Grim Dawn Alpha Build is far better than Diablo 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Baurus_1
Baurus_1

804

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1 Baurus_1
Member since 2007 • 804 Posts

Really there is no comparison. Gameplay, graphics, and even physical effects are far better in Grim Dawn Alpha Build than Diablo 3. Grim Dawn looks much more real, dark, and gritty with much better atmosphere than Diablo 3. After playing both, I can't see a single thing that is better about Diablo 3. And Grim Dawn Alpha Build is only Act 1 of the game. When the entire game is released, Grim Dawn will no doubt be one of the greatest top-down-view Action RPGs ever made!

Avatar image for Baranga
Baranga

14217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#2 Baranga
Member since 2005 • 14217 Posts

When the entire game is released, Grim Dawn will no doubt be one of the greatest top-down-view Action RPGs ever made!

Baurus_1

Famous last words.

Avatar image for Cwagmire21
Cwagmire21

5896

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Cwagmire21
Member since 2007 • 5896 Posts

[QUOTE="Baurus_1"]

When the entire game is released, Grim Dawn will no doubt be one of the greatest top-down-view Action RPGs ever made!

Baranga

Famous last words.

Yup. Never heard X "will be the greatest game ever made" before. :roll:

Avatar image for Gladestone1
Gladestone1

5695

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Gladestone1
Member since 2004 • 5695 Posts

[QUOTE="Baranga"]

[QUOTE="Baurus_1"]

When the entire game is released, Grim Dawn will no doubt be one of the greatest top-down-view Action RPGs ever made!

Cwagmire21

Famous last words.

Yup. Never heard X "will be the greatest game ever made" before. :roll:

Well any thing is better than diablo three an these guys created titan quest..So in a way hes right..Lmao Even vanhelsing i think is better than diablo 3..Much funner game any how

Avatar image for FelipeInside
FelipeInside

28548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 FelipeInside
Member since 2003 • 28548 Posts

Really there is no comparison. Gameplay, graphics, and even physical effects are far better in Grim Dawn Alpha Build than Diablo 3. Grim Dawn looks much more real, dark, and gritty with much better atmosphere than Diablo 3. After playing both, I can't see a single thing that is better about Diablo 3. And Grim Dawn Alpha Build is only Act 1 of the game. When the entire game is released, Grim Dawn will no doubt be one of the greatest top-down-view Action RPGs ever made!

Baurus_1
World of Warcraft killer for sure.... oh wait.
Avatar image for Gladestone1
Gladestone1

5695

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Gladestone1
Member since 2004 • 5695 Posts

[QUOTE="Baurus_1"]

Really there is no comparison. Gameplay, graphics, and even physical effects are far better in Grim Dawn Alpha Build than Diablo 3. Grim Dawn looks much more real, dark, and gritty with much better atmosphere than Diablo 3. After playing both, I can't see a single thing that is better about Diablo 3. And Grim Dawn Alpha Build is only Act 1 of the game. When the entire game is released, Grim Dawn will no doubt be one of the greatest top-down-view Action RPGs ever made!

FelipeInside

World of Warcraft killer for sure.... oh wait.

Say it right felipe world of warcrap..

Avatar image for FelipeInside
FelipeInside

28548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 FelipeInside
Member since 2003 • 28548 Posts

[QUOTE="FelipeInside"][QUOTE="Baurus_1"]

Really there is no comparison. Gameplay, graphics, and even physical effects are far better in Grim Dawn Alpha Build than Diablo 3. Grim Dawn looks much more real, dark, and gritty with much better atmosphere than Diablo 3. After playing both, I can't see a single thing that is better about Diablo 3. And Grim Dawn Alpha Build is only Act 1 of the game. When the entire game is released, Grim Dawn will no doubt be one of the greatest top-down-view Action RPGs ever made!

Gladestone1

World of Warcraft killer for sure.... oh wait.

Say it right felipe world of warcrap..

LOL. It ain't a bad game, I used to play it back in the day. I actually tried it again a few months back, but I like PvE, Exploration and Story and it's gotten stale on those aspects.

Games like GW2, SWTOR, The Secret World etc are better at those things now so I choose to play those.

Avatar image for ssvegeta555
ssvegeta555

2448

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 ssvegeta555
Member since 2003 • 2448 Posts

Well to be fair, it's not a hard thing to do. :P But yeah, Grim Dawn is shaping up to be a great game.

Avatar image for mrbojangles25
mrbojangles25

60837

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#9 mrbojangles25
Member since 2005 • 60837 Posts

allllllllllllllllll aboaaaaaaaaaaaaaaarrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrd the baaaandwwaaaaagonnnn

bandwagon.jpg

On a serious note: I love Diablo 1, 2, and 3; I love Titan Quest; I will problably love Grim Dawn; and I am thankful I live in a world where I can enjoy all of them.  

A shame some people force themselves to live in a world where they cannot.

Avatar image for nutcrackr
nutcrackr

13032

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 72

User Lists: 1

#10 nutcrackr
Member since 2004 • 13032 Posts
I am looking forward to it. I just wish people weren't so combative with games. How about: "Grim Dawn alpha build is excellent"
Avatar image for FelipeInside
FelipeInside

28548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 FelipeInside
Member since 2003 • 28548 Posts
I am looking forward to it. I just wish people weren't so combative with games. How about: "Grim Dawn alpha build is excellent"nutcrackr
But don't you know how it works? I play this game so obviously it's DA BEST GAME EVA !!!
Avatar image for -wildflower-
-wildflower-

2997

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 -wildflower-
Member since 2003 • 2997 Posts

If it doesn't force me to be on-line to play then it's already better than Diablo 3.

Avatar image for FelipeInside
FelipeInside

28548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 FelipeInside
Member since 2003 • 28548 Posts

If it doesn't force me to be on-line to play then it's already better than Diablo 3.

-wildflower-
But why do u judge a game cause of it's DRM? No one complains about Path of Exile being always online, yet with D3 everyone has a fit.
Avatar image for ShimmerMan
ShimmerMan

4634

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#14 ShimmerMan
Member since 2008 • 4634 Posts

Even taking a morning number 2 with the newspaper is more entertaining than playing DIablo III.

Avatar image for -wildflower-
-wildflower-

2997

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 -wildflower-
Member since 2003 • 2997 Posts

[QUOTE="-wildflower-"]

If it doesn't force me to be on-line to play then it's already better than Diablo 3.

FelipeInside

But why do u judge a game cause of it's DRM? No one complains about Path of Exile being always online, yet with D3 everyone has a fit.

I think I've been fairly consistent on this point - I don't buy any game that requires me to be on-line (mmorpgs excluded).  Path of Exile is free, Diablo 3 is not; it costs $60.  When I spend money on something it is mine to use when, where, and how I see fit.  To add insult to injury, if what I've read is true, the upcoming console version of D3 will not require people to play their single-player games on-line nor will it have Blizzard's ill conceived real-money auction houses.

If it's good enough for the console players then why should we PC gamers accept anything less?

Avatar image for FelipeInside
FelipeInside

28548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 FelipeInside
Member since 2003 • 28548 Posts

[QUOTE="FelipeInside"][QUOTE="-wildflower-"]

If it doesn't force me to be on-line to play then it's already better than Diablo 3.

-wildflower-

But why do u judge a game cause of it's DRM? No one complains about Path of Exile being always online, yet with D3 everyone has a fit.

I think I've been fairly consistent on this point - I don't buy any game that requires me to be on-line (mmorpgs excluded).  Path of Exile is free, Diablo 3 is not; it costs $60.  When I spend money on something it is mine to do use when, where, and how I see fit.  To add insult to injury, if what I've read is true, the upcoming console version of D3 will not require people to play their single-player games on-line nor will it have Blizzard's ill conceived real-money auction houses.

If it's good enough for the console players then why should we PC gamers accept anything less?

It wasn't directed at you only, mostly general. So if Diablo3 had of been free then it's fine to have always online DRM? I just don't see the difference sorry. D3 is nearly an MMO, that's why the online requirement is there. I agree on ur point with consoles though.
Avatar image for NaveedLife
NaveedLife

17179

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 NaveedLife
Member since 2010 • 17179 Posts

I was wondering if it was any good.  Path of Exile is the best one since DII in my opinion.  With that said DIII was awesome while it lasted, then it got super boring when you hit Inferno and grind for gear.  Awful gear system between the AH and such.  They NEED to scrap the AH.

Avatar image for Elann2008
Elann2008

33028

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#18 Elann2008
Member since 2007 • 33028 Posts

Even taking a morning number 2 with the newspaper is more entertaining than playing DIablo III.

ShimmerMan
Not sure about it being more entertaining, but it definitely feels better than paying $60 for Diablo 3.
Avatar image for FelipeInside
FelipeInside

28548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 FelipeInside
Member since 2003 • 28548 Posts
[QUOTE="ShimmerMan"]

Even taking a morning number 2 with the newspaper is more entertaining than playing DIablo III.

Elann2008
Not sure about it being more entertaining, but it definitely feels better than paying $60 for Diablo 3.

The game was fine, what ruined D3 was the AH which they implemented to fix the hackers from D2. There was just no point in questing since u could buy the same item that took u hours to find with a 2 minute purchase.
Avatar image for Elann2008
Elann2008

33028

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#20 Elann2008
Member since 2007 • 33028 Posts
[QUOTE="Elann2008"][QUOTE="ShimmerMan"]

Even taking a morning number 2 with the newspaper is more entertaining than playing DIablo III.

FelipeInside
Not sure about it being more entertaining, but it definitely feels better than paying $60 for Diablo 3.

The game was fine, what ruined D3 was the AH which they implemented to fix the hackers from D2. There was just no point in questing since u could buy the same item that took u hours to find with a 2 minute purchase.

That made the game NOT fine. I prefer to earn gear by, you know.. earning it. The AH ruined it. Therefore, it was $60 down the gutter.
Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#21 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

I feel that the whole isometric, action RPG has just run its course. It's really limiting and frankly not that fun to play anymore. Diablo 2 was the last great. I haven't played one since that has come close.

As I said, it's just too limiting. Combat is too shallow, level design is severely limited, too much repetition, and overall it just has been done to death. 

It's not the fault of the developers but rather a fault of the genre. 

Avatar image for FelipeInside
FelipeInside

28548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 FelipeInside
Member since 2003 • 28548 Posts
[QUOTE="Elann2008"][QUOTE="FelipeInside"][QUOTE="Elann2008"] Not sure about it being more entertaining, but it definitely feels better than paying $60 for Diablo 3.

The game was fine, what ruined D3 was the AH which they implemented to fix the hackers from D2. There was just no point in questing since u could buy the same item that took u hours to find with a 2 minute purchase.

That made the game NOT fine. I prefer to earn gear by, you know.. earning it. The AH ruined it. Therefore, it was $60 down the gutter.

Well I guess yeah. I was just commenting on the ACTUAL game, like graphics, gameplay, sound etc. But ur right, the AH made the game less enjoyable.
Avatar image for FelipeInside
FelipeInside

28548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 FelipeInside
Member since 2003 • 28548 Posts

I feel that the whole isometric, action RPG has just run its course. It's really limiting and frankly not that fun to play anymore. Diablo 2 was the last great. I haven't played one since that has come close.

As I said, it's just too limiting. Combat is too shallow, level design is severely limited, too much repetition, and overall it just has been done to death. 

It's not the fault of the developers but rather a fault of the genre. 

Wasdie
Maybe for you. Van Helsing is pretty awesome.
Avatar image for Elann2008
Elann2008

33028

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#24 Elann2008
Member since 2007 • 33028 Posts
[QUOTE="FelipeInside"][QUOTE="Elann2008"][QUOTE="FelipeInside"] The game was fine, what ruined D3 was the AH which they implemented to fix the hackers from D2. There was just no point in questing since u could buy the same item that took u hours to find with a 2 minute purchase.

That made the game NOT fine. I prefer to earn gear by, you know.. earning it. The AH ruined it. Therefore, it was $60 down the gutter.

Well I guess yeah. I was just commenting on the ACTUAL game, like graphics, gameplay, sound etc. But ur right, the AH made the game less enjoyable.

Yeah, if going by those aspects of the game, it is a pretty well-made video game. It's too bad they threw in terrible design choices.
Avatar image for nutcrackr
nutcrackr

13032

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 72

User Lists: 1

#25 nutcrackr
Member since 2004 • 13032 Posts

I feel that the whole isometric, action RPG has just run its course. It's really limiting and frankly not that fun to play anymore. Diablo 2 was the last great. I haven't played one since that has come close.

As I said, it's just too limiting. Combat is too shallow, level design is severely limited, too much repetition, and overall it just has been done to death. 

It's not the fault of the developers but rather a fault of the genre. 

Wasdie
I thought Torchlight 2 was great fun, the action comes alive with combos and complexities.
Avatar image for ShimmerMan
ShimmerMan

4634

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#26 ShimmerMan
Member since 2008 • 4634 Posts

[QUOTE="Elann2008"][QUOTE="ShimmerMan"]

Even taking a morning number 2 with the newspaper is more entertaining than playing DIablo III.

FelipeInside

Not sure about it being more entertaining, but it definitely feels better than paying $60 for Diablo 3.

The game was fine, what ruined D3 was the AH which they implemented to fix the hackers from D2. There was just no point in questing since u could buy the same item that took u hours to find with a 2 minute purchase.

Just the AH.. What about the ridiculous plot, the laughable voice acting. The watered down RPG mechanics and the WOW inspiried visuals. They turned DIablo into a tranvestite, I don't fully understand how they thought that would be a good idea. The last level has the players running through heaven with porn music in the background and Diablo screaming in a male/female tone about how awesome she is. The game is four hours long and they even give an achivement to the player for completing each act in under one hour. Online only, monitized Auction house, no PVP... lol.

Avatar image for ShimmerMan
ShimmerMan

4634

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#27 ShimmerMan
Member since 2008 • 4634 Posts

I feel that the whole isometric, action RPG has just run its course. It's really limiting and frankly not that fun to play anymore. Diablo 2 was the last great. I haven't played one since that has come close.

As I said, it's just too limiting. Combat is too shallow, level design is severely limited, too much repetition, and overall it just has been done to death.

It's not the fault of the developers but rather a fault of the genre.

Wasdie

Nope. The genre has plenty of life in it , look at games such as Bastion which are small time compared to Diablo III and yet are a great success because it's been made well. DIII was made crappy and they seemed to deliberetely sacrifice the quality of the game.

Avatar image for FelipeInside
FelipeInside

28548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 FelipeInside
Member since 2003 • 28548 Posts

[QUOTE="FelipeInside"][QUOTE="Elann2008"] Not sure about it being more entertaining, but it definitely feels better than paying $60 for Diablo 3.ShimmerMan

The game was fine, what ruined D3 was the AH which they implemented to fix the hackers from D2. There was just no point in questing since u could buy the same item that took u hours to find with a 2 minute purchase.

 

Just the AH.. What about the ridiculous plot, the laughable voice acting. The watered down RPG mechanics and the WOW inspiried visuals. They turned DIablo into a tranvestite, I don't fully understand how they thought that would be a good idea. The last level has the players running through heaven with porn music in the background and Diablo screaming in a male/female tone about how awesome she is. The game is four hours long and they even give an achivement to the player for completing each act in under one hour. Online only, monitized Auction house, no PVP... lol.

Yes, cause Diablo always had an award winning story plot and Oscar Performance Voice Acting...

Graphics were more WoW than Diablo, I agree.  It should of looked like Path of Exile.

Four hours long?  Where did u get that one from?  If u want to speed thru ANY game then yes...the game will be short.

Avatar image for ShimmerMan
ShimmerMan

4634

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#29 ShimmerMan
Member since 2008 • 4634 Posts

Diablo 1 had a great story, it was a simple tale but it was probably one of the best for a video game of its genre. DII went more into the realm of fantasy and hocus pocus and DIII is just well w/e... It's a joke. And yes DIablo III is as short as anything, I completed each act in about 20 mins per act on my Demon Hunter. There's no puzzles or anything and they removed all the randomization from the dungeons, the dungeons are linear and easy to get through and so the game is very short.

Avatar image for FelipeInside
FelipeInside

28548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 FelipeInside
Member since 2003 • 28548 Posts

Diablo 1 had a great story, it was a simple tale but it was probably one of the best for a video game of its genre. DII went more into the realm of fantasy and hocus pocus and DIII is just well w/e... It's a joke.

ShimmerMan
Well, it's the weakest of the three I agree. I still got my money's worth, but it should of been more like how Path of Exile plays out, with different levels instead of the same ones over and over.
Avatar image for Mcspanky37
Mcspanky37

1693

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 Mcspanky37
Member since 2010 • 1693 Posts

I feel that the whole isometric, action RPG has just run its course. It's really limiting and frankly not that fun to play anymore. Diablo 2 was the last great. I haven't played one since that has come close.

As I said, it's just too limiting. Combat is too shallow, level design is severely limited, too much repetition, and overall it just has been done to death. 

It's not the fault of the developers but rather a fault of the genre. 

Wasdie
I had tons of fun with Dark Alliance and Champions of Norrath - I think there's plenty of room left in the ARPG genre, games just needs to evolve beyond their Diablo roots.
Avatar image for the_bi99man
the_bi99man

11465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#32 the_bi99man
Member since 2004 • 11465 Posts

And so is Path of Exile and Torchlight 2. What else is new?

That said, Diablo 3 is still fun. I still play it every now and again. I actually think the combat itself is among the best, if not  the  best in any top-down-view ARPG to date. It's just that the underlying systems have absolutely no depth, thus taking away player creativity in building/leveling a character, and destroying most replay value. Pretty much took the RPG right out of ARPG.

Avatar image for Maroxad
Maroxad

25372

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 Maroxad
Member since 2007 • 25372 Posts

I feel that the whole isometric, action RPG has just run its course. It's really limiting and frankly not that fun to play anymore. Diablo 2 was the last great. I haven't played one since that has come close.

As I said, it's just too limiting. Combat is too shallow, level design is severely limited, too much repetition, and overall it just has been done to death. 

It's not the fault of the developers but rather a fault of the genre. 

Wasdie

Nox is still great fun last time I played it which was a few months ago.

Too bad we never got more games similar to it. Isometic Action RPGs do work, but they need to stop trying to play like Diablo. What should be done is making enemies more varied, add more fun and useful skills (no longer spam 2 skills to win) and make all dodges and blocks manual as opposed to RNG based.

Avatar image for AzatiS
AzatiS

14969

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#34 AzatiS
Member since 2004 • 14969 Posts

Everything is better than D3 not just GD ... PoE is , Torchlight is , Torchlight 2 is , Diablo 2 is , Titan quest is , Baldurs gate is .... Diablo 3 has a long run to go to be "again" the king of action RPGs. And with this slow pace of patching ... maybe in 1,5 years

Avatar image for AzatiS
AzatiS

14969

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#35 AzatiS
Member since 2004 • 14969 Posts

And so is Path of Exile and Torchlight 2. What else is new?

That said, Diablo 3 is still fun. I still play it every now and again. I actually think the combat itself is among the best, if not  the  best in any top-down-view ARPG to date. It's just that the underlying systems have absolutely no depth, thus taking away player creativity in building/leveling a character, and destroying most replay value. Pretty much took the RPG right out of ARPG.

the_bi99man

+1 for Diablo 3s gameplay... Its the best and most intense out of all action RPGs... But thats all about that game actually... BAD itemization even after a year on release , really bad linear maps , not the slightest RPG element other than level up... , one of the cheesiest and anticlimax stories in any RPG ever released , VERY bad end game design ( at least on release , now its better but no way near to what it should ) , lack of LADDER , lack of PVP , lack of BUILD diversity , lack of everything really .... Its not for no reason out of 13 M buyers , only a million left to play daily... biggest decline ever happened in any online RPG in PC history .. We like it or not ..

Avatar image for bussinrounds
bussinrounds

3324

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#36 bussinrounds
Member since 2009 • 3324 Posts

Actually, I think the Dark Alliance/Champions of Norrath games have the best gameplay out of the arpgs/loot whoring games.

 

At least you can manually block, aim at targets, use analog/wasd to move around...   Point & click works well for a tactical RPG,  but for arpgs like these...let me play it like an action game

Avatar image for kozzy1234
kozzy1234

35966

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 86

User Lists: 0

#37 kozzy1234
Member since 2005 • 35966 Posts

It's alot better than torchlight2 and path of exile to imo. Was becoming bored with this genre lately but this one is a nice breath of fresh air, even early on.

Was dissapointed with TL2 and Van Helsing, but what ive played so far of the alpha gives me hope this genre can be revived again. Whichs doesn't realy surprise me as Titans Quest was the last great action rpg imo.

Avatar image for NaveedLife
NaveedLife

17179

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 NaveedLife
Member since 2010 • 17179 Posts

And so is Path of Exile and Torchlight 2. What else is new?

That said, Diablo 3 is still fun. I still play it every now and again. I actually think the combat itself is among the best, if not  the  best in any top-down-view ARPG to date. It's just that the underlying systems have absolutely no depth, thus taking away player creativity in building/leveling a character, and destroying most replay value. Pretty much took the RPG right out of ARPG.

the_bi99man

This, and the AH is a big issue.  I LOVED DIII for hours and hours until I reached inferno (I had multiple chars before reaching inferno thats why it took so long to see this) and realized the end game is just boring and shallow.  

Avatar image for mrbojangles25
mrbojangles25

60837

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#39 mrbojangles25
Member since 2005 • 60837 Posts

I feel that the whole isometric, action RPG has just run its course. It's really limiting and frankly not that fun to play anymore. Diablo 2 was the last great. I haven't played one since that has come close.

As I said, it's just too limiting. Combat is too shallow, level design is severely limited, too much repetition, and overall it just has been done to death. 

It's not the fault of the developers but rather a fault of the genre. 

Wasdie

I think I've been afraid to admit this to myself :(

I really wanted to enjoy Torchlight and Torchlight 2, but just could not.  After beating Diablo 3, and toying with other characters, I have not touched it.  Titan Quest was fun for a while as well, but it takes way too long to play through.

I wonder if there is something new to do with the isometric presentation that is more than a gimmick.  It be nice to see some fresh air breathed into the subgenre without necessarily reinventing it.

Avatar image for FelipeInside
FelipeInside

28548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 FelipeInside
Member since 2003 • 28548 Posts

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

I feel that the whole isometric, action RPG has just run its course. It's really limiting and frankly not that fun to play anymore. Diablo 2 was the last great. I haven't played one since that has come close.

As I said, it's just too limiting. Combat is too shallow, level design is severely limited, too much repetition, and overall it just has been done to death. 

It's not the fault of the developers but rather a fault of the genre. 

mrbojangles25

I think I've been afraid to admit this to myself :(

I really wanted to enjoy Torchlight and Torchlight 2, but just could not.  After beating Diablo 3, and toying with other characters, I have not touched it.  Titan Quest was fun for a while as well, but it takes way too long to play through.

I wonder if there is something new to do with the isometric presentation that is more than a gimmick.  It be nice to see some fresh air breathed into the subgenre without necessarily reinventing it.

I still think Torchlight 1 was crap (haven't played Torchlight 2). You should try Van Helsing...it made me have fun in ARPG again.
Avatar image for the_bi99man
the_bi99man

11465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#41 the_bi99man
Member since 2004 • 11465 Posts

Is the Grim Dawn Alpha closed, by the way? Is it possible to get in on it at this point? I would love to play it early, and contribute to shaping it. I was in the Path of Exile closed beta since over a year ago, and it's been a blast.

Avatar image for FelipeInside
FelipeInside

28548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 FelipeInside
Member since 2003 • 28548 Posts

Is the Grim Dawn Alpha closed, by the way? Is it possible to get in on it at this point? I would love to play it early, and contribute to shaping it. I was in the Path of Exile closed beta since over a year ago, and it's been a blast.

the_bi99man

I like Path of Exile, but it's missing something. I can't seem to put my finger on what it is but it feels like it's incomplete.

Avatar image for the_bi99man
the_bi99man

11465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#43 the_bi99man
Member since 2004 • 11465 Posts

[QUOTE="the_bi99man"]

Is the Grim Dawn Alpha closed, by the way? Is it possible to get in on it at this point? I would love to play it early, and contribute to shaping it. I was in the Path of Exile closed beta since over a year ago, and it's been a blast.

FelipeInside

I like Path of Exile, but it's missing something. I can't seem to put my finger on what it is but it feels like it's incomplete.

Well it is still in beta. :P 

But yeah, it's missing something. I think what it's missing is tight, responsive controls. Combat can still be pretty wonky/clunky at times. I hope that gets completely revamped/smoothed over before they decide it's ready and call it version 1.0. Also, the story isn't complete yet. Even with Act 3 in place (which wasn't there when I started playing the closed beta) it ends right in the middle of shit going down. I was talking to one of the developers on the global chat a while back, and he mentioned that there will be an Act 4 to complete the "base game", and then, after the full version release, they plan on a new act every year, going forward. Also, he said that after they released Act 3, they realized (as did most of the players) that Act 3 was just way better than the first two. So now they're also in the process of doing extensive redesigning of large portions of Act 1 and 2, to bring them up to the standard of Act 3, and the new versions of those will probably launch alongside Act 4. I can't wait to start a new character for that.

Avatar image for Elann2008
Elann2008

33028

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#44 Elann2008
Member since 2007 • 33028 Posts

[QUOTE="the_bi99man"]

Is the Grim Dawn Alpha closed, by the way? Is it possible to get in on it at this point? I would love to play it early, and contribute to shaping it. I was in the Path of Exile closed beta since over a year ago, and it's been a blast.

FelipeInside

I like Path of Exile, but it's missing something. I can't seem to put my finger on what it is but it feels like it's incomplete.

I agree. It's not just that it's in beta. It's in beta so the core chunk of the game should be already there. It's definitely missing something... I don't mean to sound cheesy but it's missing "magic." It's the intangible thing that's missing.

Avatar image for FelipeInside
FelipeInside

28548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 FelipeInside
Member since 2003 • 28548 Posts

[QUOTE="FelipeInside"]

[QUOTE="the_bi99man"]

Is the Grim Dawn Alpha closed, by the way? Is it possible to get in on it at this point? I would love to play it early, and contribute to shaping it. I was in the Path of Exile closed beta since over a year ago, and it's been a blast.

Elann2008

I like Path of Exile, but it's missing something. I can't seem to put my finger on what it is but it feels like it's incomplete.

I agree. It's not just that it's in beta. It's in beta so the core chunk of the game should be already there. It's definitely missing something... I don't mean to sound cheesy but it's missing "magic." It's the intangible thing that's missing.

Yeah I agree with both of you. I love the look of it (what Diablo3 should of looked like), although the camera is too close for me personally. I love the different armours and weapons you get that actually make your character look different. But the pacing, combat and way to tell the story is just....off...
Avatar image for Maroxad
Maroxad

25372

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 Maroxad
Member since 2007 • 25372 Posts

[QUOTE="FelipeInside"]

[QUOTE="the_bi99man"]

Is the Grim Dawn Alpha closed, by the way? Is it possible to get in on it at this point? I would love to play it early, and contribute to shaping it. I was in the Path of Exile closed beta since over a year ago, and it's been a blast.

Elann2008

I like Path of Exile, but it's missing something. I can't seem to put my finger on what it is but it feels like it's incomplete.

I agree. It's not just that it's in beta. It's in beta so the core chunk of the game should be already there. It's definitely missing something... I don't mean to sound cheesy but it's missing "magic." It's the intangible thing that's missing.

What the game is missing for me is the atmosphere. The thing that killed the atmosphere for me was the lack of challenge for most of the part and awful animations.

Avatar image for NaveedLife
NaveedLife

17179

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 NaveedLife
Member since 2010 • 17179 Posts

[QUOTE="Elann2008"]

[QUOTE="FelipeInside"]

I like Path of Exile, but it's missing something. I can't seem to put my finger on what it is but it feels like it's incomplete.

Maroxad

I agree. It's not just that it's in beta. It's in beta so the core chunk of the game should be already there. It's definitely missing something... I don't mean to sound cheesy but it's missing "magic." It's the intangible thing that's missing.

What the game is missing for me is the atmosphere. The thing that killed the atmosphere for me was the lack of challenge for most of the part and awful animations.

I swear people are playing a different game than me.  It is rather challenging later on.  Great atmosphere, just needs polish in areas.  Animations could use some work no doubt though.

Avatar image for NaveedLife
NaveedLife

17179

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 NaveedLife
Member since 2010 • 17179 Posts

Is the Grim Dawn Alpha closed, by the way? Is it possible to get in on it at this point? I would love to play it early, and contribute to shaping it. I was in the Path of Exile closed beta since over a year ago, and it's been a blast.

the_bi99man

you can get in if you purchase a certain pack.  I think the one that is $50 gets you into the alpha.  Beta is cheaper to get into I belieev.

Avatar image for deactivated-5ef52b89b6fd0
deactivated-5ef52b89b6fd0

4928

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#49 deactivated-5ef52b89b6fd0
Member since 2009 • 4928 Posts

I am hoping GrimDawn delivers, I have a beta key and already bought the game. I am sick of loot hunt games that even with countless hrs of farming feel very unrewarding grinding for loot. Path of Exile included, that is my only real complait with the game, I have grinded my ass off and loot drops are mainly total trash. If grimdawn is the same way I am done with the genre, I dont want loot handed to me, but If I invest the time I expect a reward.

 

 

I hear postive feed back about the Alpha build, the game engine loooks really dated to me, I hope that gets  alot of work before release.