Brink review for the PC is crap

  • 53 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Tera_Bite
Tera_Bite

93

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Tera_Bite
Member since 2011 • 93 Posts

Gamespot review brink for the PC and rated it allongside it's PS3 and Xbox counterparts. That's complete crap.

The PC version of this game is superior. Way to not play each version seperately.

Avatar image for Ikuto_Tsukiyomi
Ikuto_Tsukiyomi

822

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Ikuto_Tsukiyomi
Member since 2010 • 822 Posts

Gamespot review brink for the PC and rated it allongside it's PS3 and Xbox counterparts. That's complete crap.

The PC version of this game is superior. Way to not play each version seperately.

Tera_Bite

Welcome to CasualSpot were most multiplate reviews are copy-pasta.

Avatar image for C_Rule
C_Rule

9816

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 C_Rule
Member since 2008 • 9816 Posts

Yep, it seems the only time the PC even gets an edited review is when the PC version is worse than console, like with GTA IV.


Side note: I just had a quick check of the reviews for GTA IV, the game (on console) got 10/10, what complete crap. Who ever reviewwd that game should feel bad. Except for graphics, GTA IV was in every way, inferior to GTA SA, which scored lower.

EDIT: Wow, my spelling & grammar was horrible with that post.

Avatar image for deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab
deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab

17476

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#4 deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab
Member since 2008 • 17476 Posts

Yep, it seems the only time the PC even gets and edited review is when the PC version is worse than console, like with GTA IV.


Side not: I just had a quick check of the reviews for GTA IV, the game the game (on console) 10/10, what complete crap. Who ever review that game should feel bad. Except for graphics, GTA IV was in every way, inferior to GTA SA, which scored lower.

C_Rule

well last year fallout 3, metro 2033, and lost planet 2 all scored higher on PC than the console counterparts. They do do stuff both ways, just not very much either way.

Avatar image for sexygirl6t9
sexygirl6t9

237

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 sexygirl6t9
Member since 2011 • 237 Posts
IGN has the best reviews on the internet check them out.
Avatar image for mkaliaz
mkaliaz

1979

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 mkaliaz
Member since 2004 • 1979 Posts

Well, they waited several days to post the PC review before the first console review went up. Are you really suggesting that they didn't do this for a reason and didn't give the PC version its own consideration?

Avatar image for Bangerman15
Bangerman15

1978

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Bangerman15
Member since 2010 • 1978 Posts
they didnt give it its own consideration, its alot better than the console ones
Avatar image for C_Rule
C_Rule

9816

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 C_Rule
Member since 2008 • 9816 Posts

[QUOTE="C_Rule"]

Yep, it seems the only time the PC even gets and edited review is when the PC version is worse than console, like with GTA IV.


Side not: I just had a quick check of the reviews for GTA IV, the game the game (on console) 10/10, what complete crap. Who ever review that game should feel bad. Except for graphics, GTA IV was in every way, inferior to GTA SA, which scored lower.

ferret-gamer

well last year fallout 3, metro 2033, and lost planet 2 all scored higher on PC than the console counterparts. They do do stuff both ways, just not very much either way.

But the reviews themselves, are just slightly edited versions of the console ones.

Avatar image for kozzy1234
kozzy1234

35966

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 86

User Lists: 0

#9 kozzy1234
Member since 2005 • 35966 Posts

Having tried both xbox and PC versions I also cant belive PC didnt get a much better score, its like two different games as far as how they run,etc..

Anyways, I am having a blast and thats all that matters, just hope more people will give this game a chance and decide for themsleves.

Avatar image for Gladestone1
Gladestone1

5695

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Gladestone1
Member since 2004 • 5695 Posts

Having tried both xbox and PC versions I also cant belive PC didnt get a much better score, its like two different games as far as how they run,etc..

Anyways, I am having a blast and thats all that matters, just hope more people will give this game a chance and decide for themsleves.

kozzy1234

Agreed even though i was in a horrible group tonight..Like when i play in kozzys team..When you get involved with a group of guys who work as a team..Than the game really shines..Its not your typical run and gun game..Swapped to a healer tonight and im having a tad more fun playing healer..How ever there are other functions..If you can get the right group its a blast to play..Best in years..Better than cod..

Avatar image for vfibsux
vfibsux

4497

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 52

User Lists: 0

#11 vfibsux
Member since 2003 • 4497 Posts

Gamespot review brink for the PC and rated it allongside it's PS3 and Xbox counterparts. That's complete crap.

The PC version of this game is superior. Way to not play each version seperately.

Tera_Bite
What I have yet to hear in this thread is how the PC version is so much better. What makes it different/better? And have you played both version at length?
Avatar image for nocoolnamejim
nocoolnamejim

15136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#12 nocoolnamejim
Member since 2003 • 15136 Posts

[QUOTE="C_Rule"]

Yep, it seems the only time the PC even gets and edited review is when the PC version is worse than console, like with GTA IV.


Side not: I just had a quick check of the reviews for GTA IV, the game the game (on console) 10/10, what complete crap. Who ever review that game should feel bad. Except for graphics, GTA IV was in every way, inferior to GTA SA, which scored lower.

ferret-gamer

well last year fallout 3, metro 2033, and lost planet 2 all scored higher on PC than the console counterparts. They do do stuff both ways, just not very much either way.

And a couple of years back, Dragon Age Origins got the best score and substantially best review on the PC.
Avatar image for yellosnolvr
yellosnolvr

19302

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#13 yellosnolvr
Member since 2005 • 19302 Posts

Yep, it seems the only time the PC even gets and edited review is when the PC version is worse than console, like with GTA IV.


Side note: I just had a quick check of the reviews for GTA IV, the game the game (on console) 10/10, what complete crap. Who ever review that game should feel bad. Except for graphics, GTA IV was in every way, inferior to GTA SA, which scored lower.

C_Rule

so true.

Avatar image for Daishi20
Daishi20

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#14 Daishi20
Member since 2005 • 25 Posts

I think the entire entity known as 'reviewing' need to be put off for a day or two after release to allow devs to send out that patch which just missed implimentation. Like the day 1 patch on the consoles which fixed the majority of the issues described in the console reviews. I say they need to re-review it.

Avatar image for jedikevin2
jedikevin2

5263

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#15 jedikevin2
Member since 2004 • 5263 Posts

I think the entire entity known as 'reviewing' need to be put off for a day or two after release to allow devs to send out that patch which just missed implimentation. Like the day 1 patch on the consoles which fixed the majority of the issues described in the console reviews. I say they need to re-review it.

Daishi20
No.. that would just continue to reward laziness of a developer.. What you describe is what gamespot has "after the facts". Sadly, gamespot barely uses it .
Avatar image for malikmmm
malikmmm

2235

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 malikmmm
Member since 2003 • 2235 Posts
gamespot doesnt give a damn about Pc.just compare the score witcher 1 and witcher 1 enhanced edition, both recieved 8.5
Avatar image for topsemag55
topsemag55

19063

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#17 topsemag55
Member since 2007 • 19063 Posts

well last year fallout 3, metro 2033, and lost planet 2 all scored higher on PC than the console counterparts. They do do stuff both ways, just not very much either way.

ferret-gamer

You forgot the DA:O review, where the PC got a 9.5 rating, head-and-shoulders above any other platform.

The Brink PC review had some different comments in the body. This assures me that Skyrim's obvious flaws will be shown, and that hype doesn't affect reviews.:)

Avatar image for Skeptomania
Skeptomania

8104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#18 Skeptomania
Member since 2004 • 8104 Posts

Boo hoo. Stop blaming reviewers when a mediocre game gets a mediocre score. Blame the devs for not finishing the job.

Avatar image for kozzy1234
kozzy1234

35966

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 86

User Lists: 0

#19 kozzy1234
Member since 2005 • 35966 Posts

Boo hoo. Stop blaming reviewers when a mediocre game gets a mediocre score. Blame the devs for not finishing the job.

Skeptomania

Devs did an amazing job imo.

Avatar image for shahabzelda
shahabzelda

130

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#20 shahabzelda
Member since 2008 • 130 Posts
I still haven't played it but extremely hope you're right!
Avatar image for Elann2008
Elann2008

33028

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#21 Elann2008
Member since 2007 • 33028 Posts
The only multi-platform game that I could remember receiving a "deserving" PC-platform specific score was Dragon Age Origins. Gamespot doesn't acknowledge the PC platform. At least not the way they use to..
Avatar image for kozzy1234
kozzy1234

35966

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 86

User Lists: 0

#22 kozzy1234
Member since 2005 • 35966 Posts

The only multi-platform game that I could remember receiving a "deserving" PC-platform specific score was Dragon Age Origins. Gamespot doesn't acknowledge the PC platform. At least not the way they use to..Elann2008

Dragon Age Origins, TF2, Risen and Fallout New Vegas are the multiplat games that I personally think are leagues better on pc. Brink is one more of those games, just doesnt feel right on consoles and the main thing is there are less bugs and mainly much less lag then xbox version.

I am pretty surprised they didnt give pc version better score, but its only a review in the end :P

Avatar image for MrSelf-Destruct
MrSelf-Destruct

13400

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#23 MrSelf-Destruct
Member since 2010 • 13400 Posts

 Good thing they weren't playing on a PC with a Radeon HD4xxx series card. They may have given it an even worse score for this gnarly grid and being unplayable. :|

Avatar image for Threesixtyci
Threesixtyci

4451

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 Threesixtyci
Member since 2006 • 4451 Posts
IGN has the best reviews on the internet check them out.sexygirl6t9
"Shadow Hearts" and "God Hand" would disagree with you...
Avatar image for kozzy1234
kozzy1234

35966

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 86

User Lists: 0

#25 kozzy1234
Member since 2005 • 35966 Posts

Good thing they weren't playing on a PC with a Radeon series card.

MrSelf-Destruct

***EDIT.... patch out on steam now that fixes this issue with ATI cards***

You can actually fix that quite easy if you did some research.

http://support.amd.com/us/kbarticles/Pages/AMDCatalyst115ahotfix.aspx

"includes performance optimizations and resolves various quality issues for hte upcoming relase of Brink"

9# Brink – Grid Effect and Blue Tinted Screen - See ATI Fix to resolve this issue ^^

Anyways, I have a friend who has a ati card and it runs very well. Try that hotfix might help your issues to. Also some people turn off Motion Blur for increase in performance.

Anyways, Splash Damage has another update coming soon (the first update made it so I hav eno lag online which is nice, hope 2nd is as good), I am hoping it fixes the sound issue that happpens sometimes on maps, thats really my only issue personally is the sound cuts off once in awhile.

its good to check your graphics card website to see if any new updates/hotfix are out when a new game comes out.

Avatar image for PurpleMan5000
PurpleMan5000

10531

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 PurpleMan5000
Member since 2011 • 10531 Posts
gamespot doesnt give a damn about Pc.just compare the score witcher 1 and witcher 1 enhanced edition, both recieved 8.5malikmmm
Did they really give seperate reviews for both versions? They should have scored the same, anyway, as the enhanced edition was available as a free patch to people with the original version. In essence, they are the same game, and if anything, the original is the superior version as it can be played with or without the enhanced features.
Avatar image for ampiva
ampiva

1251

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#27 ampiva
Member since 2010 • 1251 Posts
You shouldn't come to GS for anything PC-related unless it's the forums.
Avatar image for Lach0121
Lach0121

11815

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#28 Lach0121
Member since 2007 • 11815 Posts

K I have a question (setting aside the reviews, as I know how lazy GS can be with the pc reviews)

Does the pc version truly have less bugs, and much better performance and visuals?

Does it really need an Icore5 to max out at 60fps at say 1080p (or would a Phenom II x4 at 3ghz paired with a GTX570 be able do it as well)?

I am still interested and would give it a chance, (once it came down in price) but only if it truly is much better on pc than console.

Avatar image for kozzy1234
kozzy1234

35966

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 86

User Lists: 0

#29 kozzy1234
Member since 2005 • 35966 Posts

K I have a question (setting aside the reviews, as I know how lazy GS can be with the pc reviews)

Does the pc version truly have less bugs, and much better performance and visuals?

Does it really need an Icore5 to max out at 60fps at say 1080p (or would a Phenom II x4 at 3ghz paired with a GTX570 be able do it as well)?

I am still interested and would give it a chance, (once it came down in price) but only if it truly is much better on pc than console.

Lach0121

The xbox version has alot of lag, I donno if its because of the P2P and not using dedicated servers like the PC version or what.

The PC version looks better then the xbox version, not a crazy amount but definatly looks better, especially at longer distances.

I tried 1-2 hours of xbox version and 24 of pc version, the difference is huge.

The specs you listed would be fine, I have a quad core and 460 GTX overclocked SE edition and its runs very well.

If your looking for a good online game that is 100% about teamwork then pick it up (somewhat like Unreal2k4 and TF2). If you are looking for a campaign and singleplayer then I would not reccomend the game, the online though is fantastic. Definatly not for everyone as its got a big learning curve and also doesnt allow for COD/Rambo style solo play, its all about team work here.

There are some bugs on the PC version (audio goes out on this one map for me sometimes and I have seen twice two team mates dissapear, although that is not much in about 24 hour Ive played of the game). Just small issues that I have with the game personally, nothing huge. The server browser sucks to (but that just got fixed)

Avatar image for kozzy1234
kozzy1234

35966

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 86

User Lists: 0

#30 kozzy1234
Member since 2005 • 35966 Posts

Also here is the info for the 2nd update that just got released a few minutes ago! Love to see the support from Splash!

General:
Fixed issues with custom ui_fov settings when playing as a client
Added support for 2560x1440
Slightly improved start up times
Fixed crash when clicking in blank area on Training Videos menu
Fixed memory leaks on shutdown
Fixed Be More Objective leaderboards being incorrectly named

Graphics:
Fixed "texture gridding" issues on certain graphics cards
Fixed settings being incorrectly applied on the advanced video options screen
Improved performance when using Ambient Occlusion
Fixed halos not rendering correctly

AI Bots:
Removed bot intelligence inhibitors for Freeplay games
Adjusted bot behaviour in Campaign games to make teams more evenly matched
Changed bots' objective priorities across all game modes
Fixed issue with bot difficulty continually dropping

User Interface:
Fixed poor server browser performance for users with a large number of items in their history
Made server browser refreshes much more responsive
Changed server browser to no longer group player counts by max players
Added new pop-up text for server browser filters
Fixed not being able to sort by favourites column
Server browser now retrieves favourites correctly from Steam
Fixed arrow keys not working when exiting out of a chat submenu
Made it easier to select a default secondary weapon
Disabled chat options in solo mode

Dedicated Servers:
Can now use net_ip command to assign IPs to server instances
Dedicated server binary can now be run as a service, which won't have a CSIDL_PERSONAL virtual folder

Avatar image for Lach0121
Lach0121

11815

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#31 Lach0121
Member since 2007 • 11815 Posts

[QUOTE="Lach0121"]

K I have a question (setting aside the reviews, as I know how lazy GS can be with the pc reviews)

Does the pc version truly have less bugs, and much better performance and visuals?

Does it really need an Icore5 to max out at 60fps at say 1080p (or would a Phenom II x4 at 3ghz paired with a GTX570 be able do it as well)?

I am still interested and would give it a chance, (once it came down in price) but only if it truly is much better on pc than console.

kozzy1234

The xbox version has alot of lag, I donno if its because of the P2P and not using dedicated servers like the PC version or what.

The PC version looks better then the xbox version, not a crazy amount but definatly looks better, especially at longer distances.

I tried 1-2 hours of xbox version and 24 of pc version, the difference is huge.

The specs you listed would be fine, I have a quad core and 460 GTX overclocked SE edition and its runs very well.

If your looking for a good online game that is 100% about teamwork then pick it up (somewhat like Unreal2k4 and TF2). If you are looking for a campaign and singleplayer then I would not reccomend the game, the online though is fantastic. Definatly not for everyone as its got a big learning curve and also doesnt allow for COD/Rambo style solo play, its all about team work here.

There are some bugs on the PC version (audio goes out on this one map for me sometimes and I have seen twice two team mates dissapear, although that is not much in about 24 hour Ive played of the game). Just small issues that I have with the game personally, nothing huge. The server browser sucks to (but that just got fixed)

If I got it would be for the multiplayer, I could always go bulletstorm for the single player... lol

It does seem like something I should keep a look out for to go on some sale, like Steams massive Summer and Winter Solstice sales... The Summer one is not too far away!!!

Thx for the breakdown bro.

Avatar image for kozzy1234
kozzy1234

35966

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 86

User Lists: 0

#32 kozzy1234
Member since 2005 • 35966 Posts

[QUOTE="kozzy1234"]

[QUOTE="Lach0121"]

K I have a question (setting aside the reviews, as I know how lazy GS can be with the pc reviews)

Does the pc version truly have less bugs, and much better performance and visuals?

Does it really need an Icore5 to max out at 60fps at say 1080p (or would a Phenom II x4 at 3ghz paired with a GTX570 be able do it as well)?

I am still interested and would give it a chance, (once it came down in price) but only if it truly is much better on pc than console.

Lach0121

The xbox version has alot of lag, I donno if its because of the P2P and not using dedicated servers like the PC version or what.

The PC version looks better then the xbox version, not a crazy amount but definatly looks better, especially at longer distances.

I tried 1-2 hours of xbox version and 24 of pc version, the difference is huge.

The specs you listed would be fine, I have a quad core and 460 GTX overclocked SE edition and its runs very well.

If your looking for a good online game that is 100% about teamwork then pick it up (somewhat like Unreal2k4 and TF2). If you are looking for a campaign and singleplayer then I would not reccomend the game, the online though is fantastic. Definatly not for everyone as its got a big learning curve and also doesnt allow for COD/Rambo style solo play, its all about team work here.

There are some bugs on the PC version (audio goes out on this one map for me sometimes and I have seen twice two team mates dissapear, although that is not much in about 24 hour Ive played of the game). Just small issues that I have with the game personally, nothing huge. The server browser sucks to (but that just got fixed)

If I got it would be for the multiplayer, I could always go bulletstorm for the single player... lol

It does seem like something I should keep a look out for to go on some sale, like Steams massive Summer and Winter Solstice sales... The Summer one is not too far away!!!

Thx for the breakdown bro.

No problem dude, let me know if you pick it up and well run some matches.

Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#33 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts
Played the pc version and boy it was bad. A good port yes but the game is bad. I can only imagine how worse its on consoles.
Avatar image for Elann2008
Elann2008

33028

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#34 Elann2008
Member since 2007 • 33028 Posts
Played the pc version and boy it was bad. A good port yes but the game is bad. I can only imagine how worse its on consoles.dakan45
Care to elaborate?
Avatar image for kris9031998
kris9031998

7554

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#35 kris9031998
Member since 2008 • 7554 Posts
IGN has the best reviews on the internet check them out.sexygirl6t9
LOL what are you talking about? IGN is paid for almost all their hyped game reviews (even if the game itself isnt good) , and underscores everything else.
Avatar image for kozzy1234
kozzy1234

35966

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 86

User Lists: 0

#36 kozzy1234
Member since 2005 • 35966 Posts

Played the pc version and boy it was bad. A good port yes but the game is bad. I can only imagine how worse its on consoles.dakan45

Much better then that unbalanced MW2 imo, but a long shot.

Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#37 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts

[QUOTE="dakan45"]Played the pc version and boy it was bad. A good port yes but the game is bad. I can only imagine how worse its on consoles.kozzy1234

Much better then that unbalanced MW2 imo, but a long shot.

Better than cod? HELLLL NOOOOOOO Hell,no, i am going back to play black ops. Brink is terrible. As for the unbalanced mw2? 9/10 gamers agree that mw2 was more fun, unbalanced yes but still more fun than black ops. Anyway brink for me is terrible, i stay the hell away from it and id rather go back and play cod. Brink has no sense of achievement in its gameplay and the level and upgrade system is very poor to bother keep playing it.
Avatar image for kozzy1234
kozzy1234

35966

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 86

User Lists: 0

#38 kozzy1234
Member since 2005 • 35966 Posts

[QUOTE="kozzy1234"]

[QUOTE="dakan45"]Played the pc version and boy it was bad. A good port yes but the game is bad. I can only imagine how worse its on consoles.dakan45

Much better then that unbalanced MW2 imo, but a long shot.

Better than cod? HELLLL NOOOOOOO Hell,no, i am going back to play black ops. Brink is terrible. As for the unbalanced mw2? 9/10 gamers agree that mw2 was more fun, unbalanced yes but still more fun than black ops. Anyway brink for me is terrible, i stay the hell away from it and id rather go back and play cod. Brink has no sense of achievement in its gameplay and the level and upgrade system is very poor to bother keep playing it.

Fair enough, but to me it destroys the COD series, Halo series and anything else not named Bad Company2 or TF2 of the last 5 years.

Better gameplay, better level design, it actually requires teamwork, higher fun factor and better controls imo then any of the last COD games.

I dont expect big COD fans to like this game, its not RAMBO/SOLO style action, its all team oriented like Enemy Territories.

In fact the only complaint ive heard online was from a COD player who said "Where is my deathmatch? Game sucks if it doesnt have deathamtch like COD. And why am I getting more points for objectives then getting kills".

Its a team work/objective game, not meant for people who want to run around like superman and try to get 1000 kills.

Avatar image for Botodile
Botodile

432

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#39 Botodile
Member since 2010 • 432 Posts

I really want to check this out now. I heard it was pretty buggy, but it seems like the PC version is much better from what you guys are saying. The gameplay looked very interesting from what I saw.

Avatar image for Roland123_basic
Roland123_basic

3841

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#40 Roland123_basic
Member since 2002 • 3841 Posts

I really want to check this out now. I heard it was pretty buggy, but it seems like the PC version is much better from what you guys are saying. The gameplay looked very interesting from what I saw.

Botodile
the PC version is the prefered method to play this game if you are going to. it is night and day a different game from the console version
Avatar image for agpickle
agpickle

3293

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 agpickle
Member since 2006 • 3293 Posts

I really want to check this out now. I heard it was pretty buggy, but it seems like the PC version is much better from what you guys are saying. The gameplay looked very interesting from what I saw.

Botodile

They're already fixing a ton of bugs too. Theres already been two patches. Another week or two and it will be in great shape.

Avatar image for Elann2008
Elann2008

33028

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#42 Elann2008
Member since 2007 • 33028 Posts

[QUOTE="Botodile"]

I really want to check this out now. I heard it was pretty buggy, but it seems like the PC version is much better from what you guys are saying. The gameplay looked very interesting from what I saw.

agpickle

They're already fixing a ton of bugs too. Theres already been two patches. Another week or two and it will be in great shape.

I have a few questions: How is the community right now? Well populated? Friendly players? Thank you in advance.

Avatar image for Roland123_basic
Roland123_basic

3841

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#43 Roland123_basic
Member since 2002 • 3841 Posts

[QUOTE="agpickle"]

[QUOTE="Botodile"]

I really want to check this out now. I heard it was pretty buggy, but it seems like the PC version is much better from what you guys are saying. The gameplay looked very interesting from what I saw.

Elann2008

They're already fixing a ton of bugs too. Theres already been two patches. Another week or two and it will be in great shape.

I have a few questions: How is the community right now? Well populated? Friendly players? Thank you in advance.

there are about 800 servers... 1/3rd of those seem to be full in the afternoons. another 1/3rd arent full (usually 6-7/8 or 14/16 depending on the server), and the final 1/3rd have no players. i would say it is a fairly active game right now.
Avatar image for kozzy1234
kozzy1234

35966

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 86

User Lists: 0

#44 kozzy1234
Member since 2005 • 35966 Posts

Great patch today that fixed the two issues I had with the game, great to see Splash Damage suppor the game this quickly. Hopefully we get more support in the future for this amazing game.

General:
Fixed issues with custom ui_fov settings when playing as a client
Added support for 2560x1440
Slightly improved start up times
Fixed crash when clicking in blank area on Training Videos menu
Fixed memory leaks on shutdown
Fixed Be More Objective leaderboards being incorrectly named

Graphics:
Fixed "texture gridding" issues on certain graphics cards
Fixed settings being incorrectly applied on the advanced video options screen
Improved performance when using Ambient Occlusion
Fixed halos not rendering correctly

AI Bots:
Removed bot intelligence inhibitors for Freeplay games
Adjusted bot behaviour in Campaign games to make teams more evenly matched
Changed bots' objective priorities across all game modes
Fixed issue with bot difficulty continually dropping

User Interface:
Fixed poor server browser performance for users with a large number of items in their history
Made server browser refreshes much more responsive
Changed server browser to no longer group player counts by max players
Added new pop-up text for server browser filters
Fixed not being able to sort by favourites column
Server browser now retrieves favourites correctly from Steam
Fixed arrow keys not working when exiting out of a chat submenu
Made it easier to select a default secondary weapon
Disabled chat options in solo mode

Dedicated Servers:
Can now use net_ip command to assign IPs to server instances
Dedicated server binary can now be run as a service, which won't have a CSIDL_PERSONAL virtual folder

Avatar image for kozzy1234
kozzy1234

35966

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 86

User Lists: 0

#45 kozzy1234
Member since 2005 • 35966 Posts

[QUOTE="Elann2008"]

[QUOTE="agpickle"]

They're already fixing a ton of bugs too. Theres already been two patches. Another week or two and it will be in great shape.

Roland123_basic

I have a few questions: How is the community right now? Well populated? Friendly players? Thank you in advance.

there are about 800 servers... 1/3rd of those seem to be full in the afternoons. another 1/3rd arent full (usually 6-7/8 or 14/16 depending on the server), and the final 1/3rd have no players. i would say it is a fairly active game right now.

ALOT more servers are coming up as the game gets released in other places besides NA.

Very easy to find a game, weither you want room for 1 or 2 people or an empty dedicated server to do a clan match on.

Hope we get more updates and I heard modding tools are coming soon, this great game can only get better and better.

Avatar image for Trinexxx
Trinexxx

883

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 Trinexxx
Member since 2008 • 883 Posts
Splash Damage has always provided great modding and map makers. Random question: I have all settings on high and all options on, but my frame rate runs pretty low. What should be the first thing I change?
Avatar image for Inconsistancy
Inconsistancy

8094

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 Inconsistancy
Member since 2004 • 8094 Posts
Splash Damage has always provided great modding and map makers. Random question: I have all settings on high and all options on, but my frame rate runs pretty low. What should be the first thing I change?Trinexxx
Ambient Occlusion then shadows methinks. What kinda video card?
Avatar image for kozzy1234
kozzy1234

35966

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 86

User Lists: 0

#48 kozzy1234
Member since 2005 • 35966 Posts

Splash Damage has always provided great modding and map makers. Random question: I have all settings on high and all options on, but my frame rate runs pretty low. What should be the first thing I change?Trinexxx

Ambient Occlusion I turn off and it runs good. One of my friends plays with Depth of View or something off also.

The singleplayer has a fps limit I think, online doesnt though.

Alot of people on the forums online say they get close to double the FPS with Ambient Occlusion off.

Avatar image for Trinexxx
Trinexxx

883

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 Trinexxx
Member since 2008 • 883 Posts
[QUOTE="Trinexxx"]Splash Damage has always provided great modding and map makers. Random question: I have all settings on high and all options on, but my frame rate runs pretty low. What should be the first thing I change?Inconsistancy
Ambient Occlusion then shadows methinks. What kinda video card?

Radeon HD 5870, just auto synced on CCC and downloaded the newest hotfix.
Avatar image for Roland123_basic
Roland123_basic

3841

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#50 Roland123_basic
Member since 2002 • 3841 Posts
Splash Damage has always provided great modding and map makers. Random question: I have all settings on high and all options on, but my frame rate runs pretty low. What should be the first thing I change?Trinexxx
take off ambient occlusion.... it runs horribly.