1920x1080 resolution. It starts me on high settings with a few slow downs I didn't measure the fps. I switched to medium settings and it runs amazingly smooth and no slow downs, I'd say at least 60fps or more easily on medium.
I'll see if I can measure the fps and edit this post for you.
1920x1080 resolution. It starts me on high settings with a few slow downs I didn't measure the fps. I switched to medium settings and it runs amazingly smooth and no slow downs, I'd say at least 60fps or more easily on medium.
I'll see if I can measure the fps and edit this post for you.
Blueflame0424
That's not bad for 1080p. I'm personally gonna only be able to run the game at 1280x1024 so I can prolly run on high (hopefully).
My GTX570 at a mixture of high and ultra is giving me a pretty smooth frame-rate at 1920x1080. I dont know what the actual FPS is since I didnt measure it. Bare in mind this is with the new beta drivers from Nvidia, when I ran it with my old drivers it seemed slower.
Well i'm getting 35-45fps outside. 50-60fps inside. At 1280x960 resolution with textures on medium and everything else on high. Not too bad considering I have a dual core and Nvidia still needs to work on their drivers some more.
I'm running it on high at 1680x1050, no AA, 16xAF and it's completely smooth both indoors and outside. I think they're majorly overstating what it takes to run this game to sell new hardware. It runs better than BC2 for me, and this is just the beta, the final build should be better otpimized.
Also, I'm playing this on a really old dual core, so the people saying you need a quad core for this game are flat out wrong.
I'm getting a mixture of high and ultra with hbao and all that jazz and I'm getting an incredibly smooth framerate at 1680x1050. I'm sure my phenom II x6 helps quite a bit too :) it's funny because caspian border runs way better and is less glitchy for me than metro! :D
If you go to the geforce.com it'll have a spot to compare what video cards should be running at in battlefield 3 for NVIDIA cards.
The 460 at 1920x1080 is around 35fps on high settings in DX11. So tune it down a bit and it'll be running extremely smooth.
And besides, on multiplayer, do you really have enough time to take in the sights at Ultra quality? I'm too focused on playing and it already looks amazing at medium quality and runs extremely smooth. I will upgrade for looks on single player :)
1080p, auto settings which is a mix of highs, (ultra textures), and lots of mediums. Framerate that was constantly smooth. Keeping in mind this is a 460M on a laptop, with 1.5gb of video memory.
Everyone is reporting better frames from it and its an enormous map with a LOT more going on. So I guess so. But my little 560 Ti is doing great on Metro. I know ultra doesn't work but when everything is set to Ultra I get 42 FPS outside. 65 FPS in the tunnels and about 50 the far side of them
I have a MSI 1GB GTX 460 OC edition Cyclone and I have been very impressed with how well the beta runs so far with it. Never gone below 45FPS and I play at 1680x1050m, was running on High settings. Also got a overclock of 840/1680/1950, with the latest Nvidia drivers for BF3 beta.
This is all I wanted from the beta to be honest, was to see how it would run.
Cant wait to try that Caspian map in the full version.
Log in to comment