Bought a 6870 and . .

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for desertpython
desertpython

1277

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1 desertpython
Member since 2006 • 1277 Posts

So I gave in and replaced my 4890 with a 6870 and I think it was a good choice. Just over 15000 marks in 3D Mark Vantage, although the drivers need work. Call of Duty World at War (as an older FPS) still slows down into the mid 20's @ 1080p with everything maxed despite a 965 and 8GB of DDR3. Crysis is smoothest at High. If you were looking at a 460 get this instead, better than that and a 5850 and pushing into 5870/GTX 470 performance. Still hits 60 degrees like 4890 too with similar noise levels.

Avatar image for hartsickdiscipl
hartsickdiscipl

14787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#2 hartsickdiscipl
Member since 2003 • 14787 Posts

I'm glad to hear that you're happy with it. I'm very happy with my GTX 460 1GB. With a quick overclock and no extra voltage, it runs like a 6870. And you can get one for only $199 now :P. Temps in gaming are mid-60's.

Avatar image for kilerchese
kilerchese

831

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 kilerchese
Member since 2008 • 831 Posts

Some thing is wrong with your PC if your dropping into the mid 20s at max settings on 1920x1080, I refuse to say those numbers with a letter after it since PCs had high def resolutions before TVs and didn't use that i and p crap because there was no i or p.

I got 15519 GPU on 3dmark with my 460 1GB with a total score of 18494.

Avatar image for Adam_the_Nerd
Adam_the_Nerd

4403

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#4 Adam_the_Nerd
Member since 2006 • 4403 Posts
Your PC might be getting bottlenecked in WaW by it's programming. Happens to me in Bad Company and I'm running a GTX 460. Good to hear you're happy with that though; will consider reocmmending it to friends.
Avatar image for yellosnolvr
yellosnolvr

19302

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#5 yellosnolvr
Member since 2005 • 19302 Posts
Your PC might be getting bottlenecked in WaW by it's programming. Happens to me in Bad Company and I'm running a GTX 460. Good to hear you're happy with that though; will consider reocmmending it to friends. Adam_the_Nerd
yes. bc2 is known to have horrendous fps spikes. still playable though.
Avatar image for Silicel1
Silicel1

2342

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#6 Silicel1
Member since 2005 • 2342 Posts

Thats good to hear that its performing well, I am planing on getting a GTX 470 at about christmas and since the 6870 poped out it just nailed a sweet spot between 5850 and 5870 where the GTX 470 pops right in as well, but seen some benches and the CF is better tesselation and AA just kill it, where as the GTX 470 dips beacause of those but leads up to 5-10 Fps in games, but without tesselation and AA they are on par. So obvious that 6870 has a couple of new features but I can say the majority of gamers wont use them yet. GTX 470 still sounds good, will just have to see what the 69xx will bring us. And Merry Pricedrops for everybody.(although nothing extreme I presume)

Avatar image for BluRayHiDef
BluRayHiDef

10839

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#7 BluRayHiDef
Member since 2009 • 10839 Posts

Some thing is wrong with your PC if your dropping into the mid 20s at max settings on 1920x1080, I refuse to say those numbers with a letter after it since PCs had high def resolutions before TVs and didn't use that i and p crap because there was no i or p.

I got 15519 GPU on 3dmark with my 460 1GB with a total score of 18494.

kilerchese

I'm gonna run 3Dmark to see what I get.

EDIT:

Bam!

Avatar image for abuabed
abuabed

6606

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 abuabed
Member since 2005 • 6606 Posts

My Score for reference:

Avatar image for freesafety13
freesafety13

823

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 freesafety13
Member since 2008 • 823 Posts
[QUOTE="abuabed"]

My Score for reference:

Whats your cpu overclock and is that a SLI or single setup?
Avatar image for abuabed
abuabed

6606

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 abuabed
Member since 2005 • 6606 Posts
^ It's written over there: CPU Score: 58648 @ 3.5GHz, I can reach about 5.2GHz but it isn't needed for a gamer like me. As for my GPU it's in a single setup. The CPU score is probably high because of PhysX effect in Nvidia GPUs, I just didn't bother to turn it off
Avatar image for BluRayHiDef
BluRayHiDef

10839

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#12 BluRayHiDef
Member since 2009 • 10839 Posts

One thing I don't get is why your CPU score is so much higher than mine. I've got my i7-920 overclocked to 3.8GHz, yet my CPU score is only around 23,247. The same thing goes forkilerchese; he's got the same CPU as me, but his score is way higher (43,538 ). Does it have something to do with having Hyper Threading on?

Avatar image for jtcraft
jtcraft

2770

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 jtcraft
Member since 2005 • 2770 Posts

One thing I don't get is why your CPU score is so much higher than mine. I've got my i7-920 overclocked to 3.8GHz, yet my CPU score is only around 23,247. The same thing goes forkilerchese; he's got the same CPU as me, but his score is way higher (43,538 ). Does it have something to do with having Hyper Threading on?

BluRayHiDef
He has PhysX enabled in the Nvidia Control Panel. When vantage gets to the cpu test it is actually the gpu doing all the work running the PhysX (which runs better on gpu's than the cpu's) and giving such a large boost in the CPU score.
Avatar image for BluRayHiDef
BluRayHiDef

10839

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#14 BluRayHiDef
Member since 2009 • 10839 Posts

[QUOTE="BluRayHiDef"]

One thing I don't get is why your CPU score is so much higher than mine. I've got my i7-920 overclocked to 3.8GHz, yet my CPU score is only around 23,247. The same thing goes forkilerchese; he's got the same CPU as me, but his score is way higher (43,538 ). Does it have something to do with having Hyper Threading on?

jtcraft

He has PhysX enabled in the Nvidia Control Panel. When vantage gets to the cpu test it is actually the gpu doing all the work running the PhysX (which runs better on gpu's than the cpu's) and giving such a large boost in the CPU score.

That's absurd.

Avatar image for swehunt
swehunt

3637

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#15 swehunt
Member since 2008 • 3637 Posts

[QUOTE="jtcraft"][QUOTE="BluRayHiDef"]

One thing I don't get is why your CPU score is so much higher than mine. I've got my i7-920 overclocked to 3.8GHz, yet my CPU score is only around 23,247. The same thing goes forkilerchese; he's got the same CPU as me, but his score is way higher (43,538 ). Does it have something to do with having Hyper Threading on?

BluRayHiDef

He has PhysX enabled in the Nvidia Control Panel. When vantage gets to the cpu test it is actually the gpu doing all the work running the PhysX (which runs better on gpu's than the cpu's) and giving such a large boost in the CPU score.

That's absurd.

Yes, that is why no benchmarks should be depending on if you got a Nvidia or not. If you look at reviews noone run Vantage with physX.
Avatar image for hartsickdiscipl
hartsickdiscipl

14787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#16 hartsickdiscipl
Member since 2003 • 14787 Posts

If you have an Nvidia card and you're running Vantage, you really need to turn off the PPU (physics processing unit) in the benchmark settings. That's the only way to get a real score for comparison.

Avatar image for MaoTheChimp
MaoTheChimp

1727

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 MaoTheChimp
Member since 2008 • 1727 Posts

If you have an Nvidia card and you're running Vantage, you really need to turn off the PPU (physics processing unit) in the benchmark settings. That's the only way to get a real score for comparison.

hartsickdiscipl

It makes for good bragging rights though :(

Avatar image for hartsickdiscipl
hartsickdiscipl

14787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#18 hartsickdiscipl
Member since 2003 • 14787 Posts

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

If you have an Nvidia card and you're running Vantage, you really need to turn off the PPU (physics processing unit) in the benchmark settings. That's the only way to get a real score for comparison.

MaoTheChimp

It makes for good bragging rights though :(

lol.. I know. I've run mine with PPU on to see how high it scores, but it's misleading.

Avatar image for abuabed
abuabed

6606

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 abuabed
Member since 2005 • 6606 Posts

I have unintentionally taken over this thread by not turning off PhysX, you guys are all making me feel like I'm a troll :x

nah. j/k :P

Avatar image for desertpython
desertpython

1277

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#20 desertpython
Member since 2006 • 1277 Posts

Mafia II is maxed out, apart from PhysX and AA which I'll turn on. Drivers need to improve for some older games, but the 6870 looks like a decent purchase.