Can I stripe my hdd's? I think I've got hardware for it, but I'm not sure...

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for liszt_rhapsody
liszt_rhapsody

71

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 liszt_rhapsody
Member since 2006 • 71 Posts

When I boot my pc, something about an Intel raid controller apperas on the screen for a short time before Vista boots.

So I've looked it up and Vista lists an 'Intel(R) ICH8R/ICH9R SATA RAID Controller' as a storage controller. There's software installed to control it and to stripe my hdd's, but I'm wondering if it'll give me the performance increase that real striping gives.

In my boot menu (I think it's the bios menu) there's nothing about raid or striping, not even in any subcategory.

My pc is an Acer M5500-1E77. I don't know what mobo's in it and I don't have a manual of it and I don't find anything of it on the internet.

So I just don't know if there's hardware to increase performance, or weither it's just software that makes two hdd's in one volume and that it so doesn't give me any performance increase what so ever.

Does somebody know how to find this out without having to buy another hdd to test it?

Avatar image for liszt_rhapsody
liszt_rhapsody

71

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 liszt_rhapsody
Member since 2006 • 71 Posts

I've found a hint that supports my suspicion that I have that hardware, but I'm not sure.

So does anyone know how I can have a definitive answer on how I can know for sure that I have a raid0-supporting chip or not?

Avatar image for 205047247090237824329930235794
205047247090237824329930235794

741

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 205047247090237824329930235794
Member since 2005 • 741 Posts
It may be difficult to find that information for a prebuilt PC. I built my own computer and it has onboard RAID capability on the motherboard, which I use. Several years ago when I had money to spare I went all out on my current PC, and I've got two 75GB Raptors in RAID0. IMO it's not worth it. Yes, it is technically faster, but I don't really notice the difference. I KNOW it is faster; I ran the tests when I first set it up. But it doesn't FEEL faster. Since the hard drive is always the bottleneck in any computer, I don't see the point in spending extra money to buy two matching drives (recommended for most arrays especially 0). I haven't had a drive fail yet, but statistically going this route means your chance of failure can go up by as much as 50%. When a drive in a RAID0 fails, there's no rebuilding the array. You either wipe the working drive and run a single drive setup or you buy another matching drive. Either way, you're faced with reinstalling from scratch (or ghosting your backup image if you made one - though I haven't actually tried that on a RAID yet). Of course you could prevent that buy getting 4 drives and running a 0+1, but that just seems like a waste. When one of these drives finally gives out, I won't be setting up another RAID. I wonder if that will happen by the time I'm ready to build a completely new PC again.
Avatar image for liszt_rhapsody
liszt_rhapsody

71

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 liszt_rhapsody
Member since 2006 • 71 Posts

About the matching hdd's, is it okay to add a new hdd of the same size, but slightly (barely) faster than the old one for raid0?

And about the hardware, I installed a new driver for it, and the name just changed, wich I think is kind off odd.

But a requirement to install it was that hardware is present on the mobo, so does anyone know if I could install the software (http://downloadcenter.intel.com/Product_Filter.aspx?ProductID=2101) without tht hardware? Or would anyone, who is sure that the hardware isn't present on his mobo, try to test it to see if you can install it?

Avatar image for eurosport_pl
eurosport_pl

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 eurosport_pl
Member since 2005 • 25 Posts
so would Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 3.5IN 500GB SATA2 8.5MS 7200RPM 32MB Cache be a bottle neck?
Avatar image for nimatoad2000
nimatoad2000

7505

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#6 nimatoad2000
Member since 2004 • 7505 Posts
no matter what hard drive you have, hard drives themselves are a bottleneck because the data transfer is soo slow compared to ram.. thats why solid state drives are out there and slowly becoming cheaper and cheaper.. a solid state drive is a bit faster than two velociraptors in raid 0.. within 5 years Solid state drives will become mainsream, or at least mainstream for power users / gamers. right now their completely enthusiast as 32 gig drives run about 350$.