By the time I got around to both sequels I was bored of the same structure; so, yes, to me they were mediocre because they mostly copied what had already been done. Hardly something I'd highly praise.[QUOTE="doomsoth"]Cenerune
[QUOTE="doomsoth"]
Under the name Obsidian Entertainment, NWN2 and KOTOR2 are the only games they've fully developed and have published. Neither one were better than the original or, for that matter, really that great, which is why I say they're mediocre. They've followed in BioWare's footsteps twice and neither one surpassed the original.
Yes, I play and own both games as well as BioWare's games.
Planeforger
I'd argue that both were much better than Bioware's originals (KOTOR 2 is debatable - everything is better except for the butchered endings), but it really doesn't matter - both Bioware and Obsidian are easily better than Bethesda, who've lately just churned out Oblivion (terrible) and Fallout 3 (bland).
Oh, and personally, I think that Obsidian's NWN2: Mask of the Betrayer was a better RPG than anything Bioware has released since BG2, so they've certainly got the potential for great games.
Hum...lot's of people disagree with you there along with many of critics reviews. The games aren't perfect, but no game is. I wouldn't say Obsidian is better than Bethesda because they've only copied BioWare's games. BioWare is a great mentor, but it requires a great studio like BioWare or Bethesda to be creative on your own.
Log in to comment