Does a better PC give you an advantage in online gaming?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for jmz768
jmz768

60

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 jmz768
Member since 2008 • 60 Posts

Does a player playing on a top of the line PC have an advantage over a person playing on something a couple years old? I'm talking mostly about FPS games and wonder if the guy on the newer rig has an advantage when you both aim and start shooting.

Avatar image for JigglyWiggly_
JigglyWiggly_

24625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#2 JigglyWiggly_
Member since 2009 • 24625 Posts
Think logically, if they have higher framerate, they can see more per second. Though, the other guy can just lower settings to acheive the same frame rate.
Avatar image for GTR12
GTR12

13490

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 GTR12
Member since 2006 • 13490 Posts

Think logically, if they have higher framerate, they can see more per second. Though, the other guy can just lower settings to acheive the same frame rate.JigglyWiggly_

It also depends on bandwidth

Avatar image for ProudLarry
ProudLarry

13511

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#4 ProudLarry
Member since 2004 • 13511 Posts

Think logically, if they have higher framerate, they can see more per second. Though, the other guy can just lower settings to acheive the same frame rate.JigglyWiggly_


Yeah it doesn't matter in the end. I know people that still play CS 1.6 at 640x480 so they don't have to worry about the possibility of a framerate drop.

[QUOTE="JigglyWiggly_"]Think logically, if they have higher framerate, they can see more per second. Though, the other guy can just lower settings to acheive the same frame rate.Amith12

It also depends on bandwidth

In relation to what? Your internet connection? That doesn't have anything to do with how good your PC is though. And even then you should be more worried about your connection to the host server, and not how much bandwidth your ISP provides.

Avatar image for JigglyWiggly_
JigglyWiggly_

24625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#5 JigglyWiggly_
Member since 2009 • 24625 Posts

[QUOTE="JigglyWiggly_"]Think logically, if they have higher framerate, they can see more per second. Though, the other guy can just lower settings to acheive the same frame rate.Amith12

It also depends on bandwidth

Online games, use like 200 kb/s or about 25 KB/s, well measured in CSS.
Avatar image for Hekynn
Hekynn

2164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Hekynn
Member since 2003 • 2164 Posts
Sometimes yes. If you find the closest server to the state your in like for me I choose either Cali Dallas or Chicago servers since I live in Az and I get pretty good results in BC2 like this morning got a double kill cause it. :D
Avatar image for Velocitas8
Velocitas8

10748

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Velocitas8
Member since 2006 • 10748 Posts

There is a point at which having old hardware will become increasingly disadvantageous. In my experience, it starts to become an issue when you're getting framerates in the sub-30 range, as it becomes harder and harder to keep accurate track of on-screen motion dropping much below that (starts to get a bit 'jumpy'.)

Generally, though, it isn't as big an issue as some would have you to believe. I've known people who do very well running at 20-30 frames per second..it's something you can adjust to, I guess. Personally: if I'm at >45 fps, I'm happy..increasing my framerate from there makes no difference and will *not* improve how I play.

People with really old hardware can always lower detail settings to gain some performance, and it usually doesn't result in a field-of-play disadvantage (though sometimes it does if they alter things like LoD, which might make distant objects/players disappear in certain games.) The biggest thing to worry about with recent online games is large amounts of input lag..which, believe it or not, is actually seen more frequently on the higher-performance machines cranking up all the visuals.

Avatar image for NamelessPlayer
NamelessPlayer

7729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 NamelessPlayer
Member since 2004 • 7729 Posts
Let's put it this way-before I got a new computer at the end of 2007 and had to go on with that old Athlon XP 1800+/512 MB DDR-266/Radeon 9600 XT box, there were several instances where the computer would just seize up entirely on a frame. "Hitching" or "stuttering" is too nice a term-this could last a half-second to even a full second, which is usually more than long enough to get killed in the middle of a firefight. Worst of all, it had a tendency to happen right when someone showed up in my face with a gun about to go off. It's hard enough to fend off people like that WITH a smooth-running system, but even lowering graphics detail wouldn't help THAT computer.
Avatar image for GTR12
GTR12

13490

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 GTR12
Member since 2006 • 13490 Posts

[QUOTE="Amith12"]

[QUOTE="JigglyWiggly_"]Think logically, if they have higher framerate, they can see more per second. Though, the other guy can just lower settings to acheive the same frame rate.JigglyWiggly_

It also depends on bandwidth

Online games, use like 200 kb/s or about 25 KB/s, well measured in CSS.

I agree they only use a tiny bit, but if you have other users on the network or say you get internet spikes/drops then it can be a pain.

Also CSS has dedicated servers, what about *cough* MW2 *cough* and you don't live in the US....where normally the hosts are.

Avatar image for GhoX
GhoX

6267

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#10 GhoX
Member since 2006 • 6267 Posts
No amount of computer hardware can overcome the 1337ms latency which happens frequently here in NZ.
Avatar image for millerlight89
millerlight89

18658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#11 millerlight89
Member since 2007 • 18658 Posts
Actually the lower the settings the easier it is from what I hear. I know people in some well known clans and they all say lower the settings, like smoke, bloom, deribs and all of that. The less you have to see through, the easier.
Avatar image for jedikevin2
jedikevin2

5263

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#12 jedikevin2
Member since 2004 • 5263 Posts

It will depend Game to game.

Example. Counterstrike source

If you have to play with shaders off then you are at a disadvantage as people can see your shadows behind objects. Higher fps on this game can allow for better hit registration. (I say this as people with low fps on this specific game seem to have less registration exepcially with fps drops such as shooting while grenades go off)

Example of lower graphics giving advantrage. Bad company 2

If you play this game in dx10 thenthere is so much dust particles and extra glare that it can impeed you alot compared to someoen playing on dx9 mode. I've been in spots where someone shot the ground around me and I literally had so much dust that i could not see where to shoot. I switched over to dx9 mode and it played much nicer in that aspect.

In the end, it can be a advantage or a disadvantage depending on a game.

Avatar image for Solar-X
Solar-X

510

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#13 Solar-X
Member since 2010 • 510 Posts

It depends purely on the monitor. If you're playing on a old CRT that can hit 120hz then yes higher framerates over 60fps will help. The eye can supposedly only see 40fps or whatever. but higher frames on a high refresh rate improve the fluidity of the combat and animations. It will be easier to see where opponents are going and it will be easier to hit them.