Doesn't the 3GB GTX 580 make the GTX 590 kind of pointless?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for x-2tha-z
x-2tha-z

8994

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#1 x-2tha-z
Member since 2003 • 8994 Posts
I'm looking to upgrade soon. I was going to get the 590, then I just discovered (about 10 minutes ago) that there's a 3GB version of the 580. I'm no GPU expert, but I'm aware of the limitations of a dual GPU card having owned a 295 for nearly two years. Isn't it better to have all the video memory on a single GPU? If so, is the 590 bettered before it's even released? I'd also bet that the 590 will be more expensive than the 3GB 580.
Avatar image for adamosmaki
adamosmaki

10718

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#2 adamosmaki
Member since 2007 • 10718 Posts
if what you trying to say that more memory=better performance that is completely wrong For instance if that was the case a 9500gt with 1gb would have been faster than gtx460 768mb What matters most is amount of shaders, gpu/memory/shader speeds, texture units, amount of rops and the architecture of the chip ( a newer vga with newer architecture will be faster than a same spec vga with older architecture ) 5970 should provide better performance compared to a gtx580 but the question is are you gonna use that 590? a gtx 580 has more than enough performance for every game at 1920x1200 hell even at 1600p is more than enough and will last you years to come ( hell even a gtx560 is more than enough ) In fact your gtx295 is still one of the fastest gpus so i suggest sticking to it at least until 2012 or until we see a VGA with significantly improved performance over that gtx295
Avatar image for GazaAli
GazaAli

25216

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 GazaAli
Member since 2007 • 25216 Posts
[QUOTE="adamosmaki"]if what you trying to say that more memory=better performance that is completely wrong For instance if that was the case a 9500gt with 1gb would have been faster than gtx460 768mb What matters most is amount of shaders, gpu/memory/shader speeds, texture units, amount of rops and the architecture of the chip ( a newer vga with newer architecture will be faster than a same spec vga with older architecture ) 5970 should provide better performance compared to a gtx580 but the question is are you gonna use that 590? a gtx 580 has more than enough performance for every game at 1920x1200 hell even at 1600p is more than enough and will last you years to come ( hell even a gtx560 is more than enough ) In fact your gtx295 is still one of the fastest gpus so i suggest sticking to it at least until 2012 or until we see a VGA with significantly improved performance over that gtx295

Avatar image for James161324
James161324

8315

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 James161324
Member since 2009 • 8315 Posts

Memory does not equal preformance what so ever. If that was the case stuff like the 5450 should just be as powerfull as the 460 or w/e. more ram just allows a higer resolution.

Avatar image for hartsickdiscipl
hartsickdiscipl

14787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#5 hartsickdiscipl
Member since 2003 • 14787 Posts

All the extra memory is going to do for the GTX 580 is allow it to maintain stable framerates in certain games at really high resolutions. That's it. In most games I bet you wouldn't even see a difference in performance between the 1.5gb and 3gb versions. The GTX 590 will be significantly faster. GPU horsepower> memory bandwidth> framebuffer in most scenarios.

Avatar image for x-2tha-z
x-2tha-z

8994

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#6 x-2tha-z
Member since 2003 • 8994 Posts
[QUOTE="adamosmaki"]if what you trying to say that more memory=better performance that is completely wrong For instance if that was the case a 9500gt with 1gb would have been faster than gtx460 768mb What matters most is amount of shaders, gpu/memory/shader speeds, texture units, amount of rops and the architecture of the chip ( a newer vga with newer architecture will be faster than a same spec vga with older architecture ) 5970 should provide better performance compared to a gtx580 but the question is are you gonna use that 590? a gtx 580 has more than enough performance for every game at 1920x1200 hell even at 1600p is more than enough and will last you years to come ( hell even a gtx560 is more than enough ) In fact your gtx295 is still one of the fastest gpus so i suggest sticking to it at least until 2012 or until we see a VGA with significantly improved performance over that gtx295

I wasn't saying more memory means better performance. What I was trying to say is the 590 will have two 1.5GB 580 GPU's on a single card, equalling 3GB. The 3GB 580 is the same GPU so we aren't talking about older GPU vs newer GPU with less memory, like your comparison of the 9500gt and the GTX 460. We're talking about the same GPU: x2 1.5GB vs x1 3GB. I'm no GPU expert so I'm just trying to understand why two GPU's with 1.5GB is better than the same GPU with 3GB. I'm looking to upgrade because I've never really been happy with the performance from my 295. It isn't as good as I was expecting. In Crysis 1920x1080 Very High, it's practically unplayable. Mafia 2 benchmark @ 1920x1080 max settings and Apex Physx on High gives me an average of about 27fps. I want to be able to have good frame rates with everything as high as it can go, the GTX 295 has never provided me with that.
Avatar image for x-2tha-z
x-2tha-z

8994

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#7 x-2tha-z
Member since 2003 • 8994 Posts

All the extra memory is going to do for the GTX 580 is allow it to maintain stable framerates in certain games at really high resolutions. That's it. In most games I bet you wouldn't even see a difference in performance between the 1.5gb and 3gb versions. The GTX 590 will be significantly faster. GPU horsepower> memory bandwidth> framebuffer in most scenarios.

hartsickdiscipl
I see. Thanks for the advice.
Avatar image for middle-earth88
middle-earth88

1262

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#8 middle-earth88
Member since 2006 • 1262 Posts

[QUOTE="adamosmaki"]if what you trying to say that more memory=better performance that is completely wrong For instance if that was the case a 9500gt with 1gb would have been faster than gtx460 768mb What matters most is amount of shaders, gpu/memory/shader speeds, texture units, amount of rops and the architecture of the chip ( a newer vga with newer architecture will be faster than a same spec vga with older architecture ) 5970 should provide better performance compared to a gtx580 but the question is are you gonna use that 590? a gtx 580 has more than enough performance for every game at 1920x1200 hell even at 1600p is more than enough and will last you years to come ( hell even a gtx560 is more than enough ) In fact your gtx295 is still one of the fastest gpus so i suggest sticking to it at least until 2012 or until we see a VGA with significantly improved performance over that gtx295x-2tha-z
I wasn't saying more memory means better performance. What I was trying to say is the 590 will have two 1.5GB 580 GPU's on a single card, equalling 3GB. The 3GB 580 is the same GPU so we aren't talking about older GPU vs newer GPU with less memory, like your comparison of the 9500gt and the GTX 460. We're talking about the same GPU: x2 1.5GB vs x1 3GB. I'm no GPU expert so I'm just trying to understand why two GPU's with 1.5GB is better than the same GPU with 3GB. I'm looking to upgrade because I've never really been happy with the performance from my 295. It isn't as good as I was expecting. In Crysis 1920x1080 Very High, it's practically unplayable. Mafia 2 benchmark @ 1920x1080 max settings and Apex Physx on High gives me an average of about 27fps. I want to be able to have good frame rates with everything as high as it can go, the GTX 295 has never provided me with that.

In a dual GPU card each GPU can only use 1.5GB of framebuffer. They do not add up to equal 3GB. It acts as two seperate cards with 1.5GB of GDDR5. The same GPU with 3GB of GDDR5 is better because it can use all 3GB of VRAM and not just 1.5GB of it.

Avatar image for mucgoo
mucgoo

317

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 mucgoo
Member since 2010 • 317 Posts
But a duel 580 card, the 590 will also have 2*512 processing core, the thing which actually chuck out the polygons. A 3gb 580 still only has 512.
Avatar image for middle-earth88
middle-earth88

1262

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#10 middle-earth88
Member since 2006 • 1262 Posts

But a duel 580 card, the 590 will also have 2*512 processing core, the thing which actually chuck out the polygons. A 3gb 580 still only has 512. mucgoo

True. There will no doubt be 6GBGTX 590's that have both dual cores and 3GB of GDDR5. I doubt that the GTX 590 is really two GTX 580 cores on one chip. That would just use too much power to be PCI-E compliant.

Avatar image for iliatay
iliatay

1325

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 iliatay
Member since 2008 • 1325 Posts
[QUOTE="x-2tha-z"][QUOTE="adamosmaki"]if what you trying to say that more memory=better performance that is completely wrong For instance if that was the case a 9500gt with 1gb would have been faster than gtx460 768mb What matters most is amount of shaders, gpu/memory/shader speeds, texture units, amount of rops and the architecture of the chip ( a newer vga with newer architecture will be faster than a same spec vga with older architecture ) 5970 should provide better performance compared to a gtx580 but the question is are you gonna use that 590? a gtx 580 has more than enough performance for every game at 1920x1200 hell even at 1600p is more than enough and will last you years to come ( hell even a gtx560 is more than enough ) In fact your gtx295 is still one of the fastest gpus so i suggest sticking to it at least until 2012 or until we see a VGA with significantly improved performance over that gtx295

I wasn't saying more memory means better performance. What I was trying to say is the 590 will have two 1.5GB 580 GPU's on a single card, equalling 3GB. The 3GB 580 is the same GPU so we aren't talking about older GPU vs newer GPU with less memory, like your comparison of the 9500gt and the GTX 460. We're talking about the same GPU: x2 1.5GB vs x1 3GB. I'm no GPU expert so I'm just trying to understand why two GPU's with 1.5GB is better than the same GPU with 3GB. I'm looking to upgrade because I've never really been happy with the performance from my 295. It isn't as good as I was expecting. In Crysis 1920x1080 Very High, it's practically unplayable. Mafia 2 benchmark @ 1920x1080 max settings and Apex Physx on High gives me an average of about 27fps. I want to be able to have good frame rates with everything as high as it can go, the GTX 295 has never provided me with that.

did u update your drivers?
Avatar image for rikimaru93
rikimaru93

762

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 rikimaru93
Member since 2003 • 762 Posts

I run Crysis at 1080p on very high at around 30 fps with my specs so I think somethings wrong on your end. You should monitor your CPU/GPU temps to make sure something isn't overheating. Also you should check to see you have all the latest drivers installed.

Avatar image for k0r3aN_pR1d3
k0r3aN_pR1d3

2148

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#13 k0r3aN_pR1d3
Member since 2005 • 2148 Posts
The 3 GB GTX 580 is primarily for people with large monitors or surround setups. The screen space is so high that the 1.5 GB 580 was not enough for three 1920x1200/1080 monitors or higher. By doubling the memory, in SLI you have a staggering 6 GB of memory to pump up the resolutions. Itndoesn't really pay to have a GTX 590 or whatever as the price per performance will be horrible. The GTX 580 maxes out every single game out right now for the majority of people.