FEAR 2 - Full Version Impressions - Keep Discussion/Disappointment Here

  • 66 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Baranga
Baranga

14217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#51 Baranga
Member since 2005 • 14217 Posts

So the ending was bad huh? im curious whether or not Paxton was in this one, for some reason i have a feeling he is since its pretty much linear with the first game. how long did it take you to finish it? legit or cheating?prlyknitswtr

Really bad.

About Paxton - [spoiler] surprisingly, he isn't in the game! But he was in the demo... In the full game there are some references about him. [/spoiler]

8 hours, legit, taking my time.

I forgot to mention the QUICK TIME EVENTS:lol: Even the boss fights are lame QTEs...

Avatar image for prlyknitswtr
prlyknitswtr

140

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 prlyknitswtr
Member since 2008 • 140 Posts
was he really? i dont remember that part...im still excited to play it. i really liked the demo, but what about mouse buttons 4 and 5?
Avatar image for biggest_loser
biggest_loser

24508

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 60

User Lists: 0

#53 biggest_loser
Member since 2007 • 24508 Posts

I finished it.

Man, that was dissapointing.

It gradually gets worse towards the end. There's one awful turret section where you're killing 100 dudes, horrible rock music plays (ROCK in FEAR!) and a guy constantly shouts all kinds of bad F-bomb variations.

The story is absolutely craptastic. The dialogue is horrible; it's not bad in the Crysis or Gears it's-so-bad-that-it's-awesome way, it's bad it that way that makes your ears bleed. The characters are amongst the most stupid characters in the history of videogames. The ending is a total lolocaust...

But the graphics are pretty (although some shadows from your flashlight would've been great...), the sound design is mostly spectacular, and the combat is quite exciting - but nowhere near the original.

Frankly, the best thing about the game is Alma. I think she's cute, and I like her voice. But then the lips are enormous:|

5/10, buy TimeShift instead.

Baranga
lol, so bad its awesome: like its so bad it becomes funny :P But yeah, I hope you didn't pay too much for the game. Did you like the story in the original FEAR? I was reading on wiki that Gamespy gave it Best Story that year - good grief. Yet the New York Times said they couldn't get into it or understand the motivations.
Avatar image for deactivated-5b5d7639964d6
deactivated-5b5d7639964d6

8225

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 deactivated-5b5d7639964d6
Member since 2008 • 8225 Posts
Are you kidding me? I didn't really care about the game, but how could they **** up FEAR? It's preposterous!
Avatar image for biggest_loser
biggest_loser

24508

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 60

User Lists: 0

#55 biggest_loser
Member since 2007 • 24508 Posts
Are you kinding me? I didn't really care about the game, but how could they **** up FEAR? It's preposterous!ZuluEcho14
I haven't played the demo, but I saw some videos and the enemies were glowing! :o It looked quite ugly!
Avatar image for MadCat46
MadCat46

1494

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 MadCat46
Member since 2004 • 1494 Posts
Finally got the game and just finshed interval 2 on hard. So far I'm loving it, haven't noticed any glowing enemies yet and the film grain doesn't seem to be as annoying as it was in the demo. AI is wierd but solid, some times it does these brillant tactical moves while other times they'll stand there and let you rip them to shreds. Graphics are great except for the blood, but I saw that coming in the demo. HUD is actually pretty nice and I like it better then the original FEAR, haven't had a spot where I've said god I wish I could lean around that corner yet so no big deal with it not being there. Also still has that nice spooky atmosphere, and actually feels a little more scary then the first though that may change later on. So far it's worth the $50, I'll write a detailed review after I've finished the game.
Avatar image for prlyknitswtr
prlyknitswtr

140

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 prlyknitswtr
Member since 2008 • 140 Posts
Finally got the game and just finshed interval 2 on hard. So far I'm loving it, haven't noticed any glowing enemies yet and the film grain doesn't seem to be as annoying as it was in the demo. AI is wierd but solid, some times it does these brillant tactical moves while other times they'll stand there and let you rip them to shreds. Graphics are great except for the blood, but I saw that coming in the demo. HUD is actually pretty nice and I like it better then the original FEAR, haven't had a spot where I've said god I wish I could lean around that corner yet so no big deal with it not being there. Also still has that nice spooky atmosphere, and actually feels a little more scary then the first though that may change later on. So far it's worth the $50, I'll write a detailed review after I've finished the game.MadCat46
finally someone that wasnt completely comparing this to the original. i cant wait to get home and play this for myself. people need to move on and except that FEAR 2 is not FEAR. i know something will reply back with "your right its not FEAR, if it was, it would be good!". So there i said it for you, get over it.
Avatar image for biggest_loser
biggest_loser

24508

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 60

User Lists: 0

#58 biggest_loser
Member since 2007 • 24508 Posts
[QUOTE="MadCat46"]Finally got the game and just finshed interval 2 on hard. So far I'm loving it, haven't noticed any glowing enemies yet and the film grain doesn't seem to be as annoying as it was in the demo. AI is wierd but solid, some times it does these brillant tactical moves while other times they'll stand there and let you rip them to shreds. Graphics are great except for the blood, but I saw that coming in the demo. HUD is actually pretty nice and I like it better then the original FEAR, haven't had a spot where I've said god I wish I could lean around that corner yet so no big deal with it not being there. Also still has that nice spooky atmosphere, and actually feels a little more scary then the first though that may change later on. So far it's worth the $50, I'll write a detailed review after I've finished the game.prlyknitswtr
finally someone that wasnt completely comparing this to the original. i cant wait to get home and play this for myself. people need to move on and except that FEAR 2 is not FEAR. i know something will reply back with "your right its not FEAR, if it was, it would be good!". So there i said it for you, get over it.

How can you NOT compare it to FEAR 1 though?
Avatar image for prlyknitswtr
prlyknitswtr

140

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 prlyknitswtr
Member since 2008 • 140 Posts
[QUOTE="prlyknitswtr"][QUOTE="MadCat46"]Finally got the game and just finshed interval 2 on hard. So far I'm loving it, haven't noticed any glowing enemies yet and the film grain doesn't seem to be as annoying as it was in the demo. AI is wierd but solid, some times it does these brillant tactical moves while other times they'll stand there and let you rip them to shreds. Graphics are great except for the blood, but I saw that coming in the demo. HUD is actually pretty nice and I like it better then the original FEAR, haven't had a spot where I've said god I wish I could lean around that corner yet so no big deal with it not being there. Also still has that nice spooky atmosphere, and actually feels a little more scary then the first though that may change later on. So far it's worth the $50, I'll write a detailed review after I've finished the game.biggest_loser
finally someone that wasnt completely comparing this to the original. i cant wait to get home and play this for myself. people need to move on and except that FEAR 2 is not FEAR. i know something will reply back with "your right its not FEAR, if it was, it would be good!". So there i said it for you, get over it.

How can you NOT compare it to FEAR 1 though?

i dunno for some reason its just not "fair" i guess. it was 4 years ago first of all...It is kind of difficult no-a-days to come out with anything "fresh", what else is there that hasnt been explored in an FPS? Unless it was running on the CryEngine, there isnt any higher graphics than that. The only gripe i have towards this game, without playing the full game, is that it is linear with the first one.
Avatar image for MadCat46
MadCat46

1494

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 MadCat46
Member since 2004 • 1494 Posts

[QUOTE="prlyknitswtr"][QUOTE="MadCat46"]Finally got the game and just finshed interval 2 on hard. So far I'm loving it, haven't noticed any glowing enemies yet and the film grain doesn't seem to be as annoying as it was in the demo. AI is wierd but solid, some times it does these brillant tactical moves while other times they'll stand there and let you rip them to shreds. Graphics are great except for the blood, but I saw that coming in the demo. HUD is actually pretty nice and I like it better then the original FEAR, haven't had a spot where I've said god I wish I could lean around that corner yet so no big deal with it not being there. Also still has that nice spooky atmosphere, and actually feels a little more scary then the first though that may change later on. So far it's worth the $50, I'll write a detailed review after I've finished the game.biggest_loser
finally someone that wasnt completely comparing this to the original. i cant wait to get home and play this for myself. people need to move on and except that FEAR 2 is not FEAR. i know something will reply back with "your right its not FEAR, if it was, it would be good!". So there i said it for you, get over it.

How can you NOT compare it to FEAR 1 though?

Why should I compare this to the first game? I'm playing FEAR 2 not FEAR 1. When it comes to sequeals I look at them each as a seperate game because in reality they are their own games. It's amazing, we bash developers for nothing pushing the envelope forward and putting new things in the game, trying to shake thing up but when it comes to sequeals the majority rise up and scream for straying off the path of their original games. To me this is just another game I've never played before, only looking back at FEAR 1 for the plot. I have no reason to sit here a loom over FEAR 2, nitpicking things they changed or took out of FEAR 1, no reason to compare it to a game that came out 4 years ago.

I don't know it's just how I am, it's how I'm able to enjoy games like Clear Sky, Kotor 2, NWN 2 games not as well recieved as their originals because they changed to many things. Like I said when playing prequeals/sequeals the only things I take from the originals is the characters and plot, nothing else matters to me as it's just a brand new game.

Avatar image for biggest_loser
biggest_loser

24508

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 60

User Lists: 0

#62 biggest_loser
Member since 2007 • 24508 Posts
[QUOTE="prlyknitswtr"][QUOTE="biggest_loser"][QUOTE="prlyknitswtr"] finally someone that wasnt completely comparing this to the original. i cant wait to get home and play this for myself. people need to move on and except that FEAR 2 is not FEAR. i know something will reply back with "your right its not FEAR, if it was, it would be good!". So there i said it for you, get over it.

How can you NOT compare it to FEAR 1 though?

i dunno for some reason its just not "fair" i guess. it was 4 years ago first of all...It is kind of difficult no-a-days to come out with anything "fresh", what else is there that hasnt been explored in an FPS? Unless it was running on the CryEngine, there isnt any higher graphics than that. The only gripe i have towards this game, without playing the full game, is that it is linear with the first one.

Oh please! lol. Its difficult to come up with anything fresh? Yes it is certainly but there are some like Valve that make the effort my friend. And there are others like Monolith who will make very standard shooters like FEAR and make ridiculous profits. I think its very fair to criticise a game for not coming up with anything "fresh" - we're paying good money for these games ($99 here in Australia) - and they've had plenty of time to at least come up with a decent story at least. Surely you want to explore something that at least tries to be different, rather than just Quake all over again?
Avatar image for pinneyapple
pinneyapple

5566

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 pinneyapple
Member since 2005 • 5566 Posts
I'll get in a few years once its dirt cheap ;)
Avatar image for prlyknitswtr
prlyknitswtr

140

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 prlyknitswtr
Member since 2008 • 140 Posts
[QUOTE="biggest_loser"][QUOTE="prlyknitswtr"][QUOTE="biggest_loser"] How can you NOT compare it to FEAR 1 though?

i dunno for some reason its just not "fair" i guess. it was 4 years ago first of all...It is kind of difficult no-a-days to come out with anything "fresh", what else is there that hasnt been explored in an FPS? Unless it was running on the CryEngine, there isnt any higher graphics than that. The only gripe i have towards this game, without playing the full game, is that it is linear with the first one.

Oh please! lol. Its difficult to come up with anything fresh? Yes it is certainly but there are some like Valve that make the effort my friend. And there are others like Monolith who will make very standard shooters like FEAR and make ridiculous profits. I think its very fair to criticise a game for not coming up with anything "fresh" - we're paying good money for these games ($99 here in Australia) - and they've had plenty of time to at least come up with a decent story at least. Surely you want to explore something that at least tries to be different, rather than just Quake all over again?

when i said "something fresh", i mean something technically advanced that we havent seen before. Graphical advancements over the past couple years are better than anything before. Crysis is still one of the best looking games and its over a year old. Story on the other hand, could be a little better, maybe some more scares that arent "jump in your face" and some creepy images. They did throw in some vehicle type combat which wasnt seen in the original, and also aim down the sights is a new thing for FEAR.
Avatar image for MadCat46
MadCat46

1494

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 MadCat46
Member since 2004 • 1494 Posts
[QUOTE="biggest_loser"][QUOTE="prlyknitswtr"][QUOTE="biggest_loser"] How can you NOT compare it to FEAR 1 though?

i dunno for some reason its just not "fair" i guess. it was 4 years ago first of all...It is kind of difficult no-a-days to come out with anything "fresh", what else is there that hasnt been explored in an FPS? Unless it was running on the CryEngine, there isnt any higher graphics than that. The only gripe i have towards this game, without playing the full game, is that it is linear with the first one.

Oh please! lol. Its difficult to come up with anything fresh? Yes it is certainly but there are some like Valve that make the effort my friend. And there are others like Monolith who will make very standard shooters like FEAR and make ridiculous profits. I think its very fair to criticise a game for not coming up with anything "fresh" - we're paying good money for these games ($99 here in Australia) - and they've had plenty of time to at least come up with a decent story at least. Surely you want to explore something that at least tries to be different, rather than just Quake all over again?

I apologize in advance if I'm wrong here but last I heard you haven't even tried the demo let alone the full game. I'm not sure how you can criticize something you have no experience with. Reviews, videos, opinions of others , and useless comments don't substitute for first hand experience and knowledge. You may very well not like the game and that's fine and dandy, but making remarks of a game, good or bad, without even touching it just makes you look asinine. Again if you have tried the demo or game I apologize.
Avatar image for biggest_loser
biggest_loser

24508

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 60

User Lists: 0

#66 biggest_loser
Member since 2007 • 24508 Posts
[QUOTE="MadCat46"][QUOTE="biggest_loser"][QUOTE="prlyknitswtr"] i dunno for some reason its just not "fair" i guess. it was 4 years ago first of all...It is kind of difficult no-a-days to come out with anything "fresh", what else is there that hasnt been explored in an FPS? Unless it was running on the CryEngine, there isnt any higher graphics than that. The only gripe i have towards this game, without playing the full game, is that it is linear with the first one.

Oh please! lol. Its difficult to come up with anything fresh? Yes it is certainly but there are some like Valve that make the effort my friend. And there are others like Monolith who will make very standard shooters like FEAR and make ridiculous profits. I think its very fair to criticise a game for not coming up with anything "fresh" - we're paying good money for these games ($99 here in Australia) - and they've had plenty of time to at least come up with a decent story at least. Surely you want to explore something that at least tries to be different, rather than just Quake all over again?

I apologize in advance if I'm wrong here but last I heard you haven't even tried the demo let alone the full game. I'm not sure how you can criticize something you have no experience with. Reviews, videos, opinions of others , and useless comments don't substitute for first hand experience and knowledge. You may very well not like the game and that's fine and dandy, but making remarks of a game, good or bad, without even touching it just makes you look asinine. Again if you have tried the demo or game I apologize.

I haven't tried the game no. But I was mainly referring to FEAR 1 which I have played all the way through. And my criticism in the previous post largely relate to that in particular (that and Condemned definitely)