dude enough with the games you've been had....at least i was willing to own up to my mistake eventually lol
your not fooling anyone, i made my messages very clear, your just taking them out of context and leave out the most important parts, so you can try and cover up your childness
so here's some quotes that are plain as day
//4 Processors running at 3 ghz. 4 x 3 = 12 you have 12 ghz OF TOTAL POWER// you left out the power part
then i said this, further showing i was NOT talking about a 12ghz chip, but 4 seperate 3ghz
//OH i dunno maybe that was so she didn't think a quadcore was a 12ghz processor???//yah the magical 12ghz processor....
and
//i never said nor implied you could run a game at 12ghz// hello anyone there?
and
//because it all comes down to the software being able to use it all and any hardware limitations. it will improve even farther as they increase support and design the software better.//
if you use "4" //3ghz// cores at //if you do use each processor at 100% load// you would have 12ghz of total power. not a magical 12ghz processor
You on the otherhand have been implying quadcores only have a total of 3ghz. and the biggest and most simpilest way of seeing that, is the fact that you've denied Everything ive said as WRONG. and have failed to even attempt to explain it because you couldn't
and here is your undeniable proof that im sure you will try yet again to wiggle your way out of
//A quad core at 3GHZ is not equal to 12GHz. I do not care how you make your argument, it is just not. It is 4 cores running a 3GHz, period.//
well id like to see you stick to your story and now admit your wrong, or continue to backpeddle with misunderstanding.
the // are quotes lol, the forum has some bug that wouldn't let me post with them all
Log in to comment