Gta4 pc runs fine whay all the fuss?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for deactivated-5ef52b89b6fd0
deactivated-5ef52b89b6fd0

4928

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1 deactivated-5ef52b89b6fd0
Member since 2009 • 4928 Posts

I didnt buy this game for a long time, after reading how bad it ran on the pc. Found it for 20 bucks the other day so I grabbed it. I have everything on high 2 on ver high and the game runs at 40/50 fps half way tru the game with no problems. I had the 360 version a few years ago. To me this is the superior version, I remember the load time on the 360 being very long, overall the GTA4 "port" dosent seem to be as bad as I had read

Avatar image for Gamartto
Gamartto

1987

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#2 Gamartto
Member since 2003 • 1987 Posts
Specs & resolution please!
Avatar image for deactivated-5ef52b89b6fd0
deactivated-5ef52b89b6fd0

4928

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#3 deactivated-5ef52b89b6fd0
Member since 2009 • 4928 Posts

1920/1080, dual core e8400, 4 gigs ram, vista 64, bfg gtx 285 ocx, not a monster rig, actually going to be upgrading cpu and gpu very soon.

Avatar image for BeavermanA
BeavermanA

2652

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 BeavermanA
Member since 2003 • 2652 Posts
It's fine with a quad core and a moderate gpu. I don't understand the fuss though either, I get much better fps than in Crysis. GTA4 with everything maxed with enhanced gfx mods and tweaked cfg files at 1920x1200 and I get 50-70+fps without overclocking my card. The mods kick ass too, driving around Lambos, Ferraris, McLaren F1's etc.
Avatar image for JangoWuzHere
JangoWuzHere

19032

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#5 JangoWuzHere
Member since 2007 • 19032 Posts

Ummmm duh it runs fine NOW. when its all patched up it runs just like any other game.

Avatar image for Gamartto
Gamartto

1987

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#6 Gamartto
Member since 2003 • 1987 Posts
It's fine with a quad core and a moderate gpu. I don't understand the fuss though either, I get much better fps than in Crysis. GTA4 with everything maxed with enhanced gfx mods and tweaked cfg files at 1920x1200 and I get 50-70+fps without overclocking my card. The mods kick ass too, driving around Lambos, Ferraris, McLaren F1's etc. BeavermanA
Can you please post a link to those custom high fps configs/mods? TiA
Avatar image for deactivated-5ef52b89b6fd0
deactivated-5ef52b89b6fd0

4928

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#7 deactivated-5ef52b89b6fd0
Member since 2009 • 4928 Posts

Ummmm duh it runs fine NOW. when its all patched up it runs just like any other game.

JangoWuzHere

ok :| pc gamers on these forums seem to have a bad rep for a reason:roll:, didnt realise it was known knowlege that it ran fantastic now.

Avatar image for BeavermanA
BeavermanA

2652

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 BeavermanA
Member since 2003 • 2652 Posts
[QUOTE="BeavermanA"]It's fine with a quad core and a moderate gpu. I don't understand the fuss though either, I get much better fps than in Crysis. GTA4 with everything maxed with enhanced gfx mods and tweaked cfg files at 1920x1200 and I get 50-70+fps without overclocking my card. The mods kick ass too, driving around Lambos, Ferraris, McLaren F1's etc. Gamartto
Can you please post a link to those custom high fps configs/mods? TiA

They aren't high fps mods, they most likely drive your fps down as they enhance the quality. Had to tweak the high detail distance since it won't let me in game with 1gb of vram, but it runs fine. Try turning off v-sync if you want more fps, that was seriously screwing me. For some reason it would even take a whole minute to load the game from the menu with it on, soon as you turn it off it takes less than 10sec.
Avatar image for RichardStallman
RichardStallman

1233

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 RichardStallman
Member since 2009 • 1233 Posts
Playing it on a laptop with a geforce 9600M at 1280x800, medium details 25-40 FPS since it came out, unpatched. Don't trust the internet for requirements things.
Avatar image for charmingcharlie
charmingcharlie

1244

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 charmingcharlie
Member since 2006 • 1244 Posts

Ok firstly no disrespect to the op but I would like to know how you are monitoring frame rates in GTA 4 ? If you are going by the GTA 4 benchmark then I can tell you now that is a load of bull. On the benchmark I get 60fps in game I see massive drops to under 20fps and this is on a Q6600 @ 3.2ghz and a GTX260. I suggest you get a copy of Fraps or install xfire and use the frame rate monitor in there. I find it very hard to believe you run GTA 4 on High/Very High settings with a dual core.

Now as to your question, I was there right at the start of the whole GTA 4 fiasco, I was one of the millions that eagerly awaited GTA 4 on the PC. I loved GTA that much I even bought an xbox 360 to play GTA 4 whilst I waited for the PC version. Then the PC version arrived and what a mess it was, did you know the console version had around 150 testers/quality assurance people ? Have a guess how many people were in charge of quality control for the PC version.... it was FOUR. The PC version of GTA 4 was tested on a massive total of four PC's that is it.

On release people were shocked to find they had to install 3 to 4 additional programs just to run the game (Securom, Social club, Visual C++ and GFWL). The social club didn't work for nearly two days the majority of people couldn't play GTA 4 online because the social club was broke for the PC. The first version of GTA 4 was also plagued with horrendous memory leaks, people could only run the game for a short period of time before the memory leak manifested itself in either slow fps or just plain crashing.

There was also a massive lack of options in the game, even basic options like getting GTA 4 to run in a window couldn't be done from the menu ..... nope we had to create a text file called "commandline.txt" and put "-windowed" in that text file. That is incredibly unprofessional and lazy if you ask me. Then we started to notice there were things not quite right with GTA 4, here is a brief list :-

  1. Several game assets were missing, including the ticker tape displays, clock on the clock tower and no moon. The ticker tape and clock tower got fixed in patch THREE. The moon has yet to be fixed.
  2. In an effort to improve things Rockstar released patch 1.0.2.0 that gave people some extra performance ......... oh yeah and removed about 50% of the in game assets. After patch 1.0.2.0 there were no hotdog stands and precious few street side objects they all got removed (and put back in a couple of months later with patch 1.0.3.0).
  3. No gun recoil, in the console version when you fired a gun you got "bullet spread" on the PC version you don't, if you used a controller in the PC version you got bullet spread but use a mouse and your bullets never deviated. This was rectified in patch 1.0.4.0, guess how they rectified it ? they just took out bullet spread for the controllers.
  4. Worse driver spawning than the console version, the drivers spawning into the car happens practically under Niko's nose on the console version you can actually snipe a driver in the car when the car is nearly 100ft away. You can't do that on the PC, the driver spawning is around 20ft and no setting alters that.
  5. Car shadows turning off, the shadows in this game have been the bane of Rockstar. Since release the shadows have never worked properly on the PC version. At 8pm every night in the game your car shadows turn off (they don't in the console version) then at 6am they turn back on. Oh it gets better at first we didn't even have a shadow for Niko if he drove a bike. They fixed that in patch 1.0..0.4 so now when Niko steals a bike you see a shadow of him when he rides the bike. The only problem is this shadow stays on whereas the car shadow doesn't. So at 8pm the car shadow turns off and you are left with a disembodied driver shadow stuck to your car.
  6. The latest patch 1.0.0.4 has also introduced NEW graphical glitches, the major one is road textures actually showing through the car.

I could carry on listing faults, bugs and errors with GTA 4 but we would be here all night and that is even before I got to mention what a complete mess multiplayer was on the PC. The PC version of GTA 4 has rightly earned it's title as one of the worst ports ever on the PC. To this day GTA 4 is the only game on the PC that needs a 2gb Vram equipped graphics card to run with all settings maxxed, even Crysis does not need that much Vram. I loved the GTA franchise and I loved GTA 4 but the PC version was such a god awful mess that I won't touch another thing from Rockstar on the PC platform.

Avatar image for OoSuperMarioO
OoSuperMarioO

6539

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 OoSuperMarioO
Member since 2005 • 6539 Posts

GTA 4 runs fine for me as well TC.

Avatar image for kevy619
kevy619

5617

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#12 kevy619
Member since 2004 • 5617 Posts

it runs ok, just not as good as it should. It ran like complete crap on 360 (and looked horrible compared to pc), so we should give them some credit.

Avatar image for rben21232
rben21232

568

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 rben21232
Member since 2007 • 568 Posts

Ok firstly no disrespect to the op but I would like to know how you are monitoring frame rates in GTA 4 ? If you are going by the GTA 4 benchmark then I can tell you now that is a load of bull. On the benchmark I get 60fps in game I see massive drops to under 20fps and this is on a Q6600 @ 3.2ghz and a GTX260. I suggest you get a copy of Fraps or install xfire and use the frame rate monitor in there. I find it very hard to believe you run GTA 4 on High/Very High settings with a dual core.

Now as to your question, I was there right at the start of the whole GTA 4 fiasco, I was one of the millions that eagerly awaited GTA 4 on the PC. I loved GTA that much I even bought an xbox 360 to play GTA 4 whilst I waited for the PC version. Then the PC version arrived and what a mess it was, did you know the console version had around 150 testers/quality assurance people ? Have a guess how many people were in charge of quality control for the PC version.... it was FOUR. The PC version of GTA 4 was tested on a massive total of four PC's that is it.

On release people were shocked to find they had to install 3 to 4 additional programs just to run the game (Securom, Social club, Visual C++ and GFWL). The social club didn't work for nearly two days the majority of people couldn't play GTA 4 online because the social club was broke for the PC. The first version of GTA 4 was also plagued with horrendous memory leaks, people could only run the game for a short period of time before the memory leak manifested itself in either slow fps or just plain crashing.

There was also a massive lack of options in the game, even basic options like getting GTA 4 to run in a window couldn't be done from the menu ..... nope we had to create a text file called "commandline.txt" and put "-windowed" in that text file. That is incredibly unprofessional and lazy if you ask me. Then we started to notice there were things not quite right with GTA 4, here is a brief list :-

  1. Several game assets were missing, including the ticker tape displays, clock on the clock tower and no moon. The ticker tape and clock tower got fixed in patch THREE. The moon has yet to be fixed.
  2. In an effort to improve things Rockstar released patch 1.0.2.0 that gave people some extra performance ......... oh yeah and removed about 50% of the in game assets. After patch 1.0.2.0 there were no hotdog stands and precious few street side objects they all got removed (and put back in a couple of months later with patch 1.0.3.0).
  3. No gun recoil, in the console version when you fired a gun you got "bullet spread" on the PC version you don't, if you used a controller in the PC version you got bullet spread but use a mouse and your bullets never deviated. This was rectified in patch 1.0.4.0, guess how they rectified it ? they just took out bullet spread for the controllers.
  4. Worse driver spawning than the console version, the drivers spawning into the car happens practically under Niko's nose on the console version you can actually snipe a driver in the car when the car is nearly 100ft away. You can't do that on the PC, the driver spawning is around 20ft and no setting alters that.
  5. Car shadows turning off, the shadows in this game have been the bane of Rockstar. Since release the shadows have never worked properly on the PC version. At 8pm every night in the game your car shadows turn off (they don't in the console version) then at 6am they turn back on. Oh it gets better at first we didn't even have a shadow for Niko if he drove a bike. They fixed that in patch 1.0..0.4 so now when Niko steals a bike you see a shadow of him when he rides the bike. The only problem is this shadow stays on whereas the car shadow doesn't. So at 8pm the car shadow turns off and you are left with a disembodied driver shadow stuck to your car.
  6. The latest patch 1.0.0.4 has also introduced NEW graphical glitches, the major one is road textures actually showing through the car.

I could carry on listing faults, bugs and errors with GTA 4 but we would be here all night and that is even before I got to mention what a complete mess multiplayer was on the PC. The PC version of GTA 4 has rightly earned it's title as one of the worst ports ever on the PC. To this day GTA 4 is the only game on the PC that needs a 2gb Vram equipped graphics card to run with all settings maxxed, even Crysis does not need that much Vram. I loved the GTA franchise and I loved GTA 4 but the PC version was such a god awful mess that I won't touch another thing from Rockstar on the PC platform.

charmingcharlie

tl;dr

He thinks GTAIV sucks because he can't run it

Avatar image for charmingcharlie
charmingcharlie

1244

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 charmingcharlie
Member since 2006 • 1244 Posts

tl;dr

He thinks GTAIV sucks because he can't run it

rben21232

If you can't be bothered to read what I typed then how about you do the board the courtesy of not quoting my post eh ? You could have simply indicated to me that you had something pointless to say. Oh and yes I could run it, I have two PC's that can run it. However just because I can run it does not change the fact the game is full of bugs, errors and faults but then you couldn't be bothered to read the post could you.

Avatar image for rben21232
rben21232

568

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 rben21232
Member since 2007 • 568 Posts

[QUOTE="rben21232"]tl;dr

He thinks GTAIV sucks because he can't run it

charmingcharlie

If you can't be bothered to read what I typed then how about you do the board the courtesy of not quoting my post eh ? You could have simply indicated to me that you had something pointless to say. Oh and yes I could run it, I have two PC's that can run it. However just because I can run it does not change the fact the game is full of bugs, errors and faults but then you couldn't be bothered to read the post could you.

I hit the sweet spot!

Avatar image for Bros89
Bros89

624

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 Bros89
Member since 2004 • 624 Posts

CC is right, GTA IV is a crappy port.

Avatar image for oldskooler79
oldskooler79

1632

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 oldskooler79
Member since 2004 • 1632 Posts

I hit the sweet spot!

rben21232

lol sounds like someone pissed in his wheaties the morning he picked his copy of GTAIV on PC up!

I had no troubles at all with the game on day 1.

Avatar image for Arach666
Arach666

23285

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -1

User Lists: 0

#18 Arach666
Member since 2009 • 23285 Posts
Indeed TC,I run the game perfectly fine.
Avatar image for naval
naval

11108

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#19 naval
Member since 2003 • 11108 Posts
I bought GTA IV few months after launch and it ran pretty good for me (with all the patches). I have been saying the same thing since then
Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#20 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts
If you have a gtx285 ofcourse it will run fine :D in my rig i can run the game at high settings. Dont you think i should be able to run it better than that? Also quadcore makes a big diffirence in the game. I honestly dont understand how a game that needs 1024mb or mod of videocard and a quad core to run on the higher settings is "fine" A rig like that should be able to max out every game out there. But lets drop our super rigs and pick a rig that SUPOSE to run the game well according with the requirements. I dare you to pick a rig from the requirements. Dual core with 8600 gt and see how well it runs. Long story short, every game runs fine if you got a super rig.
Avatar image for -D3ATH-
-D3ATH-

615

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 -D3ATH-
Member since 2008 • 615 Posts

Stay away from console sandbox/open-world game ports on PC.

Avatar image for Rahnyc4
Rahnyc4

6660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 Rahnyc4
Member since 2005 • 6660 Posts
im buying this on steam. OS: Windows Vista - Service Pack 1 / Windows XP - Service Pack 3 Processor: Intel Core 2 Duo 1.8GHz, AMD Athlon X2 64 2.4GHz Memory: 1.5GB XP / 1.5GB Vista Graphics: 256MB Nvidia 7900 / 256MB ATI X1900 DirectX Version: DirectX 9.0c Compliant Card should be easy to run on my rig
Avatar image for mattuk69
mattuk69

3050

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 mattuk69
Member since 2009 • 3050 Posts

The game runs fine for me too. Its had its problems on release i just got a 4870 1gb but i couldn't max it (View distance) and ran bad it was a shock for alot of ppl. PC gamers hate not being able to max settings with a high end gaming rig. But with patches it got alot better but still stained from the bad launch. I dont care what any1 says i clocked GTA for the 4th time yesterday the game is epic graphically stunning in some parts and the open world phsyx kick ass.

Avatar image for -D3ATH-
-D3ATH-

615

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 -D3ATH-
Member since 2008 • 615 Posts
[QUOTE="Rahnyc4"]im buying this on steam. OS: Windows Vista - Service Pack 1 / Windows XP - Service Pack 3 Processor: Intel Core 2 Duo 1.8GHz, AMD Athlon X2 64 2.4GHz Memory: 1.5GB XP / 1.5GB Vista Graphics: 256MB Nvidia 7900 / 256MB ATI X1900 DirectX Version: DirectX 9.0c Compliant Card should be easy to run on my rig

Don't let the reqs fool you.
Avatar image for Rahnyc4
Rahnyc4

6660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 Rahnyc4
Member since 2005 • 6660 Posts
[QUOTE="-D3ATH-"][QUOTE="Rahnyc4"]im buying this on steam. OS: Windows Vista - Service Pack 1 / Windows XP - Service Pack 3 Processor: Intel Core 2 Duo 1.8GHz, AMD Athlon X2 64 2.4GHz Memory: 1.5GB XP / 1.5GB Vista Graphics: 256MB Nvidia 7900 / 256MB ATI X1900 DirectX Version: DirectX 9.0c Compliant Card should be easy to run on my rig

Don't let the reqs fool you.

im gonna trust steam, haven't disappoint me yet.
Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#26 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts
[QUOTE="-D3ATH-"][QUOTE="Rahnyc4"]im buying this on steam. OS: Windows Vista - Service Pack 1 / Windows XP - Service Pack 3 Processor: Intel Core 2 Duo 1.8GHz, AMD Athlon X2 64 2.4GHz Memory: 1.5GB XP / 1.5GB Vista Graphics: 256MB Nvidia 7900 / 256MB ATI X1900 DirectX Version: DirectX 9.0c Compliant Card should be easy to run on my rig

Don't let the reqs fool you.

True the requriements said that 8600 gt is the reccomended vga and it runed with 18 fps on medium settings.
Avatar image for Jamiemydearx3
Jamiemydearx3

4062

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 Jamiemydearx3
Member since 2008 • 4062 Posts

Runs fine on the settings I have it as (everything maxed except draw distance/car density )

Avatar image for anolecrabcf
anolecrabcf

658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 anolecrabcf
Member since 2005 • 658 Posts
Well for one it has a massive memory leak, I have to run a program on the background to recover my RAM or the game freezes after playing for 15 minutes.
Avatar image for The_PC_Gamer
The_PC_Gamer

2910

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 The_PC_Gamer
Member since 2003 • 2910 Posts

Ummmm duh it runs fine NOW. when its all patched up it runs just like any other game.

JangoWuzHere

that

Avatar image for wizdom
wizdom

10111

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#30 wizdom
Member since 2003 • 10111 Posts

I didnt buy this game for a long time, after reading how bad it ran on the pc. Found it for 20 bucks the other day so I grabbed it. I have everything on high 2 on ver high and the game runs at 40/50 fps half way tru the game with no problems. I had the 360 version a few years ago. To me this is the superior version, I remember the load time on the 360 being very long, overall the GTA4 "port" dosent seem to be as bad as I had read

Advid-Gamer
of course it runs better now, try playing the game two years ago when it came out, the game is pacth and ready to go now.