Final Fantasy XIV Review

[QUOTE="kozzy1234"]

[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]

Tell me whats the difference between 4/10 and 5/10? Both games the vast majority of people are not going to buy anything below 6 or 7 out of 10..

StopThePresses

There is very little difference between a 4 adn 5, I was jsut saying in my opinion what I played of the beta was a 5/10 for me personally.

Me and Kevin agree on this game, I dont agree with alot of his other scores though.

I said 5/10 for me because it shows how I thought the game was abotu the same as he did, where as Elemental he gave 4/10 and I gave 9/10.

I agree with Kevin V on some games, but defiantly dont on some others (Elemental and Alpha PRotocol I loved, he didnt, the new FF we both didnt like much).

I was jsut saying that peopel in general should try gaems first instead of just goign by one sties reviews, we all dont have the same opinions on things, what one person hates another might LOVE. In Alpha PRotocol I loved the story, choices and gameplay, I can look passed some Optimization issues if a game gives me high fun factor, godo story and what not. Some others want graphcis and optimization. Everyone is differnt is what im trying to get across.

Some of my favorite games are rated 7 or lower, so I pay ZERO attention to reviews, I try the games myself.

Yeah people seem not to understand this.. Reviews are buyer's guides.. Thats why I am infavor for a 5 point system.. 5 being amazing, 4 being great, 3 being good.. and 2 being average.... 1 being not worth it.. The point of the matter is this 10 point system is ridiculous.. I mean 6 points out of the 10 are ranges of games that the radically majority of people shouldn't buy.. Which is wierd.. We have a larger scale of numbers to differenitate crap games, then we do good games. that makes little sense.

[QUOTE="AfroPirate"]

I giggled when i saw it.

I lol'd to bad. APB had a higher score and failed in a few months.

Now let us wait for the servers to shut down.

PcGamingRig

I was little surprised with the review. I do believe Kevin is one of the better reviewers, especially when it comes to role playing game.

I spent some time in the beta and it did had problems, all MMO usually do, especially in beta stages. However, if what Kevin says is true then many of those problems haven't been fixed or worked on,

We'll see how it goes in future. The console version is months away and by that time I expect PC patches to fix most of the problems, hopefully..

[QUOTE="StopThePresses"][QUOTE="kozzy1234"]

There is very little difference between a 4 adn 5, I was jsut saying in my opinion what I played of the beta was a 5/10 for me personally.

Me and Kevin agree on this game, I dont agree with alot of his other scores though.

I said 5/10 for me because it shows how I thought the game was abotu the same as he did, where as Elemental he gave 4/10 and I gave 9/10.

I agree with Kevin V on some games, but defiantly dont on some others (Elemental and Alpha PRotocol I loved, he didnt, the new FF we both didnt like much).

I was jsut saying that peopel in general should try gaems first instead of just goign by one sties reviews, we all dont have the same opinions on things, what one person hates another might LOVE. In Alpha PRotocol I loved the story, choices and gameplay, I can look passed some Optimization issues if a game gives me high fun factor, godo story and what not. Some others want graphcis and optimization. Everyone is differnt is what im trying to get across.

Some of my favorite games are rated 7 or lower, so I pay ZERO attention to reviews, I try the games myself.

sSubZerOo

Yeah people seem not to understand this.. Reviews are buyer's guides.. Thats why I am infavor for a 5 point system.. 5 being amazing, 4 being great, 3 being good.. and 2 being average.... 1 being not worth it.. The point of the matter is this 10 point system is ridiculous.. I mean 6 points out of the 10 are ranges of games that the radically majority of people shouldn't buy.. Which is wierd.. We have a larger scale of numbers to differenitate crap games, then we do good games. that makes little sense.

[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]

[QUOTE="StopThePresses"] The whole point of reviews is to determine whether or not to buy a game in the first place, so it's a little odd to say that people should try it. I'm not trying every game that is released. That's just conceptually ludicrous, even if money was not an issue. If this is some kind of code for, "Pirate the game first," well, no.Daytona_178

Yeah people seem not to understand this.. Reviews are buyer's guides.. Thats why I am infavor for a 5 point system.. 5 being amazing, 4 being great, 3 being good.. and 2 being average.... 1 being not worth it.. The point of the matter is this 10 point system is ridiculous.. I mean 6 points out of the 10 are ranges of games that the radically majority of people shouldn't buy.. Which is wierd.. We have a larger scale of numbers to differenitate crap games, then we do good games. that makes little sense.