Can Mods save Duke Nukem Forever?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Miroku32
Miroku32

8666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 0

#1 Miroku32
Member since 2006 • 8666 Posts

As many who have already played the game (and those who dont but read in forums and blogs), Gearbox stripped many things that made Duke Nukem so great like the arsenal of weapons at your disposal, they removed health packs and introduced regenerative health, no keycards, linear gameplay and for many the graphics are awful.

Now, we know that mods can do wonders to a game and even make better the graphics (Stalker and Crysis for example). Do you think, when modders can finally find tools gave to them by Gearbox or made by themselves, can fix what Gearbox ruined for many of us old gamers who wanted a DNF to be like old Duke Nukem games?

Avatar image for Starshine_M2A2
Starshine_M2A2

5593

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 19

#2 Starshine_M2A2
Member since 2006 • 5593 Posts

Well, that kind of depends on your opinion of the game. I don't think Duke needs saving at all and the game is great fun for a nostalgic generation - as i've said many times to people now; this game is not aimed at the newer generation of gamers brought up on modern open ended games. So, no, mods won't save Duke because there isn't any reason to save him. He's good.

Avatar image for -GeordiLaForge-
-GeordiLaForge-

7167

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 -GeordiLaForge-
Member since 2006 • 7167 Posts
Mods or not, I'm buying the game on day one. I didn't like having to reduce the "aim accuracy" to make the horizontal and vertical mouse speeds the same, and I don't know why they labled it as such, but whatever.. Stilll a worthy successor to the original IMO...
Avatar image for Miroku32
Miroku32

8666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 0

#4 Miroku32
Member since 2006 • 8666 Posts
Well, I wont deny that I liked it but I miss the fact I could wield many weapons in the past. It was fun using the shrinking ray and then use the duke foot for squash the monsters while I could still have my shotgun and other weapons.

as i've said many times to people now; this game is not aimed at the newer generation of gamers brought up on modern open ended games.

Starshine_M2A2
Then why regenerative health and only two weapons? As a gamer who played Doom, many of his clones and other FPS of the 90s I prefer the healthpacks instead of health regen.
Avatar image for Starshine_M2A2
Starshine_M2A2

5593

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 19

#5 Starshine_M2A2
Member since 2006 • 5593 Posts
[QUOTE="Miroku32"]Well, I wont deny that I liked it but I miss the fact I could wield many weapons in the past. It was fun using the shrinking ray and then use the duke foot for squash the monsters while I could still have my shotgun and other weapons. [QUOTE="Starshine_M2A2"]

as i've said many times to people now; this game is not aimed at the newer generation of gamers brought up on modern open ended games.

Then why regenerative health and only two weapons? As a gamer who played Doom, many of his clones and other FPS of the 90s I prefer the healthpacks instead of health regen.

Because although the game is a throwback to the old days, Gearbox still needs to make a profit from their games so they include some modern mechanics in order to appeal to a wider audiences but the core elements of the 90s like the simplistic running and gunning, the lack of a fleshed out character or story and the action oriented game play are all intact. Its designed to be fun, thats all.
Avatar image for Baranga
Baranga

14217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#6 Baranga
Member since 2005 • 14217 Posts

3D Realms themselves made those changes.

George Broussard: Yeah, blame us for it if you want. It may change in the future and I don't know what will happen with it, but it was us. I stand by it too, as you cannot discount designing games for a modern world and part of that world is consoles where the bulk of the sales can be. And on those consoles you have a controller. We tried for a long time to support lots of guns but we simply could not find a nice way to map it to a controller, despite trying 4-5 designs. We gave it enough time and decided to stop swimming against the current and adopt what was basically the "standard". It's not 1996 anymore.

Avatar image for -GeordiLaForge-
-GeordiLaForge-

7167

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 -GeordiLaForge-
Member since 2006 • 7167 Posts
Well, I wont deny that I liked it but I miss the fact I could wield many weapons in the past. It was fun using the shrinking ray and then use the duke foot for squash the monsters while I could still have my shotgun and other weapons. [QUOTE="Starshine_M2A2"]

as i've said many times to people now; this game is not aimed at the newer generation of gamers brought up on modern open ended games.

Miroku32
Then why regenerative health and only two weapons? As a gamer who played Doom, many of his clones and other FPS of the 90s I prefer the healthpacks instead of health regen.

The vehicles would be too hard to kill without regenerative health.. But what do mean by "only two weapons?"
Avatar image for Miroku32
Miroku32

8666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 0

#8 Miroku32
Member since 2006 • 8666 Posts
Yeah, time changes. I doubt I will see those old mechanics in any of today FPS games nor the future ones. And I always thought it was Gearbox who did those changes, not 3DRealms.
Avatar image for Starshine_M2A2
Starshine_M2A2

5593

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 19

#9 Starshine_M2A2
Member since 2006 • 5593 Posts
[QUOTE="-GeordiLaForge-"][QUOTE="Miroku32"]Well, I wont deny that I liked it but I miss the fact I could wield many weapons in the past. It was fun using the shrinking ray and then use the duke foot for squash the monsters while I could still have my shotgun and other weapons. [QUOTE="Starshine_M2A2"]

as i've said many times to people now; this game is not aimed at the newer generation of gamers brought up on modern open ended games.

Then why regenerative health and only two weapons? As a gamer who played Doom, many of his clones and other FPS of the 90s I prefer the healthpacks instead of health regen.

The vehicles would be too hard to kill without regenerative health.. But what do mean by "only two weapons?"

The vehicles don't actually take damage, its only Duke himself that gets hit by bullets. You can only carry two weapons at a time in the game instead of all of them as in 3D. Its designed to make the action a bit more strategic since you have to think about which weapon you will need for the current situation.
Avatar image for -GeordiLaForge-
-GeordiLaForge-

7167

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 -GeordiLaForge-
Member since 2006 • 7167 Posts
[QUOTE="-GeordiLaForge-"][QUOTE="Miroku32"] Then why regenerative health and only two weapons? As a gamer who played Doom, many of his clones and other FPS of the 90s I prefer the healthpacks instead of health regen. Starshine_M2A2
The vehicles would be too hard to kill without regenerative health.. But what do mean by "only two weapons?"

The vehicles don't actually take damage, its only Duke himself that gets hit by bullets. You can only carry two weapons at a time in the game instead of all of them as in 3D. Its designed to make the action a bit more strategic since you have to think about which weapon you will need for the current situation.

I meant that enemy vehicles, like the spaceship, would be too hard to kill without regenerative health.. But yeah, I think that Duke should be able to carry more than two weapons too, though it's definitely not a deal killer for me...
Avatar image for Miroku32
Miroku32

8666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 0

#11 Miroku32
Member since 2006 • 8666 Posts
Ya, you have a point there. DNF isnt a bad game, it is good but not perfect. Although, I would have wanted more the old feel of the other Duke Nukem games.
Avatar image for Qixote
Qixote

10843

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#12 Qixote
Member since 2002 • 10843 Posts

The bigger question is, will modders want to save Duke?

Avatar image for macronia
macronia

585

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#13 macronia
Member since 2008 • 585 Posts
No. Duke is already dead , it has its moments but still it failed :(
Avatar image for NoAssKicker47
NoAssKicker47

2855

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 28

User Lists: 0

#14 NoAssKicker47
Member since 2004 • 2855 Posts

I really don't think Gearbox is to blame here. Remember that they picked up the project so they can finish what 3D Realms already started. They didn't reinvent the game.

Avatar image for GarGx1
GarGx1

10934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#15 GarGx1
Member since 2011 • 10934 Posts

I'm am old gamer and the game felt like a 'Duke' game, it was fun to play although not that much of a challenge. The only gripe i have is only being able to carry 2 weapons instead of being a bristling armory, so a mod to fix that issue would do me fine. Oh and mirror reflections are rubbish, very pixilated.

Avatar image for abuabed
abuabed

6606

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 abuabed
Member since 2005 • 6606 Posts
Dead on the ass, no buy from me now or later.
Avatar image for Bros89
Bros89

624

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 Bros89
Member since 2004 • 624 Posts

My brother (1986) really enjoys it, his only complains are the weird and dated graphics (modern character models and lightning, (some) old enviroments.

But he keeps telling how the game is totally duke (he loves to screw up pigs, blasting them with shells)

Myself (1989) haven't played the game yet but I think i will defenitly love it, I was one of the last Duke gamers.

Avatar image for Gladestone1
Gladestone1

5695

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 Gladestone1
Member since 2004 • 5695 Posts

Its why im buying this and rage this year..Ill love my duke fix for old time sake..When rage is out..Ill fullfil my weapons game..Its a decent year for fps games..Duke though will always be in our hearts..Im sure this game is find shame some of yall, are playing it and most of us have to wait until tue...Would love for games to hit stores on thur instead of tue..Would make more sence have the weekend to enjoy them..Ah well..In time ill be enjoying the duke for what he is..

Avatar image for Remmib
Remmib

2250

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 Remmib
Member since 2010 • 2250 Posts

Mods or not, I'm buying the game on day one. I didn't like having to reduce the "aim accuracy" to make the horizontal and vertical mouse speeds the same, and I don't know why they labled it as such, but whatever.. Stilll a worthy successor to the original IMO...-GeordiLaForge-

Day one?

Dude you are making a huge mistake. Why not just wait another day for more reviews / player reviews to come out?

You are going to regret this big time. Need I remind you that the Steam summer sale is around the corner in which your money will go further and you will get better games for that same money...

Please rethink this dude, the only similarity between this game and the oldschool Duke Nukem 3D is the name.

Avatar image for Starshine_M2A2
Starshine_M2A2

5593

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 19

#20 Starshine_M2A2
Member since 2006 • 5593 Posts

[QUOTE="-GeordiLaForge-"]Mods or not, I'm buying the game on day one. I didn't like having to reduce the "aim accuracy" to make the horizontal and vertical mouse speeds the same, and I don't know why they labled it as such, but whatever.. Stilll a worthy successor to the original IMO...Remmib

Day one?

Dude you are making a huge mistake. Why not just wait another day for more reviews / player reviews to come out?

You are going to regret this big time. Need I remind you that the Steam summer sale is around the corner in which your money will go further and you will get better games for that same money...

Please rethink this dude, the only similarity between this game and the oldschool Duke Nukem 3D is the name.

That's a strange level of concern right there. Do you work for a competitor?
Avatar image for Remmib
Remmib

2250

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 Remmib
Member since 2010 • 2250 Posts

[QUOTE="Remmib"]

[QUOTE="-GeordiLaForge-"]Mods or not, I'm buying the game on day one. I didn't like having to reduce the "aim accuracy" to make the horizontal and vertical mouse speeds the same, and I don't know why they labled it as such, but whatever.. Stilll a worthy successor to the original IMO...Starshine_M2A2

Day one?

Dude you are making a huge mistake. Why not just wait another day for more reviews / player reviews to come out?

You are going to regret this big time. Need I remind you that the Steam summer sale is around the corner in which your money will go further and you will get better games for that same money...

Please rethink this dude, the only similarity between this game and the oldschool Duke Nukem 3D is the name.

That's a strange level of concern right there. Do you work for a competitor?

Yeah, it's called informed consumers. 8)

Just trying to help this dude not waste his money. I hate seeing people get shafted.

Avatar image for Lach0121
Lach0121

11815

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#22 Lach0121
Member since 2007 • 11815 Posts

[QUOTE="Starshine_M2A2"][QUOTE="Remmib"]

Day one?

Dude you are making a huge mistake. Why not just wait another day for more reviews / player reviews to come out?

You are going to regret this big time. Need I remind you that the Steam summer sale is around the corner in which your money will go further and you will get better games for that same money...

Please rethink this dude, the only similarity between this game and the oldschool Duke Nukem 3D is the name.

Remmib

That's a strange level of concern right there. Do you work for a competitor?

Yeah, it's called informed consumers. 8)

Just trying to help this dude not waste his money. I hate seeing people get shafted.

Wait and see if you get it for sale during the Steam Sale... I am going to do that...

Secondly it might not be wasting his money... He may love the game... There may be a game in your collection that he can't stand, and would feel that you wasted your money!

Avatar image for Remmib
Remmib

2250

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 Remmib
Member since 2010 • 2250 Posts

[QUOTE="Remmib"]

[QUOTE="Starshine_M2A2"] That's a strange level of concern right there. Do you work for a competitor?Lach0121

Yeah, it's called informed consumers. 8)

Just trying to help this dude not waste his money. I hate seeing people get shafted.

Wait and see if you get it for sale during the Steam Sale... I am going to do that...

Secondly it might not be wasting his money... He may love the game... There may be a game in your collection that he can't stand, and would feel that you wasted your money!

Well that would be a subjective opinion, DNF is objectively terrible. The game can be had from Greenmangaming for $36 at the moment. I doubt you'll see it cheaper than that during the Steam sale. Gearbox is just trying to do a cash grab as fast as they can before more terrible reviews come out.

Hell they've already cut enough content from the game for 3 DLC releases.

Avatar image for MythPro1
MythPro1

2746

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#24 MythPro1
Member since 2003 • 2746 Posts

As many who have already played the game (and those who dont but read in forums and blogs), Gearbox stripped many things that made Duke Nukem so great like the arsenal of weapons at your disposal, they removed health packs and introduced regenerative health, no keycards, linear gameplay and for many the graphics are awful.

Now, we know that mods can do wonders to a game and even make better the graphics (Stalker and Crysis for example). Do you think, when modders can finally find tools gave to them by Gearbox or made by themselves, can fix what Gearbox ruined for many of us old gamers who wanted a DNF to be like old Duke Nukem games?

Miroku32

Shows what the OP knows. Gearbox didn't ruin anything, most of the work and the assets were already done. Blame George Broussard for turning DNF into Duke Halo Forever.

How Broussard killed Duke.

Avatar image for Lach0121
Lach0121

11815

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#25 Lach0121
Member since 2007 • 11815 Posts

[QUOTE="Lach0121"]

[QUOTE="Remmib"]

Yeah, it's called informed consumers. 8)

Just trying to help this dude not waste his money. I hate seeing people get shafted.

Remmib

Wait and see if you get it for sale during the Steam Sale... I am going to do that...

Secondly it might not be wasting his money... He may love the game... There may be a game in your collection that he can't stand, and would feel that you wasted your money!

Well that would be a subjective opinion, DNF is objectively terrible. The game can be had from Greenmangaming for $36 at the moment. I doubt you'll see it cheaper than that during the Steam sale. Gearbox is just trying to do a cash grab as fast as they can before more terrible reviews come out.

Hell they've already cut enough content from the game for 3 DLC releases.

Objectively.. Funny... I see this will just turn into my opinion is right routine.

Secondly thats only 27% (if the game is as bad as you say, then I CAN expect it to be on Steam Sale for around 33%off easily)

Anyway good gaming.

Avatar image for Remmib
Remmib

2250

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 Remmib
Member since 2010 • 2250 Posts

Objectively.. Funny... I see this will just turn into my opinion is right routine.

Secondly thats only 27% (if the game is as bad as you say, then I CAN expect it to be on Steam Sale for around 33%off easily)

Anyway good gaming.

Lach0121

Yes objectively, the fact that my opinion is right as well is just icing on the cake.

DNF is absolutely terrible:
- A to B linear gameplay.
- Slow running
- Only 2 weapons
- Regen health
- Awful level design
- No secrets to find
- No reason to explore the level
- Terrible floaty mouse feel
- Extremely scripted events
- Unskippable cutscenes
- No color
- No music
- No mighty boot kick
- Clunky vehicle sections
- Too many turret sections
- Checkpoint save system
- Bad graphics (graphics are the least of the worries, but figured I'd add it to the list)

This is absolutely OPPOSITE of gaming in the 90's.

Avatar image for Lach0121
Lach0121

11815

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#27 Lach0121
Member since 2007 • 11815 Posts

[QUOTE="Lach0121"]

Objectively.. Funny... I see this will just turn into my opinion is right routine.

Secondly thats only 27% (if the game is as bad as you say, then I CAN expect it to be on Steam Sale for around 33%off easily)

Anyway good gaming.

Remmib

Yes objectively, the fact that my opinion is right as well is just icing on the cake.

DNF is absolutely terrible:
- A to B linear gameplay.
- Slow running
- Only 2 weapons
- Regen health
- Awful level design
- No secrets to find
- No reason to explore the level
- Terrible floaty mouse feel
- Extremely scripted events
- Unskippable cutscenes
- No color
- No music
- No mighty boot kick
- Clunky vehicle sections
- Too many turret sections
- Checkpoint save system
- Bad graphics (graphics are the least of the worries, but figured I'd add it to the list)

This is absolutely OPPOSITE of gaming in the 90's.

IF it is truly that bad, then yea it is bad... SUBJECTIVELY...

that is not objective, These are all based on the bias of what would entertain YOU (what you consider good or bad)! Someone else could be thoroughly entertained by this... THAT IS THE FACT HERE! STOP CONFUSING THAT!

Now if this stuff is true, no music, that linear, etc then yeah it is not a good game in my opinion either, Its why I do not preorder anything or buy anything day one!

While I do not disagree with you about how the game is ( I have not played it, and if it is how you say, that would be what I consider to be not good) however, the only way your objectively looking at it, is Objectively from your own point of view! And determining it based off your own Entertainment Values..

Avatar image for MythPro1
MythPro1

2746

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#28 MythPro1
Member since 2003 • 2746 Posts

Yes objectively, the fact that my opinion is right as well is just icing on the cake.Remmib

Touting how "right" you are is not being objective. Regardless, many of the things you list as negative are opinion based, or easily disregarded when the game is actually played. Also, how about you list some positives.

Now that is being Objective.

Avatar image for Falconoffury
Falconoffury

1722

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 Falconoffury
Member since 2003 • 1722 Posts

"Gearbox still needs to make a profit from their games so they include some modern mechanics in order to appeal to a wider audiences but the core elements of the 90s like the simplistic running and gunning, the lack of a fleshed out character or story and the action oriented game play are all intact." (quote)

Health packs and secrets were core elements from the 90s FPS games. The campaign felt like the CoD Black Ops campaign with slightly less story, and that's a new game. I think what you are claiming are features of old, are actually newer features in FPS games. The problem with Duke Nukem Forever is not that it is too old school, the problem is that it is too new school.

"Yeah, time changes. I doubt I will see those old mechanics in any of today FPS games nor the future ones. And I always thought it was Gearbox who did those changes, not 3DRealms." (quote)

I can promise you that Serious Sam 3 will be very old school. It will have a better level design and tons of secrets to find. It will have powerups, health packs, and armor. If the next Half Life game or episode only let you hold two weapons, I would be shocked.

Avatar image for Elann2008
Elann2008

33028

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#30 Elann2008
Member since 2007 • 33028 Posts

I'm not a fan of using mods. I try to enjoy a game in its vanilla form as much as possible. The only mod I ever bothered to use (because it was so great) was Stalker complete mod 2009. Although I feel mods are extremely important to the PC community and the good ones do make games incredibly better.

According to recent complaints, I smell a texture mod coming and other variants that improve the graphics. Possibly a mod that allows you to equip more than two weapons, which has been the bulk of heavy complaints.

Eh, I'll enjoy DNF. I happen to like the demo a lot. It was good ole' fun.

Avatar image for Miroku32
Miroku32

8666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 0

#31 Miroku32
Member since 2006 • 8666 Posts



I can promise you that Serious Sam 3 will be very old school. It will have a better level design and tons of secrets to find. It will have powerups, health packs, and armor. If the next Half Life game or episode only let you hold two weapons, I would be shocked.

Falconoffury

Gonna keep an eye on Serious Sam 3 then.

Avatar image for Vexx88
Vexx88

33342

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 60

User Lists: 0

#32 Vexx88
Member since 2006 • 33342 Posts

No, a game that was in development for 15 years and it ends up sucking will stay bad.

Avatar image for Treflis
Treflis

13757

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 Treflis
Member since 2004 • 13757 Posts
Anyone who expected Duke Nukem Forever to be like Duke Nukem 3D was nothing more then complete and utterly naive. If that was what you wanted then you could've just gotten E-Duke.
Avatar image for bionicle_lover
bionicle_lover

4501

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 bionicle_lover
Member since 2005 • 4501 Posts

i only played the demo but the graphics arent that bad... really, i thought i was picky about graphics when i look fro them, but only the character models were a little out of whack.

Also, i never played a duke game, but its not as run and gun as i thought. hell, call of duty 4 was more run and gun. I played on the easiest setting and duke dies after only a couple shots. its also not easy to rapid fire because there is a lot of recoil. Is the demo harder than the actual game? i mean, i understand it being harder on normal or hard, but on easy where the description says "never played fps before" (though i have) it was so easy to die.

I want to pick up duke as a game to play while having fun and not worry about dieing... but it sure is so easy to die XP. not a bad demo though very short. its sense of humor had me chuckling a little bit to myself.

Avatar image for bonafidetk
bonafidetk

3911

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#35 bonafidetk
Member since 2004 • 3911 Posts
What engine is it running on? Its likely UE3 although I havent checked. If thats the case then you wont be seeing any complex mods. Ive played a few hours and Im actually quite shocked at how bad some stuff looks. I would have thought Gearbox would have taken it under their wing and polished it up to todays standards. Instead it looks like they just glued together what 3d realms made into a half-cohesive game
Avatar image for Xtasy26
Xtasy26

5589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 53

User Lists: 0

#36 Xtasy26
Member since 2008 • 5589 Posts

I am definitely looking forward to the mods.

And TC it wasn't Gearbox's decision to include only two weapons. Randy Pitchford himself stated it in an interview that it wasn't their decision. What you are playinng is essentially a 3D Realms game. What Gearbox essentially did was polish the game and fixed the bugs and got more developers working on it to port it to the Xbox 360 and PS3. So, you shouldn't blame Gearbox.

I am looking forward to what Gearbox can do by building Duke from the ground up with a new engine that will not take freaking 14 years to make.

Avatar image for Falconoffury
Falconoffury

1722

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 Falconoffury
Member since 2003 • 1722 Posts

I don't know if mods can save Duke, but I think Serious Sam can save the genre if all else fails.

Avatar image for a_sh0pping_cart
a_sh0pping_cart

354

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 a_sh0pping_cart
Member since 2009 • 354 Posts

wtf kind of vote is "COD forever"?

Avatar image for Starshine_M2A2
Starshine_M2A2

5593

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 19

#39 Starshine_M2A2
Member since 2006 • 5593 Posts

I don't know if mods can save Duke, but I think Serious Sam can save the genre if all else fails.

Falconoffury
You mean the FPS genre? I don't think it needs saving, dude. CoD and Battlefield are seeing to that.
Avatar image for GhoX
GhoX

6267

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#40 GhoX
Member since 2006 • 6267 Posts
That'd depend on the mods, not Duke. Duke has a special place in many gamers' memory. It's quite possible that there will be modders who will manage to turn this game around. One of the best examples where mods saved the game would be Vampire - the Masquerade. The original game was glitchy and feel incomplete. After a couple years enough excellent mods came out both to fix the bugs, restore cut content, re-balance game mechanics, and introduce new content. After all those mods one of the greatest disappointment became one of my all time favourite games.