Crysis 2 is finally here....

  • 56 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for FelipeInside
FelipeInside

28548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 FelipeInside
Member since 2003 • 28548 Posts

What we were waiting for....???

Avatar image for Daytona_178
Daytona_178

14962

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#2 Daytona_178
Member since 2005 • 14962 Posts

Meh, it maybe Technically the best looking game of all time. But its still nowhere near as fun as the original Crysis!

Avatar image for Elann2008
Elann2008

33028

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#3 Elann2008
Member since 2007 • 33028 Posts

Meh, it maybe Technically the best looking game of all time. But its still nowhere near as fun as the original Crysis!

Daytona_178
I agree with this.
Avatar image for poovannaorcbane
poovannaorcbane

543

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 poovannaorcbane
Member since 2009 • 543 Posts
[QUOTE="Daytona_178"]

Meh, it maybe Technically the best looking game of all time. But its still nowhere near as fun as the original Crysis!

Elann2008
I agree with this.

i second this :D
Avatar image for poovannaorcbane
poovannaorcbane

543

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 poovannaorcbane
Member since 2009 • 543 Posts

What we were waiting for....???

FelipeInside
it makes certain objects look glossy and environment is blurry and bright thats it imo, the lighting in DX11 was top notch photo-realistic anyway
Avatar image for call_of_duty_10
call_of_duty_10

4954

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 call_of_duty_10
Member since 2009 • 4954 Posts

The mod looks amazing but it wont make me re-install crysis 2.

I will wait until the modders make a real sequel to crysis.

Yeah thats right I want a game with huge islands and gameplay which makes you plan your attacks.

Until someone mods crysis 2 to that point,it does not exist for me.It is nothing but a call of duty game set in the future.

Avatar image for deactivated-635601fd996cc
deactivated-635601fd996cc

4381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#7 deactivated-635601fd996cc
Member since 2009 • 4381 Posts
That looks very ugly. All they did was increase the contrast, Crytek and their DX11 patch still did the majority of the graphics tech, these wannabe modders should get absolutely no credit.
Avatar image for Grey_Eyed_Elf
Grey_Eyed_Elf

7971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Grey_Eyed_Elf
Member since 2011 • 7971 Posts
I just played through it last week and honestly its like they took Crysis and put it through a Call of Duty shaped hole... obviously it couldn't fit so they had to cut out the right size circle to push it through. I'm not going to download any graphical mod's for this. Will downloads mod's though, when a good one is made.
Avatar image for deactivated-597bb01c846a2
deactivated-597bb01c846a2

1495

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: -3

#9 deactivated-597bb01c846a2
Member since 2011 • 1495 Posts

That looks very ugly. All they did was increase the contrast, Crytek and their DX11 patch still did the majority of the graphics tech, these wannabe modders should get absolutely no credit.ocstew

http://www.adrenaline.com.br/forum/pc/352364-crysis-2-mod-blackfires-mod-2-a.html

That looks way better than anything Crytek did with Crysis 2.

Avatar image for DigitalExile
DigitalExile

16046

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#10 DigitalExile
Member since 2008 • 16046 Posts

[QUOTE="ocstew"]That looks very ugly. All they did was increase the contrast, Crytek and their DX11 patch still did the majority of the graphics tech, these wannabe modders should get absolutely no credit.Diophage


http://www.adrenaline.com.br/forum/pc/352364-crysis-2-mod-blackfires-mod-2-a.html

That looks way better than anything Crytek did with Crysis 2.

It seems in some areas they did a good job with new textures and what not, but also a lot of it does look like they just messed wth the contrast. I'm really sick of seeing mods mnaking things really light and dark and calling it a realism or ultra mod or something. Obviously lighting in an important part, but I've never looked at the sky and seen it white. Ther sky has colour and these mods fail to do that, and it just reflects poorly into other parts of the game world (as I said making things extra bright or dark).

Avatar image for VeNoM_JaCKaL
VeNoM_JaCKaL

82

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#11 VeNoM_JaCKaL
Member since 2011 • 82 Posts

[QUOTE="ocstew"]That looks very ugly. All they did was increase the contrast, Crytek and their DX11 patch still did the majority of the graphics tech, these wannabe modders should get absolutely no credit.Diophage


http://www.adrenaline.com.br/forum/pc/352364-crysis-2-mod-blackfires-mod-2-a.html

That looks way better than anything Crytek did with Crysis 2.

Agree that is a better representation of what the mode has achieved and it does look way better to. Crysis 2 just seemed to be so linear in its approach play "cheating" you into thinking that the play area was bigger than it actually was with vertical layers but in all a small play area. Whereas with Crysis approach play was vast and wide perfectly suited to its environment. For that reason Crysis 2 was a slight let down.

Avatar image for Zubinen
Zubinen

2555

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#12 Zubinen
Member since 2011 • 2555 Posts

Looks a lot better, but still doesn't compare to Metro 2033, RAGE, or The Witcher 2 with ubersampling.

Avatar image for abuabed
abuabed

6606

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 abuabed
Member since 2005 • 6606 Posts
[QUOTE="Elann2008"][QUOTE="Daytona_178"]

Meh, it maybe Technically the best looking game of all time. But its still nowhere near as fun as the original Crysis!

poovannaorcbane
I agree with this.

i second this :D

I'm with you fellows.
Avatar image for NoodleFighter
NoodleFighter

11897

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 NoodleFighter
Member since 2011 • 11897 Posts

someone should make a physics mod and stuff so that way when I bring my gaming PC to my cousins house who has Crysis 2 for PS3 I can humilate him :twisted:

Avatar image for deactivated-635601fd996cc
deactivated-635601fd996cc

4381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#15 deactivated-635601fd996cc
Member since 2009 • 4381 Posts

[QUOTE="Diophage"]

[QUOTE="ocstew"]That looks very ugly. All they did was increase the contrast, Crytek and their DX11 patch still did the majority of the graphics tech, these wannabe modders should get absolutely no credit.DigitalExile


http://www.adrenaline.com.br/forum/pc/352364-crysis-2-mod-blackfires-mod-2-a.html

That looks way better than anything Crytek did with Crysis 2.

It seems in some areas they did a good job with new textures and what not, but also a lot of it does look like they just messed wth the contrast. I'm really sick of seeing mods mnaking things really light and dark and calling it a realism or ultra mod or something. Obviously lighting in an important part, but I've never looked at the sky and seen it white. Ther sky has colour and these mods fail to do that, and it just reflects poorly into other parts of the game world (as I said making things extra bright or dark).

This. Don't you people get it? This mod doesn't come anywhere near beating Crytek's work. All they did was change the TOD, something I could do and have done in 5 seconds.

Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts
Shame Crysis 2 isn't that good.
Avatar image for Jebus213
Jebus213

10056

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 Jebus213
Member since 2010 • 10056 Posts

They do a good job at making the game look worst.

Avatar image for pelvist
pelvist

9001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#18 pelvist
Member since 2010 • 9001 Posts

Looks nice and all that, but the graphics dont make the game any less boring or linear. I uninstalled Crysis 2 less than a week after I baught it and have no incentive to reinstall even for the DX11 patch or this, I just didnt enjoy the game and the graphics mods wont change what I dont like about it.

Avatar image for trastamad03
trastamad03

4859

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#19 trastamad03
Member since 2006 • 4859 Posts

[QUOTE="DigitalExile"]

[QUOTE="Diophage"]

http://www.adrenaline.com.br/forum/pc/352364-crysis-2-mod-blackfires-mod-2-a.html

That looks way better than anything Crytek did with Crysis 2.

ocstew

It seems in some areas they did a good job with new textures and what not, but also a lot of it does look like they just messed wth the contrast. I'm really sick of seeing mods mnaking things really light and dark and calling it a realism or ultra mod or something. Obviously lighting in an important part, but I've never looked at the sky and seen it white. Ther sky has colour and these mods fail to do that, and it just reflects poorly into other parts of the game world (as I said making things extra bright or dark).

This. Don't you people get it? This mod doesn't come anywhere near beating Crytek's work. All they did was change the TOD, something I could do and have done in 5 seconds.

Not to mention, people seem to have never seen shadows in real life. Why do they try to make them look ultra sharp is beyond me... Shadows are supposed to soft and blurry.

Avatar image for deactivated-597bb01c846a2
deactivated-597bb01c846a2

1495

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: -3

#20 deactivated-597bb01c846a2
Member since 2011 • 1495 Posts

[QUOTE="DigitalExile"]

[QUOTE="Diophage"]

http://www.adrenaline.com.br/forum/pc/352364-crysis-2-mod-blackfires-mod-2-a.html

That looks way better than anything Crytek did with Crysis 2.

ocstew

It seems in some areas they did a good job with new textures and what not, but also a lot of it does look like they just messed wth the contrast. I'm really sick of seeing mods mnaking things really light and dark and calling it a realism or ultra mod or something. Obviously lighting in an important part, but I've never looked at the sky and seen it white. Ther sky has colour and these mods fail to do that, and it just reflects poorly into other parts of the game world (as I said making things extra bright or dark).

This. Don't you people get it? This mod doesn't come anywhere near beating Crytek's work. All they did was change the TOD, something I could do and have done in 5 seconds.

You guys have no idea what you're talking about. It's more than a simple TOD change. Look at the screen shots carefully. You aren't going to get those kind of results by upping contrast ratios. A lot of texture work went into that. If you think it's easy and they put little to no work into it, please replicate it something like that on your own. I'd love to see what kind of garbage you can come up with. Either way, it's much more appealing to look at than the default Crysis 2.

Avatar image for deactivated-597bb01c846a2
deactivated-597bb01c846a2

1495

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: -3

#21 deactivated-597bb01c846a2
Member since 2011 • 1495 Posts

[QUOTE="ocstew"]

[QUOTE="DigitalExile"]It seems in some areas they did a good job with new textures and what not, but also a lot of it does look like they just messed wth the contrast. I'm really sick of seeing mods mnaking things really light and dark and calling it a realism or ultra mod or something. Obviously lighting in an important part, but I've never looked at the sky and seen it white. Ther sky has colour and these mods fail to do that, and it just reflects poorly into other parts of the game world (as I said making things extra bright or dark).

trastamad03

This. Don't you people get it? This mod doesn't come anywhere near beating Crytek's work. All they did was change the TOD, something I could do and have done in 5 seconds.

Not to mention, people seem to have never seen shadows in real life. Why do they try to make them look ultra sharp is beyond me... Shadows are supposed to soft and blurry.

Shadows are supposed to look like this.

Crysis 2 isn't even close to that. Unless disfigured shadows is your thing.

Avatar image for trastamad03
trastamad03

4859

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#22 trastamad03
Member since 2006 • 4859 Posts

[QUOTE="trastamad03"]

[QUOTE="ocstew"] This. Don't you people get it? This mod doesn't come anywhere near beating Crytek's work. All they did was change the TOD, something I could do and have done in 5 seconds.

Diophage

Not to mention, people seem to have never seen shadows in real life. Why do they try to make them look ultra sharp is beyond me... Shadows are supposed to soft and blurry.

Shadows are supposed to look like this.

Crysis 2 isn't even close to that. Unless disfigured shadows is your thing.

Look at the edges of the shadow in the pic you posted, they are SOFT not sharp. There's gradiant between lit area and shaded area. Also, the shadow being cast is from a shorter distance, rather than a tree's shadow which is cast from a longer distance which disfigures the shadow and makes it blurrier.

Avatar image for deactivated-597bb01c846a2
deactivated-597bb01c846a2

1495

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: -3

#23 deactivated-597bb01c846a2
Member since 2011 • 1495 Posts

[QUOTE="Diophage"]

[QUOTE="trastamad03"] Not to mention, people seem to have never seen shadows in real life. Why do they try to make them look ultra sharp is beyond me... Shadows are supposed to soft and blurry.

trastamad03

Shadows are supposed to look like this.

Crysis 2 isn't even close to that. Unless disfigured shadows is your thing.

Look at the edges of the shadow in the pic you posted, they are SOFT not sharp. There's gradiant between lit area and shaded area. Also, the shadow being cast is from a shorter distance, rather than a tree's shadow which is cast from a longer distance which disfigures the shadow and makes it blurrier.

Shadows are suppose to be soft. But this is what shadows normally look like in Crysis 2:

http://images.bit-tech.net/content_images/2011/03/crysis-2-pc-review/crysis2_shadows_h.jpg

I'd rather have hard shadows than... that.

Avatar image for trastamad03
trastamad03

4859

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#24 trastamad03
Member since 2006 • 4859 Posts

[QUOTE="trastamad03"]

[QUOTE="Diophage"]Shadows are supposed to look like this.

Crysis 2 isn't even close to that. Unless disfigured shadows is your thing.

Diophage

Look at the edges of the shadow in the pic you posted, they are SOFT not sharp. There's gradiant between lit area and shaded area. Also, the shadow being cast is from a shorter distance, rather than a tree's shadow which is cast from a longer distance which disfigures the shadow and makes it blurrier.

Shadows are suppose to be soft. But this is what shadows normally look like in Crysis 2:

http://images.bit-tech.net/content_images/2011/03/crysis-2-pc-review/crysis2_shadows_h.jpg

I'd rather have hard shadows than... that.

Ok, well, then for me, Default Crysis 2 shadows are fine. To each their own I suppose.

Avatar image for deactivated-59b71619573a1
deactivated-59b71619573a1

38222

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 deactivated-59b71619573a1
Member since 2007 • 38222 Posts

I just did a playtest of the mod and it doesn't look all that different. The texture work is great, the ground seems much sharper and cracks etc are more detailed and pop out more.Except for the fact that all pictures on walls and advertisements around the city now have naked girls or scantily clad women on them,But the lighting doesn't look much different. Everything does seema bit clearer though like most smoke in certain areas is gone but thats not really better so to speak. The shadows look worse than the dx11 soft shadows. Shadows aren't that sharp in real life despite what people say. The soft ones are better. But also cos they are less complex I got a slight performance boost. The fire is also red in a lot of areas. Which looks really bad and stands out too much. Overall its not that great. But definitely props to the texture guy.

Avatar image for psn8214
psn8214

14930

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 psn8214
Member since 2009 • 14930 Posts

Shame Crysis 2 isn't that good. skrat_01

Amen brotha'. Modding Crysis was fun because Crysis was fun. I'm all about pretty graphics, but I have no intention of touching Crysis 2 again, and I still can't believe I paid $60 for it. :(

Avatar image for s_emi_xxxxx
s_emi_xxxxx

1058

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#27 s_emi_xxxxx
Member since 2005 • 1058 Posts
I wasn't impressed by this mod at all, Idk what major improvements people see in it. also unlike Crysis 1 It's hard to notice graphical differences in Crysis 2.. atleast for me.
Avatar image for blurguy6
blurguy6

699

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 blurguy6
Member since 2010 • 699 Posts
Am I the only one who enjoyed crysis 2 here? Ive hooked up my pc to my 42" HDTV playing with the 360 controller and im having a blast. And the best part is that I can set the in game resolution to something lower like 1600x900 (native is 1080p) and my TV will upscale it to 1080P! Looks the exact same yet I get a nice 10fps boost and now I can play the game at a constant 60fps on a mix of ultra and extreme.
Avatar image for guildclaws
guildclaws

7921

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#29 guildclaws
Member since 2009 • 7921 Posts

Meh, it maybe Technically the best looking game of all time. But its still nowhere near as fun as the original Crysis!

Daytona_178
It's just not fun without Super Strength and Super Speed mode :(
Avatar image for ChubbyGuy40
ChubbyGuy40

26442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 ChubbyGuy40
Member since 2007 • 26442 Posts

I made a copy of my Crysis 2 folder so I can play both versions. I like certain things about the mod, like how it finally blocks out the stars/moonlight as you can't see those very well, if at all in NYC. Also the high-res textures are actually high-res. But the shadows are too overdone.

Too bad the game will never be as great or nearly as fun as the original crysis.

Avatar image for deactivated-59b71619573a1
deactivated-59b71619573a1

38222

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 deactivated-59b71619573a1
Member since 2007 • 38222 Posts

I made a copy of my Crysis 2 folder so I can play both versions. I like certain things about the mod, like how it finally blocks out the stars/moonlight as you can't see those very well, if at all in NYC. Also the high-res textures are actually high-res. But the shadows are too overdone.

Too bad the game will never be as great or nearly as fun as the original crysis.

ChubbyGuy40

Yeah some things are nice but the high contrast makes it blindingly bright outdoors in some scenes. Night time looks better. The high res texture REALLY pop. But there are stupid porn pics everywhere in it. Like when you go into hargreav's mansion all his pictures on the walls and the laptop monitors,tv screens all have naked girls on them. Its very tacky.

Avatar image for BlueJinn
BlueJinn

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 BlueJinn
Member since 2011 • 25 Posts
I actually like the second part better and not only because of the better graphics.
Avatar image for OgreB
OgreB

2523

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#33 OgreB
Member since 2004 • 2523 Posts

[QUOTE="skrat_01"]Shame Crysis 2 isn't that good. psn8214

Amen brotha'. Modding Crysis was fun because Crysis was fun. I'm all about pretty graphics, but I have no intention of touching Crysis 2 again, and I still can't believe I paid $60 for it. :(

Avatar image for firefluff3
firefluff3

2073

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 firefluff3
Member since 2010 • 2073 Posts

[QUOTE="ocstew"]That looks very ugly. All they did was increase the contrast, Crytek and their DX11 patch still did the majority of the graphics tech, these wannabe modders should get absolutely no credit.Diophage


http://www.adrenaline.com.br/forum/pc/352364-crysis-2-mod-blackfires-mod-2-a.html

That looks way better than anything Crytek did with Crysis 2.

The contrast is plain annoying though.

Avatar image for yellosnolvr
yellosnolvr

19302

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#35 yellosnolvr
Member since 2005 • 19302 Posts
[QUOTE="Grey_Eyed_Elf"]I just played through it last week and honestly its like they took Crysis and put it through a Call of Duty shaped hole... obviously it couldn't fit so they had to cut out the right size circle to push it through. I'm not going to download any graphical mod's for this. Will downloads mod's though, when a good one is made.

:lol: thats an amazing way to put it. for some reason, i really want to quote this and put it on my profile somewhere.
Avatar image for theafiguy
theafiguy

962

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#36 theafiguy
Member since 2006 • 962 Posts
Crysis, Crysis: Warhead, and Crysis 2 were the most generic FPS games I've ever played.
Avatar image for deactivated-59b71619573a1
deactivated-59b71619573a1

38222

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 deactivated-59b71619573a1
Member since 2007 • 38222 Posts

Crysis, Crysis: Warhead, and Crysis 2 were the most generic FPS games I've ever played.theafiguy

As opposed to? I have no idea how could could ever call Crysis 1 generic

Avatar image for theafiguy
theafiguy

962

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#38 theafiguy
Member since 2006 • 962 Posts

[QUOTE="theafiguy"]Crysis, Crysis: Warhead, and Crysis 2 were the most generic FPS games I've ever played.seanmcloughlin

As opposed to? I have no idea how could could ever call Crysis 1 generic

I shouldn't have said generic, I should have said repetitious and linear. There was openness, sure, but it wasn't exactly alive. Warhead was a joke in every regard, that game was the definition of linear, for a modern day FPS at least.

Avatar image for ChubbyGuy40
ChubbyGuy40

26442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 ChubbyGuy40
Member since 2007 • 26442 Posts

[QUOTE="seanmcloughlin"]

[QUOTE="theafiguy"]Crysis, Crysis: Warhead, and Crysis 2 were the most generic FPS games I've ever played.theafiguy

As opposed to? I have no idea how could could ever call Crysis 1 generic

I shouldn't have said generic, I should have said repetitious and linear. There was openness, sure, but it wasn't exactly alive. Warhead was a joke in every regard, that game was the definition of linear, for a modern day FPS at least.

Honestly sounds like you've never played more than 3 FPSes the way you put it.

Avatar image for theafiguy
theafiguy

962

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#40 theafiguy
Member since 2006 • 962 Posts
No, I have, but I don't find many games actually innovate. Call of Duty 4 did one thing right (multiplayer) and Crysis definitely pushed the bar for graphics, but it was just a boring game beyond that, similar to how CoD4 would have been boring without the MP.
Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts

I shouldn't have said generic, I should have said repetitious and linear. There was openness, sure, but it wasn't exactly alive. Warhead was a joke in every regard, that game was the definition of linear, for a modern day FPS at least.

theafiguy
No, I have, but I don't find many games actually innovate. Call of Duty 4 did one thing right (multiplayer) and Crysis definitely pushed the bar for graphics, but it was just a boring game beyond that, similar to how CoD4 would have been boring without the MP. theafiguy
Crysis was a highly innovative in its own right. The game was an extension of the Far Cry school of design - freeform FPS gameplay, however Crytek pushed this further not just with the inclusion of better technology that was able to realise a more complex intractable playing space, but their nanosuit design which allowed players to quite literally change their playstyle on the fly; and the game itself would adapt to changes. Everything was an extension of this for most of the part - until the game popped itself on rails and lost all common sense in the final act. It actually did that all remarkably well, Crysis 2 however took much of that (and what had been done in Warhead) and scaled it back substantially, with much more of a focus on narrative. I'd honestly say while the game wasn't bad it failed; it didn't refine, nor did it enhance. Now Warhead was a damn good game; it was different to the first in regard of not offering a level as a 'scenario of options' rather 'action bubbles' - self contained set pieces where the player was given a reasonably high degree of freedom - such as the 'on rails' train level, where the player can abandon the 'on rails' action entirely and run about as they see fit. It also had a stronger focus on narrative (and action based gameplay), difference is it hit that middleground far better than Crysis 2 did.
Avatar image for Baranga
Baranga

14217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#42 Baranga
Member since 2005 • 14217 Posts

Is this Doom 3, or is it Crysis 2? WHO KNOWS?

The mod is bollocks, and that's an objective truth. It crushes blacks, burns whites. destroys the contrast and the mood, adds random textures because LOL WHY NOT, adds crap shadows and chicks in bikini instead of advertisments.

Avatar image for ZimpanX
ZimpanX

12636

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#43 ZimpanX
Member since 2005 • 12636 Posts

There is a fix in the mod's Crymod thread for the excessive contrast for those of you that are bothered by it (myself included).

Avatar image for deactivated-59b71619573a1
deactivated-59b71619573a1

38222

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 deactivated-59b71619573a1
Member since 2007 • 38222 Posts

There is a fix in the mod's Crymod thread for the excessive contrast for those of you that are bothered by it (myself included).

ZimpanX

The contrast is still all over the place even with the fix. Outdoors are blinding white, some indoors are far too dark. Most of the night time scenes are very obscurely dark. Its a nice attempt at modding considering what a joke the editor turned out to be but I don't think it really adds anything to the game visually

Avatar image for ChubbyGuy40
ChubbyGuy40

26442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 ChubbyGuy40
Member since 2007 • 26442 Posts

I tried it and liked it. It makes it look 100% more interesting than dull and boring config it is now.

Still the mod somehow managed to break my game. I can't shoot anything and all I can do is melee attack. Good thing I used this on a copied folder of crysis 2.

Avatar image for Darksonic666
Darksonic666

3482

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 50

User Lists: 0

#46 Darksonic666
Member since 2009 • 3482 Posts

I had fun with that game and yes it was a very nice looking game but it was missing the heart that crysis 1 had and never felt as fun as crysis 1 did hopefully they will make crysis 2 more like the first.

Avatar image for gameguy6700
gameguy6700

12197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 gameguy6700
Member since 2004 • 12197 Posts
What's different about that mod? It just looks like all they did was increase the brightness.
Avatar image for NoodleFighter
NoodleFighter

11897

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 NoodleFighter
Member since 2011 • 11897 Posts

No, I have, but I don't find many games actually innovate. Call of Duty 4 did one thing right (multiplayer) and Crysis definitely pushed the bar for graphics, but it was just a boring game beyond that, similar to how CoD4 would have been boring without the MP. theafiguy

Right cause this is totally boring http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vHv7Laj3JiM

Avatar image for deactivated-635601fd996cc
deactivated-635601fd996cc

4381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#49 deactivated-635601fd996cc
Member since 2009 • 4381 Posts

[QUOTE="ocstew"]

[QUOTE="DigitalExile"]It seems in some areas they did a good job with new textures and what not, but also a lot of it does look like they just messed wth the contrast. I'm really sick of seeing mods mnaking things really light and dark and calling it a realism or ultra mod or something. Obviously lighting in an important part, but I've never looked at the sky and seen it white. Ther sky has colour and these mods fail to do that, and it just reflects poorly into other parts of the game world (as I said making things extra bright or dark).

Diophage

This. Don't you people get it? This mod doesn't come anywhere near beating Crytek's work. All they did was change the TOD, something I could do and have done in 5 seconds.

You guys have no idea what you're talking about. It's more than a simple TOD change. Look at the screen shots carefully. You aren't going to get those kind of results by upping contrast ratios. A lot of texture work went into that. If you think it's easy and they put little to no work into it, please replicate it something like that on your own. I'd love to see what kind of garbage you can come up with. Either way, it's much more appealing to look at than the default Crysis 2.

Well it might shock you that I worked with the Crysis SDK. Changing textures still does not come near "beating" what Crytek did. One thing that annoys me the most, is when people give WAY too much credit to unskilled modders who do very little.
Avatar image for deactivated-635601fd996cc
deactivated-635601fd996cc

4381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#50 deactivated-635601fd996cc
Member since 2009 • 4381 Posts

[QUOTE="trastamad03"]

[QUOTE="Diophage"]Shadows are supposed to look like this.

Crysis 2 isn't even close to that. Unless disfigured shadows is your thing.

Diophage

Look at the edges of the shadow in the pic you posted, they are SOFT not sharp. There's gradiant between lit area and shaded area. Also, the shadow being cast is from a shorter distance, rather than a tree's shadow which is cast from a longer distance which disfigures the shadow and makes it blurrier.

Shadows are suppose to be soft. But this is what shadows normally look like in Crysis 2:

http://images.bit-tech.net/content_images/2011/03/crysis-2-pc-review/crysis2_shadows_h.jpg

I'd rather have hard shadows than... that.

I'm guessing you've never touched Crysis 2 DX11 then? Crysis 2 has, by default realistic shadows. Making everything sharp, whether the shadows be miles away or right in front of you is not realistic.