http://www.shacknews.com/onearticle.x/54745
Your thoughts?
This topic is locked from further discussion.
This is very old news.
After COD4, I knew they'd milk the franchise's udders until they were swollen.
I'd be surprised if it's actually called Call of Duty 6, though. They slipped a subtitle in with CoD 4 as the transitional title and Call of Duty 5 doesn't even have a numeral. Makes sense when you think about it. There are certain connotations associated with large numerals.
Personally, I think they should call it Call of Duty 2009.
the COD series are amazing but its true that they do have to do something different.
Im not sure but COD4 seems around modern day time while COD5 seems like Vietnam? I could be completely wrong though.
I just hope that they dont go back to WW2 in COD6 or if they do they need to put a BIG twist in it, maybe do the axis campaign and do the "What If" scenario for Hitlers success, but that would be really dark .
-5TeN
cant wait for 6 it but cod 5 sucks, i actually heard that, anyway i want it like 4 plz!thenewau25
COD5 isn't out.
yeah i heard someone saying its ww2 ir sucks so cod5 thats all anyway i want cod4 guns in cod2 lol enemies too!thenewau25
What makes you think Call of Duty 6 will be any different? Call of Duty 4 certainly didn't do anything new, besides the setting, but that hardly changes how the game plays.
I'd be surprised if it's actually called Call of Duty 6, though. They slipped a subtitle in with CoD 4 as the transitional title and Call of Duty 5 doesn't even have a numeral. Makes sense when you think about it. There are certain connotations associated with large numerals.
Personally, I think they should call it Call of Duty 2009.
fatshodan
It probebly won't end up like that though. If they named it something like COD: Futuristic Awesome Warfare, it might take away some of the thunder from COD5. People might think they might as well stick with MW and skip over 5.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment