Do all 128-bit cards stink?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Vuud
Vuud

1336

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Vuud
Member since 2003 • 1336 Posts

I'm shopping for a new card (making the big switch from ATI to Nvidia, ATI's drivers have given me endless grief) And I saw a 1 GB Nvidia card at a great price, but it's only 128-bit interface. The 256-bit of course would give better performance, but the price is signifigantly higher. So my question is could a card even with 1 gb of memory but only 128-bit be outmatched by say a 512 mb card with a 256-bit interface?

Avatar image for aura_enchanted
aura_enchanted

7942

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#2 aura_enchanted
Member since 2006 • 7942 Posts

they dont suck at all my hd 3870's are 128-bit and they match well against a9800gtx+ which is a respectable result. a single one will still do most games on high though its time is running short. so i say no they arent bad but aging certainly 256-bit cards are just much more efficient at graphical producing and as a result can do more complex tasks faster. its the age old situation: small, faster, and more reliable nothing wrong witgh them its just.. not as good as it could be.

Avatar image for UltimateGamer95
UltimateGamer95

4720

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#3 UltimateGamer95
Member since 2006 • 4720 Posts

I'm shopping for a new card (making the big switch from ATI to Nvidia, ATI's drivers have given me endless grief) And I saw a 1 GB Nvidia card at a great price, but it's only 128-bit interface. The 256-bit of course would give better performance, but the price is signifigantly higher. So my question is could a card even with 1 gb of memory but only 128-bit be outmatched by say a 512 mb card with a 256-bit interface?

Vuud

no the 256-bit interface card would win depending on what card. Why have Ati's drivers given you endless grief? Try Catalyst 9.8 instead of 9.7 and that's because Catalyst 9.7 was mainly released for Windows 7 RTM and this could be interfering somehow.

Avatar image for chefkw
chefkw

2588

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 chefkw
Member since 2004 • 2588 Posts

I'm shopping for a new card (making the big switch from ATI to Nvidia, ATI's drivers have given me endless grief) And I saw a 1 GB Nvidia card at a great price, but it's only 128-bit interface. The 256-bit of course would give better performance, but the price is signifigantly higher. So my question is could a card even with 1 gb of memory but only 128-bit be outmatched by say a 512 mb card with a 256-bit interface?

Vuud

It depends on the card, but usually 256-bit cards are going to be high-end cards while 128-bit are the budget to mid-range cards. So when comparing two cards of the same generation, the 256-bit will likely trump the 128-bit.

But all this is secondary to the graphics chip itself anyway. The chip is what really matters.

Avatar image for RayvinAzn
RayvinAzn

12552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 RayvinAzn
Member since 2004 • 12552 Posts

they dont suck at all my hd 3870's are 128-bit and they match well against a9800gtx+ which is a respectable result. a single one will still do most games on high though its time is running short. so i say no they arent bad but aging certainly 256-bit cards are just much more efficient at graphical producing and as a result can do more complex tasks faster. its the age old situation: small, faster, and more reliable nothing wrong witgh them its just.. not as good as it could be.

aura_enchanted
Your HD3870's are 256-bit, not 128-bit, and unless you're talking about them in Crossfire, they do not match up against a 9800GTX+ by themselves. That being said, the actual interface has very little to do with it, it's all about available memory bandwidth. The HD4770 uses a 128-bit interface, but thanks to the use of GDDR5, its available memory bandwidth is nearly the same as that of the HD4850 which uses GDDR3 and a 256-bit interface. And no, 1GB of VRAM on a 128-bit interface will NOT be the same as 512MB on a 256-bit interface (assuming we're talking about like memory types of course).
Avatar image for clyde46
clyde46

49061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#6 clyde46
Member since 2005 • 49061 Posts

My 4670 1Gb isnt that bad. Plays Crysis well.

Avatar image for washd123
washd123

3418

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 washd123
Member since 2003 • 3418 Posts

it depends on other things as well like shader count, clock speed, memory speed. if the cards are the same in all those aspects or similar (provided brands are the same) then the 256mb version will perform better. however dont rule out 128bit cards like the hd4600 series and the hd4770. which offer performance that rivals or overcomes their 256bit counterparts

Avatar image for CrazyKilljoy117
CrazyKilljoy117

1073

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#8 CrazyKilljoy117
Member since 2006 • 1073 Posts

My 4670 1Gb isnt that bad. Plays Crysis well.

clyde46
Same here, except I have the 512MB version.
Avatar image for Vuud
Vuud

1336

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Vuud
Member since 2003 • 1336 Posts

Since I have a thread open I might as well try and get help with my current problem. My HD 4350 just crapped out. I don't know what happened, but suddenly it started freezing my pc. First I couldn't click on anything, then the mouse pointer would freeze up, and I'd have to reboot. Sometimes it would tell me that ati2dvag.dll stopped working properly. Then I notice that I could not open CCC any more, it said that it did not support the current device or something like that. So I uninstall everything, run driver cleaner pro, and reinstall from the disk that came with the card, but it still won't work! I still can't access CCC and after a few minutes the PC freezes up. None of my restore points will work either. Once I got a BSOD telling me that the problem was from ati2dvag.dll BUT I'm not sure if it's that file itself or something hardware related.

Avatar image for k0r3aN_pR1d3
k0r3aN_pR1d3

2148

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#10 k0r3aN_pR1d3
Member since 2005 • 2148 Posts
Bits come first, then memory. Think of it like a highway. the 128 bit card is like a 4 lane highway, and the 256 bit is like a 8 lane highway. Even though the 128 bit card has 1 GB of memory, you won't be able to utilize it all due to the bit rate. So in this case, even if the 128 bit card had 4 gb of video memory, it wouldn't give any noticeable performance boosts. There are some exceptions here and there, but 128 bit cards don't stink per say. They do the job needed, but they won't be running high end games at 1920x1200 anytime soon.
Avatar image for imprezawrx500
imprezawrx500

19187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 imprezawrx500
Member since 2004 • 19187 Posts
it really depends on the card. the 4670s are great cards. all 128bit does is limit the memory bandwidth.
Avatar image for Vuud
Vuud

1336

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 Vuud
Member since 2003 • 1336 Posts

Tell my what you think about this one:

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814141093

It looks good but I've gotten cards that look good but turn out to be real clunkers.

edit -- forget that, what about THIS http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814150370

Now that looks slick. I think I want this one.

Avatar image for Vuud
Vuud

1336

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 Vuud
Member since 2003 • 1336 Posts

I'm 90% settled on this one http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814130501

It turns out my 4350 is only 64-bit so a 128-bit will be quite an improvement, plus double the memory. It aslso didn't have a fan, just a heat sink. And this was a very hot summer on a cheap card so I think the head got to it so it's out of commission.

Avatar image for washd123
washd123

3418

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 washd123
Member since 2003 • 3418 Posts

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814121324

much much better for not much more.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814121320

cheaper and better

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814102838

again cheaper but better.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814121329

again way better

Avatar image for CZ_Shadow_X58
CZ_Shadow_X58

96

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 CZ_Shadow_X58
Member since 2009 • 96 Posts

I'm 90% settled on this one http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814130501

It turns out my 4350 is only 64-bit so a 128-bit will be quite an improvement, plus double the memory. It aslso didn't have a fan, just a heat sink. And this was a very hot summer on a cheap card so I think the head got to it so it's out of commission.

Vuud

NOOOOOOOOOOO, PLEASE DO NOT GET THAT CARD!!!!!!!!! That's is a terrible card!!!! It is about equivalent to my 8600 GTS, and that sucks!!! If you play some games, then please get this:

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814102837

It may be twice the price of what you are currently looking at, but it is worth it!!! Absolute bargain at the moment too.

Avatar image for aura_enchanted
aura_enchanted

7942

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#16 aura_enchanted
Member since 2006 • 7942 Posts

[QUOTE="Vuud"]

I'm 90% settled on this one http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814130501

It turns out my 4350 is only 64-bit so a 128-bit will be quite an improvement, plus double the memory. It aslso didn't have a fan, just a heat sink. And this was a very hot summer on a cheap card so I think the head got to it so it's out of commission.

CZ_Shadow_X58

NOOOOOOOOOOO, PLEASE DO NOT GET THAT CARD!!!!!!!!! That's is a terrible card!!!! It is about equivalent to my 8600 GTS, and that sucks!!! If you play some games, then please get this:

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E1681410283

It may be twice the price of what you are currently looking at, but it is worth it!!! Absolute bargain at the moment too.

i half agree the 9500gt is trash but the hd 4650 and 4670 and mere pennies more and significantly better those babies pack an awful punch and will even do crysis on most resolutions on medium (which is a huge feat all by itself)

Avatar image for Vuud
Vuud

1336

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 Vuud
Member since 2003 • 1336 Posts

Just curious, low-profile cards aren't any different from standard cards right? They still perform the same?

Avatar image for kilerchese
kilerchese

831

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 kilerchese
Member since 2008 • 831 Posts

Just curious, low-profile cards aren't any different from standard cards right? They still perform the same?

Vuud

Yeah, they perform the same. Some company USED to make a low profile 9800 GT.

Look at that, they still do.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814187061

Avatar image for nintendog66
nintendog66

2300

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 nintendog66
Member since 2006 • 2300 Posts

[QUOTE="Vuud"]

I'm 90% settled on this one http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814130501

It turns out my 4350 is only 64-bit so a 128-bit will be quite an improvement, plus double the memory. It aslso didn't have a fan, just a heat sink. And this was a very hot summer on a cheap card so I think the head got to it so it's out of commission.

CZ_Shadow_X58

NOOOOOOOOOOO, PLEASE DO NOT GET THAT CARD!!!!!!!!! That's is a terrible card!!!! It is about equivalent to my 8600 GTS, and that sucks!!! If you play some games, then please get this:

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814102837

It may be twice the price of what you are currently looking at, but it is worth it!!! Absolute bargain at the moment too.

He migh aswell get this HD4870 since it's the same price... http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814102850
Avatar image for Vuud
Vuud

1336

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 Vuud
Member since 2003 • 1336 Posts

Well you can all calm down. I made a purchase. It may not be the very best, but it got rave reviews and it's a very decent card, certainly enough for my needs. I'm not going to say what it is. But this is a replacement for my dead 4350 until I can save up enough to get a real top-of-the-line model.

Avatar image for schober2004
schober2004

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#21 schober2004
Member since 2009 • 25 Posts

Ok,

Actually just correct the 3870's and 3850's are 256 bit that is why they rock. I have an older system and that 3850 (AGP 3870) kicks $@%! As far as the 128-bit interface it is for resolution more then anything else, the card will run all effects and AF but high resolution coupled with AA will kill your frame-rate. Hardcore gamers fight the older 128-bit interface cards.

Avatar image for Vuud
Vuud

1336

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 Vuud
Member since 2003 • 1336 Posts

OH MY GOD!!! I just popped in the new video card and I started crying when I started up Clear Sky. I've never gotten these framerates before. :cry:

So this thread has a happy ending :D