance and Horde? who would win? how could the story pan out? You would upset half your player base if one faction beats the other.

WC4 will only exist after WoW is done. Which won't be for a very very long time.

Avatar image for MJPK
MJPK

3360

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#67 MJPK
Member since 2006 • 3360 Posts

You answered your own question....I said they're probably going to continue where Warcraft 3 ended and you said how will they continue if they killed Arthas in WoW...I doubt they will develop something entirely new that can be used for a future WoW expansion, they won't expand it forever, Cataclysm might be the last expansion.DanielDust

So in other words u think there going to just forget everything that happened in WoW.....Both games use the same lore and really doubt that they will just forget everything that has happened in WoW and continue on the W3 story.

Cataclysm won't be the last expansion, why would Blizzard stop WoW when it's making them alot of money.There not going to be a Warcraft 4 while WoW is going and it's not going to die anytime soon.

Avatar image for BrickMcStick
BrickMcStick

103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 BrickMcStick
Member since 2010 • 103 Posts

[QUOTE="BrickMcStick"]

[QUOTE="HFkami"]

counterstrike isnt made from valve. Also valve makes shooters for the most part. There werent something important like balance patches just pointless updates for steam, and bug fixes. Plus these games are shooters, the players have to host their own servers. Every Blizzard game has still access to bnettoday, even diablo1 and warcraft 2. And valve doesnt support their game as esport titles. Blizzard hosts tournaments for starcraft, warcraft 3 and wow with pricemoney of at least 10.000$ each in blizzcon every year.

HFkami

You are wrong, period. Simply put, you are wrong. Counter Strike IS MADE BY VALVE. It was originally a mod but Valve liked it so much that they hired the mod team making it and made than released it as a retail game, that is fact, they also made CSS which just got a major patch and is still getting support to this day. FPS games are supposed to have dedicated servers, match making is known as the devil of PC gaming for FPS games and dedicated servers are always a better system and one of the standards of PC gaming for FPS games, that is a fact.

You are horribly misguided, look at Team Fortress 2. That has recieved more free content, like weapons, maps, achievements and BALANCE PATCHES than any other game I have ever played in my life and they have a second round of weapons planned for 5 of the character types, that is fact. What you said isn't true, that is fact. Umm people can still play old Valve games online too, fact. It is true that Valve doesn't hold big tournament for their games but CS games are some of the most competitive PC games (possibly the most) ever created and they have constant tournament.

Please stop trying to argue this, you are wrong. You don't know enough about the topic and are just spitting out info like you know what you are talking about, what I have said here is based on fact. Sorry but you don't have a clue about all Valve has done for their games, especially TF2 which has gotten more love from Valve than all Blizzard games combined in terms of free content.

EDIT: Why can you not accept that there are companies that are as supportive, arguably more, than Blizzard? I'm not insulting them I am just saying they aren't the only people that support stuff.

no youre wrong those are mods period. And you cant compare tf with good rts classics like wc3 or sc. These are serious games which bring to some people even money and are played in big tournaments, tf isnt even played in wcg


Listen, you are WRONG. I have provided facts and you are in complete denial of the truth here. Do you think TF2 is a mod? CSS? HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHA. That is a lie, they are games, that is a fact. And CSS is one of the most competeitive games of all time. You are basing this on the fact that you think RTS games are just better than FPS games just 'cause, TF2 can be compared to RTS games like WC3 and SC because the topic is support and TF2 has gotten more free content and suppor than either WC3 or SC. TF2 has a smaller competitive scene, you have got me there but CSS could easily compete with the competetive scene for SC (maybe not in Korea). Stop trying to defend Blizzard, YOU ARE WRONG. I have given you facts but you are just dis regarding them. You are wrong, you have lost this argument, you have. If you think that DoD:S, CSS and TF2 are nothing than mods and that because they are FPS game's they cannot be supported and are crappy compared because they aren't RTS games than you don't know anything about what you are talking about and your argument is both invalid and in complete denial. I have facts, you don't, stop arguing and just accept that Blizzard isn't the only PC supporting company in the world.

Avatar image for usule
usule

1734

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 usule
Member since 2003 • 1734 Posts

I think we can conclude that both VALVe and Blizzard are great companies that keeps updating their games.

ventnor
Thank you ;)
Avatar image for DanielDust
DanielDust

15402

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 DanielDust
Member since 2007 • 15402 Posts

[QUOTE="DanielDust"]You answered your own question....I said they're probably going to continue where Warcraft 3 ended and you said how will they continue if they killed Arthas in WoW...I doubt they will develop something entirely new that can be used for a future WoW expansion, they won't expand it forever, Cataclysm might be the last expansion.MJPK

So in other words u think there going to just forget everything that happened in WoW.....Both games use the same lore and really doubt that they will just forget everything that has happened in WoW and continue on the W3 story.

Cataclysm won't be the last expansion, why would Blizzard stop WoW when it's making them alot of money.There not going to be a Warcraft 4 while WoW is going and it's not going to die anytime soon.

Nobody is going to make a sequel to an RTS series forcing the player to buy and play another game to find out what happened meanwhile, especially not a MMO, and especially smart developers like Blizzard. They will lose sales not gain more, because the core War community doesn't care about WoW just as much as the core WoW community doesn't care about RTSs.

Avatar image for MJPK
MJPK

3360

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#71 MJPK
Member since 2006 • 3360 Posts

[QUOTE="MJPK"]

[QUOTE="DanielDust"]You answered your own question....I said they're probably going to continue where Warcraft 3 ended and you said how will they continue if they killed Arthas in WoW...I doubt they will develop something entirely new that can be used for a future WoW expansion, they won't expand it forever, Cataclysm might be the last expansion.DanielDust

So in other words u think there going to just forget everything that happened in WoW.....Both games use the same lore and really doubt that they will just forget everything that has happened in WoW and continue on the W3 story.

Cataclysm won't be the last expansion, why would Blizzard stop WoW when it's making them alot of money.There not going to be a Warcraft 4 while WoW is going and it's not going to die anytime soon.

Nobody is going to make a sequel to an RTS series forcing the player to buy and play another game to find out what happened meanwhile, especially not a MMO, and especially smart developers like Blizzard. They will lose sales not gain more, because the core War community doesn't care about WoW just as much as the core WoW community doesn't care about RTSs.

The point is there is no point talking about Warcraft 4 at all because it's not going to be make for a long time and I really doubt that they will just forget WoW when they do make Warcraft 4.

Avatar image for SF_KiLLaMaN
SF_KiLLaMaN

6446

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#72 SF_KiLLaMaN
Member since 2007 • 6446 Posts
I'll keep this plain and simple. If your game still needs balancing patches after 8 years, you are doing something wrong.
Avatar image for DanielDust
DanielDust

15402

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 DanielDust
Member since 2007 • 15402 Posts
I'll keep this plain and simple. If your game still needs balancing patches after 8 years, you are doing something wrong.SF_KiLLaMaN
If you're assuming that after 8 years patches still contain balance improvements, you're doing it wrong. They mostly fixed bugs that were cause by new hardware/software and some exploits, they finished with balancing patches quite a while ago. Nice attempt but that's not how you try to convince people that support after years = bad/game is bad ;).
Avatar image for SF_KiLLaMaN
SF_KiLLaMaN

6446

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#74 SF_KiLLaMaN
Member since 2007 • 6446 Posts
[QUOTE="SF_KiLLaMaN"]I'll keep this plain and simple. If your game still needs balancing patches after 8 years, you are doing something wrong.DanielDust
If you're assuming that after 8 years patches still contain balance improvements, you're doing it wrong. They mostly fixed bugs that were cause by new hardware/software and some exploits, they finished with balancing patches quite a while ago. Nice attempt but that's not how you try to convince people that support after years = bad/game is bad ;).

the original post says "New WC3 balance patch woot." So I assumed that was what it was... Sorry for believing someone. :o
Avatar image for HFkami
HFkami

855

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#75 HFkami
Member since 2009 • 855 Posts

Listen, you are WRONG. I have provided facts and you are in complete denial of the truth here. Do you think TF2 is a mod? CSS? HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHA. That is a lie, they are games, that is a fact. And CSS is one of the most competeitive games of all time. You are basing this on the fact that you think RTS games are just better than FPS games just 'cause, TF2 can be compared to RTS games like WC3 and SC because the topic is support and TF2 has gotten more free content and suppor than either WC3 or SC. TF2 has a smaller competitive scene, you have got me there but CSS could easily compete with the competetive scene for SC (maybe not in Korea). Stop trying to defend Blizzard, YOU ARE WRONG. I have given you facts but you are just dis regarding them. You are wrong, you have lost this argument, you have. If you think that DoD:S, CSS and TF2 are nothing than mods and that because they are FPS game's they cannot be supported and are crappy compared because they aren't RTS games than you don't know anything about what you are talking about and your argument is both invalid and in complete denial. I have facts, you don't, stop arguing and just accept that Blizzard isn't the only PC supporting company in the world.

BrickMcStick

every game that isnt in wcg isnt serious enough to be an esport classic.