Do You think Skirim will beat W2?

  • 92 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for GeneralShowzer
GeneralShowzer

11598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#51 GeneralShowzer
Member since 2010 • 11598 Posts

[QUOTE="JigglyWiggly_"][QUOTE="morrowindnic"]

No way in hell. I love the Elder Scrolls games but. Skyrim is a console game, it will just be like a Oblvion 1.5. It wont even come close to the quality of a game like W2.

morrowindnic

What quality? You mean not being able to break open doors, or jumping over small obstacles, or being faced with 1000 invisible walls?

Every game has issues, those are W2 issues. Thats not going to stop W2 from being much better then skyrim. Hell just look at all the interviews. Skyrim is going to end up being a disapointment just like Oblivion.

99% of RPG's have those "issues", constricted movements, invisible walls, what the hell do you want it's not a free roaming game.
Avatar image for Darkhell153
Darkhell153

124

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#52 Darkhell153
Member since 2011 • 124 Posts
Let me put it this way, given the current amount of information I am already willing to play the game for a month straight and damn the health risks (and death). I'm certain it'll be good :D
Avatar image for deactivated-6243ee9902175
deactivated-6243ee9902175

5847

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 deactivated-6243ee9902175
Member since 2007 • 5847 Posts

[QUOTE="Whiteblade999"]

Will Skyrim be good? Probably, I know I'm buying it for the mods alone. Will it be a better RPG? Not a chance in hell given how Bethesda wants to make the series more of an action adventure with RPG elements.

jedinat

...hah. I'll take an open world RPG where you can walk around the world encountering NPCs, quests, and dungeons as you will... rather than being pigeon-holed into an established character and propelled through narrative-heavy branching corridor. I can only imagine how you're fooling yourself into thinking a TES game is less an RPG than a Witcher game.

Where is the choice and consequences in Oblivion? How about the meaningful character progression? Oh right there is none for both. If you want an open world RPG go try out Arcanum or Gothic. Oblivion isn't a bad game but looking at the trends started in that game it is obvious Bethesda wants to appeal to the action adventure crowd and not the RPG crowd.

The Witcher 2 doesn't force you into *a* character. By that Geralt acts how you want him to act and not how someone else wants him to act. I imported my saves in which Geralt was the character I wanted him to be. Throughout the game choices I made in the first game were referenced which reinforces it is my character. The second one isn't any different considering the game can totally swing in a different direction if you make certain choices.

Avatar image for Mograine
Mograine

3666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 Mograine
Member since 2006 • 3666 Posts

I never installed mods onto my copy of oblivion and still loved it, and I don't know where you are getting this "10,000 bugs" idea from. Sure Oblivion had some bugs, but not enough to make a fuss about IMO.DavidianMH

Some bugs?

Unofficial Oblivion Patch (note: does not include Shivering Isles nor DLC, strictly vanilla Oblivion)

Things it changed in Oblivion

If you care enough to count "bugs", go ahead...there are 3979 lines in that list.

Avatar image for Mograine
Mograine

3666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 Mograine
Member since 2006 • 3666 Posts

On topic, no it won't.

Sales wise, perhaps. Quality wise, Skyrim will only be enjoyable with a crapload of mods installed, just like Oblivion was. Not much to give Bethesda credit for.

Avatar image for DanielDust
DanielDust

15402

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 DanielDust
Member since 2007 • 15402 Posts
[QUOTE="morrowindnic"]

[QUOTE="JigglyWiggly_"] What quality? You mean not being able to break open doors, or jumping over small obstacles, or being faced with 1000 invisible walls?biggest_loser

Every game has issues, those are W2 issues. Thats not going to stop W2 from being much better then skyrim. Hell just look at all the interviews. Skyrim is going to end up being a disapointment just like Oblivion.

lol every game has problems yes but thats such a weak defensive line: more like every game has problems but some, like W2's, are just a lot more noticeable and serious than others.

Nope it's more like, this is "that kind" of a game (I never heard such complaints about DA, only W2 and that's just Jiggly and you acknowledging him), I don't know a single RPG that lets you go through doors or open them with your fancy sword and forget about jumping over small objects (towards the limit of the map between houses that nobody will ever go there) Jiggly posted a video in which he was also trying to take a house down with his sword. Neither of these are problems they're features for this kind of RPG (linear) and some of them weren't even implemented in games yet.
Avatar image for GeneralShowzer
GeneralShowzer

11598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#57 GeneralShowzer
Member since 2010 • 11598 Posts

On topic, no it won't.

Sales wise, perhaps. Quality wise, Skyrim will only be enjoyable with a crapload of mods installed, just like Oblivion was. Not much to give Bethesda credit for.

Mograine
I found that recent Bethesda games are most fun when they are played the farthest possible from what the developers intended.
Avatar image for Mograine
Mograine

3666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 Mograine
Member since 2006 • 3666 Posts

I found that recent Bethesda games are most fun when they are played the farthest possible from what the developers intended.GeneralShowzer

Indeed. I still find it mind numbing how could Oblivion score so high on consoles. I guess that goes to show how much the standards really differ.

Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#59 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts
How can you not be better than Witcher 2? It lets you have 0 freedom in witcher 2, can't climb over rubble, picklock doors, anyhting good. I rather go to sleep. Oblivion on otherhand was all freedom and stuff, and Skyrim will be epic as well. Also FPS combat is awesome.JigglyWiggly_
OH SNAP!!! +Respect ;)
Avatar image for biggest_loser
biggest_loser

24508

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 60

User Lists: 0

#60 biggest_loser
Member since 2007 • 24508 Posts

[QUOTE="biggest_loser"]

[QUOTE="morrowindnic"]

Every game has issues, those are W2 issues. Thats not going to stop W2 from being much better then skyrim. Hell just look at all the interviews. Skyrim is going to end up being a disapointment just like Oblivion.

GeneralShowzer

lol every game has problems yes but thats such a weak excuse, because some like the WC2's issues are more noticeable and severe and more likely to hamper playing time.

Like what?

Bad optimisation and inconsistent frame rates, extreme popup during new areas, like buildings missing for a certain duration and then eventually loading, menus taking over 20 seconds to open :( If i wanted to be really harsh I could also talk about the invisible walls cornering the riverbanks etc

Fortunately I was one of the ones not bogged down by activation problems!

Avatar image for GeneralShowzer
GeneralShowzer

11598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#61 GeneralShowzer
Member since 2010 • 11598 Posts

[QUOTE="GeneralShowzer"]

[QUOTE="biggest_loser"] lol every game has problems yes but thats such a weak excuse, because some like the WC2's issues are more noticeable and severe and more likely to hamper playing time.

biggest_loser

Like what?

Bad optimisation and inconsistent frame rates, extreme popup during new areas, like buildings missing for a certain duration and then eventually loading, menus taking over 20 seconds to open :( If i wanted to be really harsh I could also talk about the invisible walls cornering the riverbanks etc

Fortunately I was one of the ones not bogged down by activation problems!

Get a better PC. Had none of those problems. The menu thing is resolved by deleting your saved games.

Avatar image for biggest_loser
biggest_loser

24508

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 60

User Lists: 0

#62 biggest_loser
Member since 2007 • 24508 Posts

[QUOTE="biggest_loser"]

[QUOTE="GeneralShowzer"] Like what?

GeneralShowzer

Bad optimisation and inconsistent frame rates, extreme popup during new areas, like buildings missing for a certain duration and then eventually loading, menus taking over 20 seconds to open :( If i wanted to be really harsh I could also talk about the invisible walls cornering the riverbanks etc

Fortunately I was one of the ones not bogged down by activation problems!

Get a better PC. Had none of those problems. The menu thing is resolved by deleting your saved games.

Why should i get a better PC when I'm meeting the requirements? Even then, I have to turn all the settings on low and still it barely reaches over 30 fps. And the menu thing still shouldn't be there in the first place. Especially considering they had a similar problem in the first game. I find it funny that you were so quick to jump on the game for having a radial menu and yet you're willing to defend such blatant flaws.

Avatar image for jedinat
jedinat

3560

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 jedinat
Member since 2003 • 3560 Posts

[QUOTE="jedinat"]

[QUOTE="Whiteblade999"]

Will Skyrim be good? Probably, I know I'm buying it for the mods alone. Will it be a better RPG? Not a chance in hell given how Bethesda wants to make the series more of an action adventure with RPG elements.

Whiteblade999

...hah. I'll take an open world RPG where you can walk around the world encountering NPCs, quests, and dungeons as you will... rather than being pigeon-holed into an established character and propelled through narrative-heavy branching corridor. I can only imagine how you're fooling yourself into thinking a TES game is less an RPG than a Witcher game.

Where is the choice and consequences in Oblivion? How about the meaningful character progression? Oh right there is none for both. If you want an open world RPG go try out Arcanum or Gothic. Oblivion isn't a bad game but looking at the trends started in that game it is obvious Bethesda wants to appeal to the action adventure crowd and not the RPG crowd.

The Witcher 2 doesn't force you into *a* character. By that Geralt acts how you want him to act and not how someone else wants him to act. I imported my saves in which Geralt was the character I wanted him to be. Throughout the game choices I made in the first game were referenced which reinforces it is my character. The second one isn't any different considering the game can totally swing in a different direction if you make certain choices.

"Choice and consequence" related to plot branchings has never been a defining trait of RPGs. Historically it's more been along the lines of: "I have a bow and three arrows, do I engage the troll or make a hasty retreat? Engage!" Immediate consequences ensue. lol. TES games provide such "roleplaying" in spades.

And sure you can choose "which" Geralt you want to be, but you can't choose not to be Geralt, lol.

Avatar image for GeneralShowzer
GeneralShowzer

11598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#64 GeneralShowzer
Member since 2010 • 11598 Posts

[QUOTE="GeneralShowzer"]

[QUOTE="biggest_loser"]

Bad optimisation and inconsistent frame rates, extreme popup during new areas, like buildings missing for a certain duration and then eventually loading, menus taking over 20 seconds to open :( If i wanted to be really harsh I could also talk about the invisible walls cornering the riverbanks etc

Fortunately I was one of the ones not bogged down by activation problems!

biggest_loser

Get a better PC. Had none of those problems. The menu thing is resolved by deleting your saved games.

Why should i get a better PC when I'm meeting the requirements? Even then, I have to turn all the settings on low and still it barely reaches over 30 fps. And the menu thing still shouldn't be there in the first place. Especially considering they had a similar problem in the first game. I find it funny that you were so quick to jump on the game for having a radial menu and yet you're willing to defend such blatant flaws.

What are your specs? It takes five seconds to delete your old saved games. It's not even worth to mention something that can be fixed so easily.

Avatar image for chaoz-king
chaoz-king

5956

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#65 chaoz-king
Member since 2005 • 5956 Posts
I think it will.
Avatar image for Elann2008
Elann2008

33028

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#67 Elann2008
Member since 2007 • 33028 Posts

[QUOTE="GeneralShowzer"]

[QUOTE="biggest_loser"]

Bad optimisation and inconsistent frame rates, extreme popup during new areas, like buildings missing for a certain duration and then eventually loading, menus taking over 20 seconds to open :( If i wanted to be really harsh I could also talk about the invisible walls cornering the riverbanks etc

Fortunately I was one of the ones not bogged down by activation problems!

biggest_loser

Get a better PC. Had none of those problems. The menu thing is resolved by deleting your saved games.

Why should i get a better PC when I'm meeting the requirements? Even then, I have to turn all the settings on low and still it barely reaches over 30 fps. And the menu thing still shouldn't be there in the first place. Especially considering they had a similar problem in the first game.I find it funny that you were so quick to jump on the game for having a radial menu and yet you're willing to defend such blatant flaws.

1) Menu's do lag a bit. For me, it's about a 2 second lag, no more than that, all the time. It's not game-breaking. It's something I've gotten use to. Like General said, there's a "fix" for it.

2) Meeting the "requirements" isn't enough. You should know that by now. I never follow requirements and recommendations. Build a rig that's powerful enough. Most people in the PC games and PC hardware forum, know that much. If you are uninformed, you could always ask and we would be glad to help!

What makes you think Skyrim won't make some of our gaming PC's chug? I'm pretty sure there will be bugs on Bethesda's end as well. I think we're all forgetting the past here. :)

3) I remember General saying that, but we all say things like that at first and then have a change of heart later. The fact that he purchased the game, enjoyed it, and judging by his recent posts, he has been patient with CDPR while they get rid of bugs; I would say General is being really fair, among everything else. :D


Avatar image for Elann2008
Elann2008

33028

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#68 Elann2008
Member since 2007 • 33028 Posts

[QUOTE="Whiteblade999"]

[QUOTE="jedinat"] ...hah. I'll take an open world RPG where you can walk around the world encountering NPCs, quests, and dungeons as you will... rather than being pigeon-holed into an established character and propelled through narrative-heavy branching corridor. I can only imagine how you're fooling yourself into thinking a TES game is less an RPG than a Witcher game.

jedinat

Where is the choice and consequences in Oblivion? How about the meaningful character progression? Oh right there is none for both. If you want an open world RPG go try out Arcanum or Gothic. Oblivion isn't a bad game but looking at the trends started in that game it is obvious Bethesda wants to appeal to the action adventure crowd and not the RPG crowd.

The Witcher 2 doesn't force you into *a* character. By that Geralt acts how you want him to act and not how someone else wants him to act. I imported my saves in which Geralt was the character I wanted him to be. Throughout the game choices I made in the first game were referenced which reinforces it is my character. The second one isn't any different considering the game can totally swing in a different direction if you make certain choices.

"Choice and consequence" related to plot branchings has never been a defining trait of RPGs. Historically it's more been along the lines of: "I have a bow and three arrows, do I engage the troll or make a hasty retreat? Engage!" Immediate consequences ensue. lol. TES games provide such "roleplaying" in spades.

And sure you can choose "which" Geralt you want to be,but you can't choose not to be Geralt, lol.

Oh yes you can. I'm guessing you don't know enough about The Witcher, Geralt of Rivia. I'm not going to give away the secret though. Too many spoilers.

Avatar image for KalDurenik
KalDurenik

3736

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#69 KalDurenik
Member since 2004 • 3736 Posts
Skyrim is overhyped all the information show that its going to be another oblivion in terms of game progression... So... Even worse then morrowind and their older games =/.
Avatar image for Starshine_M2A2
Starshine_M2A2

5593

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 19

#70 Starshine_M2A2
Member since 2006 • 5593 Posts

I have an original unpatched copy of Oblivion and i've never encountered a single bug...

Avatar image for Artekus
Artekus

15700

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 Artekus
Member since 2008 • 15700 Posts
Not in terms of characters or story I don't think. In terms of scale, freedom, customisation and overall sales - yes it will.
Avatar image for Inconsistancy
Inconsistancy

8094

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 Inconsistancy
Member since 2004 • 8094 Posts
Let me put it this way, given the current amount of information I am already willing to play the game for a month straight and damn the health risks (and death). I'm certain it'll be good :DDarkhell153
O.o, I don't recall seeing any real gameplay, just little cinematic shots, of a single slash or spell cast. I'd really not trust so little, so much.
Avatar image for mrbojangles25
mrbojangles25

60866

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#73 mrbojangles25
Member since 2005 • 60866 Posts

I am happy I live in a world where I can love both equally and enjoy them all. Why should I pick what is my favorite out of my two children!?

Avatar image for goosetroop
goosetroop

285

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 goosetroop
Member since 2011 • 285 Posts

Yeah, i think it will. Even though Witcher 2 is the boobies.

Avatar image for cabose38
cabose38

1162

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 cabose38
Member since 2005 • 1162 Posts

I would be hyped for Skyrim, but Oblivion was such a pile of crap that I'm not sure if Skyrim will actually be good. If it is like Morrowind, then I will definitely buy it though.

Avatar image for teardropmina
teardropmina

2806

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#76 teardropmina
Member since 2006 • 2806 Posts

[QUOTE="morrowindnic"]

[QUOTE="JigglyWiggly_"] What quality? You mean not being able to break open doors, or jumping over small obstacles, or being faced with 1000 invisible walls?GeneralShowzer

Every game has issues, those are W2 issues. Thats not going to stop W2 from being much better then skyrim. Hell just look at all the interviews. Skyrim is going to end up being a disapointment just like Oblivion.

99% of RPG's have those "issues", constricted movements, invisible walls, what the hell do you want it's not a free roaming game.

TW2 successfully wins over arcade action gamers, and thankfully, CD projekt red didn't attempt to woo the purposeless romaning gamers.

Gothic 3 is also free roaming, but choice-consequence is thare, purpose is there...Oblivion, on the other hand, depletes of any role-playing value except for cosmeticizing PC and taking quests (the vanilla leveling system is moot and so there even isn't meaningful character development).

Gothic 3 also relies on gamer community to make it playable, but the mods are to sort out the bug and make combat more enjoyable; that is, the core gameplay is intact...and we all know how and why Oblivion mods make the game more enjoyable.

Avatar image for Starshine_M2A2
Starshine_M2A2

5593

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 19

#77 Starshine_M2A2
Member since 2006 • 5593 Posts

[QUOTE="GeneralShowzer"][QUOTE="morrowindnic"]

Every game has issues, those are W2 issues. Thats not going to stop W2 from being much better then skyrim. Hell just look at all the interviews. Skyrim is going to end up being a disapointment just like Oblivion.

teardropmina

99% of RPG's have those "issues", constricted movements, invisible walls, what the hell do you want it's not a free roaming game.

purposeless romaning gamers.

How is 'roaming' purposeless? its an integral part of most RPGs and provides the majority of the atmosphere for the setting. Also, if you're referring to material rewards, free roaming allows the uncovering of hidden quests and therefore hidden rewards. It is most definitley not purposeless. Drop the elitist attitude.

Avatar image for leeveeu
leeveeu

3405

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#78 leeveeu
Member since 2003 • 3405 Posts
In terms of gameplay elements, Skyrim could beat The Witcher 2. In terms of graphical quality it's highly unlikely.
Avatar image for teardropmina
teardropmina

2806

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#79 teardropmina
Member since 2006 • 2806 Posts

[QUOTE="teardropmina"]

[QUOTE="GeneralShowzer"] 99% of RPG's have those "issues", constricted movements, invisible walls, what the hell do you want it's not a free roaming game.Starshine_M2A2

purposeless romaning gamers.

How is 'roaming' purposeless? its an integral part of most RPGs and provides the majority of the atmosphere for the setting. Also, if you're referring to material rewards, free roaming allows the uncovering of hidden quests and therefore hidden rewards. It is most definitley not purposeless. Drop the elitist attitude.

it'll be difficult for me to drop any attiude when you just do name calling so easily.

anyway, to me, role-playing purpose is brought about or realized through choice and consequence. hidden quests, phat loots and such are fun additions, but meaningless.

you like your ..... roaming games, I like my choice-consequence ones. am I clear enough?

Avatar image for Starshine_M2A2
Starshine_M2A2

5593

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 19

#80 Starshine_M2A2
Member since 2006 • 5593 Posts
[QUOTE="teardropmina"]

[QUOTE="Starshine_M2A2"]

[QUOTE="teardropmina"]

purposeless romaning gamers.

How is 'roaming' purposeless? its an integral part of most RPGs and provides the majority of the atmosphere for the setting. Also, if you're referring to material rewards, free roaming allows the uncovering of hidden quests and therefore hidden rewards. It is most definitley not purposeless. Drop the elitist attitude.

it'll be difficult for me to drop any attiude when you just do name calling so easily.

anyway, to me, role-playing purpose is brought about or realized through choice and consequence. hidden quests, phat loots and such are fun additions, but meaningless.

you like your ..... roaming games, I like my choice-consequence ones. am I clear enough?

Didn't call you anything, I was referring to your attitude. And yes, I do like my free roaming games but there's nothing that says free roamers can't also have choice and consequence in them which Bethesda proved with their recent Fallout games.
Avatar image for teardropmina
teardropmina

2806

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#81 teardropmina
Member since 2006 • 2806 Posts

[QUOTE="teardropmina"]

[QUOTE="Starshine_M2A2"] How is 'roaming' purposeless? its an integral part of most RPGs and provides the majority of the atmosphere for the setting. Also, if you're referring to material rewards, free roaming allows the uncovering of hidden quests and therefore hidden rewards. It is most definitley not purposeless. Drop the elitist attitude.

Starshine_M2A2

it'll be difficult for me to drop any attiude when you just do name calling so easily.

anyway, to me, role-playing purpose is brought about or realized through choice and consequence. hidden quests, phat loots and such are fun additions, but meaningless.

you like your ..... roaming games, I like my choice-consequence ones. am I clear enough?

Didn't call you anything, I was referring to your attitude. And yes, I do like my free roaming games but there's nothing that says free roamers can't also have choice and consequence in them which Bethesda proved with their recent Fallout games.

of course, that's why I mentioned Gothic 3 in my previous post, as an example of choice-consequence free roamer.

Fallout 3 certainly has some choice-consequence in it, but we don't know whether it'll be there in Skirim; most importantly though, I don't think it matters, since c-c has nothing to do with why people are hyping the game.

Avatar image for jettpack
jettpack

3192

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#82 jettpack
Member since 2009 • 3192 Posts

the witcher 2 is probably a better game. But skyrim will be more accessible and so will do better with reviewers..... im looking at YOU jim sterling

Avatar image for GeneralShowzer
GeneralShowzer

11598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#83 GeneralShowzer
Member since 2010 • 11598 Posts

the witcher 2 is probably a better game. But skyrim will be more accessible and so will do better with reviewers..... im looking at YOU jim sterling

jettpack
True. I mean honestly, some of the reviews dragging it down on metacritic are ridiculous. All the important sites gave it 9 and up.
Avatar image for GeneralShowzer
GeneralShowzer

11598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#84 GeneralShowzer
Member since 2010 • 11598 Posts

I remember General saying that, but we all say things like that at first and then have a change of heart later. The fact that he purchased the game, enjoyed it, and judging by his recent posts, he has been patient with CDPR while they get rid of bugs; I would say General is being really fair, among everything else. :D


Elann2008

Well, the UI and controller menus were the only thing i was bothered with. The original Witcher had a lot better inventory and UI, simply for the fact that it was made for a keyboard. The Witcher 2 was made for keyboard / controller, and the inventory, alchemy, crafting panel is not that great with either control scheme.

Avatar image for Born_Lucky
Born_Lucky

1730

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#85 Born_Lucky
Member since 2003 • 1730 Posts

Daggerfall, Morrowind, and Oblivion are some of the best RPGs ever made.

Bioware fanatics can't accept this. They make ridiculous excuses for any piece of crap that Biware makes, while bashing Bethesda.

Another point in favor of Bethesda - they aren't trying to shove their alternative lifestyle propaganda down everyone's throat.

Avatar image for Walincas
Walincas

511

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#86 Walincas
Member since 2006 • 511 Posts

Skyrim looks to have really great graphics and I liked the former elder scroll games, im just worried its going to be too simplistic, like mass effect 2 for instance, cause bethesda, aint as strong in story as bioware is, which is why - the gameplay is more important in skyrim, than it is in mass effect

Avatar image for Starshine_M2A2
Starshine_M2A2

5593

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 19

#87 Starshine_M2A2
Member since 2006 • 5593 Posts

Another point in favor of Bethesda - they aren't trying to shove their alternative lifestyle propaganda down everyone's throat.

Born_Lucky
Its just a form of promotion for their games. Most companies do it.
Avatar image for nooblet69
nooblet69

5162

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#90 nooblet69
Member since 2004 • 5162 Posts

Yep, witcher 2 is a bit overrated in my opinion. I honestly enjoyed the first one more. Elder scrolls never dissapoints because of the freedom and exploration.

Avatar image for rmfd341
rmfd341

3808

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#91 rmfd341
Member since 2008 • 3808 Posts

Yep, witcher 2 is a bit overrated in my opinion. I honestly enjoyed the first one more. Elder scrolls never dissapoints because of the freedom and exploration.

nooblet69
Hmm...Oblivion?
Avatar image for SilverSignal
SilverSignal

551

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#92 SilverSignal
Member since 2011 • 551 Posts

[QUOTE="SilverSignal"][QUOTE="topsemag55"]

People liked Oblivion because of mods, and forget that it took three mods to fix the > 10,000 bugs Bethesda left in the game after they stopped supporting it.

topsemag55

I think that's a bit of a massive over exaggeration.

Apparently you never had the game - I bought it at release, and installed over 70 mods. Three of them were the mods that fixed those 10,000 bugs.

I take it you never heard of the UOP, UOMP, and USIP mods.;)

Don't instantly assume I'm an idiot just because I don't want to install mods. The game does seriously not have 10,000 bugs. Most of the time what people think are bugs are just things they don't like about the game.