Crysis 2 worth $20?

  • 90 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for deactivated-5e7f8a21de9dd
deactivated-5e7f8a21de9dd

4403

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 144

User Lists: 1

#51 deactivated-5e7f8a21de9dd
Member since 2008 • 4403 Posts

I got all of them for $20. I think its pretty good. The FoV is very difficult to change, but other than that is a fine port. They have ironed out all of the in-game issues. I wouldn't spen $20 on it, but the gunplay is pretty good and it looks really nice. Multiplayer is aight.

Avatar image for Baranga
Baranga

14217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#52 Baranga
Member since 2005 • 14217 Posts

Furthermore Crysis 1's "story" was pretty nonexistent, with no character development or anything of that sort..

sSubZerOo

Crysis 1's lightweight story was effective and inoffensive. It had a nice little mystery at heart, made enough nods to sci-fi cIassics and transitioned beautifully from military porn to alien porn. Crysis 2 went full retard I don't care about stories in games but when they're so atrocious and constantly intrusive, they drag the game down a lot.

While character development isn't a requirement for a good story, I'd argue Prophet's journey and personality change was pretty intriguing.

As for the voice acting, except for Prophet and Jason Statham everybody was just as horrible as in Crysis 2. What's with Crytek and voice acting anyway? Even Claudia Black sucked in Crysis. At least Far Cry's mercs, one-liners and gay innuendos were hilarious

Avatar image for topgunmv
topgunmv

10880

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#53 topgunmv
Member since 2003 • 10880 Posts

[QUOTE="topgunmv"]

[QUOTE="Pedro"]

Its definitely not unreasonable but to act (not you specifically) as if the story is worse than first seems reaching, especially since the first game's storyline was far from stella.

sSubZerOo

The horrible voice acting in 2 drops it about 10 notches.

How was the second's voice acting any worse then the first? Furthermore Crysis 1's "story" was pretty nonexistent, with no character development or anything of that sort..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1F4AB_hJF0

Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#54 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts

[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]

[QUOTE="topgunmv"]

The horrible voice acting in 2 drops it about 10 notches.

topgunmv

How was the second's voice acting any worse then the first? Furthermore Crysis 1's "story" was pretty nonexistent, with no character development or anything of that sort..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1F4AB_hJF0

:| That doesn't prove ANYTHING.. You posted two clips from Crysis 1, one where they are talking within a aircraft.. And the other where a guy is screaming during a fire fight.. You then link it with Gould who is talking during a loading screen on a walkie talkie.. How in the hell does that EVEN prove anything? Both games had acceptable voice acting, it wasn't as if that these roles were out of this world to do..

Avatar image for topgunmv
topgunmv

10880

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#55 topgunmv
Member since 2003 • 10880 Posts

[QUOTE="topgunmv"]

[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]

How was the second's voice acting any worse then the first? Furthermore Crysis 1's "story" was pretty nonexistent, with no character development or anything of that sort..

sSubZerOo

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1F4AB_hJF0

:| That doesn't prove ANYTHING.. You posted two clips from Crysis 1, one where they are talking within a aircraft.. And the other where a guy is screaming during a fire fight.. You then link it with Gould who is talking during a loading screen on a walkie talkie.. How in the hell does that EVEN prove anything? Both games had acceptable voice acting, it wasn't as if that these roles were out of this world to do..

I didn't post anything, some guy posted that a year ago.

The point is a random marine you encounter once in the campaign of crysis 1 has better voice acting than a main character in crysis 2.

Obviously I'm not the only one who thinks so when random people are making comparisons like this on youtube.

Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#56 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts

[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]

[QUOTE="topgunmv"]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1F4AB_hJF0

topgunmv

:| That doesn't prove ANYTHING.. You posted two clips from Crysis 1, one where they are talking within a aircraft.. And the other where a guy is screaming during a fire fight.. You then link it with Gould who is talking during a loading screen on a walkie talkie.. How in the hell does that EVEN prove anything? Both games had acceptable voice acting, it wasn't as if that these roles were out of this world to do..

I didn't post anything, some guy posted that a year ago.

The point is a random marine you encounter once in the campaign of crysis 1 has better voice acting than a main character in crysis 2.

Obviously I'm not the only one who thinks so when random people are making comparisons like this on youtube.

I see so your "comparison" on talent is when the random marine is screaming at the top of his lungs compared to a guy that is trying to explain to something to you over a walkie talkie.. How the hell was he suppose to sound? I mean seriously, its laughable that you can even compare the two.. Do you even know what your talking about? How the hell can you compare the "talent" level of the two with such ridiculous comparisons.. How bout we start using the constant walkie talkie voices over the intercom that Nomad constantly gets.. They are just as dry and just as the same as what you posted for Crysis 2.. In the end of day Crysis and Crysis 2 do not have amazing voice acting, they basically have the standard voice acting you expect to see from these type of games..

Avatar image for topgunmv
topgunmv

10880

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#57 topgunmv
Member since 2003 • 10880 Posts

[QUOTE="topgunmv"]

[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]

:| That doesn't prove ANYTHING.. You posted two clips from Crysis 1, one where they are talking within a aircraft.. And the other where a guy is screaming during a fire fight.. You then link it with Gould who is talking during a loading screen on a walkie talkie.. How in the hell does that EVEN prove anything? Both games had acceptable voice acting, it wasn't as if that these roles were out of this world to do..

sSubZerOo

I didn't post anything, some guy posted that a year ago.

The point is a random marine you encounter once in the campaign of crysis 1 has better voice acting than a main character in crysis 2.

Obviously I'm not the only one who thinks so when random people are making comparisons like this on youtube.

I see so your "comparison" on talent is when the random marine is screaming at the top of his lungs compared to a guy that is trying to explain to something to you over a walkie talkie.. How the hell was he suppose to sound? I mean seriously, its laughable that you can even compare the two.. Do you even know what your talking about? How the hell can you compare the "talent" level of the two with such ridiculous comparisons.. How bout we start using the constant walkie talkie voices over the intercom that Nomad constantly gets.. They are just as dry and just as the same as what you posted for Crysis 2.. In the end of day Crysis and Crysis 2 do not have amazing voice acting, they basically have the standard voice acting you expect to see from these type of games..

Butthurt much?

Browse the forums, you'll find tons of people talking about how bad the voice acting is, I'm not the one in my own little bubble on the issue here.

Avatar image for ShadowsDemon
ShadowsDemon

10059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#58 ShadowsDemon
Member since 2012 • 10059 Posts
It's more than worth the cash. Get it.
Avatar image for nismo8000
nismo8000

1000

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 nismo8000
Member since 2007 • 1000 Posts

saying crysis 2 is bad because of one of the voice actors is like saying scarlett johansson is ugly cuz she has a mole.

Avatar image for Silicel1
Silicel1

2342

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#60 Silicel1
Member since 2005 • 2342 Posts

saying crysis 2 is bad because of one of the voice actors is like saying scarlett johansson is ugly cuz she has a mole.

nismo8000
Do you even know what your talking about, crysis 2 is trying to be heavy on story and fails miserably at it. Voice acting is a very important part of immersion.
Avatar image for KalDurenik
KalDurenik

3736

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#61 KalDurenik
Member since 2004 • 3736 Posts
Maybe 8$ for a retail copy...
Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#62 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts

[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]

[QUOTE="topgunmv"]

I didn't post anything, some guy posted that a year ago.

The point is a random marine you encounter once in the campaign of crysis 1 has better voice acting than a main character in crysis 2.

Obviously I'm not the only one who thinks so when random people are making comparisons like this on youtube.

topgunmv

I see so your "comparison" on talent is when the random marine is screaming at the top of his lungs compared to a guy that is trying to explain to something to you over a walkie talkie.. How the hell was he suppose to sound? I mean seriously, its laughable that you can even compare the two.. Do you even know what your talking about? How the hell can you compare the "talent" level of the two with such ridiculous comparisons.. How bout we start using the constant walkie talkie voices over the intercom that Nomad constantly gets.. They are just as dry and just as the same as what you posted for Crysis 2.. In the end of day Crysis and Crysis 2 do not have amazing voice acting, they basically have the standard voice acting you expect to see from these type of games..

Butthurt much?

Browse the forums, you'll find tons of people talking about how bad the voice acting is, I'm not the one in my own little bubble on the issue here.

What a great rebuttal, I can see this debate is going far.. And "hey other people think so too!" is not a real point.. We all have opinions and share from.. The point I am making is the fact that I would hardly call either game having great voice acting.. It doesn't take much to shout or show alittle anger in dialogue.. Its only when you see in games (mainly rpg's it seems) where voice acting goes beyond in trying to flesh out a character in showing much more emotion.. So in the end of the day I find it hilarious that people think there is much difference between the two.. You compared two husky bad ass marine voices with a random scientist voice.. What exactly is he suppose to sound like? The radical majority of games now a days have GREAT voice acting and Crysis and Crysis 2 fall into that median.. There is nothing amazing about it, but nothing bad about it either.

Avatar image for Ricardo41
Ricardo41

1046

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 Ricardo41
Member since 2002 • 1046 Posts

At $20 this is a no brainer. It's an excellent game with great gunplay. Looks great, too.

It's quite a challenge at higher difficulty levels since the checkpoints are often fairly far apart.

Don't listen to the naysayers who basically expected more of the same, i.e, you, the player running around

shooting Korean soldiers on some dinky island.

This is an urban shooter.

Avatar image for nismo8000
nismo8000

1000

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 nismo8000
Member since 2007 • 1000 Posts
[QUOTE="nismo8000"]

saying crysis 2 is bad because of one of the voice actors is like saying scarlett johansson is ugly cuz she has a mole.

Silicel1
Do you even know what your talking about, crysis 2 is trying to be heavy on story and fails miserably at it. Voice acting is a very important part of immersion.

the gunplay was fun, the weapons are interesting, the multiplayer is fun with varied maps and interesting game types, the graphics are the best i've seen and literally the only game i own (i gots lots of games, dawg) that can't max out graphically and keep playable frame rates so they're technically and aesthetically advanced, the story was okish...overall, great game. your problem is managing your expectations. if you want a deus ex style story from the game, play somthing else. i wanted twitch shooting with eye melting visuals and it was perfect in that regard. ps, i don't think you understand a metaphor. you're glossing over all of the good things about crysis 2 and saying that is garbage because of the voice acting, which is asinine. kind of like saying a beautiful woman is undesirable because of one imperfection.
Avatar image for rzepak
rzepak

5758

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 rzepak
Member since 2005 • 5758 Posts
Its worth it although I am pretty sure I have seen it cheaper during various sales even on Origin.
Avatar image for V4LENT1NE
V4LENT1NE

12901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#66 V4LENT1NE
Member since 2006 • 12901 Posts
I personally thought it was great and the graphics were amazing.
Avatar image for ChubbyGuy40
ChubbyGuy40

26442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 ChubbyGuy40
Member since 2007 • 26442 Posts

This is an urban shooter.

Ricardo41

No, this is a corridor shooter. No urban or alternative pathways here.

Avatar image for Elann2008
Elann2008

33028

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#68 Elann2008
Member since 2007 • 33028 Posts
No. Definitely not worth $20. By itself, it's worth like $10, maybe less. Compared to Crysis 1 and Crysis Warhead.. it's not even worth $5.
Avatar image for NoAssKicker47
NoAssKicker47

2855

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 28

User Lists: 0

#69 NoAssKicker47
Member since 2004 • 2855 Posts

I'm playing the SP now and I'm enjoying it quite a bit. It's really not that different at all from the original Crysis.

Avatar image for AlphaJC
AlphaJC

712

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 AlphaJC
Member since 2010 • 712 Posts
Its worth it for 20 bucks, pretty cool game. There are some awesome moments in the game.
Avatar image for -Unreal-
-Unreal-

24650

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 1

#71 -Unreal-
Member since 2004 • 24650 Posts

It's a pretty good game. 7.5/10. Definately enjoyable. People were crying because it wasn't a PC exclusive. We can't have sequel to a PC exclusive on a console and be enjoyed by a PC gamer now, can we?

Avatar image for Mr_Ditters
Mr_Ditters

1920

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 0

#72 Mr_Ditters
Member since 2008 • 1920 Posts

Let me say this:

The only thing reallly bad with Crysis 2 is that it is named Crysis. Its a pretty damn good game. Its just not the same kind of game as Crysis. Its Crysis lite for consoles--not a sandbox. Its annoying as hell that its not a true sequel.

If this were a console port with a different name no one here would be saying its not worth $20. I have seen it go for $10 before, but its definitely worth it. I would hold out for $10 personally.

Avatar image for nismo8000
nismo8000

1000

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 nismo8000
Member since 2007 • 1000 Posts

i paid $30 and it was fully worth it. the sound is pretty damned amazing too. with nice little touches such as bullet casings making different sounds depending on what types of surfaces they interact with on the way to the ground.

Avatar image for GameFan1983
GameFan1983

2189

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#74 GameFan1983
Member since 2004 • 2189 Posts

you kidding? before you listen to those brainless morons/haters with low-mid DX9/10 rigs

for $20 you get the best looking game on PC, that along is worth it. or, not a graphic whore? no problem, thinking about this.

These days, how many PC games offer you a complete game with no hidden charged DLC along with a free access to their game engine? with crysis2, you get

1. the best looking game on PC right now 2. FREE SDK and mod SDK, you can create your own level or play/edit other artists' work result 3. tons of mods and custom maps you can continue playing after finish the SP. 4. a full MP experience with all the free DLC

it is a $200 package!

edit: bottom line, you don't even need to like the SP or MP to like this game, Free SDK and mod SDK + mods along worth more than a $200 rebate, and there's no reason to miss the best looking game on PC.

personally I think the story is more enageing but has less surpsing elements compare to the first, also missed the flying and tank mission, beside that is a wonderful experience.

Avatar image for visceron
visceron

2160

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 1

#75 visceron
Member since 2005 • 2160 Posts

I hope you haven't made your decision yet. Just a little background about myself:

Played the entire campaign of Crysis, absolutely loved it. Not really for the story, but for the gameplay. I even encountered more bugs in the last level than I have in any game in its entirety. (And I completed Dead Island and Stalin vs Martians.)

Played the entire campaign of Warhead, loved it too. It was a little short, but damn that nano suit is fun.

Played the entire campaign of Crysis 2, loved it too. I couldn't stop playing it. The nano suit is back just a little more simplified. Doesn't change the gameplay at all, just makes it easier.

As I read above, someone said that story makes no sense with the first story. This is absolutely true, but I didn't think the story in the first game was the strongest. I loved the game for the gameplay. I enjoyed the story in the second game quite a bit more. Just don't try to line it up with the first game. I can see how this could upset anyone who wanted a story that was a true sequel to the first game. If this is going to bother you, you should wait until the game is cheaper.

The next item that I can see really upsetting a lot of players is that the game is no longer a sandbox. The game is much more linear, but not completely linear. You can still go about almost any situation the way you want to. I ran around stealth almost the entire game and performed stealth kills. If you want another sandbox game, again you should wait for the price to drop more.

There is one thing I didn't like about Crysis 2, the ending. I thought it totally sucked. I feel like the game should have had another level or 2 at the end. I can't really believe where it ended. I guess they want to make another Crysis, which I will be happy to buy. I am not that big on FPS games, but there are 3 series I absolutely love and have played all the games in the series: Half-Life, Crysis, and Riddick.

Avatar image for wis3boi
wis3boi

32507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#76 wis3boi
Member since 2005 • 32507 Posts

you kidding? before you listen to those brainless morons/haters with low-mid DX9/10 rigs

for $20 you get the best looking game on PC, that along is worth it. or, not a graphic whore? no problem, thinking about this.

These days, how many PC games offer you a complete game with no hidden charged DLC along with a free access to their game engine? with crysis2, you get

1. the best looking game on PC right now 2. FREE SDK and mod SDK, you can create your own level or play/edit other artists' work result 3. tons of mods and custom maps you can continue playing after finish the SP. 4. a full MP experience with all the free DLC

it is a $200 package!

GameFan1983
who's payroll you on?
Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts

you kidding? before you listen to those brainless morons/haters with low-mid DX9/10 rigs

for $20 you get the best looking game on PC, that along is worth it. or, not a graphic whore? no problem, thinking about this.

These days, how many PC games offer you a complete game with no hidden charged DLC along with a free access to their game engine? with crysis2, you get

1. the best looking game on PC right now 2. FREE SDK and mod SDK, you can create your own level or play/edit other artists' work result 3. tons of mods and custom maps you can continue playing after finish the SP. 4. a full MP experience with all the free DLC

it is a $200 package!

edit: bottom line, you don't even need to like the SP or MP to like this game, Free SDK and mod SDK + mods along worth more than a $200 rebate, and there's no reason to miss the best looking game on PC.

personally I think the story is more enageing but has less surpsing elements compare to the first, also missed the flying and tank mission, beside that is a wonderful experience.

GameFan1983
That's astoundingly dumb. I can go download UDK right now and modify with a far better toolset then Crytek has ever produced, for free - or purchase a UDK title - one of the huge variety - that supports SDK development, same goes for any other Unreal 3 Engine title. Or hell, why not Crysis 1 with its far stronger modding scene, a huge multitude of Source games or waiting for the Cryengine 3 sandbox stand alone client. Or why not Unity for actually creating custom titles with easy scripting. Of all bad ways to pitch a game, let alone a godamn toolset for anyone interested in mods, modding or games development you've taken the cake, hurled it in the air and let it let it hit the ceiling.
Avatar image for GameFan1983
GameFan1983

2189

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#78 GameFan1983
Member since 2004 • 2189 Posts

[QUOTE="GameFan1983"]

you kidding? before you listen to those brainless morons/haters with low-mid DX9/10 rigs

for $20 you get the best looking game on PC, that along is worth it. or, not a graphic whore? no problem, thinking about this.

These days, how many PC games offer you a complete game with no hidden charged DLC along with a free access to their game engine? with crysis2, you get

1. the best looking game on PC right now 2. FREE SDK and mod SDK, you can create your own level or play/edit other artists' work result 3. tons of mods and custom maps you can continue playing after finish the SP. 4. a full MP experience with all the free DLC

it is a $200 package!

edit: bottom line, you don't even need to like the SP or MP to like this game, Free SDK and mod SDK + mods along worth more than a $200 rebate, and there's no reason to miss the best looking game on PC.

personally I think the story is more enageing but has less surpsing elements compare to the first, also missed the flying and tank mission, beside that is a wonderful experience.

skrat_01

That's astoundingly dumb. I can go download UDK right now and modify with a far better toolset then Crytek has ever produced, for free - or purchase a UDK title - one of the huge variety - that supports SDK development, same goes for any other Unreal 3 Engine title. Or hell, why not Crysis 1 with its far stronger modding scene, a huge multitude of Source games or waiting for the Cryengine 3 sandbox stand alone client. Or why not Unity for actually creating custom titles with easy scripting. Of all bad ways to pitch a game, let alone a godamn toolset for anyone interested in mods, modding or games development you've taken the cake, hurled it in the air and let it let it hit the ceiling.

UDK is a "better" toolset than crytek ever produced?? ROFL!!! let's first put that idiocy aside, I want thank you for making it clear that you have little moding knowledge/experience over either engine if any at all. it's easy to putdown something you don't understand. first in case you don't know, crytek has a stand along version CE3 SDK too, v3.39 for FREE. with the capability that is far superior to CE2 and UDK combined.

without hating on UDK, I myself using it and love it, it's an engine only suited for small scale games (the memory optimization on texture draw is terrible) also most visual function and material came from UDK are static, and if you want make them dynamic, well you may, unless you are a professional artist versed in maya or 3ds max, but in SDK everything is dynamic and volumetric. for example, UDK doesn't even have a TOD function, you just select a sun direction template and then have to modify the skydom and cloud moving pattern yourself. it's an engine encourage modder to build/draw martial and assets of their own. it's a good engine for small scale games, and the ability to craft and sculpted thing are nothing come close to what CE3 SDK has to offer.

and in case if you haven't walked into 2010 already, most CE2 modding projects were jumped to CE3. Crysis1's modding community is no way bigger than crysis2's, it took crysis1 5 years to have less than 5 good looking decent mods/maps out of 200+, which can't hold a candle to crysis2 low-mid setting.

Also CE2's SDK was fun and straight forward and all, but severely lacking in flexibility and assets storage, it's only suited for one or two style of rendering, beach and sun, tropical environment, change TOD and all over again, .that's why you don't see many CE2 licensed game. CE3 however already got at least 30 licensed games in develop or soon to release, it has a bigger and richer modding community than CE2 can ever dream to have in its 5 years life cycle, again, asset storage, pixel quality, polygon unit handling and the optimization of CE3 far above and beyond CE2 and UDK combined.

if you perfer to live in the past and moaning how good looking CE2 was compare to titles before 2010, stay there. if you have a strong DX11 rig and can't wait to see what's out there in 2012 and beyond, get crysis2 and CE3

Avatar image for topgunmv
topgunmv

10880

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#79 topgunmv
Member since 2003 • 10880 Posts

[QUOTE="topgunmv"]

[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]

I see so your "comparison" on talent is when the random marine is screaming at the top of his lungs compared to a guy that is trying to explain to something to you over a walkie talkie.. How the hell was he suppose to sound? I mean seriously, its laughable that you can even compare the two.. Do you even know what your talking about? How the hell can you compare the "talent" level of the two with such ridiculous comparisons.. How bout we start using the constant walkie talkie voices over the intercom that Nomad constantly gets.. They are just as dry and just as the same as what you posted for Crysis 2.. In the end of day Crysis and Crysis 2 do not have amazing voice acting, they basically have the standard voice acting you expect to see from these type of games..

sSubZerOo

Butthurt much?

Browse the forums, you'll find tons of people talking about how bad the voice acting is, I'm not the one in my own little bubble on the issue here.

What a great rebuttal, I can see this debate is going far.. And "hey other people think so too!" is not a real point.. We all have opinions and share from.. The point I am making is the fact that I would hardly call either game having great voice acting.. It doesn't take much to shout or show alittle anger in dialogue.. Its only when you see in games (mainly rpg's it seems) where voice acting goes beyond in trying to flesh out a character in showing much more emotion.. So in the end of the day I find it hilarious that people think there is much difference between the two.. You compared two husky bad ass marine voices with a random scientist voice.. What exactly is he suppose to sound like? The radical majority of games now a days have GREAT voice acting and Crysis and Crysis 2 fall into that median.. There is nothing amazing about it, but nothing bad about it either.

You're trying to debate? Looks to me like you were just spazzing out.

Avatar image for 04dcarraher
04dcarraher

23857

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#80 04dcarraher
Member since 2004 • 23857 Posts
Crysis 2 isnt even worth the time of day if you liked the 1st.
Avatar image for SF_KiLLaMaN
SF_KiLLaMaN

6446

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#81 SF_KiLLaMaN
Member since 2007 • 6446 Posts
Crysis 2 isnt even worth the time of day if you liked the 1st. 04dcarraher
I loved the first and liked the second. Crysis 2 was fun and people automatically write it off for not being enough like the first.
Avatar image for Sentinel112
Sentinel112

571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 Sentinel112
Member since 2006 • 571 Posts
I was really anticipating Crysis 2 back in the day. But to be brutally honest, the gameplay is abysmal: so no, it is not worth 20 bucks. The ending was anti-climatic. The gunsounds are quite nice though. It just did not hit the right cords for me personally.
Avatar image for dav2693
dav2693

423

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 dav2693
Member since 2010 • 423 Posts

Crysis 2 was one of the biggest dissapointments in gaming history for me.

Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#84 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts

[QUOTE="skrat_01"][QUOTE="GameFan1983"]

you kidding? before you listen to those brainless morons/haters with low-mid DX9/10 rigs

for $20 you get the best looking game on PC, that along is worth it. or, not a graphic whore? no problem, thinking about this.

These days, how many PC games offer you a complete game with no hidden charged DLC along with a free access to their game engine? with crysis2, you get

1. the best looking game on PC right now 2. FREE SDK and mod SDK, you can create your own level or play/edit other artists' work result 3. tons of mods and custom maps you can continue playing after finish the SP. 4. a full MP experience with all the free DLC

it is a $200 package!

edit: bottom line, you don't even need to like the SP or MP to like this game, Free SDK and mod SDK + mods along worth more than a $200 rebate, and there's no reason to miss the best looking game on PC.

personally I think the story is more enageing but has less surpsing elements compare to the first, also missed the flying and tank mission, beside that is a wonderful experience.

GameFan1983

That's astoundingly dumb. I can go download UDK right now and modify with a far better toolset then Crytek has ever produced, for free - or purchase a UDK title - one of the huge variety - that supports SDK development, same goes for any other Unreal 3 Engine title. Or hell, why not Crysis 1 with its far stronger modding scene, a huge multitude of Source games or waiting for the Cryengine 3 sandbox stand alone client. Or why not Unity for actually creating custom titles with easy scripting. Of all bad ways to pitch a game, let alone a godamn toolset for anyone interested in mods, modding or games development you've taken the cake, hurled it in the air and let it let it hit the ceiling.

UDK is a "better" toolset than crytek ever produced?? ROFL!!! let's first put that idiocy aside, I want thank you for making it clear that you have little moding knowledge/experience over either engine if any at all. it's easy to putdown something you don't understand. first in case you don't know, crytek has a stand along version CE3 SDK too, v3.39 for FREE. with the capability that is far superior to CE2 and UDK combined.

without hating on UDK, I myself using it and love it, it's an engine only suited for small scale games (the memory optimization on texture draw is terrible) also most visual function and material came from UDK are static, and if you want make them dynamic, well you may, unless you are a professional artist versed in maya or 3ds max, but in SDK everything is dynamic and volumetric. for example, UDK doesn't even have a TOD function, you just select a sun direction template and then have to modify the skydom and cloud moving pattern yourself. it's an engine encourage modder to build/draw martial and assets of their own. it's a good engine for small scale games, and the ability to craft and sculpted thing are nothing come close to what CE3 SDK has to offer.

and in case if you haven't walked into 2010 already, most CE2 modding projects were jumped to CE3. Crysis1's modding community is no way bigger than crysis2's, it took crysis1 5 years to have less than 5 good looking decent mods/maps out of 200+, which can't hold a candle to crysis2 low-mid setting.

Also CE2's SDK was fun and straight forward and all, but severely lacking in flexibility and assets storage, it's only suited for one or two style of rendering, beach and sun, tropical environment, change TOD and all over again, .that's why you don't see many CE2 licensed game. CE3 however already got at least 30 licensed games in develop or soon to release, it has a bigger and richer modding community than CE2 can ever dream to have in its 5 years life cycle, again, asset storage, pixel quality, polygon unit handling and the optimization of CE3 far above and beyond CE2 and UDK combined.

if you perfer to live in the past and moaning how good looking CE2 was compare to titles before 2010, stay there. if you have a strong DX11 rig and can't wait to see what's out there in 2012 and beyond, get crysis2 and CE3

Don't make assumptions, it only makes you look like an idiot. I use these toolsets, yes I develop and yes I'm actually involved in the damn games industry and had exposure to a nice volume of toolsets. The Unreal Engine maintains its popularity for a reason, and that boils down to how excellent its toolset is, the versatility of the engine and ease of licensing; and as a result it has by a huge margin, the most developer support, community support and a massive community. CryEngine 3 does not. You're using a horrible straw man argument; did I say that it didn't have technical advantages, that it was a worse engine than the UDK? No. What I did say is that your idea of buying a game for prefabs, of a toolset that does have a free release is outstandingly stupid, especially considering there are games with SDKs supporting a far better variety of prefabs out there. The toolset is not as good, that's absolutely glaring, which isn't to say Crytek aren't making an effort. Crysis 2 modding is a small microcosm in general; there have been no large moves of creative surges. Theres' no Call of the Fireflies or MechWarrior Living Legends, and while porting is certainly good, it's impossible for modifications like Living Legends, forcing developers to back massive concessions backtracking years of progress. It doesn't have nearly the community Crysis did, which itself petered out. Naturally I'm hoping stand alone CryEngine 2 will actually offer some competition to UDK, and gain a bit more support. That isn't the case at the moment, and the community is reflective of it, and of the SDK's and Crytek's own shortcomings. Which again comes around to. Using an SDK as a reason or justification to buy a video game; particularly this example, unless they're wanting it for prefabs is astoundingly stupid, and when you use a outright avoid my points with a straw man argument and try to counterpoint and make dumb claims about people you're only digging yourself a hole of bad logic.
Avatar image for DJ_Headshot
DJ_Headshot

6427

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#85 DJ_Headshot
Member since 2010 • 6427 Posts
Yes very much worth it I didn't quite get my monies worth at full price for $20 its a no brainier.
Avatar image for GameFan1983
GameFan1983

2189

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#86 GameFan1983
Member since 2004 • 2189 Posts

[QUOTE="GameFan1983"]

[QUOTE="skrat_01"] That's astoundingly dumb. I can go download UDK right now and modify with a far better toolset then Crytek has ever produced, for free - or purchase a UDK title - one of the huge variety - that supports SDK development, same goes for any other Unreal 3 Engine title. Or hell, why not Crysis 1 with its far stronger modding scene, a huge multitude of Source games or waiting for the Cryengine 3 sandbox stand alone client. Or why not Unity for actually creating custom titles with easy scripting. Of all bad ways to pitch a game, let alone a godamn toolset for anyone interested in mods, modding or games development you've taken the cake, hurled it in the air and let it let it hit the ceiling.skrat_01

UDK is a "better" toolset than crytek ever produced?? ROFL!!! let's first put that idiocy aside, I want thank you for making it clear that you have little moding knowledge/experience over either engine if any at all. it's easy to putdown something you don't understand. first in case you don't know, crytek has a stand along version CE3 SDK too, v3.39 for FREE. with the capability that is far superior to CE2 and UDK combined.

without hating on UDK, I myself using it and love it, it's an engine only suited for small scale games (the memory optimization on texture draw is terrible) also most visual function and material came from UDK are static, and if you want make them dynamic, well you may, unless you are a professional artist versed in maya or 3ds max, but in SDK everything is dynamic and volumetric. for example, UDK doesn't even have a TOD function, you just select a sun direction template and then have to modify the skydom and cloud moving pattern yourself. it's an engine encourage modder to build/draw martial and assets of their own. it's a good engine for small scale games, and the ability to craft and sculpted thing are nothing come close to what CE3 SDK has to offer.

and in case if you haven't walked into 2010 already, most CE2 modding projects were jumped to CE3. Crysis1's modding community is no way bigger than crysis2's, it took crysis1 5 years to have less than 5 good looking decent mods/maps out of 200+, which can't hold a candle to crysis2 low-mid setting.

Also CE2's SDK was fun and straight forward and all, but severely lacking in flexibility and assets storage, it's only suited for one or two style of rendering, beach and sun, tropical environment, change TOD and all over again, .that's why you don't see many CE2 licensed game. CE3 however already got at least 30 licensed games in develop or soon to release, it has a bigger and richer modding community than CE2 can ever dream to have in its 5 years life cycle, again, asset storage, pixel quality, polygon unit handling and the optimization of CE3 far above and beyond CE2 and UDK combined.

if you perfer to live in the past and moaning how good looking CE2 was compare to titles before 2010, stay there. if you have a strong DX11 rig and can't wait to see what's out there in 2012 and beyond, get crysis2 and CE3

Don't make assumptions, it only makes you look like an idiot. I use these toolsets, yes I develop and yes I'm actually involved in the damn games industry and had exposure to a nice volume of toolsets. The Unreal Engine maintains its popularity for a reason, and that boils down to how excellent its toolset is, the versatility of the engine and ease of licensing; and as a result it has by a huge margin, the most developer support, community support and a massive community. CryEngine 3 does not. You're using a horrible straw man argument; did I say that it didn't have technical advantages, that it was a worse engine than the UDK? No. What I did say is that your idea of buying a game for prefabs, of a toolset that does have a free release is outstandingly stupid, especially considering there are games with SDKs supporting a far better variety of prefabs out there. The toolset is not as good, that's absolutely glaring, which isn't to say Crytek aren't making an effort. Crysis 2 modding is a small microcosm in general; there have been no large moves of creative surges. Theres' no Call of the Fireflies or MechWarrior Living Legends, and while porting is certainly good, it's impossible for modifications like Living Legends, forcing developers to back massive concessions backtracking years of progress. It doesn't have nearly the community Crysis did, which itself petered out. Naturally I'm hoping stand alone CryEngine 2 will actually offer some competition to UDK, and gain a bit more support. That isn't the case at the moment, and the community is reflective of it, and of the SDK's and Crytek's own shortcomings. Which again comes around to. Using an SDK as a reason or justification to buy a video game; particularly this example, unless they're wanting it for prefabs is astoundingly stupid, and when you use a outright avoid my points with a straw man argument and try to counterpoint and make dumb claims about people you're only digging yourself a hole of bad logic.

right~~ I'm the one making assumption, why keep bringing more idiotic arguments to the table after I schooled all your old ones? BTW,Please stop abusing the word logic as if you had any in that rubbish post of yours.

UDK wins in " popularity"? lol! elementary school math anymore? how many years UDK has been around? and commercial version CE3 wasn't available till 2011 Q2, even though, in less than half year it's licensed games and mod projects reached a global scale, more massive than UE3 generated in 2 years of time.

Saying CE3's popularity is lower than CE2 only made it more obvious how clueless you are, in less than 11 month, CE3 licensed games almost doubled what CE2 had from 5 years combined. ->

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CryEngine

as for Crysis2's modding community size(I myself am a part of crysis1-2 modding community just so you know)wow, grats, you made yourself sound even dumber. in case you still haven't pull your head out from sand since 2007, most serious big modding projects were shifted from CE2 to CE3 due to better flexibility, better visual asset and pretty much everything else, many CE2 modders are modding for CE3 now and still learning, to this date, there areno less than 100 announced mod projects and other couple hundred working in process, and in my PC along there are 2 dozen finished mods. CE2 had more junk mods, ture due to its 5 years existence vs CE3's 11 month, but following the growing speed of CE3's modding community it shall surpass CE2's mods count in less than 2 years.

more over, I NEVER said CE3 and modding tool is the only reason to buy cryiss2,you put the words in my month and tried to call it a day to save the amzing dumb point you started from begining, sure it's one of the many reasons to buy crysis2 and I even clearly stated, if you are too lazy to learn to mod, you can still enjoy the work from others.

Now, look at who's the onemake dumb assumtpions on everything he doesn't know jack about.

Avatar image for fenriz275
fenriz275

2393

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#87 fenriz275
Member since 2003 • 2393 Posts

Not really, I'd wait until it's one sale for $5 if you really want to play it.

Avatar image for ssvegeta555
ssvegeta555

2448

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#88 ssvegeta555
Member since 2003 • 2448 Posts

Not really, I'd wait until it's one sale for $5 if you really want to play it.

fenriz275
What about $7.50? That's what Amazon has it for right now.
Avatar image for alishathomaz
alishathomaz

127

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#89 alishathomaz
Member since 2012 • 127 Posts

Its graphics ae good.. & it should be free.

Avatar image for danjammer69
danjammer69

4331

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#90 danjammer69
Member since 2004 • 4331 Posts
no it like sucks hardJigglyWiggly_
No it doesn't. BUT, it is not what it could have and should have been. It is still an enjoyable SP experience. Worth $20? IDK about that one. I would wait for a Steam Sale. The Summer Sales are not far off and I am sure this will be covered. Without a worthwhile MP experience I can't say it is worth the full $20. Maybe $15, definately $10.But $20? Nah, pass.